Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “multilevel optimization”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1989

Fuzzy set applications in engineering optimization: Multilevel fuzzy optimization

A formulation for multilevel optimization with fuzzy objective functions is presented. With few exceptions, formulations for fuzzy optimization have dealt with a one-level problem in which the objective is the membership function of a fuzzy set formed by the fuzzy intersection of other sets. In the problem examined here, the goal set G is defined in a more general way, using an aggregation operator H that allows arbitrary combinations of set operations (union, intersection, addition) on the individual sets Gi. This is a straightforward extension of the standard form, but one that makes possible the modeling of interesting evaluation strategies. A second, more important departure from the standard form will be the construction of a multilevel problem analogous to the design decomposition problem in optimization. This arrangement facilitates the simulation of a system design process in which different components of the system are designed by different teams, and different levels of design detail become relevant at different time stages in the process: global design features early, local features later in the process.

Diaz, Alejandro R.↗
NASA NTRS1985

Structural optimization by generalized, multilevel optimization

In the present development history for both a general multilevel optimization capability and a three-level structural optimization, which is taken to be qualitatively equivalent to a multilevel implementation, a structure is partitioned into a number of substructuring levels where each substructure corresponds to a subsystem. The method is illustrated by a portal framework that decomposes into individual beams, each of which is a box that can be further decomposed into stiffened plates. Substructuring therefore spans three different levels. Since further extensions would only add to the intermediate substructuring levels, the three-level case is qualitatively complete.

Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J.↗
NASA NTRS1994

An algorithm for solving the system-level problem in multilevel optimization

A multilevel optimization approach which is applicable to nonhierarchic coupled systems is presented. The approach includes a general treatment of design (or behavior) constraints and coupling constraints at the discipline level through the use of norms. Three different types of norms are examined: the max norm, the Kreisselmeier-Steinhauser (KS) norm, and the 1(sub p) norm. The max norm is recommended. The approach is demonstrated on a class of hub frame structures which simulate multidisciplinary systems. The max norm is shown to produce system-level constraint functions which are non-smooth. A cutting-plane algorithm is presented which adequately deals with the resulting corners in the constraint functions. The algorithm is tested on hub frames with increasing number of members (which simulate disciplines), and the results are summarized.

Balling, R. J.↗
NASA NTRS1990

Direct handling of equality constraints in multilevel optimization

In recent years there have been several hierarchic multilevel optimization algorithms proposed and implemented in design studies. Equality constraints are often imposed between levels in these multilevel optimizations to maintain system and subsystem variable continuity. Equality constraints of this nature will be referred to as coupling equality constraints. In many implementation studies these coupling equality constraints have been handled indirectly. This indirect handling has been accomplished using the coupling equality constraints' explicit functional relations to eliminate design variables (generally at the subsystem level), with the resulting optimization taking place in a reduced design space. In one multilevel optimization study where the coupling equality constraints were handled directly, the researchers encountered numerical difficulties which prevented their multilevel optimization from reaching the same minimum found in conventional single level solutions. The researchers did not explain the exact nature of the numerical difficulties other than to associate them with the direct handling of the coupling equality constraints. The coupling equality constraints are handled directly, by employing the Generalized Reduced Gradient (GRG) method as the optimizer within a multilevel linear decomposition scheme based on the Sobieski hierarchic algorithm. Two engineering design examples are solved using this approach. The results show that the direct handling of coupling equality constraints in a multilevel optimization does not introduce any problems when the GRG method is employed as the internal optimizer. The optimums achieved are comparable to those achieved in single level solutions and in multilevel studies where the equality constraints have been handled indirectly.

Renaud, John E.↗
NASA NTRS1989

Recent developments in multilevel optimization

Recent developments in multilevel optimization are briefly reviewed. The general nature of the multilevel design task, the use of approximations to develop and solve the analysis design task, the structure of the formal multidiscipline optimization problem, a simple cantilevered beam which demonstrates the concepts of multilevel design and the basic mathematical details of the optimization task and the system level are among the topics discussed.

Vanderplaats, Garret N.↗
NASA NTRS1986

An improved multilevel optimization approach for the design of complex engineering systems

Multilevel optimization methods are being considered for the design of complex systems on distributed networks of computers or even parallel processors. An obstacle to the use of multilevel methods is that they can be computationally expensive because of the cycling necessary to account for the coupling between the subproblems. This research effort aims at increasing the efficiency of multilevel optimization by adapting two techniques that are widely used in conventional one-level optimization: constraint approximation and temporary constraint deletion. These improvements are implemented and tested on three-, ten- and 52-bar planar truss designs. The results show that for larger problems (approximately 100 design variables and larger), the cost of analysis dominates the total cost so that multilevel optimization is no more expensive than one-level optimization. If parallel processing is used or the analysis process itself is decomposed, then multilevel optimization stands to become more economical than one-level optimization.

Barthelemy, J.-F. M.↗
NASA NTRS1990

Computer Simulation For Multilevel Optimization Of Design

New simulator for multilevel optimization of complex hierarchical systems reduces cost of analysis in experimentation with multilevel design-optimization algorithms. Computer program mimics qualitative behavior and data couplings that occur among subsystems of complex engineering system, such as car, aircraft, or building. Eliminates engineering analyses in subsystems by replacing them with judiciously-chosen analytical functions. Serves as tool for development of strategy for multilevel optimization of design.

Padula, Sharon L.↗
NASA NTRS1989

Integrated structure/control law design by multilevel optimization

A new approach to integrated structure/control law design based on multilevel optimization is presented. This new approach is applicable to aircraft and spacecraft and allows for the independent design of the structure and control law. Integration of the designs is achieved through use of an upper level coordination problem formulation within the multilevel optimization framework. The method requires the use of structure and control law design sensitivity information. A general multilevel structure/control law design problem formulation is given, and the use of Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) control law design and design sensitivity methods within the formulation is illustrated. Results of three simple integrated structure/control law design examples are presented. These results show the capability of structure and control law design tradeoffs to improve controlled system performance within the multilevel approach.

Gilbert, Michael G.↗
NASA NTRS1989

Integrated structure/control law design by multilevel optimization

A new approach to integrated structure/control law design based on multilevel optimization is presented. This new approach is applicable to aircraft and spacecraft and allows for the independent design of the structure and control law. Integration of the designs is achieved through use of an upper level coordination problem formulation within the multilevel optimization framework. The method requires the use of structure and control law design sensitivity information. A general multilevel structure/control law design problem formulation is given, and the use of Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) control law design and design sensitivity methods within the formulation is illustrated. Results of three simple integrated structure/control law design examples are presented. These results show the capability of structure and control law design tradeoffs to improve controlled system performance within the multilevel approach.

Gilbert, Michael G.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Simulator for multilevel optimization research

A computer program designed to simulate and improve multilevel optimization techniques is described. By using simple analytic functions to represent complex engineering analyses, the simulator can generate and test a large variety of multilevel decomposition strategies in a relatively short time. This type of research is an essential step toward routine optimization of large aerospace systems. The paper discusses the types of optimization problems handled by the simulator and gives input and output listings and plots for a sample problem. It also describes multilevel implementation techniques which have value beyond the present computer program. Thus, this document serves as a user's manual for the simulator and as a guide for building future multilevel optimization applications.

Padula, S. L.↗
NASA NTRS1988

Engineering applications of heuristic multilevel optimization methods

Some engineering applications of heuristic multilevel optimization methods are presented and the discussion focuses on the dependency matrix that indicates the relationship between problem functions and variables. Coordination of the subproblem optimizations is shown to be typically achieved through the use of exact or approximate sensitivity analysis. Areas for further development are identified.

Barthelemy, Jean-Francois M.↗
NASA NTRS1989

Engineering applications of heuristic multilevel optimization methods

Some engineering applications of heuristic multilevel optimization methods are presented and the discussion focuses on the dependency matrix that indicates the relationship between problem functions and variables. Coordination of the subproblem optimizations is shown to be typically achieved through the use of exact or approximate sensitivity analysis. Areas for further development are identified.

Barthelemy, Jean-Francois M.↗
NASA NTRS1989

Engineering applications of heuristic multilevel optimization methods

Some engineering applications of heuristic multilevel optimization methods are presented and the discussion focuses on the dependency matrix that indicates the relationship between problem functions and variables. Coordination of the subproblem optimizations is shown to be typically achieved through the use of exact or approximate sensitivity analysis. Areas for further development are identified.

Barthelemy, Jean-Francois M.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Two alternative ways for solving the coordination problem in multilevel optimization

Two techniques for formulating the coupling between levels in multilevel optimization by linear decomposition, proposed as improvements over the original formulation, now several years old, that relied on explicit equality constraints which were shown by application experience as occasionally causing numerical difficulties. The two new techniques represent the coupling without using explicit equality constraints, thus avoiding the above diffuculties and also reducing computational cost of the procedure. The old and new formulations are presented in detail and illustrated by an example of a structural optimization. A generic version of the improved algorithm is also developed for applications to multidisciplinary systems not limited to structures.

Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, Jaroslaw↗
NASA NTRS1988

An efficient multilevel optimization method for engineering design

An efficient multilevel deisgn optimization technique is presented. The proposed method is based on the concept of providing linearized information between the system level and subsystem level optimization tasks. The advantages of the method are that it does not require optimum sensitivities, nonlinear equality constraints are not needed, and the method is relatively easy to use. The disadvantage is that the coupling between subsystems is not dealt with in a precise mathematical manner.

Vanderplaats, G. N.↗
NASA NTRS1976

A multilevel optimization of large-scale dynamic systems

A multilevel feedback control scheme is proposed for optimization of large-scale systems composed of a number of (not necessarily weakly coupled) subsystems. Local controllers are used to optimize each subsystem, ignoring the interconnections. Then, a global controller may be applied to minimize the effect of interconnections and improve the performance of the overall system. At the cost of suboptimal performance, this optimization strategy ensures invariance of suboptimality and stability of the systems under structural perturbations whereby subsystems are disconnected and again connected during operation.

Siljak, D. D.↗
NASA NTRS1992

Multilevel optimization using a continuum model for structures

The new concept of using a continuum model in the multilevel decomposition of structural optimization problems is presented. The practicality of this concept is demonstrated by application in a scheme for the optimization of beam-like space structures. This scheme is tested against traditional optimization procedures for savings in computational cost. Results from both optimization methods are presented for comparison.

Yates, K.↗
NASA NTRS1983

Development of a Multilevel Optimization Approach to the Design of Modern Engineering Systems

A general algorithm is proposed which carries out the design process iteratively, starting at the top of the hierarchy and proceeding downward. Each subproblem is optimized separately for fixed controls from higher level subproblems. An optimum sensitivity analysis is then performed which determines the sensitivity of the subproblem design to changes in higher level subproblem controls. The resulting sensitivity derivatives are used to construct constraints which force the controlling subproblems into chosing their own designs so as to improve the lower levels subproblem designs while satisfying their own constraints. The applicability of the proposed algorithm is demonstrated by devising a four-level hierarchy to perform the simultaneous aerodynamic and structural design of a high-performance sailplane wing for maximum cross-country speed. Finally, the concepts discussed are applied to the two-level minimum weight structural design of the sailplane wing. The numerical experiments show that discontinuities in the sensitivity derivatives may delay convergence, but that the algorithm is robust enough to overcome these discontinuities and produce low-weight feasible designs, regardless of whether the optimization is started from the feasible space or the infeasible one.

Barthelemy, J. F. M.↗