SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Two-dimensional panel flutter and panel divergence in subsonic flow - wind tunnel testing of two and three-dimensional panels
Experimental panel flutter data have been obtained at Mach numbers from 1.2 to 3.0 for buckled rectangular panels and the effect of a pressure differential has been determined. Increasing the pressure differential was effective in eliminating flutter on most of the panels tested. The effects of the variables in the panel flutter parameter ((square root of m(exp 2) -1) * (E/q))(exp 1/3) t/l (where M is the Mach number, q is the dynamic pressure, E is Young's modulus, and t and l are the panel thickness and length, respectively) were investigated for buckled panels clamped on the front and rear edges and a critical value of this parameter of 0.44 is indicated at zero pressure differential when the panel width-length ratio is 0.69. An estimated flutter boundary is presented for buckled panels clamped on four edges, with width-length ratios of 0.21 to 4.0. This boundary shows that the panel width is more significant than the panel length when the ratio of width to length is less than approximately 0.5. Panels clamped on four edges and buckled in two half waves in the direction of flow were found to be particularly susceptible to flutter. The results of limited tests on panels with applied damping, curvature, and lengthwise stiffeners are also presented and discussed.
Flutter tests have been made on flat panels having a 1/4 inch-thick plastic-foam core covered with thin fiber-glass laminates. The testing was done in the Langley Unitary Plan wind tunnel at Mach numbers from 1.76 t o 2.87. The flutter boundary for these panels was found to be near the flutter boundary of thin metal panels when compared on the basis of an equivalent panel stiffness. The results also demonstrated that the depth of the cavity behind the panel has a pronounced influence on flutter. Changing the cavity depth from 1 1/2 inches to 1/2 inch reduced the dynamic pressure at start of flutter by 40 percent. No flutter was obtained when the spacers on the back of the panel were against the bottom of the cavity.
Approximately two-thirds of residential buildings in the United States were constructed before the Department of Energy established energy conservation measures. These buildings present major opportunities for improving energy efficiency, though retrofitting them remains technically and economically challenging. This study presents the development and the durability evaluation of an innovative retrofit panel system that integrates vacuum insulation panels (VIP) with a nail-base panel (called a retrofit insulated panel) to enhance thermal performance with minimal disruption to occupants and without altering standard nail-based panel installation practices. Hygrothermal simulations were conducted to assess the moisture behavior of wall assemblies before and after retrofit installation under varying water vapor control strategies and climate conditions. Results indicate that, with appropriate moisture control strategy, the retrofit system effectively prevents moisture accumulation, keeping mold index values and relative humidity levels below critical thresholds. Additionally, Guarded Hot Box testing was performed to compute the effective R-value of the panel under different coverage areas that demonstrates its effectiveness in enhancing both thermal and moisture performance in existing residential buildings.
Optical monitor panel projects a chosen panel configuration upon a translucent screen by using a master projector and appropriate slide to project panel board nomenclature and a series of smaller individual projectors to superimpose monitor indicators upon the projected panel board.
Agent-based models (ABMs) in transportation modeling simulate activity and travel decisions at the disaggregate level of households and individuals. To do this, ABMs require detailed and realistic information on agents’ socioeconomic and demographic characteristics. Various synthetic population generators have been proposed to address this need. However, most of those currently in practice are cross-sectional in nature and do not account for the dynamics within households and individuals as they progress through life events over time. This is a major shortcoming, as literature has shown that transportation decisions are affected by the transition between and co-occurrence of life cycle events. While some demographic evolution simulators have been proposed to address this issue, they are developed using cross-sectional data and capture only a small set of life cycle events and their interdependence. Addressing these drawbacks, we propose a demographic microsimulator (DEMOS) that captures the “continuum of life” by considering a range of household- and individual-level life cycle events. DEMOS is developed using the Panel Survey of Income Dynamics, one of the world’s longest-running longitudinal surveys. The DEMOS submodels consider key life cycle events that are influenced by agents’ demographic variables. DEMOS is applied to evolve the population of the San Francisco Bay Area over a 9-year horizon. Results demonstrate how DEMOS generates life trajectories and how DEMOS outputs match the observed demographic trends. DEMOS is expected to enable longitudinal analysis in the context of ABMs and expand ABMs analyses relating to dynamic processes such as household-level vehicle transactions.
Panel flutter results for flat and curved titanium skin panels at supersonic speed
Flutter at Mach 3 of thermally stressed flat isotropic panels
Panel attachment mechanism for replaceable heat shield system of manned lifting entry vehicle
Supersonic wind tunnel tests on flutter resistance of Centaur flight insulation panels
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.