Results for “real-space methods”

NASA NTRS1994

Recovering the real density field of galaxies from redshift space

This paper proposes a number of methods for recovering the true, real-space large-scale density distributions from redshift data sets. On the largest scales, the effects of peculiar velocities is to compress the galaxy clustering along the line of sight and consequently the density gradient in the radial direction is enhanced in comparison with the density gradient perpendicular to the line of sight. We calculate the relation between the density gradients in real and redshift space in the linear regime and show that it is a simple function of the density parameter, Omega. By considering the anisotropy of density gradients in redshift space it is possible, in principle, to obtain information about the value of Omega. Using N-body simulations we examine different methods for correcting the effects of large-scale velocities to obtain the true density distributions. We derive the peculiar velocity field from the redshift data and iterate to place each galaxy at a distance consistent with its measured redshift and its derived velocity. Linear theory, as well as second-order solutions for the peculiar velocity field are tested. The density distributions in low-density regions predicted by both linear theory and second-order theory are similar, and in good agreement with the true density field in the simulation. The use of the second-order corrections improves the prediction of the density field in high-density regions.

Gramann, Mirt↗

NASA NTRS1994

Power spectrum, correlation function, and tests for luminosity bias in the CfA redshift survey

We describe and apply a method for directly computing the power spectrum for the galaxy distribution in the extension of the Center for Astrophysics Redshift Survey. Tests show that our technique accurately reproduces the true power spectrum for k greater than 0.03 h Mpc(exp -1). The dense sampling and large spatial coverage of this survey allow accurate measurement of the redshift-space power spectrum on scales from 5 to approximately 200 h(exp -1) Mpc. The power spectrum has slope n approximately equal -2.1 on small scales (lambda less than or equal 25 h(exp -1) Mpc) and n approximately -1.1 on scales 30 less than lambda less than 120 h(exp -1) Mpc. On larger scales the power spectrum flattens somewhat, but we do not detect a turnover. Comparison with N-body simulations of cosmological models shows that an unbiased, open universe CDM model (OMEGA h = 0.2) and a nonzero cosmological constant (CDM) model (OMEGA h = 0.24, lambda(sub zero) = 0.6, b = 1.3) match the CfA power spectrum over the wavelength range we explore. The standard biased CDM model (OMEGA h = 0.5, b = 1.5) fails (99% significance level) because it has insufficient power on scales lambda greater than 30 h(exp -1) Mpc. Biased CDM with a normalization that matches the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) anisotropy (OMEGA h = 0.5, b = 1.4, sigma(sub 8) (mass) = 1) has too much power on small scales to match the observed galaxy power spectrum. This model with b = 1 matches both Cosmic Background Explorer Satellite (COBE) and the small-scale power spect rum but has insufficient power on scales lambda approximately 100 h(exp -1) Mpc. We derive a formula for the effect of small-scale peculiar velocities on the power spectrum and combine this formula with the linear-regime amplification described by Kaiser to compute an estimate of the real-space power spectrum. Two tests reveal luminosity bias in the galaxy distribution: First, the amplitude of the pwer spectrum is approximately 40% larger for the brightest 50% of galaxies in volume-limited samples that have M(sub lim) greater than M*. This bias in the power spectrum is independent of scale, consistent with the peaks-bias paradigm for galaxy formation. Second, the distribution of local density around galaxies shows that regions of moderate and high density contain both very bright (M less than M* = -19.2 + 5 log h) and fainter galaxies, but that voids preferentially harbor fainter galaxies (approximately 2 sigma significance level).

Park, Changbom↗