Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “metadata quality”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2016

Evolution in Metadata Quality: Common Metadata Repository's Role in NASA Curation Efforts

Metadata Quality is one of the chief drivers of discovery and use of NASA EOSDIS (Earth Observing System Data and Information System) data. Issues with metadata such as lack of completeness, inconsistency, and use of legacy terms directly hinder data use. As the central metadata repository for NASA Earth Science data, the Common Metadata Repository (CMR) has a responsibility to its users to ensure the quality of CMR search results. This poster covers how we use humanizers, a technique for dealing with the symptoms of metadata issues, as well as our plans for future metadata validation enhancements. The CMR currently indexes 35K collections and 300M granules.

metadata quality↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

pyQuARC: Open Source Library for Earth Observation Metadata Quality Assessment

Metadata quality is essential to effective data discovery and has become increasingly vital as more Earth Science data sets become available. The Common Metadata Repository (CMR) hosts metadata describing NASA’s Earth Observation data products, which are archived across 12 Distributed Active Archive Centers (DAACs). The Analysis and Review of CMR (ARC) Team, located at Marshall Space Flight Center, conducts metadata quality assessments to ensure that these data products are discoverable, accessible, and usable. To achieve these goals, the ARC team has developed a metadata quality assessment framework to evaluate metadata completeness, correctness, and consistency. ARC uses a combination of manual and automated methods to assess these three components and identify areas of improvement; the team then collaborates with the DAACs to resolve any findings. To streamline this process, ARC is currently developing a host of scripts, known as pyQuARC, to automate metadata quality assessments as much as possible. pyQuARC is an open source library for Earth Observation Metadata Quality Assessment, and the tool utilizes ARC’s metadata quality assessment framework to make basic validation checks, pinpoint inconsistencies between dataset-level (i.e. collection) and file-level (i.e. granule) metadata, and identify opportunities for more descriptive and robust information. Since pyQuARC is also customizable, other users can make modifications as needed, and future metadata standards can also be implemented. Once pyQuARC is fully developed, it will support multiple schema types to serve the broader EOSDIS metadata community. This presentation will provide an overview of pyQuARC and its process of development while showcasing the tool’s valuable features and uses.

Jenny Wood↗
NASA NTRS2016

International Metadata Standards and Enterprise Data Quality Metadata Systems

Well-documented data quality is critical in situations where scientists and decision-makers need to combine multiple datasets from different disciplines and collection systems to address scientific questions or difficult decisions. Standardized data quality metadata could be very helpful in these situations. Many efforts at developing data quality standards falter because of the diversity of approaches to measuring and reporting data quality. The one size fits all paradigm does not generally work well in this situation. I will describe these and other capabilities of ISO 19157 with examples of how they are being used to describe data quality across the NASA EOS Enterprise and also compare these approaches with other standards.

data quality↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Framework for Assessing Earth Observation Metadata Quality: Implications for Data Discovery and Open Science

The Common Metadata Repository (CMR) contains metadata records describing NASA’s collection of over 8,000 Earth observation data products. The Analysis and Review of CMR (ARC) Team at Marshall Space Flight Center assesses the quality of these metadata records. Metadata, rather than the data itself, is indexed for search in both discipline-specific datacenters and global or aggregated catalogs (such as Earth data Search), making it essential for determining whether a data product is appropriate for a given research question or application need. Since metadata connects users to data, it should be as accurate and complete as possible in addition to meeting minimum database requirements. The ARC team has developed a metadata quality framework by which to assess quality. The framework consists of a set of quality criteria that converge around the dimensions of correctness, completeness, and consistency, with the goal of improving the discoverability, accessibility, and usability of NASA’s Earth Observation data. The application of the framework has resulted in a measurable improvement in NASA’s metadata quality. Key aspects of the framework’s success are the ability to systematically evaluate metadata and provide actionable quality improvement recommendations. Lessons learned from the project will be shared along with implementation details which may be relevant to other science disciplines. By aiming to make data more discoverable and accessible to a broad user community, the ARC metadata quality framework helps contribute to NASA’s commitment to open science.

Jeanne Le Roux↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

pyQuARC: Preparing for Full Release

Metadata holds the contextual information about data and is the underlying structure for many data search portals. High quality metadata optimizes search results, allowing users to quickly retrieve the data they need. With the abundant volume and diversity of Earth observation datasets, data discovery and metadata quality are critical for end users. The Common Metadata Repository (CMR), for example, currently hosts metadata for over 9,000 Earth observation data products archived across 12 NASA Distributed Active Archive Centers (DAACs). The Analysis and Review of CMR (ARC) Team, located at Marshall Space Flight Center, assesses the completeness, correctness, and consistency of these metadata records to ensure they are accessible, usable, and discoverable. In 2021, ARC began developing pyQuARC, an open source library for Earth Observation Metadata Quality Assessment to automate this effort. The tool uses ARC’s existing metadata quality framework to provide prioritized recommendations for metadata improvement. During initial testing, pyQuARC automatically identified 58% of metadata findings when compared with a sample of manually reviewed records. Using the results from initial testing, this presentation will focus on recent advancements and improvements of the tool as the ARC team prepares for pyQuARC’s full release. It will also demonstrate pyQuARC's enrichment value, not only for the ARC team, but the broader EOSDIS metadata community as well.

Essence Raphael↗
NASA NTRS2016

Making Metadata Better with CMR and MMT

Ensuring complete, consistent and high quality metadata is a challenge for metadata providers and curators. The CMR and MMT systems provide providers and curators options to build in metadata quality from the start and also assess and improve the quality of already existing metadata.

Quality↗
NASA NTRS2017

CMR Metadata Curation

This talk explains the ongoing metadata curation activities in the Common Metadata Repository. It explores tools that exist today which are useful for building quality metadata and also opens up the floor for discussions on other potentially useful tools.

metadata↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

ASDC’s Python-Based Metadata Extraction Pipeline for Suborbital Campaigns

The FAIRness of data products, especially findability and accessibility depend on rich metadata which, when extracted, can allow for proper curation. Over the past few years, the Atmospheric Science Data Center (ASDC) suborbital science support team has developed a metadata extraction pipeline to ensure the required metadata can be retrieved systematically, effectively, and efficiently to ensure the data can be used by a broad community. The development of a pipeline has presented many, but necessary, challenges to support archival and distribution of ASDC’s 30+ suborbital missions. Though sufficient metadata is provided by instrument scientists, the metadata may not be readily machine actionable due to different formats and templates. Further complicating metadata extraction, our team has found that the nature of metadata can be quite diverse given the difference in measurement types, instruments, and measurement platforms. A metadata extraction pipeline has been developed to provide an efficient, plugin-in based, method for adding new parsers, a configuration system that lets non-developers customize how files are processed, and a system for identifying and logging metadata quality issues to ensure they are readily found and addressed. The metadata extraction pipeline identifies critical pieces of metadata that are needed to promote data FAIRness, including location, file revision, measurement start/end datetime and can be easily modified to extract further information (such as variables). Given the wide-ranging datasets, the pipeline has been modified to accommodate multiple file formats, including multiple versions of ICARTT (International Consortium for Atmospheric Research on Transport and Transformation), HDF (Hierarchical Data Format), netCDF (network Common Data Form), and multiple versions of the Ames File Format. The pipeline also supports building metadata for file formats that cannot have metadata easily extracted from them, such as PDF (Portable Document Format) and GIF (Graphics Interchange Format). The pipeline has allowed our team to maintain a consistent flow of data and metadata to archival and distribution services, ensuring the ASDC meets the needs of the suborbital science community. This presentation will highlight the ASDC’s suborbital metadata extraction pipeline, its development, how it’s been modified to support data FAIRness, and plans for maintaining the pipeline and adding new features.

Abraham Porter↗
NASA NTRS2017

Documentation Resources on the ESIP Wiki

The ESIP community includes data providers and users that communicate with one another through datasets and metadata that describe them. Improving this communication depends on consistent high-quality metadata. The ESIP Documentation Cluster and the wiki play an important central role in facilitating this communication. We will describe and demonstrate sections of the wiki that provide information about metadata concept definitions, metadata recommendation, metadata dialects, and guidance pages. We will also describe and demonstrate the ISO Explorer, a tool that the community is developing to help metadata creators.

ESIP Documentation Cluster↗
NASA NTRS2016

Evaluating and Evolving Metadata in Multiple Dialects

Despite many long-term homogenization efforts, communities continue to develop focused metadata standards along with related recommendations and (typically) XML representations (aka dialects) for sharing metadata content. Different representations easily become obstacles to sharing information because each representation generally requires a set of tools and skills that are designed, built, and maintained specifically for that representation. In contrast, community recommendations are generally described, at least initially, at a more conceptual level and are more easily shared. For example, most communities agree that dataset titles should be included in metadata records although they write the titles in different ways.

metadata quality↗
NASA NTRS2022

Greenland Geothermal Heat Flow Database and Map (Version 1)

We compile and analyze all available geothermal heat flow measurements collected in and around Greenland into a new database of 419 sites and generate an accompanying spatial map. This database includes 290 sites previously reported by the International Heat Flow Commission (IHFC), for which we now standardize measurement and metadata quality. This database also includes 129 new sites, which have not been previously reported by the IHFC. These new sites consist of 88 offshore measurements and 41 onshore measurements, of which 24 are subglacial. We employ machine learning to synthesize these in situ measurements into a gridded geothermal heat flow model that is consistent across both continental and marine areas in and around Greenland. This model has a native horizontal resolution of 55 km. In comparison to five existing Greenland geothermal heat flow models, our model has the lowest mean geothermal heat flow for Greenland onshore areas. Our modeled heat flow in central North Greenland is highly sensitive to whether the NGRIP (North GReenland Ice core Project) elevated heat flow anomaly is included in the training dataset. Our model's most distinctive spatial feature is pronounced low geothermal heat flow (< 40 mW m−2) across the North Atlantic Craton of southern Greenland. Crucially, our model does not show an area of elevated heat flow that might be interpreted as remnant from the Icelandic plume track. Finally, we discuss the substantial influence of paleoclimatic and other corrections on geothermal heat flow measurements in Greenland. The in situ measurement database and gridded heat flow model, as well as other supporting materials, are freely available from the GEUS Dataverse (https://doi.org/10.22008/FK2/F9P03L; Colgan and Wansing, 2021).

William Colgan↗
NASA NTRS2016

Making Interoperability Easier with NASA's Metadata Management Tool (MMT)

While the ISO-19115 collection level metadata format meets many users' needs for interoperable metadata, it can be cumbersome to create it correctly. Through the MMT's simple UI experience, metadata curators can create and edit collections which are compliant with ISO-19115 without full knowledge of the NASA Best Practices implementation of ISO-19115 format. Users are guided through the metadata creation process through a forms-based editor, complete with field information, validation hints and picklists. Once a record is completed, users can download the metadata in any of the supported formats with just 2 clicks.

metadata quality↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

QuARC: Development of a Service to Enable FAIR-er Metadata

The ARC Project: The ARC Team located at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center conducts quality assessments of metadata records that catalog NASA’s collection of over 9,000 Earth observation data products, stored in a centralized database called the Common Metadata Repository (CMR). The ARC Team has developed a metadata quality assessment framework to evaluate metadata completeness, correctness, and consistency with the goal of making NASA’s data products more discoverable, accessible, and usable. ARC = Analysis and Review of the CMR

Earth Science Informatics↗
NASA NTRS2014

Verification of a New NOAA/NSIDC Passive Microwave Sea-Ice Concentration Climate Record

A new satellite-based passive microwave sea-ice concentration product developed for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)Climate Data Record (CDR) programme is evaluated via comparison with other passive microwave-derived estimates. The new product leverages two well-established concentration algorithms, known as the NASA Team and Bootstrap, both developed at and produced by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC). The sea ice estimates compare well with similar GSFC products while also fulfilling all NOAA CDR initial operation capability (IOC) requirements, including (1) self describing file format, (2) ISO 19115-2 compliant collection-level metadata,(3) Climate and Forecast (CF) compliant file-level metadata, (4) grid-cell level metadata (data quality fields), (5) fully automated and reproducible processing and (6) open online access to full documentation with version control, including source code and an algorithm theoretical basic document. The primary limitations of the GSFC products are lack of metadata and use of untracked manual corrections to the output fields. Smaller differences occur from minor variations in processing methods by the National Snow and Ice Data Center (for the CDR fields) and NASA (for the GSFC fields). The CDR concentrations do have some differences from the constituent GSFC concentrations, but trends and variability are not substantially different.

Passive Microwave↗