SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
A general method has been developed which permits the transfer of a spacecraft from a highly elliptic and generally oriented Earth orbit to a specified escape direction and energy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The cost of executing planetary missions in the next ten years is expected to decrease significantly.
The cost of executing planetary missions in the next ten years is expected to decrease significantly. The principle reason is that new technology is reducing spacecraft mass while increasing capability. Another reason is that launch costs are expected to decrease. A move in this direction is to permit important planetary missions to fly as secondary payloads, and this opportunity is now provided by the French on the Ariane 5 using the Ariane Structure for Auxiliary Payloads (ASAP). The ASAP will fly on GEO missions, and can boost up to eight 100 kg (or 200 kg, if paired) payloads into the elliptical geosynchronous transfer orbit (GTO), which delivers large communication satellites to GEO. An efficient multi-burn method has been developed by this author to deliver these small spacecraft from GTO to Mars and other destinations. This method, referred to here as Moon-Earth Gravity Assist (MEGA), requires 3 or more major maneuvers together with close flybys of the earth and moon. An example for a Mars 2003 mission (not to scale) is shown in Figure 1, where, once in GTO, the first burn sends the spacecraft beyond the Moon to a distance of 1.2 million kilometers. At apogee, the second burn targets to an encounter with the Moon such that a swingby returns the spacecraft to the Earth with a 300 km perigee, and with an inclination such that a perigee burn will send the spacecraft off to Mars with the required escape velocity vector. Details of this method, specifically for Mars missions, can be found in Reference 3. A similar strategy works for Venus, with some caveats. This method is required to work for any Ariane 5 launch date over a three month period, to ensure a high probability of getting off the ground. The launch period is provided by fixing the Earth escape date (3rd burn), but allowing the high ellipse (beyond the Moon) period to vary by one or two months, and also allowing a one to two month wait time in GTO (or other orbit) before the first burn is performed. Figure 2 shows the trajectory profiles for the early and late GTO launch dates for a Mars 2003 mission. Venus. which is an inner planet, poses special problems for the MEGA process. The escape direction is reverse that of Earth's motion, and the GTO apogee arrival
For spacecraft departing the Earth - Moon system, lunar flybys can significantly increase the hype rbolic escape energy (C3, in km 2 /sec 2 ) for a modest increase in flight time. Within ~2 months, lunar flybys can produce a C3 of ~2. Over 4 - 6 months, lunar flybys alone can increase the C3 to ~4.5, or they can provide for additional periapsis burns to increase the C3 from ~2 -3 to 10 or more, suitable for planetary missions. A lunar flyby departure can be followed by additional ∆ -V (such as that efficiently provided by a low thrust system, eg. Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP)) to raise the Earth - relative velocity (at a ratio of more than 2:1) before a subsequent Earth flyby, which redirects that velocity to a more di stant target, all within not much more than a year. This paper describes the applicability of lunar flybys for different flight times and propulsi on systems, and illustrates this with instances of past usage and future possibilities. Examples discussed i nclude ISEE - 3, Nozomi, STEREO, 2018 Mars studies (which showed an 8% payload increase), and missions to Near Earth Objects (NEOs). In addition, the options for the achieving the initial lunar flyby are systematically discussed, with a view towards their p ractical use with in a compact launch period. In particular, we show that launches to geosynchronous transfer orbit (GTO) as a secondary payload provide a feasible means of obtaining a lunar flyby for an acceptable cost, even for SEP systems that cannot ea sily deliver large ∆ - Vs at periapsis. Taken together, these results comprise a myriad of options for increasing the mission performance, by the efficient use of lunar flybys within an acceptable extension of the flight time.
For spacecraft departing the Earth - Moon system, lunar flybys can significantly increase the hyperbolic escape energy (C3, in km (exp 2) /sec (exp 2) ) for a modest increase in flight time. Within approx 2 months, lunar flybys can produce a C3 of approx 2. Over 4 - 6 months, lunar flybys alone can increase the C3 to approx 4.5, or they can provide for additional periapsis burns to increase the C3 from approx 2 -3 to 10 or more, suitable for planetary missions. A lunar flyby departure can be followed by additional delta -V (such as that efficiently provided by a low thrust system, eg. Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP)) to raise the Earth - relative velocity (at a ratio of more than 2:1) before a subsequent Earth flyby, which redirects that velocity to a more distant target, all within not more than a year. This paper describes the applicability of lunar flybys for different flight times and propulsion systems, and illustrates this with instances of past usage and future possibilities. Examples discussed include ISEE-3, Nozomi, STEREO, 2018 Mars studies (which showed an 8% payload increase), and missions to Near Earth Objects (NEOs). In addition, the options for the achieving the initial lunar flyby are systematically discussed, with a view towards their practical use within a compact launch period. In particular, we show that launches to geosynchronous transfer orbit (GTO) as a secondary payload provide a feasible means of obtaining a lunar flyby for an acceptable cost, even for SEP systems that cannot easily deliver large delta-Vs at periapsis. Taken together, these results comprise a myriad of options for increasing the mission performance, by the efficient use of lunar flybys within an acceptable extension of the flight time.