DOE OSTI2021
A series of supported ReO x catalysts were investigated that allowed identifying the unique surface anchoring sites on oxide supports responsible for activating the surface ReO 4 sites for propylene metathesis (the catalytic active site). The catalysts were synthesized by incipient-wetness impregnation of aqueous HReO 4 onto the oxide supports (Al 2 O 3 , ZrO 2 , TiO 2 , SiO 2 and CeO 2 ), characterized under dehydrated and propylene metathesis reaction conditions with in situ spectroscopy (Raman, DRIFTS, UV-Vis and NAP-XPS), and chemically probed (CH 3 CH=CH 2 -TPSR, CH 2 =CH 2 /CH 3 CH=CHCH 3 titration and steady-state self-metathesis of propylene to ethylene and 2-butene). The initially calcined supported rhenia species anchor as isolated surface Re 7+ O 4 sites on the oxide supports by reacting with the surface hydroxyls (terminal S-OH, bridged S-OH-S and tricoordinated S 3 -OH) of the oxide supports. The specific oxide support was found to control the number of activated sites (Al 2 O 3 >> ZrO 2 > CeO 2 > TiO 2 > SiO 2 ) and propylene metathesis activity (Al 2 O 3 >> ZrO 2 >> TiO 2 ~ CeO 2 ~ SiO 2 ) revealing that the oxide support action is a potent ligand for the surface ReO x sites. The activation and specific activity of the surface ReO x sites depend on several factors (nature of surface hydroxyls (S 3 -OH > S-OH-S > S-OH), coordination of the oxide support surface cation (ZrO 7 , AlO 6 , CeO 4 ) and electronegativity of the oxide support cation (SiO 2 > Al 2 O 3 > TiO 2 > ZrO 2 > CeO 2 ). No relationships exist between olefin metathesis activity and acid strength of surface Lewis and Brønsted sites. Here, prior studies primarily focused on supported ReO x /Al 2 O 3 and the lack of examination of non-Al 2 O 3 supported rhenia catalysts precluded comparison between efficient and inefficient olefin metathesis catalysts, which prevented identifying the catalytic active site for olefin metathesis by supported ReO x catalysts.
37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗