Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “recycling CG”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Krylov subspace recycling for evolving structures

Krylov subspace recycling is a powerful tool when solving a long series of large, sparse linear systems that change only slowly over time. In PDE constrained shape optimization, these series appear naturally, as typically hundreds or thousands of optimization steps are needed with only small changes in the geometry. In this setting, however, applying Krylov subspace recycling can be a difficult task. As the geometry evolves, in general, so does the finite element mesh defined on or representing this geometry, including the numbers of nodes and elements and element connectivity. This is especially the case if re-meshing techniques are used. As a result, the number of algebraic degrees of freedom in the system changes, and in general the linear system matrices resulting from the finite element discretization change size from one optimization step to the next. Changes in the mesh connectivity also lead to structural changes in the matrices. In the case of re-meshing, even if the geometry changes only a little, the corresponding mesh might differ substantially from the previous one. Obviously, this prevents any straightforward mapping of the approximate invariant subspace of the linear system matrix (the focus of recycling in this work) from one optimization step to the next; similar problems arise for other selected subspaces. In this paper, we present an algorithm to map an approximate invariant subspace of the linear system matrix for the previous optimization step to an approximate invariant subspace of the linear system matrix for the current optimization step, for general meshes. This is achieved by exploiting the map from coefficient vectors to finite element functions on the mesh, combined with interpolation or approximation of functions on the finite element mesh. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach numerically with several proof of concept studies for a specific meshing technique.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Surfactant-Based Plastics De-Inking

Surfactant-mediated binder removal is critical for de-inking pretreatment in plastics recycling, yet the molecular mechanisms governing surfactant performance remain poorly understood. We used all-atom (AA) and coarse-grained (CG) molecular dynamics (MD) simulations alongside alkaline surfactant washing experiments to investigate interactions between a series of surfactants and a polyether urethane (PEU) binder in solution and on a polyethylene (PE) surface. Experiments reveal a range of de-inking efficiencies, ranging from <25 to >95% depending upon surfactant headgroup charge and tail length. AA simulations reveal that charged surfactants reach stable levels of surfactant coverage, while nonionic surfactants aggregate on the binder. CG umbrella sampling calculations quantify the thermodynamics of binder desorption in water. In ∼0.25 M surfactant solutions, up to a 52% reduction in the free energy barrier is computed, with trends in good agreement (R 2 = 0.92, Pearson’s r = –0.96, Spearman’s ρ = –0.83) with experimental de-inking efficiencies. We find that charged surfactants are more effective than nonionic surfactants for de-inking and propose three regimes of surfactant de-inking processes: good de-inking occurs in surfactants that promote PEU desorption with a low radius of gyration (R g ); moderate de-inking occurs when surfactants stabilize PEU but increase R g ; poor de-inking occurs in surfactants that aggregate on the binder and promote extensive anchoring to the surface. Overall, these molecular-level insights have the potential to guide the design of surfactant formulations for plastics recycling applications.

ink removal↗