Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “non-PLL”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

7 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2020

Design of a Non-PLL Grid-Forming Inverter for Smooth Microgrid Transition Operation

This paper develops a controller for a grid-forming (GFM) inverter that is capable of operating as either a GFM or grid-feeding source that can improve the operation of a microgrid during on-off grid transitions through use of a novel synchronization approach. Furthermore, this controller avoids use of a phase-locked loop (PLL) and the inverter is able to synchronize with the grid with self-generated voltage and frequency. This prevents the inverter from replicating any grid voltage disturbances in its output—a key disadvantage of many grid-connected inverters that use a PLL. To enable fast synchronization, active synchronization control is adopted both during inverter start-up and microgrid reconnection operation and a method of coordinating synchronization of the inverter with a microgrid controller and grid interconnection circuit breaker is presented. Simulation results for multiple microgrid transition operations and unplanned islanding events demonstrate that the developed non-PLL grid-connected GFM inverter controller and synchronization method are effective in synchronizing the inverter and microgrid to the grid, avoiding phase jump during microgrid transition operation, and improving microgrid islanding transients versus a traditional configuration.

27 ARPA - Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy↗
DOE OSTI2020

Design of a Non-PLL Grid-Forming Inverter for Smooth Microgrid Transition Operation: Preprint

This paper develops a non-phase-locked loop (PLL) grid-connected inverter that can improve the microgrid’s transients during transition operation. By emulating the operation of a synchronous machine, the inverter generates its own voltage and frequency during startup, synchronizes and connects to the grid, then operates in reactive power mode (grid-feeding) with self-generated voltage and frequency, and switches to voltage-frequency mode to establish system voltage and frequency (grid-forming) when the microgrid disconnects from the main grid, and vice versa. To enable fast synchronization, active synchronization control is adopted both during inverter startup and microgrid reconnection operation. The simulation results show that the developed non-PLL grid-connected inverter works effectively to synchronize the inverter and microgrid to the grid and avoids a phase jump during microgrid transition operation. Thus, the microgrid’s transients are significantly improved with the proposed control technique.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗
DOE OSTI2021

Time Disciplined Non-PLL Active Synchronization for Grid Forming Inverters

Two major issues facing grid-forming inverters are synchronism and phase reference inaccuracies. Prior literature has addressed these problems with solutions such as disciplining the phase reference using GPS and active synchronization modes but these methods have not yet been integrated together. This paper serves to unite solutions and develop a means for an inverter to remain synchronized and grid-forming without phase reference inaccuracies through a novel time-disciplined active synchronization phase reference. Further, this work expands upon prior literature on active synchronization to include black-start capabilities. Finally, the time disciplined phase reference is evaluated in Simulink as a grid-forming inverter capable of any synchronization circumstance and assessed by key metrics from modern standards.

blackstart↗
DOE OSTI2021

Time-Disciplined Non-PLL Active Synchronization for Grid-Forming Inverters: Preprint

Grid Forming Inverters (GFMIs) are a critical component of the future Grid. One major challenge with GFMIs is synchronization. Currently, most research in GFMI synchronization is focused around specific transition types but this is only a subcategory of the possible events facing GFMIs. In this paper, we propose categorizing all possible synchronization events into four categories: (1) Initial Grid Synchronization, (2) Ride-Through, (3) Blackstart Coordination, (4) Grid Reconnection Coordination. By categorizing events, we can better compare and integrate different control strategies under specific test conditions as demonstrated in simulation. This paper’s framework helps guide GFMI primary-level control design to further research towards the 100% inverter-dominant Grid.

blackstart↗
DOE OSTI2021

Time Disciplined Non-PLL Active Synchronization for Grid Forming Inverters

Grid forming inverters (GFMIs) are a critical component of the future grid. One major challenge with GFMIs is synchronization. Currently, most research in GFMI synchronization is focused around specific transition types but this is only a subcategory of the possible events facing GFMIs. In this paper, we propose categorizing all possible synchronization events into four categories: (1) initial grid synchronization, (2) ride-through, (3) blackstart coordination, (4) grid reconnection coordination. By categorizing events, we can better compare and integrate different control strategies under specific test conditions as demonstrated in simulation. This paper's framework helps guide GFMI primary-level control design to further research towards the 100% inverter-dominant grid.

blackstart↗
DOE OSTI2022

Design Power Control Strategies of Grid-Forming Inverters for Microgrid Application

This paper develops and compares two control schemes in the application control layer of a non-phase-locked loop (non-PLL) grid-forming (GFM) inverter to gain insight and understanding into how the two schemes affect the dynamic responses of GFM inverters and the transition operation of microgrids. The first scheme adopts power tracking based on an outer current loop in grid-connected mode and droop control in islanded mode, and the second uses droop control in both grid-connected and islanded modes. Analytical study is developed to compare the performance of these two strategies from various aspects, including fundamental differences, transition operation, power tracking, and P-Q capability with low point-of-common-coupling (PCC) voltages. Extensive simulation testing is carried out to validate the control performance of these two control strategies, and the simulation testing confirms the findings of the analytic study. Finally, the second strategy is recommended because of its superior control performance and ease of implementation. The analysis and results are useful in developing reliable control schemes for non-PLL GFM inverters because increasing numbers of inverters will work as non-PLL grid-forming sources in future grids because of their improved stability and reliability.

grid-forming↗
DOE OSTI2021

Design Power Control Strategies of Grid-Forming Inverters for Microgrid Application: Preprint

This paper compares two control schemes in the application control layer of a non-PLL grid-forming (GFM) inverter to gain the insights and understanding of how the two schemes affect the dynamic responses of the GFM inverters and the transition operation of microgrids. Both schemes can achieve smooth microgrid transition operation and power tracking, however, the first scheme expects to exhibit more transients due to the feedforward of the inverse dynamic model of the output filter. Simulation results show that both control schemes achieve successful transition operation with smooth transients, and the second control scheme exhibits slightly better transients in the system frequency during islanding operation and the first one has slightly superior transients in the system frequency during reconnection operation. The power tracking performance in the grid-connected mode is evaluated, which shows that the first scheme has better active power tracking and the second one has better reactive power tracking. The analysis and results are useful to develop reliable control schemes for non-PLL GFM inverters because more and more inverters will work as non-PLL grid-forming sources in the future grids due to better stability and reliability.

grid-forming inverter↗