Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “multimaterial 3D printing”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

9 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2025

Hybrid epoxy–acrylate resins for wavelength-selective multimaterial 3D printing

Structures in nature have evolved to combine hard and soft materials in precise 3D arrangements, which imbues bulk properties and functionality that remain elusive to mimic synthetically. However, the potential for biomimetic analogs to seamlessly interface hard materials with soft surfaces for applications ranging from robotics and sealants to medical devices (e.g., prosthetics and wearable health monitors) has driven the demand for innovative chemistries and manufacturing approaches. Herein, we unveil a liquid resin for rapid, high resolution digital light processing (DLP) 3D printing of multimaterial objects with an unprecedented combination of strength, elasticity, and resistance to aging. Two enabling discoveries are the use of a covalently bound (hybrid) epoxy-acrylate monomer that precludes plasticization of soft domains and a wavelength-selective photosensitizer that accelerates cationic curing for hard domains. Using dual projection for multicolor DLP 3D printing (UV and violet light), several bioinspired metamaterial structures are fabricated, including one with hard springs embedded in a soft cylinder to adjust compressive behavior and a detailed knee joint featuring “bones” and “ligaments” for smooth motion. Lastly, the application of this system to facilitate selective stretching for electronic devices is demonstrated with a proof-of-concept device.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Toward Multiscale, Multimaterial 3D Printing

Biological materials and organisms possess the fundamental ability to self-organize, through which different components are assembled from the molecular level up to hierarchical structures with superior mechanical properties and multifunctionalities. These complex composites inspire material scientists to design new engineered materials by integrating multiple ingredients and structures over a wide range. Additive manufacturing, also known as 3D printing, has advantages with respect to fabricating multiscale and multi-material structures. The need for multifunctional materials is driving 3D printing techniques toward arbitrary 3D architectures with the next level of complexity. In this paper, the aim is to highlight key features of those 3D printing techniques that can produce either multiscale or multimaterial structures, including innovations in printing methods, materials processing approaches, and hardware improvements. Several issues and challenges related to current methods are discussed. Ultimately, the authors also provide their perspective on how to realize the combination of multiscale and multimaterial capabilities in 3D printing processes and future directions based on emerging research.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Multimaterial 3D Printing in Activating Bath Enables In Situ Polymerization of Thermosets with Intricate Geometries and Diverse Elastic Behaviors

Polydicyclopentadiene, p(DCPD), is a high‐performance thermoset valued for its exceptional toughness, strength, and stiffness. When copolymerized with 1,5‐cyclooctadiene (COD), its mechanical properties can be tuned from glassy to rubbery at room temperature. While frontal polymerization enables a rapid and energy‐efficient route to 3D print DCPD‐based materials, challenges such as ink shelf life and gravitational distortion, especially in direct ink writing of soft COD‐rich formulations, must be considered. Here, a complementary chemical strategy is presented, embedded 3D printing, that enables localized in situ polymerization of printed DCPD/COD inks within a reactive support matrix. The matrix provides both physical support and a reservoir of chemical activator, which diffuses into the ink, activates a latent bis(N‐heterocyclic carbene) Ru precatalyst, and initiates ring‐opening metathesis polymerization. Curing begins at the ink–matrix interface and propagates inward via diffusion, stabilizing the interface and preventing capillary‐driven deformation regardless of the matrix yield stress. This approach eliminates the need for cold storage, external curing, or photoinitiation, significantly expanding the processing window. Using this method, diverse thermosetting and elastomeric architectures are fabricated with features as small as 5 µm and aspect ratios of 100, including interlinked chains, shallow spherical shells exhibiting snap‐through buckling, and hair‐like fin arrays inaccessible through traditional techniques.

chemical activation↗
NASA NTRS2017

NASA's In-Space Manufacturing Project: Materials and Manufacturing Process Development Update

The mission of NASA's In-Space Manufacturing (ISM) project is to identify, design, and implement on-demand, sustainable manufacturing solutions for fabrication, maintenance and repair during exploration missions. ISM has undertaken a phased strategy of incrementally increasing manufacturing capabilities to achieve this goal. The ISM project began with the development of the first 3D printer for the International Space Station. To date, the printer has completed two phases of flight operations. Results from phase I specimens indicated some differences in material properties between ground-processed and ISS-processed specimens, but results of follow-on analyses of these parts and a ground-based study with an equivalent printer strongly indicate that this variability is likely attributable to differences in manufacturing process settings between the ground and flight prints rather than microgravity effects on the fused deposition modeling (FDM) process. Analysis of phase II specimens from the 3D Printing in Zero G tech demo, which shed further light on the sources of material variability, will be presented. The ISM project has also developed a materials characterization plan for the Additive Manufacturing Facility, the follow-on commercial multimaterial 3D printing facility developed for ISS by Made in Space. This work will yield a suite of characteristic property values that can inform use of AMF by space system designers. Other project activities include development of an integrated 3D printer and recycler, known as the Refabricator, by Tethers Unlimited, which will be operational on ISS in 2018. The project also recently issued a broad area announcement for a multimaterial fabrication laboratory, which may include in-space manufacturing capabilities for metals, electronics, and polymeric materials, to be deployed on ISS in the 2022 timeframe.

Prater, Tracie↗
DOE OSTI2026

Lithographic crystallinity regulation in additive fabrication of thermoplastics (CRAFT)

For semicrystalline polyolefin thermoplastics, the balance between interconnected ordered crystalline and disordered amorphous regions is paramount to their performance and processability. However, contemporary manufacturing strategies, from injection molding to three-dimensional (3D) printing, result in monolithic objects, unable to spatially encode crystallinity. We develop a light-based approach for fabricating mechanically robust polyolefin thermoplastics with microscopic control over crystallinity in 3D space. Light dosage governs polymer stereochemistry giving access to a continuum of materials, from strong rigid plastics, such as high-density polyethylene, to more extensible materials akin to low-density polyethylene, all at the flick of a switch. Leveraging this finding in lithographic grayscale 3D printing enables rapid multimaterial fabrication with voxel-level control over optical and mechanical properties, opening avenues in information storage, soft robotics, and energy damping.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Self-Sensing Composites via an Embedded 3D-Printed PVDF-MoS 2 Nanosensor for Structural Health Monitoring

Carbon fiber (CF)-reinforced epoxy composites are widely used in vehicle applications, where early damage detection is crucial for reliability and safety. To address this need, we developed a self-sensing epoxy/CF composite by embedding a PVDF-MoS 2 nanosensor via an embedded 3D printing method. By harnessing the intrinsic curing kinetics of epoxy, we tailored its rheological properties to optimize the embedded printing process, enabling precise and reliable support for sensor filaments without compromising the composite’s structural and functional integrity. Through comprehensive rheological and kinetic analysis, we established a quantitative relationship among curing temperature, conversion rate, and resulting yield modulus─defining a narrow processing window essential for successful sensor integration. Specifically, we identified that an epoxy yield modulus range of 180–294 Pa and a conversion rate below 10% are critical to support the PVDF-MoS 2 filament architecture. Here, this embedded 3D printing method produces complex and multimaterial PVDF-MoS 2 sensors within an epoxy matrix with minimal deformation and reduced postprocessing, which is scalable and adaptable for industrial applications. Under cyclic loading, the embedded sensors exhibited stable signals under constant loads and increased voltage signals in response to crack formation (17–35% higher) and catastrophic failure (1 order of magnitude higher), effectively capturing structural changes in real time. This study demonstrates the potential of PVDF-MoS 2 nanocomposite sensor materials for real-time structural health monitoring in epoxy–CF composite systems, enabling early detection of defects and stress anomalies, significantly reducing the risk of unexpected failures, and enhancing structural reliability.

PVDF-MoS2 sensor↗
DOE OSTI2026

Towards gradient multimaterial toolpath generation for direct ink writing with connected fermat spirals

This work describes advances towards a reproducible, parametrically defined algorithm for generating graded multimaterial toolpaths for direct ink writing. Expanding on the existing Fermat space-filling algorithm and coupling with image-driven processing techniques, we demonstrate the fabrication of multimaterial structures. Here, material composition is encoded within toolpaths by parsing hue values from a multi-colored image. By performing dynamic velocity compensation based on local curvature and Euclidean distance filtering, internal voids are mitigated while optimizing print fidelity. Here, the work opens new avenues for designing complex toolpaths with locally programmable composition.

3D Printing↗
DOE OSTI2024

Hierarchical Composites Patterned via 3D Printed Cellular Fluidics

Additive manufacturing of freeform structures containing multiple materials with deterministic spatial arrangement and interactions remains a challenge for most 3D printing processes, due to complex fabrication tool requirements and limitations in printability of some material classes. Here, in this paper, a versatile method is reported to produce architected composites using the concept of cellular fluidics, in which lattices of unit cells are used as templating scaffolds to guide flowable infill materials in a programmed spatial pattern, upon which they are cured in place to produce a deterministically ordered multimaterial solid. The lattice design relies on the unit cell size, type, strut diameter, surface wetting, and distribution of cellular structures to control liquid flow and retention. Individual unit cells are tuned to achieve reliable infilling and combined into higher-order architectures to achieve multiscale composite materials with disparate mechanical properties, including those considered non-printable. Lattice design considerations for leveraging capillary phenomena and demonstrate several methods of patterning polymers in 3D-printed cellular fluidic structures are presented. The concept of tuning the compressive response of an architected composite using a flexible-elastomer as the lattice and a stiff-epoxy as the infill material is illustrated.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
NASA NTRS2019

Optimization of Aluminum-Tin Ink Composition and Sintering in Atmospheric Conditions

This study will focus on the basics of generating an aluminum-tin ink that can sinter in air and exhibits properties near that of a solid aluminum-tin alloy. Sintering temperatures will also be assessed in this study. Once the optimal aluminum ink composition is determined, the optimal ink thickness for homogeneous sintering must be determined by additional experimentation. Additive manufacturing is a rapidly developing and growing manufacturing process and has proven successful in many different ways. Processes, such as extrusion three-dimensional (3D) printing and selective laser melting (SLM), have proven to work but have limitations, such as material capabilities or density issues. SLM is a revolutionary process for additive manufacturing of metals but cannot be used in outer space due to the need for metallic powder which would diffuse into the atmosphere in a zero-gravity environment. For this reason, metallic ink additive manufacturing is a potential solution. Work is being done on metallic ink additive manufacturing in a vacuum for electrical applications. This project has focused on developing an aluminum-tin metallic ink that can sinter without the need of a vacuum or inert gas-purged atmosphere in order to prevent oxidation of the aluminum by adding flux. Once a potential ink composition has been determined through sintering of small disks and thin layers of ink, the ink may be studied with a multimaterial 3D printer at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) in future experiments. If successful, this aluminum-tin ink will be capable for use on the International Space Station to make replacement parts quickly. Along with its zero-gravity advantages, this ink may also have applications on Earth because it may be extruded on a substrate with precise ceramic tips in a 3D printing process. This would allow the fabrication of precise, complex shapes and may generate a much faster and more efficient printing process as compared with traditional powder bed additive manufacturing processes. The process would not be limited by a small building volume because the system would not require an enclosed chamber.

Courtright, Z. S.↗