Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “main engine”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1990

Airflow Model Testing to Determine the Distribution of Hot Gas Flow and O/F Ratio Across the Space Shuttle Main Engine Main Injector Assembly

Engine 0209, the certification engine for the new Phase 2+ Hot Gas Manifold (HGM), showed severe deterioration of the Main Combustion Chamber (MCC) liner during hot fire tests. One theory on the cause of the damage held that uneven local distribution of the fuel rich hot gas flow through the main injector assembly was producing regions of high oxidizer/fuel (O/F) ratio near the wall of the MCC liner. Airflow testing was proposed to measure the local hot gas flow rates through individual injector elements. The airflow tests were conducted using full scale, geometrically correct models of both the current Phase 2 and the new Phase 2+ HGMs. Different main injector flow shield configurations were tested for each HGM to ascertain their effect on the pressure levels and distribution of hot gas flow. Instrumentation located on the primary faceplate of the main injector measured hot gas flow through selected injector elements. These data were combined with information from the current space shuttle main engine (SSME) power balances to produce maps of pressure, hot gas flow rate, and O/F ratio near the main injector primary plate. The O/F distributions were compared for the different injector and HGM configurations.

Mahorter, L.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Investigations of ice formation in the Space Shuttle Main Engine 0209 main injector coolant cavity

Severe main combustion chamber wall and main injector baffle element deterioration occurred during tests of Space Shuttle Main Engine 0209. One of the possible causes considered is ice formation and blockage of coolant to these components, resulting from the mixing of leaking hot turbine exhaust gas (hydrogen rich steam) and hydrogen coolant in the injector coolant cavity. The plausibility of ice blockage is investigated through simple mixing calculations for hot gas and hydrogen, investigation of condensation and water droplet formation, calculation of the freezing times for droplets, and the prediction of ice layer thicknesses. It is concluded that condensation and droplet formation can occur, and small water droplets that form can freeze very quickly when in contact with the cold coolant cavity surfaces. Copnservative analysis predicts, however, that the maximum thickness of the ice layers formed is too small to result in significant blockage of the coolant flow.

Richards, D. R.↗
NASA NTRS1989

The cost of performance - A comparison of the space transportation main engine and the Space Shuttle main engine

This paper compares the cost of the Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) and the Space Transportation Main Engine (STME) proposed by the Advanced Launch System Program. A brief description of the SSME and STME engines is presented, followed by a comparison of these engines that illustrates the impact of focusing on acceptable performance at minimum cost (as for the STME) or on maximum performance (as for the SSME). Several examples of cost reduction methods are presented.

Barisa, B. B.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Numerical analysis of the three-dimensional flow in the main injector assembly of the Space Shuttle Main Engine

The Main Injector Assembly of the Space Shuttle Main Engine supplies the propellants to the Main Combustion Chamber through a large number of vertical injector elements. The gas flow around these elements (LOX posts) is three-dimensional, turbulent and compressible. This paper presents the results of numerical modeling of the hot and cool sections of the Main Injector Assembly and shows that the shields on the outermost row of injector elements affect the flow and the pressure drop in the hot section significantly. It is suggested that appropriate experiments are undertaken to verify the predictions.

Mukerjee, T.↗
NASA NTRS1992

Probabilistic design applications for the Space Transportation Main Engines

All of the current rocket engine designs are based on deterministic design analysis methods. The most recently designed engine, Space Shuttle Main Engines (SSME), was designed and developed using these techniques in the 1970's and 80's. The Space Transportation Main Engine (STME) design objective is to use a robust design methodology and to pro-actively assess and improve the design during the design process. The design approach is a combination of the traditional deterministic methodologies and recently developed probabilistic methodologies. The designer must use a more rigorous structural criteria, conduct pro-active reliability assessments (reliability allocations, failure modes and effects analysis, reliability growth studies, and design reliability assessment), use a damage tolerant design philosophy and perform probabilistic analyses. Rigorous application of this structured methodology will develop a better engine product.

Ohara, Kevin↗
NASA NTRS1977

Booster engines derived from the Space Shuttle Main Engine

Current vehicle studies of post-Space Shuttle vehicles have identified the potential need for a high-pressure booster engine using liquid oxygen/hydrocarbon fuel (RP-1) as propellants. Recent studies of the possibility of using Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) components for a high pressure LOX/RP-1 engine have resulted in several engine configurations which are based largely on SSME components. The current SSME thrust chamber is regeneratively cooled with hydrogen using a relatively low percentage of the total hydrogen flow. For a LOX/RP-1 application the SSME thrust chamber can be run at high pressures and be cooled with a relatively low hydrogen flow. In addition, the SSME oxygen pump, valves, and main injector components may be utilized for the booster engine. By using a majority of the current SSME engine components for the LOX/RE-1 booster engine, engine development time and cost can be significantly reduced compared to the development of a new engine.

Sobin, A. J.↗
NASA NTRS1984

Space Shuttle Main Engine overhaul program

The Space Shuttle Main Engine first flight set from the Orbiter Columbia was returned to Rockwell International/Rocketdyne Division in Canoga Park, California for overhaul after five successful development flights. The three main engines have been completely disassembled and the hardware assessed for space flight effects. Schedules to overhaul subsequent flight engines have been established based on operational requirements of the Space Transportation System. To support these requirements, a dedicated Space Shuttle Main Engine Overhaul Center is being built at the Canoga Park Rocketdyne Facility incorporating the latest in manufacturing, inspection, and data processing equipment.

Stohler, S.↗
NASA NTRS1995

Automation based on knowledge modeling theory and its applications in engine diagnostic systems using Space Shuttle Main Engine vibrational data

Humans can perform many complicated tasks without explicit rules. This inherent and advantageous capability becomes a hurdle when a task is to be automated. Modern computers and numerical calculations require explicit rules and discrete numerical values. In order to bridge the gap between human knowledge and automating tools, a knowledge model is proposed. Knowledge modeling techniques are discussed and utilized to automate a labor and time intensive task of detecting anomalous bearing wear patterns in the Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) High Pressure Oxygen Turbopump (HPOTP).

Kim, Jonnathan H.↗
NASA NTRS1987

Configuration evaluation and criteria plan. Volume 2: Evaluation criteria plan (update). Space Transportation Main Engine (STME) configuration study

Candidate main engine configurations which enhance vehicle performance, operation and cost are identified. These candidate configurations are evaluated and the configurations which provide significant advantages over existing systems are selected for consideration for the next generation of launch vehicles. The unbiased selection of the Space Transportation Main Engine (STME) configuration requires that the candidate engines be evaluated against a predetermined set of criteria which must be properly weighted to emphasize critical requirements defined prior to the actual evaluation. During a prior study of the STME a Gas Generator Cycle engine was selected for conceptual design, with emphasis on reusability, reliability and low cost while achieving good performance. In this study emphasis is on expendable application of the STME while maintaining low cost and high reliability.

Bair, E. K.↗
NASA NTRS1999

Thermographic Leak Detection of the Space Shuttle Main Engine Nozzle

The Space Shuttle Main Engines Nozzles consist of over one thousand tapered Inconel coolant tubes brazed to a stainless steel structural jacket. Liquid Hydrogen flows through the tubing, from the aft to forward end of the nozzle, under high pressure to maintain a thermal balance between the rocket exhaust and the nozzle wall. Three potential problems occur within the SSME nozzle coolant tubes as a result of manufacturing anomalies and the highly volatile service environment including poor or incomplete bonding of the tubes to the structural jacket, cold wall leaks and hot wall leaks. Of these conditions the identification of cold wall leaks has been the most problematic. The methods and results presented in this summary addresses the thermographic identification of cold wall "interstitial" leaks between the structural jacket and coolant tubes of the Space Shuttle Main Engines Nozzles.

Walker, James L.↗
NASA NTRS2010

Space Shuttle Main Engine Liquid Air Insulation Redesign Lessons Learned

The Space Shuttle Main Engine Liquid Air Insulation redesign was required to prevent the reoccurance of the STS-111 High Pressure Speed Sensor In-Flight Anomaly. The STS-111 In-Flight Anomaly Failure Investigation Team's initial redesign of the High Pressure Fuel Turbopump Pump End Ball Bearing Liquid Air Insulation failed the certification test by producing Liquid Air. The certification test failure indicated not only the High Pressure Fuel Turbopump Liquid Air Insulation, but all other Space Shuttle Main Engine Liquid Air Insulation. This paper will document the original Space Shuttle Main Engine Liquid Air STS-111 In-Flight Anomaly investigation, the heritage Space Shuttle Main Engine Insulation certification testing faults, the techniques and instrumentation used to accurately test the Liquid Air Insulation systems on the Stennis Space Center SSME test stand, the analysis techniques used to identify the Liquid Air Insulation problem areas and the analytical verification of the redesign before entering certification testing, Trade study down selected to three potential design solutions, the results of the development testing which down selected the final Liquid Air Redesign are also documented within this paper.

Darrell Gaddy↗
NASA NTRS2010

History and Benefits of Engine Level Testing Throughout the Space Shuttle Main Engine Program

Rocket engine testing is important throughout a program s life and is essential to the overall success of the program. Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) testing can be divided into three phases: development, certification, and operational. Development tests are conducted on the basic design and are used to develop safe start and shutdown transients and to demonstrate mainstage operation. This phase helps form the foundation of the program, demands navigation of a very steep learning curve, and yields results that shape the final engine design. Certification testing involves multiple engine samples and more aggressive test profiles that explore the boundaries of the engine to vehicle interface requirements. The hardware being tested may have evolved slightly from that in the development phase. Operational testing is conducted with mature hardware and includes acceptance testing of flight assets, resolving anomalies that occur in flight, continuing to expand the performance envelope, and implementing design upgrades. This paper will examine these phases of testing and their importance to the SSME program. Examples of tests conducted in each phase will also be presented.

VanHooser, Katherine↗
NASA NTRS1973

The Space Shuttle Main Engine

The Space Shuttle Main Engine is the highest performance large rocket engine being developed in the world. This engine will be used to put the Space Shuttle orbiter vehicle into earth orbit and will be the workhorse propulsion system of the 1970s and 1980s. The propulsion requirements demand maximum performance from the liquid oxygen/hydrogen propellants with a minimum hardware weight. The system is being developed at low cost with a required early flight schedule of 1978. The engine system and components are based on the latest technology using advanced materials and high-pressure combustion. Engine weight and performance are discussed. This paper describes engine design, the program and present progress, the technology of advanced components, experimental results, and development areas underway.

Sanchini, D. J.↗
NASA NTRS1980

Investigation of the fuel feed line failures on the Space Shuttle main engine

The Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) development program experienced two similar appearing fuel feed line failures during the shutdown portion of two engine tests. Failure investigations into each incident showed that a few cycles of high-amplitude transient strain occurring during the start and cutoff portions of each test could have either accumulated damage and led to a fatigue failure after 46 tests, or caused rupture in a low-strength weld joint. The cause of the high strain was traced to a period of unsteady flow separation during the start and cutoff of each test coincident with the oblique shock approaching the nozzle exit. Since elimination of the flow separation was impractical, the steps taken to allow engine development and flight preparations to continue were: (1) establish the safe operating life of the nozzle, (2) reinforce all low-strength welds, and (3) eliminate the use of thin-wall fuel feed lines. In parallel, the feed line was redesigned and fabrication was initiated on units to be incorporated into the development program.

Larson, E. W.↗