SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “retrocommissioning”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

4 records

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2017

Chapter 16: Retrocommissioning Evaluation Protocol. The Uniform Methods Project: Methods for Determining Energy Efficiency Savings for Specific Measures

Retrocommissioning (RCx) is a systematic process for optimizing energy performance in existing buildings. It specifically focuses on improving the control of energy-using equipment (e.g., heating, ventilation, and air conditioning [HVAC] equipment and lighting) and typically does not involve equipment replacement. Field results have shown proper RCx can achieve energy savings ranging from 5 percent to 20 percent, with a typical payback of two years or less (Thorne 2003). The method presented in this protocol provides direction regarding: (1) how to account for each measure's specific characteristics and (2) how to choose the most appropriate savings verification approach.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

DOE OSTI2016

Sensor Suitcase Tablet Software

The Retrocommissioning Sensor Suitcase is targeted for use in small commercial buildings of less than 50,000 square feet of floor space that regularly receive basic services such as maintenance and repair, but don't have in-house energy management staff or buildings experts. The Suitcase is designed to be easy-to-use by building maintenance staff, or other professionals such as telecom and alarm technicians. The software in the hand-held is designed to guide the staff to input the building and system information, deploy the sensors in proper location, configure the sensor hardware, and start the data collection.

Source record↗

DOE OSTI2018

The Uniform Methods Project: Methods for Determining Energy Efficiency Savings for Specific Measures: January 2012 - September 2016

This is the complete set of Uniform Methods Project protocols for determining energy efficiency savings for specific measures, all within one report. The report includes the following chapters: Chapter 1: Introduction. Chapter 2: Commercial and Industrial Lighting Evaluation Protocol. Chapter 3: Commercial and Industrial Lighting Controls Evaluation Protocol. Chapter 4: Small Commercial and Residential Unitary and Split System HVAC Cooling Equipment-Efficiency Upgrade Evaluation Protocol. Chapter 5: Residential Furnaces and Boilers Evaluation Protocol. Chapter 6: Residential Lighting Evaluation Protocol. Chapter 7: Refrigerator Recycling Evaluation Protocol. Chapter 8: Whole-Building Retrofit with Consumption Data Analysis Evaluation Protocol. Chapter 9: Metering Cross-Cutting Protocol. Chapter 10: Peak Demand and Time-Differentiated Energy Savings Cross-Cutting Protocol. Chapter 11: Sample Design Cross-Cutting Protocol. Chapter 12: Survey Design and Implementation for Estimating Gross Savings Cross-Cutting Protocol. Chapter 13: Assessing Persistence and Other Evaluation Issues Cross-Cutting Protocol. Chapter 14: Chiller Evaluation Protocol. Chapter 15: Commercial New Construction Evaluation Protocol. Chapter 16: Retrocommissioning Evaluation Protocol. Chapter 17: Residential Behavior Evaluation Protocol. Chapter 18: Variable Frequency Drive Evaluation Protocol. Chapter 19: HVAC Controls (DDC/EMS/BAS) Evaluation Protocol. Chapter 20: Data. Center IT Efficiency Measures Evaluation Protocol. Chapter 21: Estimating Net Savings - Common Practices. Chapter 22: Compressed Air Evaluation Protocol. Chapter 23: Combined Heat and Power Evaluation Protocol. Chapter 24: Strategic Energy Management (SEM) Evaluation Protocol

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗

DOE OSTI2019

From Theory to Practice: Lessons Learned from an Advanced M&V Commercial Pilot

Advanced measurement & verification (M&V), or M&V 2.0, is an energy data analysis method using advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) data in combination with analytics to quantify energy efficiency project savings. Advanced M&V is viewed as an enabler for underutilized behavioral, retrocommissioning, and holistic multi-measure efficiency efforts, as quantifying savings for these programs with existing methods has typically been very challenging. Despite its promise, there are still several unanswered questions about the use of advanced M&V such as: How accurately can these tools quantify energy savings? How can advanced M&V satisfy regulatory requirements for rigorous savings estimates? Where and how does advanced M&V intersect with traditional impact evaluation and the principles of ‘embedded’ evaluation, measurement & verification (EM&V)? Pilots are being pursued in various regions and program contexts to address these research questions. However, results from these pilots are rarely made public, meaning that lessons may not be widely shared and the scope of analyses varies widely. The paper presents encouraging results from a recent advanced M&V pilot and discusses key process-related aspects such as managing AMI data and refining analysis methodologies. An approach to reviewing and classifying projects based on savings characteristics and magnitude is demonstrated, as a potential risk management tool. The authors also demonstrate how advanced M&V can identify underperforming projects and non-routine events in a timely manner. The paper also outlines lessons learned from this and other recent pilot activity and barriers to be overcome in moving toward the goal of widespread adoption of holistic meter-based programs.

Crowe, Eliot↗