Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “non-carbonate electrolyte”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

3 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

Enabling Non-Carbonate Electrolytes for Silicon Anode Batteries Using Fluoroethylene Carbonate

Silicon is considered as one of the most promising anodes for next generation lithium-ion batteries, due to its high theoretical capacity and energy density. However, many technical barriers remain to its implementation, due to its high chemical/electrochemical reactivities with standard electrolytes and incomplete passivation. In this work, we take the most effective passivating additive of fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) and study its impact on non-carbonate electrolytes. Our results indicate that esters and ureas-based electrolytes are similarly stabilized by FEC, and have very similar capacity retentions and Coulombic efficiencies to the state-of-the-art carbonate electrolyte. This study indicates the discovery of more efficient additives other than FEC is vital in developing an electrolyte that can successfully enable a silicon-anode battery.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Co-intercalation-free ether electrolytes for graphitic anodes in lithium-ion batteries

Carbonate-based electrolytes are widely used in Li-ion batteries but are limited by a small operating temperature window and poor cycling with silicon-containing graphitic anodes. The lack of non-carbonate electrolyte alternatives such as ether-based electrolytes is due to undesired solvent co-intercalation that occurs with graphitic anodes. Here, we show that fluoroethers are the first class of ether solvents to intrinsically support reversible lithium-ion intercalation into graphite without solvent co-intercalation at conventional salt concentrations. In full cells using a graphite anode, they enable 10-fold higher energy densities compared to conventional ethers, and better thermal stability over carbonate electrolytes (operation up to 60 °C) by producing a robust solvent-derived solid electrolyte interphase (SEI). As single-solvent–single-salt electrolytes, they remarkably outperform carbonate electrolytes with fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) and vinylene carbonate (VC) additives when cycled with graphite–silicon composite anodes. In conclusion, our molecular design strategy opens a new class of electrolytes that can enable next generation Li-ion batteries with higher energy density and a wider working temperature window.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Multimodal quantification of degradation pathways during extreme fast charging of lithium-ion batteries

Enabling fast charging of Li-ion batteries will be a key step towards realizing the technology's full potential in electric vehicles. Currently, fast charging is limited by a variety of processes that reduce cell capacity upon extended cycling. Using a multimodal approach combining incremental capacity analysis (dQ/dV), high energy X-ray diffraction (HEXRD), and mass spectrometry titration (MST), we identify specific degradation mechanisms—including Li plating, dead Li x C 6 formation, Li 2 C 2 formation, solid carbonate solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) deposition, and loss of positive electrode active material (LAM PE )—that occur during extended fast charge cycling. We find that Li plating is the major source of capacity loss in cells cycled at 6C, while non-carbonate SEI species deposition on the graphite anode is the main source of capacity loss when cycled at 4C. We also study local degradative phenomena by examining specific ~1–5 cm 2 regions of the cells using HEXRD and MST. Here, we find that plated Li is often collocated with dead Li x C 6 , Li 2 C 2 , and solid carbonate SEI species, and these additional species cumulatively account for ~20% of the capacity lost during 6C cycling. Finally, in a cell with an anomalously high amount of LAM PE (quantified via dQ/dV), we find that regions of cathode degradation were accompanied by non-carbonate SEI products on the adjacent region of the anode. We postulate that this phenomenon arises due to crosstalk between the electrodes, wherein soluble electrolyte oxidation products formed at the delithiated cathode migrate to the graphite anode and are ultimately deposited on the graphite surface. This work demonstrates the utility of combining multiple characterization techniques to reveal a more holistic understanding of degradative phenomena that occur across multiple length scales during fast charge.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗