Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “power flight”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2004

Solar Powered Flight on Venus

Solar powered flight within the Venus environment from the surface to the upper atmosphere was evaluated. The objective was to see if a station-keeping mission was possible within this environment based on a solar power generating system. Due to the slow rotation rate of Venus it would be possible to remain within the day light side of the planet for extended periods of time. However the high wind speeds and thick cloud cover make a station-keeping solar powered mission challenging. The environment of Venus was modeled as a function of altitude from the surface. This modeling included density, temperature, solar attenuation and wind speed. Using this environmental model flight with both airships and aircraft was considered to evaluate whether a station-keeping mission is feasible. The solar power system and flight characteristics of both types of vehicles was modeled and power balance was set up to determine if the power available from the solar array was sufficient to provide enough thrust to maintain station over a fixed ground location.

Colozza, Anthony↗
NASA NTRS1973

Unified powered flight guidance

A complete revision of the orbiter powered flight guidance scheme is presented. A unified approach to powered flight guidance was taken to accommodate all phases of exo-atmospheric orbiter powered flight, from ascent through deorbit. The guidance scheme was changed from the previous modified version of the Lambert Aim Point Maneuver Mode used in Apollo to one that employs linear tangent guidance concepts. This document replaces the previous ascent phase equation document.

Timothy J Brand↗
NASA NTRS2013

Powered Flight Design and Reconstructed Performance Summary for the Mars Science Laboratory Mission

The Powered Flight segment of Mars Science Laboratory's (MSL) Entry, Descent, and Landing (EDL) system extends from backshell separation through landing. This segment is responsible for removing the final 0.1% of the kinetic energy dissipated during EDL and culminating with the successful touchdown of the rover on the surface of Mars. Many challenges exist in the Powered Flight segment: extraction of Powered Descent Vehicle from the backshell, performing a 300m divert maneuver to avoid the backshell and parachute, slowing the descent from 85 m/s to 0.75 m/s and successfully lowering the rover on a 7.5m bridle beneath the rocket-powered Descent Stage and gently placing it on the surface using the Sky Crane Maneuver. Finally, the nearly-spent Descent Stage must execute a Flyaway maneuver to ensure surface impact a safe distance from the Rover. This paper provides an overview of the powered flight design, key features, and event timeline. It also summarizes Curiosity's as flown performance on the night of August 5th as reconstructed by the flight team.

Mars Science Laboratory (MSL)↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Some Basic GN&C Modeling-and-Design Gap Areas for Low-Gee Slosh: Comparisons to Powered Flight Slosh

Potential gaps between powered-flight slosh and near-zero-gee slosh modeling intuition ... - Extremely-basic items like inertia (which is a strong function of frequency and liquid depth) - Visualization of response – ability to form a physical picture via mechanical analog - Availability of frequency-domain design insight from open-loop plant - Sense for edge-of model-validity – how does it behave “at the edges” And some suggestions on how NASA can help

Guidance Navigation and Control Modeling and Desig↗
NASA NTRS2018

Orion's Powered Flight Guidance Burn Options for Near Term Exploration Missions

NASA's Orion exploration spacecraft will fly more demanding mission profiles than previous NASA human flight spacecraft. Missions currently under development are destined for cislunar space. The EM-1 mission will fly unmanned to a Distant Retrograde Orbit (DRO) around the Moon. EM-2 will fly astronauts on a mission to the lunar vicinity. To fly these missions, Orion requires powered flight guidance that is more sophisticated than the orbital guidance flown on Apollo and the Space Shuttle. Orion's powered flight guidance software contains five burn guidance options. These five options are integrated into an architecture based on a proven shuttle heritage design, with a simple closed-loop guidance strategy. The architecture provides modularity, simplicity, versatility, and adaptability to future, yet-to-be-defined, exploration mission profiles. This paper provides a summary of the executive guidance architecture and details the five burn options to support both the nominal and abort profiles for the EM-1 and EM-2 missions.

Fill, Thomas↗
NASA NTRS2018

Orion Powered Flight Guidance Burn Options for Near Term Exploration

NASA's Orion exploration spacecraft will fly more demanding mission profiles than previous NASA human flight spacecraft. Missions currently under development are destined for cislunar space. The EM-1 mission will fly unmanned to a Distant Retrograde Orbit (DRO) around the Moon. EM-2 will fly astronauts on a mission to the lunar vicinity. To fly these missions, Orion requires powered flight guidance that is more sophisticated than the orbital guidance flown on Apollo and the Space Shuttle. Orion's powered flight guidance software contains five burn guidance options. These five options are integrated into an architecture based on a proven shuttle heritage design, with a simple closed-loop guidance strategy. The architecture provides modularity, simplicity, versatility, and adaptability to future, yet-to-be-defined, exploration mission profiles. This paper provides a summary of the executive guidance architecture and details the five burn options to support both the nominal and abort profiles for the EM-1 and EM-2 missions.

Fill, Tom↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Dragonfly Preparation for Powered Flight: Lander Separation State Control to Ensure Successful Landing

NASA’s Dragonfly mission, led by The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, is a relocatable octocopter lander to study Saturn’s largest moon Titan. The scientific goals of the mission include studying Titan’s prebiotic chemistry, geology, and atmosphere. Upon Titan arrival, the lander will enter the atmosphere, descend on a parachute to a ground-relative altitude of about 1000 m before being released, and then fly on internal power down to the surface. To guarantee desirable initial conditions for the lander release, the lander must meet certain angular rate conditions. These conditions include reducing the spin rate about the vertical axis to 4.9 deg/sec, using the rotors as actuators; and releasing with a negative pitch rate (rotating nose down) to ensure a successful transition to powered flight. This is achieved using a release trigger. Achieving these desired rates for lander release is part of the mission phase known as ‘preparation for powered flight’ (PPF). This paper proposes controls and logic to achieve the desired conditions for releasing the lander from the parachute.

Flight Mechanics↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Dragonfly Preparation for Powered Flight: Lander Separation State Control to Ensure Successful Landing

NASA’s Dragonfly mission, led by The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, is a relocatable octocopter lander to study Saturn’s largest moon Titan. The scientific goals of the mission include studying Titan’s prebiotic chemistry, geology, and atmosphere. Upon Titan arrival, the lander will enter the atmosphere, descend on a parachute to a ground-relative altitude of about 1000 m before being released, and then fly on internal power down to the surface. To guarantee desirable initial conditions for the lander release, the lander must meet certain angular rate conditions. These conditions include reducing the spin rate about the vertical axis to 4.9 deg/sec, using the rotors as actuators; and releasing with a negative pitch rate (rotating nose down) to ensure a successful transition to powered flight. This is achieved using a release trigger. Achieving these desired rates for lander release is part of the mission phase known as ‘preparation for powered flight’ (PPF). This paper proposes controls and logic to achieve the desired conditions for releasing the lander from the parachute.

Flight Mechanics↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Orion's Powered Flight Guidance Performance During Artemis I

Artemis is NASA’s campaign to explore the Moon and beyond. Artemis I, the un-crewed exo-LEO test flight, was completed in 2022. The Artemis I mission provided the means to prove-out both vehicle and systems as a pre-cursor to more advanced missions. The Orion capsule and service module had to be capable of accurately executing all major orbital burns and numerous correction burns to successfully execute the mission profile. In support of this needed translation maneuver capability, a powered flight guidance algorithm has been designed that provides a number of guided burn options depending on the burn objective. Some of these guidance options are based on classic orbit transfer problems, such as Lambert's time-of-flight problem. Some are based on proven NASA heritage manned space programs like Apollo and Shuttle. Some are new concepts that fill unique niche requirements. All of these options are integrated into an architecture based on a proven Shuttle heritage design, with a simple closed-loop guidance strategy, that provides both modularity, simplicity and adaptability to future, as yet to be defined, mission profiles. This paper will summarize the performance of Orion’s orbital powered flight guidance during the mission.

space guidance↗
NASA NTRS1960

Aerodynamic and Landing Measurements Obtained During the First Powered Flight of the North American X-15 Research Airplane

During the first powered flight of the North American X-15 research airplane on September 17, 1959, a Mach number of 2.1 and an altitude of 52,000 feet were attained. Static and dynamic maneuvers were performed to evaluate the characteristics of the airplane at subsonic and supersonic speeds. Data from these maneuvers as well as from the launch and landing phases are presented, discussed, and compared with predicted values. The rate of separation of the X-15 from the B-52 carrier airplane at launch was less than that predicted by wind-tunnel studies and was less rapid than in the lightweight condition of the initial glide flight. In addition, the angular motions and bank angle attained following the launch were of lesser magnitude than in the glide flight. Stable longitudinal-stability trends were apparent during the acceleration to maximum speed, and the pilot reported experiencing little or no transonic trim excursions. An inexplicable high-frequency vibration, which occurred at Mach numbers above 1.4, is being investigated further. Essentially linear lift and stability characteristics were indicated within the limited ranges of angle of attack and angle of sideslip investigated. The dynamic longitudinal and lateral-directional stability and control-effectiveness characteristics appeared satisfactory to the pilot. Although the longitudinal- and lateral-directional-damping ratios showed no significant change from subsonic to supersonic speeds, on the basis of time to damp, the damping characteristics at supersonic speeds appeared to the pilot to be somewhat improved over those at subsonic speeds.

Source record↗