Metal Organic Framework Derivative Improving Lithium Metal Anode Cycling
Abstract not provided
Zhong, Yiren↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “metal anodes”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Surface diffusion manifestation in electrodeposition of metal anodes
Metal anode-based battery systems have been deemed indispensable towards energy storage renaissance engendering extensive research into strategies countering dendritic growth of metal electrodeposition. Fundamentally, the morphological evolution of a material is uniquely characterized by the heights of its self-diffusion barrier across multiple pathways. Herein, based on a coarse-grained kinetic Monte Carlo method, we derive insights into the nucleation and growth of metallic electrodeposits in liquid electrolytes, governed by surface self-diffusion characteristics cognizant of the diverse diffusion routes including terrace, away from step and interlayer pathways. We deconvolve the roles played by each of these surface diffusion mechanisms in conjunction with the electrochemical reaction rate on the deposition morphology regime (film vs. mossy vs. fractal). We identify interlayer diffusion as the predominant morphology-determining mechanism; dendrite-free deposition even at moderate current rates constrains this diffusion barrier to an upper limit. Additionally, we highlight subtle features amidst the realm of the morphological growth assortment that connect to the cell's electrochemical performance. Finally, we delineate morphological features of Li, Na, Mg and Al based on their respective surface diffusion barriers and applied overpotentials, and provide a baseline for the interpretation of experimental observations. This fundamental study sheds light on the mesoscale underpinnings of morphological variances in mono-valent and multi-valent metal electrodeposition.
37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
Lithicone‐Protected Lithium Metal Anodes for Lithium Metal Batteries with Nickel‐Rich Cathode Materials
The high energy density advantage of lithium (Li) metal batteries (LMBs) makes them increasingly desirable; however, problems such as strong reactivity and dendrite growth of Li metal anode limit their practical uses. In this work, a novel Li‐containing glycerol (LiGL) or lithicone protection layer on a 50 μm thick Li metal anode is employed for improving the performance of LMBs. This LiGL layer was accurately deposited via a molecular layer deposition (MLD) process at 150 °C, using lithium tert‐butoxide and glycerol as precursors. The as‐formed LiGL coating layer is highly tunable in its thickness by simply adjusting MLD cycles and shows a good stability and outstanding ionic transport properties. The LiGL layer is found to effectively mitigate side reactions and enhance cycling stability in both symmetric cells and full cells. Specifically, the LMBs with LiGL@Li anode of 400 MLD cycles and LiNi 0.6 Mn 0.2 Co 0.2 O 2 cathode enable a capacity retention of ≈87%, much higher than ≈35% of the cells with bare Li after 200 cycles at a charge/discharge current density of 2.1 mA cm −2 . This work paves a feasible way for practical LMBs with improved capacity and stability through applying an innovative protection layer on Li metal anodes.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
Unraveling the convoluted and dynamic interphasial mechanisms on Li metal anode
Accurate understanding of the chemistry of solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) is key to developing new electrolytes for high-energy batteries using lithium metal (Li-0) anodes(1). SEI is generally believed to be formed by the reactions between Li-0 and electrolyte(2,3). However, our new study shows this is not the whole story. Through synchrotron-based X-ray diffraction and pair distribution function analysis, we reveal a much more convoluted formation mechanism of SEI, which receives considerable contributions from electrolyte, cathode, moisture and native surface species on Li-0, with highly dynamic nature during cycling. Using isotope labelling, we traced the origin of LiH to electrolyte solvent, moisture and a new source: the native surface species (LiOH) on pristine Li-0. When lithium accessibility is very limited as in the case of anode-free cells, LiOH develops into plate-shaped large crystals during cycling. Alternatively, when the lithium source is abundant, as in the case of Li||NMC811 cells, LiOH reacts with Li-0 to form LiH and Li2O. While the desired anion-derived LiF-rich SEI is typically found in the concentrated electrolytes or their derivatives, we found it can also be formed in low-concentration electrolyte via the crosstalk effect, emphasizing the importance of formation cycle protocol and opening up opportunities for low-cost electrolyte development.
Polzin, Bryant J.↗
Recent progress in understanding solid electrolyte interphase on lithium metal anode
Lithium (Li) metal batteries (LMBs) are among the most promising candidates of next-generation high-energy-density rechargeable batteries. Solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) on Li metal anode plays a significant role which influences the Li deposition morphology and the cycle life of LMBs. Although SEI is the most important part, a thorough understanding of SEI is inadequate. In this review, we focus on the progresses of understanding on structures, properties and influencing factors of SEI as well as efficient strategies of tailoring SEI. First, the compositions, models and recent progresses on characterizing atomic structure of SEI are summarized. Second, the properties of SEI, including electronic conduction, ionic conduction, stability and mechanical properties are elucidated. Structures and properties of SEI are greatly influenced by multiple factors such as solvent, salt, additive, solvation structure, impurity, current density, temperature, pressure and capacity utilization. Thus, interactions between these factors and SEI are comprehensively discussed. Correlations of SEI with Li deposition morphology, rate capability and cycle life are further summarized. Moreover, efficient strategies of tailoring SEI with desired properties, including in-situ SEI and ex-situ SEI are also reviewed. Despite the significant progresses that have been achieved in the researches of SEI, better understanding of SEI is still highly demand. Finally, future directions especially in-operando techniques, multi-modality approaches for characterization of SEI and artificial intelligence assisted understanding of correlation between electrolyte components and SEI properties are proposed.
Wu, Haiping↗
Impact of Pressure Distribution and Magnitude on the Performance of Lithium Metal Anodes
Li metal anodes are a critical battery technology due to their ability to substantially increase the energy density of Li-based batteries. It is well known that pressure greatly impacts the performance of a Li-metal anode. However, precisely how the pressure value and distribution of pressure affect performance is unclear. Furthermore, the solid-electrolyte interphase composition that forms under varying pressure distributions remains a key parameter for practical lithium metal anodes. In this work, different pressure distributions were employed by using differently shaped and oriented mechanical springs in the coin cells, resulting in varying contact points. Pressure-sensitive films were used to spatially map the pressure and correlate it to the performance. It was found that higher average pressure does not necessarily have a positive effect on performance. When high pressure is paired with poor pressure uniformity, the performance is in fact worse likely due to the current focusing effect, rendering unsatisfied cycling stability. This work points to the importance of controlling the relationship between average pressure and pressure uniformity.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
Metallic Cu Surface Enables Reversible Na Metal Anodes and Stabilizes Anode-Free Sodium Metal Batteries
Anode free Na metal batteries are promising for future energy storage because they not only provide the highest energy densities but also eliminate the need of handling hazardous Na metals during battery manufacturing. However, they suffer from much faster degradation due to strong sensitivities even to trace levels of side reactions. In view of the crucial roles of surface chemistry on modulating electrochemical plating, this work systematically investigated a series of Cu surfaces for Na plating and stripping in the 1.0 M NaPF 6 diglyme electrolyte. Our results suggest that Na plating and stripping on pure Cu surface without Cu oxide species exhibits much better reversibility and smaller overpotentials across a wide range of current densities, especially for the first plating/stripping cycle. The high performance includes consistently higher than 99.8% Faradaic efficiencies, much more stable interfacial resistance, and negligible formation of mossy Na after 500 cycles. This improved performance can be explained based on the stronger Na-Cu affinity compared with the Na-CuO affinity. Anode-free Na metal batteries equipped with high-capacity sodium vanadium phosphate cathodes and pure Cu current collector exhibited at least 70% capacity retention for 100 cycles.
Electrochemistry↗
Surface heterogeneity propagation and homogenization for pouch cell-scale Li metal anodes
Li metal anode is a promising candidate for next-generation energy storage systems and is widely explored in Li-ion and solid-state batteries. Despite its potential, Li metal anodes face instabilities during long-term cycling, especially when paired with NMC or sulfur-based cathodes, where Li is cycled at high capacities of 6-8 mAh/cm2, equivalent to a thickness of 30-40 µm. During such extensive utilization, degradation mechanisms such as excessive solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), dendrites, and dead Li emerge, and ultimately lead to sudden failure and reduced cycle life. The origin of the degradation mechanisms stem from surface heterogeneities introduced during Li foil manufacturing and storage [1, 2]. As cycling progresses, the local heterogeneities propagate, resulting in uneven Li utilization and degradation-prone regions across the electrode [3], which consequently induce performance variations at the cell level. This heterogeneity propagation is particularly pronounced in large-format pouch cells in practical applications, where the surface effects are magnified. Without a clear understanding of the multi-scale heterogeneities and the development of surface homogenization methods, the performance consistency will be compromised, hindering the commercialization of Li metal batteries. In this presentation, we investigate the evolution of surface heterogeneity propagation on commercially available Li foils. We discover that inhomogeneous Li utilization appears as early as the first half-cycle of formation, manifesting as localized clusters and pits. In pouch cell configurations, these features exhibit areal density variations across the electrode on a scale of millimeters. To improve Li utilization homogeneity, a scalable mechanical brushing method is introduced to remove the chemically heterogeneous surface passivation layer. Furtherore, the influence of utilization homogeneity on cell-to-cell consistency is evaluated using 32 Li-NMC811 pouch cells divided into as-received and brushed Li groups. On the brushed Li, clusters and pits are no longer observable, and the cells exhibit significantly improved consistency in discharge capacity trajectories and cycle lifetime. Overall, this study highlights the role of Li surface utilization homogeneity on long-term cycling performance. Our research provides a pathway for improving large-area electrode uniformity and establishing evaluation methods for cell-to-cell consistency, both are key steps toward the commercialization of Li metal batteries and beyond. [1] Otto, Svenja-K., et al. "In-depth characterization of lithium-metal surfaces with XPS and ToF-SIMS: toward better understanding of the passivation layer." Chemistry of Materials 33.3 (2021): 859-867. [2] Hatzell, Kelsey, et al. "Aligning lithium metal battery research and development across academia and industry." Joule (2024). [3] Kim, Sangwook, et al. "Calendar life of lithium metal batteries: Accelerated aging and failure analysis." Energy Storage Materials 65 (2024): 103147.
25 - ENERGY STORAGE↗
Deconvoluting the impact of current collector structure and electrolyte selection on Coulombic efficiency of lithium metal anodes
Lithium metal batteries are regarded as a promising avenue for significantly boosting the gravimetric energy density of batteries, particularly for electric vehicles. However, the instability of the lithium metal anode continues to hinder performance. While 3D structured current collectors for lithium metal anodes have been frequently proposed as a solution, few studies explore the impact of these structures when combined with various electrolytes and the inclusion of a lithium reservoir within the structure. This study pairs four commercially available copper current collectors with four different electrolytes to assess how these factors influence cycling performance with a 4 mAh/cm2 lithium reservoir. Coulombic efficiency (CE) measurements revealed no statistically significant difference in CE across different current collectors within the same electrolyte. However, significant variations were noted when the current collector remained intact, and the electrolyte was changed. Although polarization, electrochemical impedance, and lithium morphology varied between structures and electrolytes, no consistent patterns emerged to suggest superior performance by any specific current collector structure. Therefore, the choice of structure appears inconsequential when a lithium reservoir is present, and efforts should focus on selecting and designing the electrolyte.
White, Julia↗
Crossover Effects in Batteries with High–Nickel Cathodes and Lithium–Metal Anodes
It is well understood that cathode-to-anode crossover, especially of transition-metal ions, can significantly impact the long-term cycling of lithium-ion batteries. The dissolved transition-metal ions in lithium-ion cells deposit on the graphite anode, disrupt the solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI), and catalyze further side reactions. Meanwhile, crossover effects in lithium-metal batteries have rarely been studied. This study is the first to investigate crossover effects in lithium-metal batteries with high-nickel layered-oxide cathodes. It is shown that the crossover of transition-metal ions from LiNi 0.9 Mn 0.05 Co 0.05 O 2 has minimal effect on the lithium-metal anode (LMA) due to the following reasons. The catalytic transition metals 1) have less effect on an inherently reactive LMA, 2) are diluted in a thicker SEI, and 3) are produced in overall lower quantity due to the limited cycle life of the LMA. Conversely, the LMA generates soluble decomposition products that cross over to the cathode even during early cycling. This crossover accelerates impedance growth and capacity fade at the cathode and is partially responsible for the mismatch between the performance of half and full-cells with layered-oxide cathodes. Finally, this study highlights the need for better battery design with LMA, potentially including electrolyte or cell modifications.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
Ionic Conductive and Highly-Stable Interface for Alkali Metal Anodes
Alkali metals are regarded as the most promising candidates for advanced anode for the next-generation batteries due to their high specific capacity, low electrochemical potential, and lightweight. However, critical problems of the alkali metal anodes, especially dendrite formation and interface stabilization, remain challenging to overcome. The solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) is a key factor affecting Li and Na deposition behavior and electrochemical performances. Herein, a facile and universal approach is successfully developed to fabricate ionic conductive interfaces for Li and Na metal anodes by modified atomic layer deposition (ALD). In this process, the Li metal (or Na metal) plays the role of Li (or Na) source without any additional Li (or Na) precursor during ALD. Moreover, the key questions about the influence of ALD deposition temperature on the compositions and structure of the coatings are addressed. The optimized ionic conductive coatings have significantly improved the electrochemical performances. In addition, the electrochemical phase-field model is performed to prove that the ionic conductive coating is very effective in promoting uniform electrodeposition. Further, this approach is universal and can be potentially applied to other different metal anodes. At the same time, it can be extended to other types of coatings or other deposition techniques.
37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
3D Artificial Solid-Electrolyte Interphase for Lithium Metal Anodes Enabled by Insulator–Metal–Insulator Layered Heterostructures
Despite considerable efforts to prevent lithium (Li) dendrite growth, stable cycling of Li metal anodes with various structures remains extremely difficult due to the direct contact of the liquid electrolyte with Li. Rational design of solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) for 3D electrodes is a promising but still challenging strategy for preventing Li dendrite growth and avoiding lithium–electrolyte side reactions in Li-metal batteries. Here, a 3D architecture is constructed with g-C 3 N 4 /graphene/g-C 3 N 4 insulator–metal–insulator sandwiched nanosheets to guide uniform Li plating/stripping in the van der Waals gap between the graphene and the g-C 3 N 4 , and the function of which can be regarded as a 3D artificial SEI. Li deposition on the surface of g-C 3 N 4 is suppressed due to its insulating nature. However, its uniform lithiophilic sites and nanopore channels enable homogeneous lithium plating between the graphene and the g-C 3 N 4 , prohibiting the direct contact of the electrolyte with the Li metal. The use of the g-C 3 N 4 -layer-modified 3D anode enables long-term Li deposition with a high Coulombic efficiency and stable cycling of full cells under high cathode loading, limited Li excess, and lean electrolyte conditions. The concept of a 3D artificial SEI will shed light on developing safe and stable Li-metal anodes.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
An Artificial Protective Coating toward Dendrite-Free Lithium-Metal Anodes for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Not provided.
Energy & Fuels↗
Interfacial Pressure Improves Calendar Aging of Lithium Metal Anodes
Lithium metal is a very attractive anode material because its theoretical specific capacity is approximately 10 times higher than conventional graphite anodes. Despite great promise, Li anodes suffer from capacity fade due to instabilities with the electrolyte as well as stranding of active Li. We have previously shown that applied interfacial pressure improves Li anode cycling because the pressure reduces the propensity for Li isolation and enables easier reconnection. Many researchers have also shown that calendar aging can lead to Li capacity loss and this has been attributed to either electrolyte decomposition with concurrent Li corrosion or to the formation of stranded Li. Our prior research focused on calendar aging during cycling suggests the mechanism for calendar aging is largely related to stranding of Li during rest and reconnection of the stranded Li upon further cycling, evidenced by similar average Coulombic efficiencies and Li loss in cells with and without rest. Because our calendar aging studies suggest Li stranding as a major cause of Coulombic efficiency drops and our Li cycling studies suggest this can be mitigated partially through applied interfacial pressure, we hypothesized that applied pressure would improve calendar aging by reducing stranded Li and enabling reconnection. We systematically varied applied pressure (0-1000 kPa) on Li metal anodes during cycling tests with and without intermittent calendar aging periods. Though the Coulombic efficiency decreases during aging periods, the lost capacity is recovered during subsequent cycles, as shown though average Coulombic efficiency and cumulative Li capacity loss analysis. We find that application of pressure partially mitigates calendar aging, in accordance with our hypothesis that calendar aging is caused by Li standing and can be mitigated to some degree with interfacial pressure. This is further supported by our results showing that the average Coulombic efficiency and cumulative Li capacity losses are similar over 50 cycles for cells that were continuously cycled and cells with periodic calendar aging periods. This result indicates that the losses during aging are reversible, which is consistent with Li stranding and reconnection. We show that pressure is one mitigation technique that helps reduce Li calendar aging in this study, but our finding that calendar aging is primarily governed by the stranding and reconnection of dead Li has wider implications. This research suggests that other mitigations which have been shown to prevent dead Li formation or encourage reconnection during cycling would also likely be successful for the purpose of improving calendar aging. The authors were supported by a Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program. This work was performed, in part, at the Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, an Office of Science User Facility operated for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science. Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-mission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (NTESS), a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International Inc., for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration (DOE/NNSA) under contract DE-NA0003525. This written work is authored by an employee of NTESS. The employee, not NTESS, owns the right, title and interest in and to the written work and is responsible for its contents. This work was authored in part by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308. Any subjective views or opinions that might be expressed in the written work do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Government.
applied pressure↗
Interface Modifications of Lithium Metal Anode for Lithium Metal Batteries
Lithium metal batteries (LMBs) enable much higher energy density than lithium–ion batteries (LIBs) and thus hold great promise for future transportation electrification. However, the adoption of lithium metal (Li) as an anode poses serious concerns about cell safety and performance, which has been hindering LMBs from commercialization. To this end, extensive effort has been invested in understanding the underlying mechanisms theoretically and experimentally and developing technical solutions. In this review, we devote to providing a comprehensive review of the challenges, characterizations, and interfacial engineering of Li anodes in both liquid and solid LMBs. Finally, we expect that this work will stimulate new efforts and help peer researchers find new solutions for the commercialization of LMBs.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
Surface-Treated Composite Polymer as a Stable Artificial Solid Electrolyte Interphase Layer for Lithium Metal Anodes
Lithium (Li) metal batteries (LMBs) are one of the most promising high energy density batteries to meet the demands of electric transportation. However, the practical applications of LMBs are hindered by short cycle life and safety concern, mainly associated with side reactions between Li metal anode and liquid electrolyte and the growth of Li dendrites during cycling. In this study, we develop a stable artificial solid electrolyte interphase (aSEI), which consists of a surface-treated (S T ) PEO–Li 6.4 Ga 0.2 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 composite polymer coating layer (CPL) on Li metal anode. The developed aSEI is stable against selected electrolyte and enables a uniform electrodeposition of Li. Therefore, S T CPL@Li||LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 (NMC811) cells exhibit improved cycling stability compared with bare Li||NMC811 cells at moderate to high current densities. Notably, using a 50 µm thick Li and a practical NMC811 cathode (~4.8 mAh cm -2 ), a capacity retention of 85% is obtained for S T CPL@Li||NMC811 cells at a current density of 2.4 mAcm -2 after 300 cycles compared with 24% for bare Li||NMC811 cells. Furthermore, S T CPL@Li||NMC811 cells demonstrate higher capacities at charge current densities of 2.4, 4.8 and 7.2 mAcm -2 compared with bare Li||NMC811 cells. Further, these findings suggest that S T CPL is promising for high current density practical LMBs.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗