Search NASASearch

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “shadow bands”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Kramers nodal line in the charge density wave state of YTe 3 and the influence of twin domains

Recent studies have focused on the relationship between charge density wave (CDW) collective electronic ground states and nontrivial topological states. YTe 3 , a nonmagnetic quasi-two-dimensional chalcogenide, has been reported to exhibit a CDW state below 334 K. Using angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) and density functional theory (DFT), we establish that YTe 3 is a CDW-induced Kramers nodal line (KNL) metal, a recently proposed topological state of matter. Scanning tunneling microscopy and low energy electron diffraction reveal two orthogonal domains, each with a unidirectional CDW and a similar wave vector (𝐪 CDW ). When the influence of twin domains is considered, the effective band structure (EBS) computations that utilize DFT-calculated bands using a noncentrosymmetric structure determined by x-ray crystallography, show excellent agreement with ARPES. The noncentrosymmetry of YTe 3 is established by Raman spectroscopy. The Fermi surface and ARPES intensity plots show weak shadow bands displaced by 𝐪 CDW from the main bands. Furthermore, these are linked to CDW modulation, as the EBS calculation confirms. Bilayer split main and shadow bands suggest the existence of crossings, according to theory and experiment. DFT bands, including spin-orbit coupling, indicate existence of a KNL along the Σ direction from multiple crossings of bands dispersing perpendicular to it. Additionally, doubly degenerate bands are only found along the KNL at all energies, with some bands dispersing through the Fermi level.

Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy

Improving Building Footprint Extraction Using NAIP and 3DEP Lidar Derived Features with Deep Learning

Accurate building footprint extraction is critical for applications ranging from population estimation to disaster management. Although optical imagery provides detailed spectral information, it often struggles with shadows, occlusions, and background clutter in dense urban environments. Lidar data, by contrast, offer precise elevation and structural attributes but face challenges such as variable point density and noise. This study integrates multispectral imagery from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) with lidar-derived feature height and intensity from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) to improve footprint extraction using a U-Net–based deep learning model. A six-band input stack (RGB, near-infrared, height, intensity) was developed, normalized, and tiled for training and evaluation against Microsoft Global Building Footprints (GBF). Results from the Houston, TX test site show that the six-band model achieved a precision of 0.86, recall of 0.88, F1 score of 0.87, and Intersection-over-Union (IoU) of 0.76, consistently outperforming four-band baselines by reducing false positives while maintaining sensitivity. Predictions on withheld Houston tiles confirmed strong within-region generalization, yielded a precision of 0.78, recall of 0.81, F1 score of 0.79, and IoU of 0.66. Qualitative analysis further revealed limitations stemming from both training label quality and vegetation–building confusion. These findings demonstrate the complementary value of integrating spectral and structural information for robust building footprint extraction and how domain adaptation strategies can be used to enhance cross-regional transferability.

Liu, Jung Kuan [United States Geological Survey (U

Multi-X-point radiation and its dynamics in up/down asymmetry in plasma detachment regimes in Wendelstein 7-X

In Wendelstein 7-X (W7-X), stable plasma detachment in ECRH hydrogen plasmas is routinely achieved with the standard magnetic configuration, containing five magnetic islands in the scrape-off layer (SOL). Plasma detachment induced by intrinsic carbon impurities is characterized by a high radiation fraction (ƒ rad ) with significantly reduced divertor heat load and particle flux. In this work, we present the radiation dynamics during the detached plasma (DP) phase, such as the shift of radiation zones in radial and poloidal directions towards the X-points as ƒ rad increases (∼0.6–0.9), as well as the penetration of the radiation layer into the confinement region in the deep DP phase with ƒ rad approaching unity. In particular, a structure of multi-X-point radiation (multi-XPR) with an up/down asymmetry in the DP phase is highlighted, which is revealed by bolometer tomography and is further confirmed by video diagnostics. The multi-XPR structure forms helical 3D bands aligned with W7-X field periodicity. Field reversal experiments show that the brightest XPR displaces between the upper and lower SOL regions, suggesting the E× B drift effects. This paper presents the multi-XPR structure observed in the W7-X plasma in detail for the first time. A simplified model considering the influence of the poloidal E× B drift ( V d ) on the impurity flow in the SOL shows that the downstream drift toward the target or target shadow region ( V d < 0) decreases the impurity content, while the upstream drift toward the LCFS ( V d > 0) increases the impurity content. On this basis, the poloidal drift potentially leads to an up/down asymmetry of impurity density in the SOL despite the symmetry magnetic topology. The dynamics of the up/down asymmetry in the multi-XPR structure is also related to the magnitude V d /D (normalized to the impurity diffusivity), with an additional effect owing to the radial inward shift of the emission zone. These results provide new insights into impurity-induced detachment dynamics and provide a basis for improving 3D modeling of impurity transport, which typically does not consider drifts.

E × B drift