Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “quantum phase estimation”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

Reductive quantum phase estimation

Estimating a quantum phase is a necessary task in a wide range of fields of quantum science. To accomplish this task, two well-known methods have been developed in distinct contexts, namely, Ramsey interferometry (RI) in atomic and molecular physics and quantum phase estimation (QPE) in quantum computing. We demonstrate that these canonical examples are instances of a larger class of phase estimation protocols, which we call reductive quantum phase estimation (RQPE) circuits. Here, we present an explicit algorithm that allows one to create an RQPE circuit. This circuit distinguishes an arbitrary set of phases with a smaller number of qubits and unitary applications, thereby solving a general class of quantum hypothesis testing to which RI and QPE belong. We further demonstrate a tradeoff between measurement precision and phase distinguishability, which allows one to tune the circuit to be optimal for a specific application. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Papadopoulos, Nicholas J. C. (ORCID:00000002635700↗

Quantum Multiple Eigenvalue Gaussian filtered Search: an efficient and versatile quantum phase estimation method

Quantum phase estimation is one of the most powerful quantum primitives. This work proposes a new approach for the problem of multiple eigenvalue estimation: Quantum Multiple Eigenvalue Gaussian filtered Search (QMEGS). QMEGS leverages the Hadamard test circuit structure and only requires simple classical postprocessing. QMEGS is the first algorithm to simultaneously satisfy the following two properties: (1) It can achieve the Heisenberg-limited scaling without relying on any spectral gap assumption. (2) With a positive energy gap and additional assumptions on the initial state, QMEGS can estimate all dominant eigenvalues to ϵ accuracy utilizing a significantly reduced circuit depth compared to the standard quantum phase estimation algorithm. In the most favorable scenario, the maximal runtime can be reduced to as low as log(1/ϵ). This implies that QMEGS serves as an efficient and versatile approach, achieving the best-known results for both gapped and gapless systems. Numerical results validate the efficiency of our proposed algorithm in various regimes.

71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSIC↗

LuGo: An enhanced quantum phase estimation implementation

Quantum Phase Estimation (QPE) is a cardinal algorithm in quantum computing that plays a crucial role in various applications, including cryptography, molecular simulation, and solving systems of linear equations. However, the standard implementation of QPE faces challenges related to time complexity and circuit depth, which limit its practicality for large-scale computations. We introduce LuGo, a novel framework designed to enhance the performance of QPE by reducing circuit duplication, as well as using parallelization techniques to achieve faster generation of the QPE circuit and gate reduction. We validate the effectiveness of our framework by generating quantum linear solver circuits, which require both QPE and inverse QPE, to solve linear systems of equations. LuGo achieves significant improvements in both computational efficiency and hardware requirements without compromising on accuracy. Compared to a standard QPE implementation, LuGo reduces time consumption to generate a circuit that solves a 2 6 × 2 6 system matrix by a factor of 50.68 and over 31× reduction of quantum gates and circuit depth, with no fidelity loss on an ideal quantum simulator. Furthermore, we demonstrated the versatility and scalability of LuGo enabled HHL algorithm by simulating a canonical Hele-Shaw fluid problem using a quantum simulator. With these advantages, LuGo paves the way for more efficient implementations of QPE, enabling broader applications across several quantum computing domains.

Quantum algorithm↗

Hardware-Efficient Quantum Phase Estimation via Local Control

Quantum phase estimation plays a central role in quantum simulation as it enables the study of spectral properties of many-body quantum systems. Most variants of the phase estimation algorithm require the application of the global unitary evolution conditioned on the state of one or more auxiliary qubits, posing a significant challenge for current quantum devices. In this work, we present an approach to quantum phase estimation that uses only locally controlled operations, resulting in a significantly reduced circuit depth. At the heart of our approach are efficient routines to measure the complex phase of the expectation value of the time-evolution operator, the so-called Loschmidt echo, for both circuit dynamics and Hamiltonian dynamics. By tracking changes in the phase during the dynamics, the routines trade circuit depth for increased sampling cost and classical postprocessing. Our approach does not rely on reference states and is applicable to any efficiently preparable state, regardless of its correlations. We provide a comprehensive analysis of the sample complexity and illustrate the results with numerical simulations. Our methods offer a practical pathway for measuring spectral properties in large many-body quantum systems using current quantum devices.

Schiffer, Benjamin F. [Max Planck Institute of Qua↗

Optimal Coherent Quantum Phase Estimation [Slides]

Many applications of quantum phase estimation (QPE) require it to be implemented coherently and with high confidence. We outline an algorithm that achieves both goals using optimal resources.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

Quantum phase estimation for a class of generalized eigenvalue problems

Quantum phase estimation provides a path to quantum computation of solutions to Hermitian eigenvalue problems Hv = λv , such as those occurring in quantum chemistry. It is natural to ask whether the same technique can be applied to generalized eigenvalue problems Av = λBv , which arise in many areas of science and engineering. Here, we answer this question affirmatively. A restricted class of generalized eigenvalue problems could be solved as efficiently as standard eigenvalue problems. A paradigmatic example is provided by Sturm-Liouville problems. Another example comes from linear ideal magnetohydrodynamics, where phase estimation could be used to determine the stability of magnetically confined plasmas in fusion reactors.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗

Effects of cosine tapering window on quantum phase estimation

Here, we provide a modification to the quantum phase estimation algorithm (QPEA) [Abrams and Lloyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5162 (1999); Cleve et al., Proc. R. Soc. A 454, 339 (1998); Nielsen and Chuang, Quantum computation and quantum information, 2002.] inspired by classical windowing methods for spectral density estimation. From this modification we obtain an upper bound in the cost that implies a cubic improvement with respect to the algorithm's error rate. Numerical evaluation of the costs also demonstrates an improvement. Moreover, with similar techniques, we detail an iterative projective measurement method for ground state preparation that gives an exponential improvement over previous bounds using QPEA. Numerical tests that confirm the expected scaling behavior are also obtained. For these numerical tests we have used a lattice Thirring model as testing ground. Using well-known perturbation theory results, we also show how to more appropriately estimate the cost scaling with respect to state error instead of evolution operator error.

72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS↗

Toward quantum computing for high-energy excited states in molecular systems: quantum phase estimations of core-level states

This paper explores the utility of the quantum phase estimation (QPE) in calculating high-energy excited states characterized by promotions of electrons occupying inner energy shells. These states have been intensively studied over the last few decades especially in supporting the experimental effort at light sources. Results obtained with the QPE are compared with various high-accuracy many-body techniques developed to describe core-level states. The feasibility of the quantum phase estimator in identifying classes of challenging shake-up states characterized by the presence of higher-order excitation effects is also discussed.

Bauman, Nicholas P.↗

Optimized Quantum Phase Estimation for Simulating Electronic States in Various Energy Regimes

While quantum algorithms for simulation exhibit better asymptotic scaling than their classical counterparts, they currently cannot be implemented on real-world devices. Instead, chemists and computer scientists rely on costly classical simulations of these quantum algorithms. In particular, the quantum phase estimation (QPE) algorithm is among several approaches that have attracted much attention in recent years for its genuine quantum character. However, it is memory-intensive to simulate and intractable for moderate system sizes. Herein, this paper discusses the performance and applicability of QPESIM, a new simulation of the QPE algorithm designed to take advantage of modest computational resources. In particular, we demonstrate the versatility of QPESIM in simulating various electronic states by examining the ground and core-level states of H 2 O. For these states, we also discuss the effect of the active-space size on the quality of the calculated energies. For the high-energy core-level states, we demonstrate that new QPE simulations for active spaces defined by 15 active orbitals significantly reduce the errors in core-level excitation energies compared to earlier QPE simulations using smaller active spaces.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Fock-Space Schrieffer–Wolff Transformation: Classically-Assisted Rank-Reduced Quantum Phase Estimation Algorithm

We present an extension of many-body downfolding methods to reduce the resources required in the quantum phase estimation (QPE) algorithm. In this paper, we focus on the Schrieffer–Wolff (SW) transformation of the electronic Hamiltonians for molecular systems that provides significant simplifications of quantum circuits for simulations of quantum dynamics. We demonstrate that by employing Fock-space variants of the SW transformation (or rank-reducing similarity transformations (RRST)) one can significantly increase the locality of the qubit-mapped similarity-transformed Hamiltonians. The practical utilization of the SW-RRST formalism is associated with a series of approximations discussed in the manuscript. In particular, amplitudes that define RRST can be evaluated using conventional computers and then encoded on quantum computers. The SW-RRST QPE quantum algorithms can also be viewed as an extension of the standard state-specific coupled-cluster downfolding methods to provide a robust alternative to the traditional QPE algorithms to identify the ground and excited states for systems with various numbers of electrons using the same Fock-space representations of the downfolded Hamiltonian. The RRST formalism serves as a design principle for developing new classes of approximate schemes that reduce the complexity of quantum circuits.

71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSIC↗

Quantum Davidson algorithm for excited states

Abstract Excited state properties play a pivotal role in various chemical and physical phenomena, such as charge separation and light emission. However, the primary focus of most existing quantum algorithms has been the ground state, as seen in quantum phase estimation and the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE). Although VQE-type methods have been extended to explore excited states, these methods grapple with optimization challenges. In contrast, the quantum Krylov subspace (QKS) method has been introduced to address both ground and excited states, positioning itself as a cost-effective alternative to quantum phase estimation. However, conventional QKS methodologies depend on a pre-generated subspace through real or imaginary-time evolutions. This subspace is inherently expansive and can be plagued with issues like slow convergence or numerical instabilities, often leading to relatively deep circuits. Our research presents an economic QKS algorithm, which we term the quantum Davidson (QDavidson) algorithm. This innovation hinges on the iterative expansion of the Krylov subspace and the incorporation of a pre-conditioner within the Davidson framework. By using the residues of eigenstates to expand the Krylov subspace, we manage to formulate a compact subspace that aligns closely with the exact solutions. This iterative subspace expansion paves the way for a more rapid convergence in comparison to other QKS techniques, such as the quantum Lanczos. Using quantum simulators, we employ the novel QDavidson algorithm to delve into the excited state properties of various systems, spanning from the Heisenberg spin model to real molecules. Compared to the existing QKS methods, the QDavidson algorithm not only converges swiftly but also demands a significantly shallower circuit. This efficiency establishes the QDavidson method as a pragmatic tool for elucidating both ground and excited state properties on quantum computing platforms.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

An Early Investigation of the HHL Quantum Linear Solver for Scientific Applications

In this paper, we explore using the Harrow–Hassidim–Lloyd (HHL) algorithm to address scientific and engineering problems through quantum computing, utilizing the NWQSim simulation package on a high-performance computing platform. Focusing on domains such as power-grid management and climate projection, we demonstrate the correlations of the accuracy of quantum phase estimation, along with various properties of coefficient matrices, on the final solution and quantum resource cost in iterative and non-iterative numerical methods such as the Newton–Raphson method and finite difference method, as well as their impacts on quantum error correction costs using the Microsoft Azure Quantum resource estimator. We summarize the exponential resource cost from quantum phase estimation before and after quantum error correction and illustrate a potential way to reduce the demands on physical qubits. This work lays down a preliminary step for future investigations, urging a closer examination of quantum algorithms’ scalability and efficiency in domain applications.

hybrid software for QC-HPC↗

Quantum eigenvalue estimation via time series analysis

We present an efficient method for estimating the eigenvalues of a Hamiltonian H from the expectation values of the evolution operator for various times. For a given quantum state ρ, our method outputs a list of eigenvalue estimates and approximate probabilities. Each probability depends on the support of ρ in those eigenstates of H associated with eigenvalues within an arbitrarily small range. The complexity of our method is polynomial in the inverse of a given precision parameter ε, which is the gap between eigenvalue estimates. Unlike the well-known quantum phase estimation algorithm that uses the quantum Fourier transform, our method does not require large ancillary systems, large sequences of controlled operations, or preserving coherence between experiments, and is therefore more attractive for near-term applications. The output of our method can be used to estimate spectral properties of H and other expectation values efficiently, within additive error proportional to ε.

71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSIC↗

Solving generalized eigenvalue problems by ordinary differential equations on a quantum computer

Many eigenvalue problems arising in practice are often of the generalized form A x = λ B x . One particularly important case is symmetric, namely A , B are Hermitian and B is positive definite. The standard algorithm for solving this class of eigenvalue problems is to reduce them to Hermitian eigenvalue problems. For a quantum computer, quantum phase estimation is a useful technique to solve Hermitian eigenvalue problems. In this work, we propose a new quantum algorithm for symmetric generalized eigenvalue problems using ordinary differential equations. The algorithm has lower complexity than the standard one based on quantum phase estimation. Moreover, it works for a wider case than symmetric: B is invertible, B - 1 A is diagonalizable and all the eigenvalues are real.

Science & Technology - Other Topics↗

Non-Boolean quantum amplitude amplification and quantum mean estimation

This paper generalizes the quantum amplitude amplification and amplitude estimation algorithms to work with non-Boolean oracles. The action of a non-Boolean oracle $U_\varphi $ on an eigenstate $\mathinner {|{x}\rangle }$ is to apply a state-dependent phase-shift $\varphi (x)$. Unlike Boolean oracles, the eigenvalues $\exp (i\varphi (x))$ of a non-Boolean oracle are not restricted to be $\pm 1$. Two new oracular algorithms based on such non-Boolean oracles are introduced. The first is the non-Boolean amplitude amplification algorithm, which preferentially amplifies the amplitudes of the eigenstates based on the value of $\varphi (x)$. Starting from a given initial superposition state $\mathinner {|{\psi _0}\rangle }$, the basis states with lower values of $\cos (\varphi )$ are amplified at the expense of the basis states with higher values of $\cos (\varphi )$. The second algorithm is the quantum mean estimation algorithm, which uses quantum phase estimation to estimate the expectation $\mathinner {\langle {\psi _0|U_\varphi |\psi _0}\rangle }$, i.e., the expected value of $\exp (i\varphi (x))$ for a random x sampled by making a measurement on $\mathinner {|{\psi _0}\rangle }$. It is shown that the quantum mean estimation algorithm offers a quadratic speedup over the corresponding classical algorithm. Both algorithms are demonstrated using simulations for a toy example. Potential applications of the algorithms are briefly discussed.

71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSIC↗