Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “multi-beam beacon”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Multi-Beam Laser Beacon Propagation Over Lunar Distance: Comparison of Predictions and Measurements

A multi-beam beacon was transmitted from the Optical Communication Telescope Laboratory (OCTL) located at Table Mountain, CA to the Lunar Laser Space Terminal (LLST), on-board the Lunar Atmospheric Dust and Environment Explorer (LADEE) spacecraft, during NASA’s recent Lunar Laser Communication Demonstration (LLCD). The laser beacon (1568?0.1 nm) was square wave modulated and sensed by a LLST quadrant sensor to enable link acquisition and tracking. LLST computed the mean received beacon power and returned 5 kHz sampled power time series over the downlink. Post-processing of the decoded downlink received at OCTL retrieved the uplink power recorded at LLST. The predicted mean irradiance delivered to LLST consistently agreed with the variable beam divergence transmitted from OCTL to within < 1 decibel (dB). Irradiance fluctuations detected at LLST were reconciled with an uplink wave-propagation model derived using independently monitored atmospheric parameters. We report good agreement of the scintillation index and atmospheric coherence time.

Biswas, A↗

45 Km horizontal path optical link demonstrations

Observations made during a mountain-top-to-mountain-top horizontal optical link demonstration are described. The optical link spans a range of 45 Km at an average altitude of 2 Km above sea level. A multi-beam beacon comprised of eight laser beams emerging from multi-mode fiber coupled lasers (780 nm) are launched through a 0.6 m diameter telescope located at the JPL Table Mountain Facility (TMF) in Wrightwood, California. The multibeam beacon is received at Strawberry Peak located in the San Bernadino Mountains of California. The NASA, JPL developed optical communications demonstrator (OCD) receives the beacon, senses the atmosphere induced motion and using an upgraded fine steering loop compensates the re-transmission of a communications laser beam (852 nm, 400 Mbps) to TMF. The eight-beam beacon allowed a four reduction in normalized irradiance or scintillation index. This in turn was sufficient to eliminate beacon fades sensed b the OCD and allowed the fine steering loop performance evaluation. The uncompensated tracking error was determined to be 2.2 - 3 prad compared to a model prediction of 3.4 prad. The paper also discusses various auxiliary observations made during the campaign

Page, Norman A.↗

The Lunar Laser OCTL Terminal (LLOT)

The NASA owned Optical Communication Telescope Laboratory (OCTL) telescope located at Table Mountain, CA is being readied as a backup ground station for the upcoming Lunar Laser Communications Demonstration (LLCD). The backup ground terminal is called the Lunar Laser OCTL Terminal (LLOT). The 1-m diameter telescope will be configured as a mono-static transceiver for transmitting a laser beacon and receiving downlink at a data-rate of 39 Mb/s. Interfaces to an operations center with near-real time exchange of monitored data at OCTL will also be developed. A system level overview of this backup ground station for LLCD will be presented.

photon-counting receiver↗

The Lunar Laser OCTL Terminal (LLOT) Optical Systems

The Lunar Laser OCTL Terminal is an auxiliary ground station terminal for the Lunar Laser Communication Demonstration (LLCD). The LLOT optical systems exercise modulation and beam divergence control over six 10-watt fiber-based laser transmitters at 1568 nanometers, which act as beacons for pointing of the space-based terminal. The LLOT design transmits these beams from distinct sub-apertures of the F/76 OCTL telescope at divergences ranging from 110 microrad to 40 microrad. LLOT also uses the same telescope aperture to receive the downlink signal at 1550 nanometers from the spacecraft terminal. Characteristics and control of the beacon lasers, methods of establishing and maintaining beam alignment, beam zoom system design, co-registration of the transmitted beams and the receive field of view, transmit/receive isolation, and downlink signal manipulation and control are discussed.

laser communications↗

Mountain-Top-to-Mountain-Top Optical Link Demonstration

A mountain-top-to-mountain-top optical link was demonstrated between JPL's Table Mountain Facility (TMF), Wrightwood, California, and Strawberry Peak (SP), Lake Arrowhead, California, during the months of June, August, and September of 2000. The bidirectional laser link was nearly horizontal at an altitude of 2 km and spanned a range of 46.8 km. The 780-nm beacon laser transmitted from TMF comprised eight co-propagating mutually incoherent laser beams. The normalized variance or scintillation index (SI) of the individual beacon lasers measured by recording the signal received through 8.50-cm-diameter spotting telescopes on three different nights (June 28-30, 2000) was 1.05 +/- 0.2, 1.76 +/- 0.6, and 0.96 +/- 0.24, respectively. These measurements agreed with values predicted by a heuristic model. The SI of the signal received at SP was found to decrease progressively with an increasing number of beams, and a factor of 3 to 3.5 reduction was achieved for all eight beams. The beam divergence determined by mapping out the point spread function of a few of the individual laser footprints received at SP was 85 to 150 microrad, compared to a design goal of 120 microrad. The 852-nm communications laser beam received at TMF through a 60-cm-diameter telescope on the nights of August 4 and September 14 and 15, 2000, yielded SI values of 0.23 +/- 0.04, 0.32 +/- 0.01, and 0.49 +/- 0.18, respectively, where the reduction was attributed to aperture averaging. The probability distribution functions of the received signal at either end, mitigated by multi-beam averaging in one direction and by aperture averaging in the other direction, displayed lognormal behavior. Consequently, the measured fade statistics showed good agreement with a lognormal model.

Biswas, A.↗