Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “record of decision”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2012

Key Decision Record Creation and Approval Module

Retaining good key decision records is critical to ensuring the success of a project or operation. Having adequately documented decisions with supporting documents and rationale can greatly reduce the amount of rework or reinvention over a project's, vehicle's, or facility's lifecycle. Stennis Space Center developed and uses a software tool that automates the Key Decision Record (KDR) process for its engineering and test projects. It provides the ability for a user to log key decisions that are made during the course of a project. By customizing Parametric Technology Corporation's (PTC) Windchill product, the team was able to log all information about a decision, and electronically route that information for approval. Customizing the Windchill product allowed the team to directly connect these decisions to the engineering data that it might affect and notify data owners of the decision. The user interface was created in JSP and Javascript, within the OOTB (Out of the Box) Windchill product, allowing users to create KDRs. Not only does this interface allow users to create and track KDRs, but it also plugs directly into the OOTB ability to associate these decision records with other relevant engineering data such as drawings, designs, models, requirements, or specifications

Hebert, Barrt↗
DOE OSTI2026

Record of Decision: MEBT Energy Change

The LAMP Conceptual Design (LCD), as described in the LAMP Conceptual Design Report incorporates a radiofrequency quadrupole (RFQ) with an output beam energy of 3.0-MeV; the medium energy beam transport line (MEBT) transports beam from the end of the RFQ into the first LAMP drift tube linac (DTL) tank. The MEBT contains components, such as rebunchers and beam choppers, designed for the specific output energy of the RFQ, and the DTL tank is designed to accept this beam energy.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2026

Record of Decision: LEBT Energy Change

The LAMP Conceptual Design (LCD), as described in the LAMP Conceptual Design Report incorporates multiple 100-keV low-energy beam transport (LEBT) lines between the ion sources and the radiofrequency quadrupole (RFQ). The LEBT lines transport H + and H - beams from their respective ion sources to the RFQ entrance, and provide the required manipulations (focusing, steering, chopping, etc.) to the ion beams to prepare them for injection into the RFQ and further acceleration.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2026

Record of Decision: H - LEBT Design Modifications

The LAMP Conceptual Design (LCD) is described in the LAMP Conceptual Design Report. The proposed new configuration of the LAMP H - LEBT encompasses multiple changes to the LCD. The new configuration makes use of a single H - source to supply beam to all LANSCE user stations except IPF; this eliminates one of the H - sources in the LCD, and the associated pulsed merger magnet the use of two such sources required. The source current from the sole H - source is gated on a macropulse-by-macropulse basis using techniques demonstrated at SNS (Spallation Neutron Source), specifically, changes to the RF plasma drive power. A pulsed electrode system is used to match the beam into the LEBT transport line, variable on a macropulse-by-macropulse basis to match the source beam current.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
NASA NTRS2012

NASA Tech Briefs, January 2012

Contents of this issue are: (1) Energy-Based Tetrahedron Sensor for High-Temperature, High-Pressure Environments (2) Handheld Universal Diagnostic Sensor (3) Large-Area Vacuum Ultraviolet Sensors (4) Fiber Bragg Grating Sensor System for Monitoring Smart Composite Aerospace Structures (5) Health-Enabled Smart Sensor Fusion Technology (6) Extended-Range Passive RFID and Sensor Tags (7) Hybrid Collaborative Learning for Classification and Clustering in Sensor Networks (8) Self-Healing, Inflatable, Rigidizable Shelter (9) Improvements in Cold-Plate Fabrication (10) Technique for Radiometer and Antenna Array Calibration - TRAAC (11) Real-Time Cognitive Computing Architecture for Data Fusion in a Dynamic Environment (12) Programmable Digital Controller (13) Use of CCSDS Packets Over SpaceWire to Control Hardware (14) Key Decision Record Creation and Approval Module (15) Enhanced Graphics for Extended Scale Range (16) Debris Examination Using Ballistic and Radar Integrated Software (17) Data Distribution System (DDS) and Solar Dynamic Observatory Ground Station (SDOGS) (18) Integration Manager (19) Eclipse-Free-Time Assessment Tool for IRIS (20) Automated and Manual Rocket Crater Measurement Software (21) MATLAB Stability and Control Toolbox Trim and Static Stability Module (22) Patched Conic Trajectory Code (23) Ring Image Analyzer (24) SureTrak Probability of Impact Display (25) Implementation of a Non-Metallic Barrier in an Electric Motor (26) Multi-Mission Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator Heat Exchangers for the Mars Science Laboratory Rover (27) Uniform Dust Distributor for Testing Radiative Emittance of Dust-Coated Surfaces (28) MicroProbe Small Unmanned Aerial System (29) Highly Stable and Active Catalyst for Sabatier Reactions (30) Better Proton-Conducting Polymers for Fuel-Cell Membranes (31) CCD Camera Lens Interface for Real-Time Theodolite Alignment (32) Peregrine 100-km Sounding Rocket Project (33) SOFIA Closed- and Open-Door Aerodynamic Analyses (34) Sonic Thermometer for High-Altitude Balloons (35) Near-Infrared Photon-Counting Camera for High-Sensitivity Observations (36) Integrated Optics Achromatic Nuller for Stellar Interferometry (37) High-Speed Digital Interferometry (38) Ultra-Miniature Lidar Scanner for Launch Range Data Collection (39) Shape and Color Features for Object Recognition Search (40) Explanation Capabilities for Behavior-Based Robot Control (41) A DNA-Inspired Encryption Methodology for Secure, Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (42) Quality Control Method for a Micro-Nano-Channel Microfabricated Device (43) Corner-Cube Retroreflector Instrument for Advanced Lunar Laser Ranging (44) Electrospray Collection of Lunar Dust (45) Fabrication of a Kilopixel Array of Superconducting Microcalorimeters with Microstripline Wiring Spacecraft Attitude Tracking and Maneuver Using Combined Magnetic Actuators (46) Coherent Detector for Near-Angle Scattering and Polarization Characterization of Telescope Mirror Coatings

Source record↗
DOE OSTI2023

Composite Analysis for Low-Level Waste Disposal in the Hanford Site Central Plateau (FY 2020) (Rev. 2)

This document provides an updated Hanford Site composite analysis (CA). A Hanford Site CA was prepared and issued in 1998 (PNNL-11800) with an addendum provided in 2002 (PNNL-11800 Addendum 1). The CA was approved in 2002 (Frei, 2002) and has been maintained (DOE/RL-2000-29 and subsequent revisions) to support low-level waste disposal performance assessments (PAs) and disposal authorizations for facilities at the Hanford Site, including the following: Continued operation of the Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility (ERDF) and the 200 East and 200 West Low-Level Burial Grounds; Construction of the Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF); Forthcoming closure of tank residual waste systems such as Waste Management Area (WMA) C. The CA maintenance program resulted in a determination in 2015 (DOE/RL-2015-66) that the Hanford Site CA needed an update for the following reasons: While the initial Hanford Site CA has been maintained since 2001, the accumulation of basis changes reported in the annual summary reports over the succeeding 14 years merit evaluation in an updated analysis; The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Headquarters requested in a memorandum in 2015 (Gilbertson and Marcinowski, 2015) that “as soon as the relevant PAs are complete, the CA will be revised to account for all of the new information.” This updated Hanford Site CA accounts for the following new information: 1. Inclusion of a detailed Hanford Site baseline disposition that projects remedial activities through site closure. There have been significant changes through decision making in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) process that were not available when the original CA was produced; 2. Inclusion of an updated inventory basis, new modeling capabilities, and new decisions reached in the associated record of decision (ROD) that was provided by issuance of DOE/EIS-0391 in fiscal year (FY) 2013. Development of a Hanford Site groundwater model from the baseline provided in a technical transfer of models for the Final Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0391) commenced in FY 2014 and resulted in the plateau-to-river (P2R) groundwater flow model that is used in this updated Hanford Site CA; 3. Accounting for pump and treat systems, which were not evaluated in the initial CA. Pump and treat systems have had significant impact on groundwater flow system behavior, contaminant transport, and contaminant removal from Hanford Site groundwater. This process is accounted for in the use of the P2R model for this updated Hanford Site CA; 4. Inclusion of water-level data collected since the initial CA was completed. Data collected as the unconfined aquifer water levels continue to recede since the cessation of large liquid discharges in the late 1990s have led to marked improvement in understanding of the flow system for future conditions, particularly regarding northward flow potential in the critical Gable Gap area. The calibration in the latest version of the P2R model accounts for this information; 5. Inclusion of results from the revised ERDF PA completed in 2013 (WCH-5209) that account for updated inventory and expansion of the ERDF facility to about twice the size that was evaluated in the original CA; 6. Use of updated geoframeworks to provide the structural basis for numerical fate and transport models in the groundwater pathway of this updated CA. The geologic basis for groundwater models has continued to improve with additional data collection and interpretation with the creation and maintenance of the Hanford South Geoframework and the Central Plateau Vadose Zone Geoframework tools; 7. Incorporation of updated tank residual inventory estimates. Tank residual inventory estimates have improved with the incorporation of tank retrieval inventory data for those tanks that have completed retrieval. The CA inventory data package includes this updated information; 8. Incorporation of WMA C PA results. Two additional PAs for tank farm closure decisions are in preparation during the period required to prepare an updated Hanford Site CA: WMA C (FY 2016) and WMA A-AX (in preparation). The WMA C PA results are incorporated into the updated Hanford Site CA, and its grouted residuals model is used as the basis for a release model to account for the other tank farm systems modeling in this updated CA; 9. An update to the IDF PA was submitted in FY 2017 and has been reviewed and approved. The results of the IDF PA are incorporated into this updated CA; 10. Updated risk assessment scenarios. The risk assessment scenarios currently in use for Hanford Site CERCLA and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) analyses differ from those evaluated in the initial Hanford Site CA. The representative person exposure scenario evaluated in this updated Hanford Site CA is consistent with recent PAs and CERCLA and RCRA analyses as the Hanford Site. This updated Hanford Site CA provides the following: A comparison of the updated Hanford Site CA all-pathway dose results with the performance measures during the compliance period, which is assumed to begin with site closure in calendar 2070 with the last scheduled disposal action and continue for 1,000 years postclosure (to calendar year 3069); A comparison of Hanford Site CA all-pathway dose results with the performance measures during the postcompliance period to address potential peaks beyond the compliance period. This is accomplished by evaluating dose in the period for 9,000 years following the compliance period (i.e., from calendar year 3070 to 12070).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Spatiotemporal Analyses of Groundwater and Shoreline Cr(VI) Concentrations in the 100 Areas at Hanford

Cleanup efforts have been ongoing since the late 1990s to remediate contaminated waste sites and groundwater in the 100 Areas at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hanford Site. One of the primary contaminants of concern is hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)), which was used as a corrosion inhibitor in cooling water for nuclear reactors that formerly operated along the shoreline of the Columbia River. Cleanup efforts have included 1) removal, treatment (as needed), and disposal of contaminated sediments; 2) in situ redox manipulation as a permeable reactive barrier; 3) pump-and-treat; 4) soil flushing; and 5) monitored natural attenuation. DOE’s annual groundwater monitoring reports document the significant reductions in Cr(VI) plume areas that have occurred over the past 10 years or more as a result of these cleanup efforts. The Record of Decision for the 100-HR-3 operable unit specified a cleanup level (CUL) for Cr(VI) in groundwater of 48 µg/L to protect human receptors, and a surface water CUL of 10 µg/L to protect aquatic organisms in the Columbia River. The Record of Decision did not specify point-of-compliance locations for the surface water CUL. Data for 2019 from the six groundwater operable units (OUs) in the 100 Areas indicate that the 48 μg/L groundwater CUL has been achieved in 100% of the wells in the 100-BC and 100-NR OUs, and in 89- 97% of the wells in the other OUs (100-KR, 100-HR-D, 100-HR-H, 100-FR). Data for 2019 indicate that 100% of the aquifer tubes monitored for Cr(VI) in the 100 Areas have concentrations below the 48 μg/L groundwater CUL. However, the 10 μg/L standard has not yet been consistently achieved for both inland groundwater monitoring wells and shoreline aquifer tubes. This report describes a series of data analyses performed to identify consistent relationships, if any, between inland well and shoreline Cr(VI) concentrations within the 100 Areas. To this end, select monitoring data for Cr(VI) measured in groundwater and aquifer tubes at the 100 Areas were analyzed for a 10-year period—2010 to 2019. Relationships between inland groundwater plumes and surface-water points of discharge in and along the Columbia River were examined through several analyses that included inland well and aquifer tube concentrations as a function of distance from the shoreline, evaluation of cumulative probability plots, trend analysis, correlation analysis, cluster analysis, and identification of plume trajectories for each of the 100 Areas. The analyses did not identify consistent relationships between inland groundwater Cr(VI) concentrations and shoreline concentrations within the 100 Areas due to several confounding factors influencing groundwater flow directions and Cr(VI) concentrations. The proximity of groundwater Cr(VI) plumes to the river, and the highly dynamic nature of the river, influence the transport behavior of the plumes and create challenges for quantifying attenuation of Cr(VI) between the inland monitoring wells and shoreline concentrations. Other factors contributing to temporal and spatial Cr(VI) concentrations, as supported by some of the data analyses, include the presence of vadose zone sources, variable sorption behavior, and complexities associated with Cr(VI) mass transfer between the upper and lower aquifers and their interactions with the river. Hence, monitoring to assess compliance with target CULs will need to be determined for each area individually since several factors influence Cr(VI) concentrations in the 100 Areas.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
NASA NTRS1998

X-33 Environmental Impact Statement: A Fast Track Approach

NASA is required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to prepare an appropriate level environmental analysis for its major projects. Development of the X-33 Technology Demonstrator and its associated flight test program required an environmental impact statement (EIS) under the NEPA. The EIS process is consists of four parts: the "Notice of Intent" to prepare an EIS and scoping; the draft EIS which is distributed for review and comment; the final ETS; and the "Record of Decision." Completion of this process normally takes from 2 - 3 years, depending on the complexity of the proposed action. Many of the agency's newest fast track, technology demonstration programs require NEPA documentation, but cannot sustain the lengthy time requirement between program concept development to implementation. Marshall Space Flight Center, in cooperation with Kennedy Space Center, accomplished the NEPA process for the X-33 Program in 13 months from Notice of Intent to Record of Decision. In addition, the environmental team implemented an extensive public involvement process, conducting a total of 23 public meetings for scoping and draft EIS comment along with numerous informal meetings with public officials, civic organizations, and Native American Indians. This paper will discuss the fast track approach used to successfully accomplish the NEPA process for X-33 on time.

McCaleb, Rebecca C.↗
DOE OSTI2025

Pantex Plant Ogallala Aquifer and Perched Groundwater Contingency Plan

The Pantex Plant Ogallala Aquifer and Perched Groundwater Contingency Plan has been developed in accordance with the requirements identified in the: • Interagency Agreement for the Pantex Superfund Site, Article 8.5 Work to be Performed, • Compliance Plan Provision of Hazardous Waste Permit No. 50284, and • Record of Decision for Groundwater, Soil, and Associated Media, Pantex Plant. A Long‐Term Monitoring System Design has been designed to monitor conditions in the perched groundwater including changes in the perched aquifer as a result of implementing the response actions. Monitoring is required for verifying the effectiveness of perched groundwater response actions (i.e., conditions in the perched aquifer are being affected as intended) and for confirming that the perched aquifer and Ogallala Aquifer characterization as defined in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Facility Investigation Report and the Corrective Measure Studies/Feasibility Study remains accurate. If monitoring results obtained through the monitoring network identify an unexpected condition or deviation, contingent actions will be considered and implemented as necessary to ensure continued protection of the Ogallala Aquifer and human health and the environment. Potential deviations to expected technology performance may be encountered for each of the four primary response actions that compose the selected remedy for perched groundwater; Playa 1 Pump and Treat System, Southeast Area Pump and Treat System, Southeast Area In‐Situ Bioremediation System (comprised of the Southeast In‐Situ Bioremediation System Original System, Southeast Area In‐Situ Bioremediation System Extension System, Offsite In‐Situ Bioremediation System, Perchlorate/Chromium ISB, Northeast ISB and County Road 8 ISB), and Zone 11 In‐Situ Bioremediation System. Monitoring will also be conducted to determine if there are deviations to the expected characterization, e.g., contaminants not expected as a result of the RCRA Facility Investigation characterization. Deviations to expected conditions in the Ogallala Aquifer could also be encountered if the response actions in the perched groundwater are not performing as expected, i.e., preventing contaminants from migrating to the Ogallala Aquifer. Currently, Pantex has begun investigation of detections of high explosives above groundwater protection standards in wells on the Texas Tech University property and a plume that is moving to the northeast from that area. Due to those detections, this Plan recognizes the fact that future detections in the Ogallala will be focused on first‐ time detections of analytes. After a remedy is determined, this Plan will require modification to address-deviations and contingent actions. This Plan was developed to identify the contingent actions necessary to mitigate impacts resulting from deviations to site conditions or response action performance. The Plan defines the environmental problem being addressed by the response actions, clarifies the expected conditions and objectives of the response actions, and identifies the potential deviations to the response actions (due to site conditions or technology performance) that could be encountered. The deviations were evaluated to determine the likelihood of occurrence, potential impact, and time to respond to avoid impact. The Plan also identifies the monitoring outlined in the Long‐Term Monitoring System Design Report (Consolidated Nuclear Security, 2024) and Sampling Analysis Plan (PanTeXas Deterrence, 2024) that will be used to detect the deviations. Lastly, the Plan specifies the contingent actions that could be implemented in response to the deviations. Because each response focuses on a discrete portion of the perched aquifer and contaminant plume, each response action has a different set of expected conditions, and therefore differing impacts from deviations to the site and technology expectations. As a result, the contingent actions are identified for each response action and potential deviation including specific constituents, location, and conditions. If deviations are encountered that impact the ability of the response action to meet performance objectives, the contingent actions will be focused on ensuring the response action can meet the performance objective. Contingent actions may be implemented as interim actions (ISMs/removal actions) in accordance with the Record of Decision, Interagency Agreement, and Hazardous Waste Permit‐50284, if warranted by the specific circumstances. For deviations to site characterization expected conditions, the contingent action will focus on determination of the source of the deviation, determination of the appropriate response, and evaluation of additional work to be completed. However, if the deviation to characterization impacts the performance of the response action, the contingent action will again focus on ensuring performance objectives can be met. Early source term removals and cleanup actions have been implemented to protect the Ogallala Aquifer. Because of these actions and based on modeling results, the expected conditions in the Ogallala Aquifer are that constituents of concern will not be detected above the Groundwater Protection Standards (GWPSs) nor will they reach potential points of exposure above the GWPS. The primary deviation of concern for the Ogallala is if constituents are detected in the Ogallala Aquifer near or above GWPSs. If it occurs, this change in expected conditions would require further evaluation of site and contaminant characteristics to determine an appropriate course of action. The evaluation would include additional monitoring, source identification, implementation of interim protective measures (if necessary), and delineation of extent. These evaluations are necessary to determine an appropriate response action for the Ogallala. The primary goal of the Plan is to provide for the continued protection of the Ogallala Aquifer and the health of its consumers. In recognition, this Plan presents a flexible and rational approach for making future decisions associated with confirming the change in perched and Ogallala aquifer conditions and identifying a response (technical activities, changes to response actions, regulatory oversight, and public involvement).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

96 Park Way Vicinity Property Remediation Challenges at the FUSRAP Maywood Superfund Site, Maywood, New Jersey - 19216

The Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) Maywood Superfund Site (FMSS), 'the Project,' was transferred to the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) in 1997. Shortly thereafter, USACE initiated FUSRAP remediation efforts on 24 commercial and residential properties and, in addition, the Project team evaluated properties previously addressed at the FMSS. One of those properties was located at 96 Park Way in Rochelle Park, New Jersey. The property history included removal of contaminated soil in 1985 by the US Department of Energy (US DOE). Soil sampling performed after removal of contaminated soil indicated the cleanup met applicable guidelines in place at the time. A Five-Year Review of the FMSS conducted by the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) in 2009 found that 96 Park Way did not meet the current residential cleanup levels for the site and recommended additional study and remediation, if warranted. The current levels are established in the approved cleanup plan for the FMSS (known as the Record of Decision [ROD]) issued in 2003. Based on USEPA's recommendation, USACE carefully reviewed all available records for the property. The review considered the differences between the soil cleanup standards used in the 1980's and the 2003 ROD standards, which are slightly more restrictive for deeper soils. The USACE conducted detailed field studies at 96 Park Way in 2014-15 to address the USEPA findings. This work included gamma walkover surveys and soil sampling to depths of approximately 3.5 meters. The results identified three discrete areas at depth that did not meet the ROD residential soil cleanup standard: two areas bordering an adjacent highway (New Jersey Route 17) and one along railroad property adjacent to the site. To address these areas, soil removal actions were conducted in 2016-17. The principal challenge with construction, engineering, and community relations was the property housed two sensitive facilities: a long-term assisted care living facility and a short-term post-surgery rehabilitation center. The operations at these facilities could not be interrupted in any way during FUSRAP activities. The three FUSRAP-impacted areas were addressed and restored in coordination with the USEPA, property management, and local officials. Site restoration presented a particular challenge well after the remedial action was completed, as the property owner and the government disagreed on the level of restoration. Those negotiations are ongoing as of this writing. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Successful Implementation of a Natural Resource Restoration Plan at the Fernald Preserve - 19568

The Fernald Preserve, Ohio, Site is a former uranium-processing plant that underwent extensive remediation pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). It is situated on a 425-hectare (ha) (1050-acre) tract of land, approximately 29 kilometers (km) (18 miles) northwest of Cincinnati, Ohio. The US Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management is responsible for management of the site. Site remediation and subsequent ecological restoration have converted the site from an industrial production facility to an undeveloped park, encompassing a series of wetlands, prairies, and forested communities. The remediation of buildings and contaminated soil was completed in 2006, but aquifer remediation is ongoing. Portions of the site are open to the public, including approximately 11 km (7 miles) of walking trails that are open year-round and a Fernald Preserve Visitors Center open four days a week. Stakeholders were instrumental in providing recommendations for final land use of the site as an undeveloped park with an emphasis on wildlife. Final land use decisions were also instrumental in the resolution of a CERCLA natural resource damage claim. The State of Ohio sued DOE in 1986 for damages to state natural resources under Section 107 of CERCLA. The suit was stayed until completion of all Records of Decision (RODs) for the site. The last ROD was signed in 1996. DOE, which was both a Natural Resource Trustee (NRT) and a potentially responsible party (PRP) under CERCLA, initiated consultation with other site NRTs in 1993. A Trustee Council was formed that included DOE, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (representing the State of Ohio), and the US Fish and Wildlife Service (representing the US Department of the Interior). The NRTs agreed collectively to conduct sitewide ecological restoration, consistent with the stakeholder vision of final land use. A conceptual restoration plan was drafted in 1998. This Natural Resource Restoration Plan (NRRP) developed goals for site restoration, as well as provisions for monitoring and maintenance of restored areas. The NRTs signed a Memorandum of Understanding in 2001, and DOE integrated ecological restoration design and construction into remediation and closure activities for the site. The NRT relationship became contentious in the following years as a result of a disagreement over monitoring commitments and compensation for groundwater injury. Final settlement was reached in 2008. As part of the settlement, DOE paid $13.75 million into the NRT fund as compensation for natural resource damages. In addition, the NRRP was finalized, and long-term commitments for monitoring and maintenance of ecologically restored areas were put in place. An Environmental Covenant was established and recorded with Hamilton and Butler Counties that ensures site activity and use limitations remain in place. The NRTs used a portion of the settlement funds to initiate the Paddys Run Conservation Project. This effort is a means to secure development rights and conservation easements within the Paddys Run watershed. Paddys Run is a third-order stream located on the western side of the Fernald Preserve. The NRTs partnered with Three Valley Conservation Trust to obtain assistance with land acquisition and conservation easement management, and since the program's inception in the Fall of 2012, more than 1820 ha (4500 acres) have been permanently protected via easement or purchase. Future decisions by the NRTs regarding monitoring and maintenance of restored areas will be negotiated in 2020. The site Restored Area Maintenance Plan (RAMP) was developed in 2010. The RAMP is a requirement within the NRRP and is scheduled for review following 10 years of implementation. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Designing a Site Closure Strategy for Uranium in Groundwater and Surface Water - 19534

A site closure strategy was designed and mapped for residual uranium present in groundwater and surface water at the US DOE Office of Legacy Management (LM) Monticello Mill Tailings Site (MMTS) Operable Unit (OU) III, which is regulated under CERCLA. The MMTS is a former mill site that was used to process uranium and vanadium ore in southeastern Utah until 1960. OU III includes surface water in Montezuma Creek and groundwater present in a shallow alluvial aquifer along the creek valley for several kilometers downgradient of the former mill site. The current remedy consists of an operating pump-and-treat system, monitored natural attenuation (MNA), and institutional controls (ICs). Performance evaluations indicate that a prolonged restoration period is likely, as well as an asymptotic trend in uranium concentrations that still exceed the remediation goal. Multiple strategies and scenarios were evaluated before selecting a preferred site closure strategy. Recommendations were developed to support advancing the site towards closure over the next few years and guide the process of regulatory interactions and decision making at the MMTS OU III. Site closure is an important milestone that reflects successful remedial progress at LM sites. Post-closure site management would be maintained to ensure conditions are protective of human health and the environment. The site closure strategy was considered in the context of site remedial progress. The primary sources of groundwater contamination have been removed, including mill tailings and contaminated soils, sediment, and debris. Five-year reviews have regularly concluded that the remedy is protective of human health and environment and that ICs are effective in preventing exposure to contaminated groundwater. The affected aquifer is low-yielding and has no history of domestic use. In 2004, the final remedy selected in the Record of Decision (ROD) was MNA with ICs. However, a pump-and-treat system was installed and continues to operate as a contingency remedy in the area with the highest residual uranium concentrations. The need for a contingency pump-and-treat system was triggered by a departure of the long-term monitoring data from model projections that were used as the basis for remedy performance metrics specified in the ROD. In 2015, the pump-and-treat system was expanded. Average uranium concentrations have declined locally over time. However, monitoring data and column studies indicate that the system effectiveness will eventually become ineffective in reducing uranium concentrations, likely due to the reequilibration of uranium present in the solid matrix in various states (i.e., sorbed, precipitated). Currently, there are no agreed-upon metrics for discontinuing the contingency pump-and-treat system. Three closure strategies effectively applied at other CERCLA sites were considered at MMTS OU III: (1) restoring natural attenuation conditions and conducting MNA; (2) applying alternate concentration limits (ACLs); and (3) waiving a remedial goal based on technical impracticability (TI). Each closure strategy was evaluated in the following manner: (1) identifying the criteria and requirements associated with current regulations, policy, and guidance, (2) assessing the ability to meet those criteria based on the current site knowledge and the conceptual site model, and (3) identifying data gaps that need to be filled to further assess the closure strategy. Following this evaluation, a preferred closure strategy was selected: to transition to a remedy based on MNA and maintenance of ICs, without active remediation. Several scenarios for transitioning to the preferred closure strategy were identified. Each scenario consisted of 'if/then logic' associated with a larger decision diagram. The decision diagram considered the current conceptual site model (CSM) and potential outcomes of studies that will be conducted to fill data gaps, as well as the performance of the existing treatment system and long-term monitoring data. Two scenarios for transitioning to the preferred closure strategy were highlighted for future planning and were described in detail. For both scenarios, the preferred closure strategy includes demonstrating criteria for MNA acceptance, pump-and-treat termination, long-term monitoring, and eventual site delisting. Recommended actions over the next few years were also developed, including updating the CSM, conducting numerical modeling to predict remedial performance and time frames, conducting geochemical analyses to assess uranium fate and transport, and summarizing the lines of evidence and basis for MNA. This detailed example of the development of a site-specific closure strategy provides the thought process and decision logic used to assess uncertainty using an if/then framework; identify common elements and recommended actions to advance the site towards closure; and navigate the inherent uncertainty in the timing of future events, outcome of regulatory discussions, and remedial progress over time that is common to many complex US DOE facilities. In addition, the national regulations, policy, guidance, and state of practice regarding commonly used site closure strategies was summarized for consideration, including MNA, ACLs, and TI. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Preparing the FUSRAP Colonie Interim Storage Site for Transfer Back to the US Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management - 19215

The Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) Colonie Interim Storage Site was transferred from the US Department of Energy (US DOE) to the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) in 1997. The USACE initiated remediation efforts at the Site under FUSRAP. The Site was separated into three distinct operable units (OU) to more efficiently manage the remedial process: 1) Groundwater OU, 2) Main Site Soils OU, and 3) Vicinity Property OU. The USACE has completed remedial actions at each of these three OUs and has advanced the OU remedies at the Site to the long-term stewardship stage to be executed by the US DOE Office of Legacy Management (LM). The US DOE LM is the current real property owner of record of the Colonie Main Site. A summary of each OU and the activities needed to prepare for site transfer follows: OU 1 - USACE issued the Colonie Groundwater OU Record of Decision (ROD) (USACE 2010a) on April 9, 2010. The Groundwater ROD remedy is monitored natural attenuation (MNA) and long-term monitoring (LTM) of groundwater after source removal completion. Results of groundwater monitoring indicate reductions in concentrations of contaminants of concern (COC). Based on the marked progress to date, USACE has optimized the groundwater LTM program (USACE, 2014) by reducing the well network, sampling frequency, and analytical parameters, and by abandoning wells that are no longer needed. A Groundwater ROD Five-Year Review report was submitted to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) for review in 2018. NYSDEC agreed that MNA is still an appropriate remedial method although it is progressing at a slower rate than predicted. OU 2 - From 1999 to 2007, USACE completed the large-scale removal of soil at the Main Site, which included the adjacent Town of Colonie Vicinity Property. Radioactively contaminated soil along with accessible metals-contaminated soil and soil containing volatile organic compounds (VOC) were removed during this effort. A total of 103,402 cubic meters (m{sup 3}) of soil was excavated and disposed offsite. On March 26, 2015, USACE signed the Main Site Soils OU ROD (USACE, 2015a). The ROD remedy included provisions for Land Use Controls (LUC) consisting of institutional controls (IC) through an Environmental Easement for management of three small and discrete inaccessible locations within three of the 27 Final Status Survey units of the Main Site. The Environmental Easement provides a means of protection based on both current and future land use by placing restrictions on soil excavation and reuse. The easement and a supporting Site Management Plan (SMP) will be finalized by LM in coordination with NYSDEC. OU 3 - the Vicinity Property OU ROD was signed on 20 September 2017. This ROD declared No Action (NA) for dust and No Further Action (NFA) for soil and other media for the Vicinity Properties. Prior to the ROD, USACE performed dust sampling and other characterization activities at representative commercial and residential Vicinity Property locations. These efforts were reported in the Colonie FUSRAP Site Vicinity Property Operable Unit Remedial Investigation Summary Report (USACE, 2016). A Site Closeout Report (SCOR) was issued to NYSDEC and approved in 2018. The approval of this report starts the transfer process back to the LM. Ongoing and future transfer activities include records retention and management, preparation and filing of real estate records, physical site management (fencing, landscape maintenance, well abandonment) and coordination with state regulators and LM staff. This presentation is intended to make all stakeholders aware of the necessary steps for site transfer from the USACE back to the LM. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2024

Soil Desiccation Treatability Testing at BC Waste Disposal Cribs

During Hanford’s production period, low-level waste products generated from chemical processing of uranium fuel rods were discharged directly to the ground through a system of cribs and trenches located in the 200-BC-1 Operable Unit (OU). The site consists of 6 cribs and 20 trenches that received more than 117,000 m3 of radioactive liquid waste discharged to the soil. These unlined infiltration galleries held volumes of liquid waste while it seeped into the ground, with the understanding that the 100 m (330 ft) thick vadose zone in the area would effectively capture the effluent and prevent groundwater impacts. A conceptual model showing the operation of cribs and trenches is shown in Figure 1. Data show effluent from the 26 cribs and trenches containing about 410 curies of Technetium-99 (Tc-99) is primarily located between 30 m and 70 m (98 ft and 230 ft) depth (Corbin et al., 2005; Ward et al., 2004). Despite no evidence indicating that the contamination has reached the groundwater at BC cribs and trenches, the mobility of Tc-99 had been demonstrated in laboratory tests and was recognized as a threat to groundwater at the site. Using data from numerical models, laboratory analyses, field investigations, and information on historical discharges, the EPA and Ecology identified Tc-99 and U contamination of the vadose zone as a remediation priority. The U.S. DOE was notified by EPA and Ecology regarding risks associated with Tc-99 contamination in a letter requesting development of a strategy for improved methods to understand the nature and extent of vadose zone contamination, specifically Tc-99, and to develop remedial options for addressing such contamination. To develop the appropriate technology for characterizing, remediating, and monitoring the deep vadose zone Tc-99 contamination, the U.S. DOE worked with the EPA and Ecology to create a Treatability Test Plan under a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) for the Hanford 200 Areas. Under this RI/FS, it was determined that a treatability test for soil desiccation should be carried out as it was identified as a promising in-situ treatment technology for mitigating risks posed by Tc-99 contamination to the groundwater table. The BC Cribs and Trenches site was identified as a representative site for Tc-99 and U contamination and selected for the soil desiccation treatability test. In this chapter, we summarize the overlying regulatory framework of RI/FS and treatability tests and illustrate how development and experimentation supported the evaluation of selected remedies. We briefly discuss the RI/FS for the 200 Areas of the Hanford Site and focus on the soil desiccation treatability testing performed at the BC cribs and trenches site under the Deep Vadose Zone Treatability Test Plan for the Hanford Central Plateau (DVZ-TT). The DVZ-TT is one component of the remedial investigation/feasibility study for the Hanford 200 Areas and represents the underlying regulatory framework that drives site operations towards records of decision and site closure.

Mangel, Adam R.↗
DOE OSTI2019

Financial Analysis of Experimental Releases Conducted at Glen Canyon Dam during Water Year 2017

This report examines the financial implications of the high-flow experiment (HFE) conducted at Glen Canyon Dam (GCD) during water year (WY) 2017. It is the eighth in a series of reports examining the financial implications of experimental flows conducted since the 1996 Record of Decision (ROD) was adopted in February 1997 (Reclamation 1996). The 1996 ROD implemented the Modified Low Fluctuating Flow (MLFF) regime. This is the first report since the 2016 ROD was adopted in January 2017 (Reclamation 2016). The 2016 ROD implemented the Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan (LTEMP) regime for monthly water releases, daily and hourly operating criteria, and experimental releases. A report released in January 2011 examined WYs 1997 to 2005 (Veselka et al. 2011); a report released in August 2011 examined WYs 2006 to 2010 (Poch et al. 2011); a report released in June 2012 examined WY 2011 (Poch et al. 2012); a report released in April 2013 examined WY 2012 (Poch et al. 2013); a report released in June 2014 examined WY 2013 (Graziano et al. 2014); a report released in September 2015 examined WY 2014 (Graziano et al. 2015); and a report released in November 2016 examined WY 2015 (Graziano et al. 2016). An experimental release may have either a positive or a negative impact on the financial value of energy production. Only one experimental release was conducted at GCD in WY 2017, specifically, a HFE release in November 2016. For this experimental release, financial costs of approximately $1.15 million were incurred because the HFE required sustained water releases exceeding the power plant’s maximum flow rate. In addition, during the month of the experiment, operators were not allowed to shape GCD power production, neither to follow firm electric service (FES) customer day-ahead energy deliveries nor to respond to market prices. This study identifies the main factors contributing to HFE costs and examines the interdependencies among these factors. It applies an integrated set of tools to estimate financial impacts by simulating GCD operations under two scenarios: (1) a Baseline scenario that mimics HFE operations both during the experiment and during the rest of the year when it complies with the 1996 daily/hourly operating criteria and the 2016 ROD monthly water release mandates, and (2) a counterfactual Without Experiments scenario identical to the Baseline scenario except it assumes that the HFE did not occur. The Generation and Transmission Maximization Superlite (GTMax SL) model was the main simulation tool used to simulate the dispatch of the GCD hydropower plant and associated water releases from Lake Powell. GCD is a Colorado River Storage Project (CRSP) power resource that is a component of the Salt Lake City Area Integrated Projects (SLCA/IP). In the modeling process the research team used extensive data sets and historical information on SLCA/IP power plant characteristics, hydrologic conditions, and Western Area Power Administration’s (WAPA’s) power purchase and sale prices. In addition to estimating the financial impact of the HFE, the team used the GTMax SL model to gain insights into the interplay among ROD operating criteria, exceptions made to criteria to accommodate the experimental releases, and WAPA operating practices.

13 HYDRO ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2019

Financial Analysis of the 2018 Glen Canyon Dam Bug Flow Experiment

This report examines the financial implications of the macroinvertebrate production flows (MPF) experiment conducted at the Glen Canyon Dam (GCD) from May 1, through August 31, 2018. It is the first report examining the financial implications of a MPF experiment since the 2016 Record of Decision (ROD) was adopted in December 2016 (Reclamation 2016). The 2016 ROD implemented the Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan (LTEMP) regime. Experimental releases may have either a positive or a negative impact on the financial value of energy production. For these experimental releases, financial costs of approximately $165,000 were incurred because this experiment maintained flat releases on the weekends and holidays. This study identifies the main factors that contribute to MPF costs and examines the interdependencies among these factors. It applies an integrated set of tools to estimate financial impacts by simulating GCD operations under two scenarios: (1) a Baseline scenario that mimics MPF operations during the period of the experiment when it complies with the 2016 ROD operating criteria, and (2) a counterfactual Without Experiments scenario that is identical to the baseline except it assumes that the MPF experiment did not occur. The Generation and Transmission Maximization Superlite (GTMax SL) model was the main simulation tool used to simulate the dispatch of the GCD hydropower plant and associated water releases from Lake Powell. GCD is a Colorado River Storage Project (CRSP) power resource that is a component of the Salt Lake City Area Integrated Projects (SLCA/IP). The research team used extensive data sets and historical information on SLCA/IP power plant characteristics, hydrologic conditions, and Western Area Power Administration’s (WAPA’s) power sale prices in the modeling process. In addition to estimating the financial impact of MPFs, the team used the GTMax SL model to gain insights into the interplay among ROD operating criteria, exceptions made to criteria to accommodate the experimental releases, and WAPA operating practices.

13 HYDRO ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2019

Y-12 Groundwater Protection Program CY 2018 Triennial Report of the Monitoring Well Inspection and Maintenance Program Y-12 National Security Complex Oak Ridge, Tennessee

This document is the Triennial Report for the Well Inspection and Maintenance Program of the Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12) Groundwater Protection Program (GWPP) at U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Y-12 and includes monitoring well inspections and well maintenance activities performed at Y-12 during calendar years (CYs) 2016 through 2018. This report formally documents well inspections completed by GWPP on active and inactive groundwater monitoring wells that are part of the Y-12 monitoring network and includes well inspections performed by URS|CH2M Oak Ridge, L.L.C. (UCOR), which administers the DOE Office of Environmental Management Y-12 Water Resources Restoration Program (WRRP). The WRRP includes wells that are utilized for the regulatory monitoring of Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) post-closure permits and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Remedial Effectiveness and Records of Decision and Solid Waste Disposal Facility (Landfill) permits and includes monitoring wells located at the CERCLA Environmental Management Waste Management Facility. Beginning in 2018, UCOR terminated three of their RCRA post-closure permits and is monitoring the former RCRA-permitted facilities under CERCLA. Consequently, the number of monitoring wells in the Y-12 network that receive UCOR-performed inspections has decreased significantly.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2019

Assessment of Technologies for I-129 Remediation in the 200-UP-1 Operable Unit

Iodine-129 (I-129) generated at the U.S. Department of Energy Hanford Site during plutonium production was released to the subsurface, resulting in several large, dilute plumes in the groundwater, including the plume in the 200-UP-1 operable unit (OU). A requirement in the Record of Decision (ROD) for interim remedial action at the 200-UP-1 OU is to “evaluate potential treatment options for I-129 as part of the selected remedy through further technology evaluation. If one or more viable technologies are identified, treatability tests will be conducted for those technologies.” The requirements also state: “In the event a viable treatment technology is not available, the use of a technical impracticable waiver under 40 CFR 300.430(f)(l)(ii)(c) may need to be considered as part of the final remedy.” Recent work has increased the understanding of iodine behavior in the Hanford subsurface. A thorough review of potential remediation technologies has also been completed, including laboratory testing of promising technologies to evaluate their effectiveness for the iodine conditions at the 200-UP-1 OU. Using the combined information from these efforts, this report evaluates potential remediation technology options for the 200-UP-1 OU with respect to the need for conducting treatability tests and to document the technology status in support of future OU decisions for addressing the I-129 plume.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗