Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “lunar lighting”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1977

Different ages of lunar light plains

The crater populations of 18 lunar light plains (Cayley plains) show a variation in relative ages by a factor of about 4 in crater frequency in regions in the surroundings of the Orientale and Imbrium basin, and by a factor of greater than 25 for more distant sites. Thus the idea of a moon-wide synchronism in the emplacement of the lunar light plains with the formation of the basins Imbrium or Orientale cannot be supported. Some light plains are younger than the youngest basin Orientale. Since these plains cannot have been emplaced by any other basin-forming event and local impact-derived origin can certainly be excluded, an endogenic (magmatic) origin is proposed for these plains. Age determination data (D sub L values) by Soderblom and Lebofsky (1972) and Soderblom and Boyce (1972) are shown to be correlated with own cumulative crater frequency data (N) for surfaces younger than about 3.8 b.y. It is found that D sub L is proportional to the 0.6 power of N. For ages greater than 3.8 b.y., the D sub L data by those authors, especially their light plains data, are incompatible with the present crater frequency data.

Neukum, G.↗
NASA NTRS2025

South Pole Lunar Lighting Studies for Driving Exploration on the Lunar Surface

NASA’s Artemis lunar missions will face new exploration challenges due to inherently low sun angles in the lunar south pole region. Whereas the Apollo missions were afforded sunlight for approximately 8 to 50-degrees above the horizon, sunlight for the next lunar missions will only be 1 to 2-degrees about the horizon. With this low angle, long shadows and high contrasts of light and dark areas will be faced by the crew and remote teleop operators while exploring the lunar surface. With this in mind, NASA developed an integrated virtual Lighting and Navigation Simulation to understand these challenges. Two studies have been conducted in this Lunar South Pole environment to evaluate the effects of natural and artificial lighting on driving and navigating a lunar rover across the surface. Early NASA studies, such as this, are used to aid in developing techniques and explore concepts of operations to promote mission success and crew safety. In the Phase One development evaluation, six astronauts were teleported to ten different lighting conditions. For each location, drivers were to drive to an imaginary target approximately 200-meters straight ahead and provide subjective feedback on their ability to drive under the given lighting conditions. Phase Two, a more operational study, four astronauts and a remote operator tested five different Artemis lunar mission scenarios. Results indicated sun direction at such low angles, especially when driving a high speed, can severely impact the crew’s ability to safely drive the rover. In the up-sun situation, with the sun directly in the driver’s eyes and compounded long shadows, the consistent preference among drivers was to initiate a tacking strategy of approximately +/- 20 to 30-degrees to improve visibility. This maneuver does require more time and rover energetics. Conversely, driving down-sun required the crew to tack as well to avoid the shadow of rover blocking the terrain. Less appreciated is how the surrounding landscape is lit. Traveling into shadowed areas, especially while facing a lit terrain beyond the shadowed area, drivers enter at their own risk due to pupil contraction making artificial lights useless. Additionally, the constant transitioning between dark and light areas are mentally taxing to the crew and natural navigational references such as the stars are invisible and therefore unusable. Slope and depth magnitude are very difficult hazards to judge when approaching a shadowed crater. This naturally leads to slower driving speeds than originally anticipated. As for observing scientifically interesting features, assessing them accurately varies greatly by the lighting condition. In most cases, the task can be completed, but the strategy is to use the sun to one’s advantage. Crew workload distribution in the cockpit for driving operations was split amongst crew. The driver primarily focused attention on visual terrain (80%) but referenced displays approximately 20% of the time, while the co-pilot/navigator generally provided directional cues to the driver. These natural lighting conditions present significant challenges for safe rover operations; however, early studies having given investigators a “first-look” into understanding of how operating on the South Lunar Pole can be accomplished.

LTv↗
NASA NTRS1975

Origin of lunar light plains

In order to determine the origin of Cayley-type lunar light plains, their physical properties, distribution, and relative ages are examined from Apollo orbital and Lunar Orbiter photographs. The distribution and apparent age of the plains deposits and data on highly feldspathic breccias indicate that these superficial materials are neither locally derived nor part of the Imbrium ejecta. The existence of a planar facies of continuous ejecta at Orientale and in the ejecta blankets of small craters is demonstrated. The data and interpretation presented support the hypothesis that the surface and near-surface materials of some light plains, including those at the Apollo 16 site, are at least partly composed of ejecta from the Orientale basin and that the materials of many rugged areas, such as the Descartes highlands, are overlain by similar material. The possibility that some Cayley-type plains may have a different origin is not excluded.

Chao, E. C. T.↗
NASA NTRS1993

Modes of formation of lunar light plains and the detection of cryptomaria deposits

The early volcanic and impact histories of the Moon are closely linked and the record preserved in surface morphology and samples is tightly convolved because of the interaction of the two processes. The deconvolution of the record is an important goal in order to assess early volcanic flux and the mode of emplacement of large crater and basin deposits. For example, lunar light plains have been variously interpreted as volcanic, impact, and volcanic covered by impact deposits. The development of criteria for the determination of the origin of light plains and the detection of cryptomaria is a key to the deconvolution of this early record. We outline the various hypotheses for the origin of and potential modes of occurrence of light plains and cryptomaria, and develop criteria for their recognition and documentation. We use the example of the Schiller-Schickard and Balmer cryptomaria to illustrate the application of these techniques to the problem of light plains interpretation and cryptomaria documentation.

Head, James W.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Can Reflector Panel Technologies Tame Terrible Lunar Lighting Environments?

This project investigated the usage of reflector panel technology to redirect collimated sunlight to make it more usable for the lunar surface EVAs. When astronauts travel to the Moon’s South Pole, they will find a terrible exterior work environment to carry out EVA tasks. The location creates a situation where collimated light from the Sun illuminates the surface at low inclination angles, and the problem that the crew will often shadow their own workspace. Artificial lighting countermeasures will be marginally beneficial because the Sun’s illumination level is orders of magnitude higher than intensities possible from battery driven lighting systems. These conditions will persist because the latitude of the polar worksite, and the Moon’s orbit around the Earth. Photographers, on Earth, battle similar problems in their studios and outdoor worksites. To solve this problem, they use large portable reflectors to redirect light towards the object they are imaging.

Toni Anne Clark↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Can Reflector Panel Technologies Tame Terrible Lunar Lighting Environments?

This project investigated passive (non-powered) lighting countermeasures to improve lighting conditions where the Sun’s rays are nearly horizontal with the operational surface. NASA’s future missions are targeting the Lunar South Pole where “day” lasts for 2 weeks and the Sun is always on the horizon. The Sun’s collimated light creates harsh working conditions where the light is glaring when facing the sun, and deep long shadows are formed when turned away from the sun. The goal of this research was to determine if standard Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) technologies, used by photographers, could increase the usability of an EVA crew member’s immediate surrounding work environment.

Toni A. Clark↗
NASA NTRS1993

Age determinations and Earth-based multispectral observations of lunar light plains

The history of light plains still remains doubtful, but there are good arguments - mainly obtained by age determinations and supported by multispectral observations - for an endogenic (magmatic) instead of an (exclusively) impact related origin. Light plains are characterized by smooth areas with an albedo lower than the surrounding highlands (12 - 13 percent), but significantly higher than maria (5 - 6 percent). Before Apollo 16 a volcanic source has been supposed, but analysis of returned samples (highly brecciated and metamorphosed rocks) favored an impact ejecta related origin. Among the currently discussed models are formation by ejecta sedimentation from multi-ringed basins, formation by secondary and tertiary cratering action of ballistically ejected material during the formation of multi-ringed basins, in situ formation by impact melt of large events, and premare (crypto-) volcanism basalts covered by a thin ejecta cover; younger impacts penetrated the ejecta surface to create the dark haloed craters. To find arguments in favor or against these ideas the chronology of light plains is of major importance. Obviously a genetic relationship between the evolution of light plains and the basin forming impacts can be possible only if the events of emplacement features happened simultaneously.

Koehler, U.↗
NASA NTRS1974

Ages of the lunar nearside light plains and maria

An extension of a previous work on relative age mapping for the lunar nearside is presented. The ages were determined from Apollo (Hasselblad, metric, and panoramic) and Lunar Orbiter photographs; three major subdivisions were observed: maria and two older light plains units. The plains units center around 3.8 b.y. and 4.0 b.y., respectively. Ages of maria decrease westward. The oldest maria is 3.7 b.y.; it comprises Mare Tranquillitatis and two small areas in southeastern Mare Imbrium. Oceanus Procellarum, southwestern Mare Imbrium, northern Mare Humorum, and northwestern Mare Serenitatis contain the youngest maria; the youngest of these formed about 1.7 b.y. ago. Emplacement of all three subdivisions occurred over a 2.3 b.y. interval. The three-stage model of mare emplacement proposed by Soderblom (1970a) is confirmed. Thus the sequence is (1) high-Ti basalts in the eastern hemisphere, (2) low-Ti basalts filling circular ring-maria, and (3) high-Ti basalts in the western hemisphere.

Boyce, J. M.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Numerical Modelling of Sublimation Losses During Sample Handling Within the Light WAVE Lunar Water Prospecting Instrument

NASA’s focus of exploring the Moon’s south pole under the Artemis program has placed new emphasis on characterizing the quantity and distribution of water ice and other volatiles present within the Moon’s permanently shadowed regions (PSRs), first measured during the 2009 LCROSS mission. NASA’s VIPER rover is the first of a series of prospecting missions to characterize this water ice resource. NASA’s Johnson Space Center (JSC) has developed the Light Water Analysis and Volatiles Extraction (Light WAVE) instrument shown in Figure 1 for a follow-on prospecting mission, designed to be a rover payload for water ice prospecting at various depths and locations within PSRs. A key source of error for lunar water prospecting instruments, including Light WAVE, is the loss of water in an icy regolith sample to the lunar vacuum via sublimation due to heating above its ice-stable temperature. This abstract and conference presentation discuss a sublimation model for Light WAVE’s sample crucible using COMSOL Multiphysics to assess the sublimation losses that would occur between sample collection from an external drill and sealing the sample within Light WAVE’s boiler.

Lunar Polar Water↗
NASA NTRS1991

Lighting constraints on lunar surface operations

An investigation into the levels of ambient lighting on the lunar surface indicates that for most nearside locations, illumination will be adequate throughout most of the lunar night to conduct EVAs with only minor artificial illumination. The maximum lighting available during the lunar night from Earthshine will be similar to the light level on a July evening at approximately 8:00 pm in the southern United States (approximately 15 minutes after sunset). Because of the captured rotation of the Moon about the Earth, the location of the Earth will remain approximately constant throughout the lunar night, with consequent constant shadow length and angle. Variations in the level of Earthside illumination will be solely a function of Earth phase angle. Experience during the Apollo Program suggests that EVA activities during the period around the lunar noon may be difficult due to lack of surface definition caused by elimination of shadows.

Eppler, Dean B.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Lunar nitrogen: Secular variation or mixing?

The two current models to explain the nearly 40% variation of the lunar nitrogen isotopic composition are: (1) secular variation of solar wind nitrogen; and (2) a two component mixing model having a constant, heavy solar wind admixed with varying amounts of indigenous light lunar N (LLN). Both models are needed to explain the step pyrolysis extraction profile. The secular variation model proposes that the low temperature release is modern day solar wind implanted into grain surfaces, the 900 C to 1100 C release is from grain surfaces which were once exposed to the ancient solar wind but which are now trapped inside agglutinates, and the >1100 C release as spallogenic N produced by cosmic rays. The mixing model ascribes the components to solar wind, indigenous lunar N and spallogenic N respectively. An extension of either interpretation is that the light N seen in lunar breccias or deep drill cores represent conditions when more N-14 was available to the lunar surface.

Norris, S. J.↗
NASA NTRS1976

Mercurian volcanism questioned

It is noted that reports of the Mariner 10 television team favor a volcanic origin for the plains materials on Mercury. The present paper advances the argument that the Mercurian plains more closely resemble the lunar light plains (which are not of volcanic origin) in terms of stratigraphic relations, surface morphology, and albedo contrast. It is suggested that the plains on Mercury may have been formed from impact materials, possibly impact melts or other basin ejecta which behaved more like a fluid than did the lunar ejecta. It is concluded that if the old intercrater plains and younger smooth plains of Mercury were formed from impact materials, then Mercury underwent neither the volcanic interlude between early cratering episodes nor the late mare-type volcanic phase deduced by the Mariner 10 investigators.

Wilhelms, D. E.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Force Measurements to Excavate Lightly Compacted Granular Lunar Soil Simulant GRC-3B

The Advanced Planetary Excavator (APEX) was used to measure the forces to dig in lightly compacted granular lunar soil simulant GRC-3B with a 21.6-cm wide bucket which has a 30° leading edge. Long linear digs at 10-cm depth and variable rake angle were conducted to determine the reproducibility of the soil preparation. Cone penetrometer tests measured the soil condition prior to each test. Linear trajectories at 10-cm depth with rake angles of 10, 20, and 30 degrees show horizontal force increased and vertical force decreased as rake angle increased. NASA Glenn’s excavation laboratory and the APEX provide the capability of repeatable excavation trajectories and consistent soil preparation. The APEX can provide both linear and arc trajectories to measure excavation forces required for a small rover pushing a blade or a bucket on the lunar surface. To determine scaling effects, the forces to excavate with different sized implements can be measured directly

Margaret P Proctor↗