Sustainability Index for Comparison of Environmental Remediation Technologies - 17492
Site remediation is a multi-decade process that incorporations planning from a variety of parties including stakeholders, regulators, scientists and engineers, and community members. When Best Management Practices are integrated during remediation action at sites, there are significant improvements to a variety of metrics including economic, environmental, and societal factors. Green and sustainable remediation tools are Best Management Practices that are a valuable means to reduce or remove environmental footprints after remedial action at sites. Applying the analysis to future feasibility studies, EM takes the next steps towards being a leader in global sustainability. The sustainability index is a quantitative test in response to a recent study published by scientists at the Hanford Site detailing an exit strategy for pump and treat remediation technologies in an effort to move away from active remediation in favor of passive techniques. The sustainability index attempts to quantify the relative sustainability of active and passive remediation strategies by examining a variety of metrics and perspectives from those involved in the decision-making process. Analysis compared 10 metrics encompassing environmental, social, and economic aspects of sustainability for the two types of remediation techniques. Perspectives and values of the stakeholders, regulators, scientists and engineers, and community members involved the decision-making process were also incorporated in this tool. Data were evaluated from active and passive remediation technologies at two locations (Richland, Washington and Mound, Ohio). Data suggest passive remediation technologies performed better in terms of sustainability performance than active technologies. Switching from active remediation to passive remediation techniques has the following impacts: aids in the conservation of local ecosystems, reduces community impacts and improves the community perception of the cleanup, lowers the lifecycle cost of the project, and contributes positively to global sustainability by using less energy and raw materials. (authors)