Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “nonsmooth optimization”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2026

RegularizedOptimization.jl: A Julia framework for regularized and nonsmooth optimization

RegularizedOptimization.jl is a Julia package that implements families of quadratic regularization and trust-region methods for solving the nonsmooth optimization problem $^{\textrm{minimize}}_{𝑥∈ℝ^𝑛}$ 𝑓(𝑥) + ℎ(𝑥) subject to 𝑐(𝑥) = 0, (1) where 𝑓 ∶ ℝ 𝑛 → ℝ and 𝑐 ∶ ℝ 𝑛 → ℝ 𝑚 are continuously differentiable, and ℎ ∶ ℝ 𝑛 → ℝ∪{+∞} is lower semi-continuous. The nonsmooth objective ℎ can be a regularizer, such as a sparsity inducing penalty, model simple constraints, such as 𝑥 belonging to a simple convex set, or can be a combination of both. All 𝑓, ℎ, and 𝑐 can be nonconvex. RegularizedOptimization.jl provides a modular and extensible framework for solving (1), and developing novel solvers. Currently, the following solvers are implemented: • Trust-region solvers TR and TRDH (Aravkin et al., 2022; Leconte & Orban, 2025) • Quadratic regularization solvers R2, R2DH and R2N (Aravkin et al., 2022; Diouane, Habiboullah, et al., 2024) • Levenberg-Marquardt solvers LM and LMTR (Aravkin et al., 2024) used when 𝑓 is a least-squares residual. • Augmented Lagrangian solver AL (De Marchi et al., 2023). All solvers rely on first derivatives of 𝑓 and 𝑐, and optionally on their second derivatives in the form of Hessian-vector products. If second derivatives are not available, quasi-Newton approximations can be used. In addition, the proximal mapping of the nonsmooth part ℎ, or adequate models thereof, must be evaluated. At each iteration, a step is computed by solving a subproblem of the form (1) inexactly, in which 𝑓, ℎ, and 𝑐 are replaced with appropriate models around the current iterate. The solvers R2, R2DH, and TRDH are particularly well suited to solve the subproblems, though they are general enough to solve (1). All solvers are allocation-free, so re-solves incur no additional allocations. To illustrate our claim of extensibility, a first version of the AL solver was implemented by an external contributor. Furthermore, a nonsmooth penalty approach, described in Diouane, Gollier, et al. (2024), is currently being developed, that relies on the library to efficiently solve the subproblems.

Gollier, Maxence [Polytechnique Montréal, QC (Cana↗
NASA NTRS1993

Nonsmooth trajectory optimization - An approach using continuous simulated annealing

An account is given of the properties of a continuous simulated annealing algorithm that can function as a global optimization tool for nonsmooth dynamic systems, as shown in the case of a trajectory-optimization program implementation. The approach is shown to successfully solve the problem of nonsmooth trajectory optimization for a high performance rigid-body aircraft. The results obtained demonstrate the superiority of the simulated annealing algorithm over widely used algorithms.

Lu, Ping↗
DOE OSTI2025

A Smoothed Augmented Lagrangian Framework for Convex Optimization with Nonsmooth Constraints

Augmented Lagrangian (AL) methods have proven remarkably useful in solving optimization problems with complicated constraints. The last decade has seen the development of overall complexity guarantees for inexact AL variants. Yet, a crucial gap persists in addressing nonsmooth convex constraints. To this end, we present a smoothed augmented Lagrangian (AL) framework where nonsmooth terms are progressively smoothed with a smoothing parameter $\eta _k$ . The resulting AL subproblems are $\eta _k$ -smooth, allowing for leveraging accelerated schemes. By a careful selection of the inexactness level $\epsilon _k$ (for inexact subproblem resolution), the penalty parameter $\rho _k$ , and smoothing parameter $\eta _k$ at epoch k, we derive rate and complexity guarantees of $\tilde{\mathcal {O}}(1/{\varepsilon }^{3/2})$ and $\tilde{\mathcal {O}}(1/{\varepsilon })$ in convex and strongly convex regimes for computing an ${\varepsilon }$ -optimal solution, when $\rho _k$ increases at a geometric rate, a significant improvement over the best available guarantees for AL schemes for convex programs with nonsmooth constraints. Analogous guarantees are developed for settings with $\rho _k = \rho$ as well as $\eta _k = \eta$ . Preliminary numerics on a fused Lasso problem display promise.

augmented Lagrangian↗
DOE OSTI2026

Memory-efficient nonsmooth dynamic optimization using adaptive randomized compression

Dynamic optimization problems arise in many applications including flow control, full waveform inversion, and medical imaging. These problems are plagued by significant computational challenges. One such challenge — and the focus of this work — is the memory limitation induced by the size of the underlying dynamical system. In particular, the entire dynamic trajectory is required for derivative computation and therefore must be stored or recomputed using, e.g., checkpointing. Although recent work demonstrated the use of adaptive randomized sketching to overcome the memory challenge, that work only applies to smooth unconstrained problems, prohibiting its use for nonsmooth regularized and constrained problems. The inclusion of nonsmooth regularizers and constraints is critical as they often arise in an attempt to preserve certain physical properties or to promote sparsity. To solve these problems, we introduce a trust-region algorithm for minimizing the sum of a smooth nonconvex function and a nonsmooth convex function that leverages randomized sketching to compress the dynamical system trajectories and adaptively adjust the sketch rank to satisfy a gradient inexactness condition. We prove convergence of this algorithm and demonstrate that it achieves substantial memory reduction on three discretized PDE-constrained optimization applications.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
NASA NTRS1988

Optimization-based design of control systems for flexible structures

The purpose of this presentation is to show that it is possible to use nonsmooth optimization algorithms to design both closed-loop finite dimensional compensators and open-loop optimal controls for flexible structures modeled by partial differential equations. An important feature of our approach is that it does not require modal decomposition and hence is immune to instabilities caused by spillover effects. Furthermore, it can be used to design control systems for structures that are modeled by mixed systems of coupled ordinary and partial differential equations.

Polak, E.↗
DOE OSTI2025

Randomized Federated Learning Methods for Nonsmooth, Nonconvex, and Hierarchical Optimization (Final Technical Report)

This final technical report summarizes the outcomes of a DOE-funded project on federated scientific machine learning (FL) under nonsmooth, nonconvex, and hierarchical optimization settings. The project develops new mathematical models, algorithms, and theoretical guarantees for decentralized stochastic, bilevel, and minimax optimization problems arising in DOE mission-relevant applications. A unified framework of randomized and zeroth-order federated optimization methods is introduced, providing provable convergence, communication efficiency, and sample-complexity guarantees. The report documents algorithmic design, theoretical analysis, and empirical validation of the proposed federated learning methods. The project also contributes to workforce development through graduate training and dissemination of results via publications and seminars.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2025

Efficient proximal subproblem solvers for a nonsmooth trust-region method

In [R. J. Baraldi and D. P. Kouri, Mathematical Programming, (2022), pp. 1-40], we introduced an inexact trust-region algorithm for minimizing the sum of a smooth nonconvex and nonsmooth convex function. The principle expense of this method is in computing a trial iterate that satisfies the so-called fraction of Cauchy decrease condition—a bound that ensures the trial iterate produces sufficient decrease of the subproblem model. In this paper, we expound on various proximal trust-region subproblem solvers that generalize traditional trust-region methods for smooth unconstrained and convex-constrained problems. We introduce a simplified spectral proximal gradient solver, a truncated nonlinear conjugate gradient solver, and a dogleg method. Finally, we compare algorithm performance on examples from data science and PDE-constrained optimization.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2025

Genetic algorithm-based geometry calibration for dynamic compression x-ray diffraction experiments

An important component of dynamic compression x-ray diffraction (XRD) experiment analysis is geometry calibration: proper data interpretation requires knowledge of the precise detector position and orientation and, if the experiment involves a single-crystal sample, knowledge of the lattice orientation. The determination of these parameters in the arbitrary three-dimensional (3D) scattering geometries often present in dynamic compression facilities is challenging, as the associated optimization problem can be highly nonlinear, nonsmooth, and discontinuous. We present a genetic algorithm-based approach for performing dynamic compression XRD calibrations that overcomes these obstacles. We provide details regarding the image processing, algorithm implementation, and open-source software deployment and demonstrate the capability of the approach to calibrate the detector and crystal parameters in 3D geometries. Notably, we demonstrate the solver’s capacity to find the crystal orientation without a priori rotation constraints.

Brown, Nathan P. [Sandia National Laboratories (SN↗
NASA NTRS1991

Supercomputer optimizations for stochastic optimal control applications

Supercomputer optimizations for a computational method of solving stochastic, multibody, dynamic programming problems are presented. The computational method is valid for a general class of optimal control problems that are nonlinear, multibody dynamical systems, perturbed by general Markov noise in continuous time, i.e., nonsmooth Gaussian as well as jump Poisson random white noise. Optimization techniques for vector multiprocessors or vectorizing supercomputers include advanced data structures, loop restructuring, loop collapsing, blocking, and compiler directives. These advanced computing techniques and superconducting hardware help alleviate Bellman's curse of dimensionality in dynamic programming computations, by permitting the solution of large multibody problems. Possible applications include lumped flight dynamics models for uncertain environments, such as large scale and background random aerospace fluctuations.

Chung, Siu-Leung↗
DOE OSTI2024

Variance-Reduced Accelerated First-Order Methods: Central Limit Theorems and Confidence Statements

In this paper, we consider a strongly convex stochastic optimization problem and propose three classes of variable sample-size stochastic first-order methods: (i) the standard stochastic gradient descent method, (ii) its accelerated variant, and (iii) the stochastic heavy-ball method. In each scheme, the exact gradients are approximated by averaging across an increasing batch size of sampled gradients. We prove that when the sample size increases at a geometric rate, the generated estimates converge in mean to the optimal solution at an analogous geometric rate for schemes (i)–(iii). Based on this result, we provide central limit statements, whereby it is shown that the rescaled estimation errors converge in distribution to a normal distribution with the associated covariance matrix dependent on the Hessian matrix, the covariance of the gradient noise, and the step length. If the sample size increases at a polynomial rate, we show that the estimation errors decay at a corresponding polynomial rate and establish the associated central limit theorems (CLTs). Under certain conditions, we discuss how both the algorithms and the associated limit theorems may be extended to constrained and nonsmooth regimes. As a result, we provide an avenue to construct confidence regions for the optimal solution based on the established CLTs and test the theoretical findings on a stochastic parameter estimation problem.

Lei, Jinlong↗
NASA NTRS1992

Active adhesion concepts for in-orbit structural construction

The in-orbit assembly of structural elements is presently addressed by means of a continuum-based theory of active-adhesion contact/impact which assumes the manufacturability of active adhesion elements by piezoelectric (and similarly behaving) materials. Block bonding characteristics can furnish an effective alternative to optimal control-based, impact surge force-mitigation strategies, especially in the numerous nonsmooth control problems that are difficult to synthesize and implement. Attention is given to design concepts employing combined serial/parallel-bonded active adhesion elements composed of cascaded piezoelectric devices.

Park, K. C.↗
NASA NTRS1994

Airfoil optimization by the one-shot method

An efficient numerical approach for the design of optimal aerodynamic shapes is presented in this paper. The objective of any optimization problem is to find the optimum of a cost function subject to a certain state equation (Governing equation of the flow field) and certain side constraints. As in classical optimal control methods, the present approach introduces a costate variable (Language multiplier) to evaluate the gradient of the cost function. High efficiency in reaching the optimum solution is achieved by using a multigrid technique and updating the shape in a hierarchical manner such that smooth (low-frequency) changes are done separately from high-frequency changes. Thus, the design variables are changed on a grid where their changes produce nonsmooth (high-frequency) perturbations that can be damped efficiently by the multigrid. The cost of solving the optimization problem is approximately two to three times the cost of the equivalent analysis problem.

Kuruvila, G.↗
NASA NTRS1995

Airfoil Design and Optimization by the One-Shot Method

An efficient numerical approach for the design of optimal aerodynamic shapes is presented in this paper. The objective of any optimization problem is to find the optimum of a cost function subject to a certain state equation (governing equation of the flow field) and certain side constraints. As in classical optimal control methods, the present approach introduces a costate variable (Lagrange multiplier) to evaluate the gradient of the cost function. High efficiency in reaching the optimum solution is achieved by using a multigrid technique and updating the shape in a hierarchical manner such that smooth (low-frequency) changes are done separately from high-frequency changes. Thus, the design variables are changed on a grid where their changes produce nonsmooth (high-frequency) perturbations that can be damped efficiently by the multigrid. The cost of solving the optimization problem is approximately two to three times the cost of the equivalent analysis problem.

Kuruvila, G.↗
NASA NTRS1992

Aerodynamic design and optimization in one shot

This paper describes an efficient numerical approach for the design and optimization of aerodynamic bodies. As in classical optimal control methods, the present approach introduces a cost function and a costate variable (Lagrange multiplier) in order to achieve a minimum. High efficiency is achieved by using a multigrid technique to solve for all the unknowns simultaneously, but restricting work on a design variable only to grids on which their changes produce nonsmooth perturbations. Thus, the effort required to evaluate design variables that have nonlocal effects on the solution is confined to the coarse grids. However, if a variable has a nonsmooth local effect on the solution in some neighborhood, it is relaxed in that neighborhood on finer grids. The cost of solving the optimal control problem is shown to be approximately two to three times the cost of the equivalent analysis problem. Examples are presented to illustrate the application of the method to aerodynamic design and constraint optimization.

Ta'asan, Shlomo↗