Advanced Electrolytes to Enable Lithium-Metal Anodes for Use in EV Batteries
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “lithium-metal anodes”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Localized High–Concentration Electrolytes with Low–Cost Diluents Compatible with Both Cobalt–Free LiNiO 2 Cathode and Lithium–Metal Anode
High-nickel layered oxide cathodes and lithium-metal anode are promising candidates for next-generation battery systems due to their high energy density. Nevertheless, the instability of the electrode–electrolyte interphase is hindering their practical application. Localized high-concentration electrolytes (LHCEs) present a promising solution for achieving uniform lithium deposition and a stable cathode–electrolyte interphase. However, the limited choice of diluents and their high cost are restricting their implementation. Four novel cost-effective diluents and their performance with highly reactive LiNiO 2 cathode and Li-metal anode are reported here. The results show that all the LHCE cells exhibit a Coulombic efficiency of >99.38% in Li | Cu cells and a capacity retention of >85% in Li | LiNiO 2 cells after 250 cycles. Advanced characterizations unveil that the stable cell operation is due to well-tuned electrode–electrolyte interphases and Li deposition morphology. In addition, online electrochemical mass spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry reveal that the gas generation and heat-release are greatly reduced with the LHCEs presented. Altogether, the study provides new insights into the role of diluents in LHCEs and offers valuable guidance for further optimization of LHCEs for high energy density lithium-metal batteries.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
Impact of Anode to Cathode Crossover in Lithium‐metal Batteries With High‐Nickel Cathodes
The advancement of high-energy-density lithium-metal batteries (LMBs) is hindered by the chemical instability of both lithium-metal anode and high-nickel layered oxide cathodes. While cathode-to-anode crossover is well-documented, the reverse process of anode-to-cathode crossover remains underexplored. Here, we systematically investigate such crossovers and the degradation pathway in pouch cells with a localized high-concentration electrolyte, comparing NMC622, NMC811, and NMC90 cathodes paired with lithium-metal and graphite anodes. Despite delivering higher initial capacities, LMBs exhibit faster capacity fade under long-term cycling at 45 °C. To isolate cathode-side degradation, galvanostatic electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (GEIS) measurements of cycled cathodes paired with delithiated lithium iron phosphate (LFP) counter electrodes reveal significantly higher charge-transfer resistance in cathodes cycled with lithium-metal. Surface characterization via X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) reveals greater electrolyte decomposition on cathodes cycled with lithium metal, leading to thicker, more organic-rich cathode–electrolyte interphases (CEIs), consistent with the elevated charge-transfer resistance observed in GEIS measurements. Notably, NMC90 shows the most pronounced CEI thickening, linking higher cathode surface reactivity to greater susceptibility to anode-to-cathode crossover. This work presents compelling evidence of crosstalk degradation originating from lithium-metal anodes and underscores the importance of cross-interface stability for the design of durable LMBs.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
A Holistic Stabilization of the Anode in Lithium‐Sulfur Batteries Through a Ternary Alloy Fusion
The anode in lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs) is plagued by not only inhomogeneous lithium (Li) deposition, but also by parasitic side-reactions. Often, a thick anode (∼400 µm) is used to compensate for these drawbacks, lowering gravimetric and volumetric energy densities. In this work, we demonstrate a ternary alloy anode fabricated via scalable thermal fusion of Li with aluminum (Al) and tellurium (Te) to cohesively address these issues. The Al–Li skeleton serves to homogenize Li deposition as well as reinforce the anode, allowing it to be rolled down to low thicknesses. Te incorporation suppresses the reaction of Li with polysulfides (Li 2 Sn) to form lithium sulfide (Li 2 S) and electrolyte degradation. It can also facilitate the formation of polytellurosulfides (Li 2 Te x Sy), which are far more conducive to Li + -ion diffusion. Even under a lean electrolyte/sulfur (E/S) ratio of 8 µL mg −1 and a low negative/positive (N/P) ratio of 3, capacities over 900 mA h g −1 at a C/5 rate are obtained in cells with Li–Te–Al anodes with a capacity retention of 80% after 70 cycles. In comparison, the baseline lithium-metal anode retains only 35% after 50 cycles. Furthermore, the Li–Te–Al anodes confer a 24% boost to gravimetric energy density at the pouch cell level.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
Interplay of molten salt and dopants in tuning the performance of single-crystalline LiNiO 2
Single-crystalline layered oxide cathodes have seen great research interest in recent years. Adoption of single-crystal morphology improves mechanical robustness and eliminates intergranular boundaries, improving the chemical stability of the cathode. Furthermore, single-crystal cathodes also suffer from worsened lithium-diffusion kinetics stemming from the significantly increased diffusion path lengths. Sluggish lithiation kinetics induce concentration gradients within the cathode particle during cell operation, resulting in the accumulation of lattice strain, which deteriorates cell performance. Foreign dopants have been shown to greatly improve ion diffusion in many high-Ni layered oxide cathode systems. In particular, we identify Ti and Te as promising dopants to ameliorate the slow diffusion kinetics. We find that doping 1 mol.% Te into single crystal LiNiO 2 greatly improves Li + diffusivity, as determined through galvanostatic intermittent titration technique. Further incorporating 2 mol.% Al and pairing with lithium-metal anode in a localized high concentration electrolyte (LHCE) delivers 206 mA h g -1 at C/3 rate and retains 94% capacity after 100 cycles in Li metal half cells. By addressing kinetically mediated degradation with Te doping, and surface-based degradation with Al and LHCE, the cathode experiences very little polarization and overpotential growth, enabling stable cycling with high accessible capacity.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
Voltage Mining for (De)lithiation-Stabilized Cathodes and a Machine Learning Model for Li-Ion Cathode Voltage
Advances in lithium-metal anodes have inspired interest in discovery of Li-free cathodes, most of which are natively found in their charged state. This is in contrast to today's commercial lithium-ion battery cathodes, which are more stable in their discharged state. In this study, we combine calculated cathode voltage information from both categories of cathode materials, covering 5577 and 2423 total unique structure pairs, respectively. The resulting voltage distributions with respect to the redox pairs and anion types for both classes of compounds emphasize design principles for high-voltage cathodes, which favor later Period 4 transition metals in their higher oxidation states and more electronegative anions like fluorine or polyanion groups. Generally, cathodes that are found in their charged, delithiated state are shown to exhibit voltages lower than those that are most stable in their lithiated state, in agreement with thermodynamic expectations. Deviations from this trend are found to originate from different anion distributions between redox pairs. In addition, a machine learning model for voltage prediction based on chemical formulas is trained and shows state-of-the-art performance when compared to two established composition-based ML models for material properties predictions, Roost and CrabNet.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
Visualizing the SEI formation between lithium metal and solid-state electrolyte
The solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) is regarded as the most important factor affecting the durability of lithium-metal anode in all-solid-state batteries (ASSBs). Despite its significance, the nucleation and growth mechanism of SEI is not yet well understood. Here, we elucidate the thermodynamics and kinetics governing SEI formation at the Li|β-Li 3 PS 4 interface at the atomic scale via thermodynamic phase equilibrium analysis and machine-learning-potential-assisted molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. An accurate moment tensor potential using the machine-learning method is developed for a reactive model of Li|β-Li 3 PS 4 . This potential enabled us to perform large-scale MD simulations with the model size expanded to the experimental dimensions (~40 nm) while maintaining the same level of accuracy as density functional theory calculations. The results reveal a four-stage evolution process at the Li|β-Li 3 PS 4 interface, namely (i) fast ion diffusion, (ii) nucleation, (iii) Li 2 S growth, and (iv) stabilization. Notably, we demonstrate that the SEI can be categorized into crystalline and amorphous regions. The simulated SEI thickness, structure, and composition closely match experimental findings, validating the accuracy of the MD simulations. We further disclose the significant impact of ion diffusion kinetic limitations on the phase formation and crystallization of interfacial products. Furthermore, we shed light on the detailed potential energy (PE) distribution of lithium along the direction perpendicular to the interface. Finally, this information is crucial for better understanding interfacial ion mobility.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
Modeling Electrodeposition in 3D Porous Architectures for Solid-State Li-Metal Batteries
Li-metal storage in three-dimensional (3D) electrodes is considered a potential dendrite-mitigation strategy. The large surface area and high porosity of these electrodes result in reduced local Li-plating current densities. The porous topology provides a scaffold for Li-deposition and stripping, maintaining both mechanical integrity and Li accessibility. The goal of this study is to understand how characteristics, such as geometry and material properties, affect the current distribution and deposition pattern. To this end, we developed a computational method to track material growth driven by electrodeposition within a complex geometry. This method ensures that the finite-element discretization remains conforming to the moving boundary while preserving an adequate mesh quality, and thus maintains solution accuracy. Using this new computational tool, we analyze the conditions under which porous anode architectures effectively expand the surface area of the charge-transfer interface, and self-regulate current density and dendrite growth.
3D electrode architectures↗
Demarcating the Impact of Electrolytes on High–Nickel Cathodes and Lithium–Metal Anode
The ever-growing demand for low-cost, high-energy-density lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) makes high-nickel layered oxide cathodes, especially LiNiO 2 (LNO), one of the most appealing candidates. However, poor structural and surface instability that leads to a short cycle life remains a formidable challenge. Herein, a systematic investigation of LNO performance in two different electrolytes (a conventional carbonate-based LP57 electrolyte and an ether-based localized high-concentration electrolyte (LHCE)) with different charge cut-off voltages is presented. These findings show that the cathode-electrolyte reactivity is the main factor dictating the performance degradation of LNO at high voltages rather than bulk integrity. While LHCE can provide good stability beyond 4.2 V with a robust, uniform solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer on the Li-metal anode, there is no significant difference in cyclability at 4.15 V (96% capacity retention after 200 cycles) for both LP57 and LHCE. From LNO symmetric cells, carbonate-based electrolyte is found to be good for LNO stability while ether-based electrolyte is beneficial toward Li-metal anode. Furthermore, a suitable electrolyte or a low cut-off voltage is necessary to maintain a decent cycle life. Altogether, this work highlights the impact of electrolyte and cut-off voltage on LNO and Li-metal, which can help guide the development of cells based on LNO.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
Lithium anode interlayer design for all-solid-state lithium-metal batteries
Not provided.
Energy & Fuels↗
Resolving three-dimensional nanoscale heterogeneities in lithium metal batteries with cryoelectron tomography
Current direct observation of sensitive battery materials and interfaces primarily relies on two-dimensional (2D) imaging, leaving out their three-dimensional (3D) relationship. Here, in this study, we used cryoelectron tomography (cryo-ET) to visualize the lithium metal anode in 3D at nanometer resolution and cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM) to reveal atomic details in local regions. We imaged both freshly prepared and calendar-aged Li metal anodes to reveal the development of LiH in Li dendrites and the Li-LiH interface, as well as the development of the solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI). Using a convolutional neural network-based technique, the 3D arrangement of Li metal, along with nanoscale LiH and Cu heterogeneities in dendrites, was visualized and annotated. In longer-term calendar aging, we observed more substantial LiH growth accompanied by extended SEI growth. Our results show that the growth of LiH and the extended SEI during battery calendar aging are temporally and spatially separate processes.
LiH↗
The Microscopic Mechanism of Lithiation and Delithiation in the Ag/C Buffer Layer for Anode‐Free Solid‐State Batteries
Abstract Lithium metal solid‐state batteries (LMSSBs) have demonstrated their high energy density and cycling performance at high current densities in an anode‐free architecture, featuring a thin Ag/C composite buffer layer (BL) between the current collector (CC) and the solid electrolyte (SE). This study explains the microscopic mechanism of the Ag/C BL by using first‐principles atomistic and continuum modeling. It is shown that Ag effectively acts as a homogeneous solid‐solution beyond AgLi 2.32 and maintains a positive potential even at AgLi 25 during lithiation. Key factors underlying the working of the Ag/C BL include lower interfacial resistance at the BL/CC interface than at the BL/SE interface, leading to predominant Li deposition on BL/CC, and substantial Ag–Li volume expansion during lithiation. This, combined with stronger BL/SE adhesion, causes BL/SE separation and Ag–Li extrusion toward the CC side. During delithiation, Ag re‐precipitates as nanoparticles uniformly on the CC, with its positive lithiation potential homogenizing Li currents in subsequent cycles. Other metals are less effective due to their relatively large overpotential, premature lithiation termination, and limited volume expansions hindering movement toward the CC. The study aids the BL design, focusing on metal choice and optimization material and microstructural properties, such as the Li‐ion conductivity and interfacial resistance.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
Precise Tailoring of Lithium-Ion Transport for Ultralong-Cycling Dendrite-Free All-Solid-State Lithium Metal Batteries
All-solid-state lithium metal batteries can address crucial challenges regarding insufficient battery cycling life and energy density. The demonstration of long-cycling dendrite-free all-solid-state lithium metal batteries requires precise tailoring of lithium-ion transport of solid-state electrolytes (SSEs). Here, in this work, a proof of concept is reported for precise tailoring of lithium-ion transport of a halide SSE, Li 3 InCl 6 , including intragranular (within grains) but also intergranular (between grains) lithium-ion transport. Lithium-ion migration tailoring mechanism in crystals is developed by unexpected enhanced Li, In, and Cl vacancy populations and lower energy barrier for hopping. The lithium-ion transport tailoring mechanism between the grains is determined by the elimination of voids between grains and the formation of unexpected supersonic conducting grain boundaries, boosting the lithium dendrite suppression ability of SSE. Due to boosted lithium-ion conduction and dendrite-suppression ability, the all-solid-state lithium metal batteries coupled with Ni-rich LiNi 0.83 Co 0.12 Mn 0.05 O 2 cathodes and lithium metal anodes demonstrate breakthroughs in electrochemical performance by achieving extremely long cycling life at a high current density of 0.5 C (2000 cycles, 93.7% capacity retention). This concept of precise tailoring of lithium-ion transport provides a cost, time, and energy efficient solution to conquer the remaining challenges in all-solid-state lithium-metal batteries for fast developing electric vehicle markets.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
Interface Design for High‐Performance All‐Solid‐State Lithium Batteries
All‐solid‐state batteries suffer from high interface resistance and lithium dendrite growth leading to low Li plating/stripping Coulombic efficiency (CE) of <90% and low critical current density at high capacity. Here, in this work, both challenges are simultaneously addressed and the Li plating/stripping CE is significantly increased to 99.6% at 0.2 mA cm −2 /0.2 mAh cm −2 , and critical current density (CCD) of > 3.0 mA cm −2 /3.0 mAh cm −2 by inserting a mixed ionic‐electronic conductive (MIEC) and lithiophobic LiF‐C‐Li 3 N‐Bi nanocomposite interlayer between Li 6 PS 5 Cl electrolyte and Li anode. The highly lithiophobic LiF‐C‐Li 3 N‐Bi interlayer with high ionic conductivity (10 −5 S cm −1 ) and low electronic conductivity (3.4×10 −7 S cm −1 ) enables Li to plate on the current collector (CC) surface rather than on Li 6 PS 5 Cl surface avoiding Li 6 PS 5 Cl electrolyte reduction. During initial Li plating on CC, Li penetrates into porous LiF‐C‐Li 3 N‐Bi interlayer and lithiates Bi nanoparticles into Li 3 Bi. The lithiophilic Li 3 Bi and Li 3 N nanoparticles in LiF‐C‐Li 3 N‐Li 3 Bi sub‐interlayer will move to CC along with plated Li, forming LiF‐C/Li 3 N‐Li 3 Bi lithiophobic/lithiophilic sublayer during the following Li stripping. This interlayer enables Co 0.1 Fe 0.9 S 2 /Li 6 PS 5 Cl/Li cell with an areal capacity of 1.4 mAh cm −2 to achieve a cycle life of >850 cycles at 150 mA g −1 . The lithiophobic/lithiophilic interlayer enables solid‐state metal batteries to simultaneously achieve high energy and long cycle life.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
Advancements in active filler-contained polymer solid-state electrolytes for lithium-metal batteries: A concise review
Lithium-metal batteries (LMBs) usually are regarded as the pinnacle of next-generation energy storage due to the high specific capacity and low redox potential of the Li-metal anode. However, their development is hindered by safety hazards related to flammable electrolytes and uncontrolled side reactions within the battery. Both polymer and solid-state inorganic electrolytes, despite their potential, exhibit shortcomings that limit their practical applications. Active filler-containing polymer electrolytes (AFPEs) offer a promising solution by combining the benefits of both types. Enhanced by supramolecular interactions between the polymer matrix and active fillers, AFPEs demonstrate superior electrochemical performance over traditional polymer electrolytes. This review discusses the progress in active fillers and various polymer matrices, examining the factors that enhance performance, particularly ionic conductivity. It also outlines the future research directions of AFPEs, aiming to broaden the application of solid electrolytes in high-performance LMBs.
All solid-state batteries↗
Resting restores performance of discharged lithium-metal batteries
In lithium-metal batteries, grains of lithium can become electrically isolated from the anode, lowering battery performance. We state that experiments reveal that rest periods after battery discharge might help to solve this problem.
36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
Single-phase local-high-concentration solid polymer electrolytes for lithium-metal batteries
Solid polymers are promising electrolytes for Li-metal batteries, but they have limitations: they cannot simultaneously achieve high ionic conductivity, good mechanical strength and compatibility with high-voltage cathodes while suppressing Li dendrites. Here, we design a class of locally high-concentration solid polymer electrolytes based on polymer blends, which are termed Li-polymer in F diluter (LPIFD). The Li-polymer (polymer-in-salt) ensures continuous Li-ion conduction channels and contributes to the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), and the F diluter (inert fluorinated polymer) adds mechanical strength. Studies reveal that a single-phase LPIFD, which is based on a miscible polymer blend, lacks phase boundaries and forms an organic-less and LiF-rich SEI, effectively suppressing lithium dendrites. The single-phase LPIFD delivers ionic conductivity of 3.0 x 10 -4 S cm -1 and enables the Li anode to reach a high coulombic efficiency of 99.1% and a critical current density of 3.7 mA cm -2 . Furthermore, the ability to form an F-rich cathode electrolyte interphase allows LiNi 0.8 Co 0.1 Mn 0.1 O 2 ||Li cells to achieve a cycle life of 450 cycles at a high operating voltage of 4.5 V. In conclusion, this design will inspire efforts to commercialize polymer electrolytes for high-energy Li-metal batteries.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
Solid Electrolyte Interphase Formation at the Ionic Liquid Electrolyte—Lithium-Metal Interface Using an Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Approach
An interfacial study is performed using ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations to elucidate the electrochemical interfacial stability of an ionic liquid (IL) as component of an electrolyte in contact with a Li-metal anode when an additive, vinylene carbonate (VC), is added to the electrolyte. The IL electrolyte is composed of 1-butyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium bis(fluoro-sulfonyl)-imide (PYR14 + FSI − ) with lithium bis(trifluoromethane-sulfonyl)imide salt (Li + TFSI − ) in a 8:2 concentration ratio. Reactions observed at the interface electrolyte/Li-metal during the AIMD simulations are verified by electronic structure calculations using density functional theory calculations considering a continuum solvent model. We found that the addition of VC to the IL prevents further reduction of the counter-ion TFSI − and retards reduction of FSI − in comparison to the case when the additive VC is absent. The PYR14 + reduction is never observed with or without the additive. The 1st, 2nd, and 3rd electron affinities of the PYR14 + are −0.08, −0.36 and −3.65 eV, indicating little to large repulsive behavior against electrons. The opposite is observed for the two negative ions, FSI − and TFSI − , which yield 1st electron affinities of 1.73 and 1.83 eV, respectively. Reactions obtained under open circuit conditions. Dissociation mechanisms are presented for all IL components reduced at the IL/Li-metal interface.
Electrochemistry↗