Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “proximal Newton method”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

7 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2025

Efficient proximal subproblem solvers for a nonsmooth trust-region method

In [R. J. Baraldi and D. P. Kouri, Mathematical Programming, (2022), pp. 1-40], we introduced an inexact trust-region algorithm for minimizing the sum of a smooth nonconvex and nonsmooth convex function. The principle expense of this method is in computing a trial iterate that satisfies the so-called fraction of Cauchy decrease condition—a bound that ensures the trial iterate produces sufficient decrease of the subproblem model. In this paper, we expound on various proximal trust-region subproblem solvers that generalize traditional trust-region methods for smooth unconstrained and convex-constrained problems. We introduce a simplified spectral proximal gradient solver, a truncated nonlinear conjugate gradient solver, and a dogleg method. Finally, we compare algorithm performance on examples from data science and PDE-constrained optimization.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2018

A O(1/k{sup 3/2}) hybrid proximal extragradient primal–dual interior point method for nonlinear monotone mixed complementarity problems

We present a Newton-type hybrid proximal extragradient primal–dual interior point method for solving smooth monotone mixed complementarity problems. Dual variables for the nonnegativity constraints are introduced. The ergodic complexity of the method is O(1/k{sup 3/2}). The method performs two types of iterations: underelaxed hybrid proximal extragradient iterations and short-steps primal–dual interior point iterations.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2022

A proximal trust-region method for nonsmooth optimization with inexact function and gradient evaluations

Many applications require minimizing the sum of smooth and nonsmooth functions. For example, basis pursuit denoising problems in data science require minimizing a measure of data misfit plus an $\ell^1$-regularizer. Similar problems arise in the optimal control of partial differential equations (PDEs) when sparsity of the control is desired. Here, we develop a novel trust-region method to minimize the sum of a smooth nonconvex function and a nonsmooth convex function. Our method is unique in that it permits and systematically controls the use of inexact objective function and derivative evaluations. When using a quadratic Taylor model for the trust-region subproblem, our algorithm is an inexact, matrix-free proximal Newton-type method that permits indefinite Hessians. We prove global convergence of our method in Hilbert space and demonstrate its efficacy on three examples from data science and PDE-constrained optimization.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
NASA NTRS1983

Improved method for transonic airfoil design-by-optimization

An improved method for use of optimization techniques in transonic airfoil design is demonstrated. FLO6QNM incorporates a modified quasi-Newton optimization package, and is shown to be more reliable and efficient than the method developed previously at NASA-Ames, which used the COPES/CONMIN optimization program. The design codes are compared on a series of test cases with known solutions, and the effects of problem scaling, proximity of initial point to solution, and objective function precision are studied. In contrast to the older method, well-converged solutions are shown to be attainable in the context of engineering design using computational fluid dynamics tools, a new result. The improvements are due to better performance by the optimization routine and to the use of problem-adaptive finite difference step sizes for gradient evaluation.

Kennelly, R. A., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS1983

Improved method for transonic airfoil design-by-optimization

An improved method for use of optimization techniques in transonic airfoil design is demonstrated. FLO6QNM incorporates a modified quasi-Newton optimization package, and is shown to be more reliable and efficient than the method developed previously at NASA-Ames, which used the COPES/CONMIN optimization problem. The design codes are compared on a series of test cases with known solutions, and the effects of problem scaling, proximity of initial point to solution, and objective function precision are studied. In contrast to the older method, well-converged solutions are shown to be attainable in the context of engineering design using computational fluid dynamics tools, a new result. The improvements are due to better performance by the optimization routine and to the use of problem-adaptive finite difference step sizes for gradient evaluation.

Kennelly, R. A., Jr.↗
DOE OSTI2026

RegularizedOptimization.jl: A Julia framework for regularized and nonsmooth optimization

RegularizedOptimization.jl is a Julia package that implements families of quadratic regularization and trust-region methods for solving the nonsmooth optimization problem $^{\textrm{minimize}}_{𝑥∈ℝ^𝑛}$ 𝑓(𝑥) + ℎ(𝑥) subject to 𝑐(𝑥) = 0, (1) where 𝑓 ∶ ℝ 𝑛 → ℝ and 𝑐 ∶ ℝ 𝑛 → ℝ 𝑚 are continuously differentiable, and ℎ ∶ ℝ 𝑛 → ℝ∪{+∞} is lower semi-continuous. The nonsmooth objective ℎ can be a regularizer, such as a sparsity inducing penalty, model simple constraints, such as 𝑥 belonging to a simple convex set, or can be a combination of both. All 𝑓, ℎ, and 𝑐 can be nonconvex. RegularizedOptimization.jl provides a modular and extensible framework for solving (1), and developing novel solvers. Currently, the following solvers are implemented: • Trust-region solvers TR and TRDH (Aravkin et al., 2022; Leconte & Orban, 2025) • Quadratic regularization solvers R2, R2DH and R2N (Aravkin et al., 2022; Diouane, Habiboullah, et al., 2024) • Levenberg-Marquardt solvers LM and LMTR (Aravkin et al., 2024) used when 𝑓 is a least-squares residual. • Augmented Lagrangian solver AL (De Marchi et al., 2023). All solvers rely on first derivatives of 𝑓 and 𝑐, and optionally on their second derivatives in the form of Hessian-vector products. If second derivatives are not available, quasi-Newton approximations can be used. In addition, the proximal mapping of the nonsmooth part ℎ, or adequate models thereof, must be evaluated. At each iteration, a step is computed by solving a subproblem of the form (1) inexactly, in which 𝑓, ℎ, and 𝑐 are replaced with appropriate models around the current iterate. The solvers R2, R2DH, and TRDH are particularly well suited to solve the subproblems, though they are general enough to solve (1). All solvers are allocation-free, so re-solves incur no additional allocations. To illustrate our claim of extensibility, a first version of the AL solver was implemented by an external contributor. Furthermore, a nonsmooth penalty approach, described in Diouane, Gollier, et al. (2024), is currently being developed, that relies on the library to efficiently solve the subproblems.

Gollier, Maxence [Polytechnique Montréal, QC (Cana↗