NASA NTRSDate not supplied
Understanding phase transitions and melting in the Venusian crust and the associated changes in density are critical to constrain crustal thickness, recycling, and remelting processes. For example, average surface conditions on Venus of 92 bars and 460 °C correspond to low-grade metamorphic conditions on Earth equivalent to hornfels- and greenschist-facies. Further, the primary igneous mineralogy in the Venusian crust should be replaced by metamorphic minerals over time and potentially melt, as temperatures and pressures increase with depth along geothermal gradients. Here, we use Perple_X (Connolly, 2005), a Gibbs free energy minimization program to calculates table phase equilibria over a range of pressure and temperature conditions for whole-rock compositions of a dry basalt, alkali basalt, and peridotite. Further, we extract mineral abundancies along five geotherms of 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 °C/km and calculate the rock density after the extraction of melt. On the coldest geotherm of 5 °C/km, melting would start at ~ 197 km and ~121 km in the basalt and alkali basalt, respectively, and therefore at depths that significantly exceed the estimated thickness of the Venusian crust (8-25 km). A density cross-over, where the crustal density would exceed that of the mantle could potentially induce delamination and is estimated to occur at ~ 40 km for both compositions. On the 10 °C/km geotherm, melting of the basalt starts at 65 km and melt extraction only causes a gradual densification due the formation of initially lower melt proportions. In contrast, the alkali basalt starts to melt at a depth of ~ 57 km and the subsequent densification of the residual composition could trigger delamination at ~ 60km depth. For hotter geotherms (i.e., 25 °C/km gradient), melting would occur at shallower depths of 21 – 23 km. However, the basalt will not get significantly denser than the mantle while the residuum of the alkali basalt would reach a density cross-over at 30 km. Hence, differences in Venusian crustal compositions can significantly influence the thickness of the crust on individual geotherms. Our results demonstrate that phase transitions and melting are strongly dependent on the assumed geotherm and could, combined with geodynamic models, further constrain crustal parameters.