Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “solar powered missions”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

A Non-Nuclear, Solar Powered Mission to Uranus Utilizing the PowerSail - a Large Solar Sail with Embedded Solar Cells

Powering missions to the outer solar system is a significant challenge. These missions are typically powered by a Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (RTG). Though these sources provide stable power regardless of location in space, they are expensive to produce, difficult to integrate, and have both safety concerns as well as negative sociopolitical connotations. Perhaps most importantly, the availability of their fuel, plutonium-238, is scarce. Solar power is often considered a more attractive option. However, photovoltaic generation falls off at the distance from the sun squared. This drives the size of traditional solar generators to infeasible levels for deep space and their utilization at locations deeper the Jupiter is currently non-existent. Herein, a hypothetical solution, the PowerSail, and its application to a non-nuclear Uranus mission is presented. The PowerSail is a marriage of solar sails and thin-film solar cell assemblies. Herein the application of PowerSail spacecraft to a high priority science mission, the Applied Physics Laboratory’s Uranus Probe and Explorer, is studied. The overall mission design along with key subsystems design changes are discussed, ultimately showing that a PowerSail could be utilized as a non-nuclear option to reach destinations very deep in our solar system. Key needed technology developments to make the PowerSail and such a mission a reality are given.

John A. Carr↗

Energy Management Operations for the InSight Solar-Powered Mission at Mars

This paper discusses how the change in launch date has changed the energy management challenges for InSight, and how the energy management approach for surface operations has been adapted to address those challenges. It also describes how energy balance and battery life are protected over the course of the InSight landed mission, in terms of a deliberate balance between autonomous on-board fault protection and ground commanding into reduced-load configurations that still make progress versus specific, prioritized mission success criteria. It describes the project’s unique statistical analysis and usage of Mars Exploration Rovers (MER) archived data on solar energy collection to develop and validate an explicit prelaunch margin policy versus energy reductions due to environment variability over multiple-sol sequences. And finally, the paper explains how this archived energy data has influenced the modification of the Phoenix-heritage autonomous fault protection, to guard against quickly-arising inclement power-generation conditions, such as rapid onset of a local dust storm or water ice cloud front.

Lisano II, MIchael E.↗

Solar-power for Deep Space Science Missions

Solar power systems have enabled dazzling planetary science missions to much of the Solar System. This chapter outlines the types of solar array structures that have been used on U.S.-led robotic planetary science missions since the beginning of the space age, including several in development for future launch. The first solar-powered spacecraft employed body-mounted solar cells but designs quickly moved to extended panels to generate more electrical power. Early “paddle” designs were replaced by deployable twin rectangular “wings” which are still common in science missions and nearly ubiquitous in commercial telecommunications satellites. The increasing complexity of science missions investigating the nature of the space environment drove the development of the solar-powered satellites from the very beginning, and unique mission requirements to explore ever more distant and harsher regions of our solar system continue to drive innovations in spacecraft design, including solar arrays. This general progression to ever larger solar arrays to power ever more sophisticated spacecraft in ever harsher environments, punctuated by missions that emphasize lower cost and complexity, is a pattern that began in the 1960s and continues to this day. This chapter describes the solar array configurations used on deep space missions, with an emphasis on NASA’s planetary science missions, including specific design requirements that led to individual design selections. Future trends are also described.

Carolyn R Mercer↗

Solar-Powered Europa Orbiter Design Study (2007)

The feasibility of implementing a solar-powered mission around Europa has been evaluated periodically over the last decade. Most recently, an assessment was performed as part of the 2006 Europa Explorer (EE) Study, which evaluated the practicality of implementing that mission design with large solar arrays instead of radioisotope power systems (RPS). This previous study went into some depth in considering the issues related to the use of solar arrays in the Europa orbit illumination and radiation environment. The study concluded that an all-solar option was impractical to meet the science objectives as defined in that study by the science team. This conclusion resulted from the prohibitive mass, packaging and articulation issues associated with the very large (approx.300 sq m) solar arrays required to accommodate frequent eclipse periods associated with the particular Europa orbit used.

Europa↗

Power Hibernation for Low-Cost Solar Powered Lunar Missions

Lunar Surface temperatures can span from equatorial highs near 400K and polar lows of 50K. The extreme cold combined with the 354-hour duration of the lunar night is particularly challenging for small robotic lander missions. NASA’s Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) missions involve robotic landers intended to provide low-cost access to the lunar surface. Current CLPS Missions are solar powered and are only intended to survive a single lunar day. The ability to survive the night and continue operations over many lunar cycles would provide a dramatic increase in science productivity. The Power Hibernation approach relies on battery cells that can tolerate the extreme cold night and recover once temperatures return to normal. System recovery from hibernation depends on power electronics that can “cold start” at lunar dawn and operate on solar array output alone. Once battery and avionics systems are restored the spacecraft resumes daytime operations. The challenge is to achieve this capability with minimum impact to the spacecraft design and payload capacity. This talk will describe recent and ongoing investigations in battery and electronics technologies that will enable power hibernation and recovery.

Space Power↗

Power Hibernation for Low-Cost Solar Powered Lunar Missions

Lunar Surface temperatures can span from equatorial highs near 400K and polar lows of 50K. The extreme cold combined with the 354-hour duration of the lunar night is particularly challenging for small robotic lander missions. NASA’s Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) missions involve robotic landers intended to provide low-cost access to the lunar surface. Current CLPS Missions are solar powered and are only intended to survive a single lunar day. The ability to survive the night and continue operations over many lunar cycles would provide a dramatic increase in science productivity. The Power Hibernation approach relies on battery cells that can tolerate the extreme cold night and recover once temperatures return to normal. System recovery from hibernation depends on power electronics that can “cold start” at lunar dawn and operate on solar array output alone. Once battery and avionics systems are restored the spacecraft resumes daytime operations. The challenge is to achieve this capability with minimum impact to the spacecraft design and payload capacity. This talk will describe recent and ongoing investigations in battery and electronics technologies that will enable power hibernation and recovery.

Space Power↗

Significant Science at Jupiter Using Solar Power

Missions to the Outer Planets are challenging for a number of reasons, primary of which is the low output of solar arrays at large heliocentric distances. The INSIDE Jupiter mission is a Discovery concept for a science investigation at Jupiter that is capable of producing major studies of the Jovian internal structure and ionospheric-magnetospheric coupling. Additional information is contained in the original extended abstract.

Reitsema, H. J.↗

A Solar-Powered Enceladus Mission

We present the results of a concept design study for a New Frontiers or small Flagship-class mission to Enceladus, using solar power. By concentrating on the science objectives most critical for a Cassini follow-on, this mission maximizes the science return while maintaining a power consumption level that can be provided by a practical solar power system. The optimized instrument payload is the product of a broad science community-based Science Definition Team Study. The spacecraft and mission designs are the products of studies carried out by the GSFC Mission Design Lab and Ball Aerospace. In addition to the low isolation at Enceladus, its location deep in Saturn's gravity well makes it a challenging target to reach, meaning that careful consideration must be given to spacecraft mass and the potential mission types. This presentation summarizes the mission science objectives and payload, the dynamical work, and the notional operations plan of this mission.

Simon-Miller, Amy A.↗

Feasibility of Passive Cryogenic Cooling for Solar Powered Outer Planetary Missions

Spacescience instruments with cooled detectors require innovative thermal cooling solutions to meet science objectives. Detector sensitivity increases with decreasing temperature and low optics temperatures are often needed to reduce background photon noise. As the detector spectral range coverage increases from the visible to far infrared also requires lower detector temperatures. Increasing demands on detector performance lead to larger format detectors and higher refresh rates resulting in significant increases in power dissipation. Passive coolers rely on emissive power of radiating surfaces to reject heat to space. As the operating temperature requirements of detectors and optics decreases, the ability to reject heat to space becomes increasingly more difficult. Reducing both cooler internal parasitic and external environmental heat loads and maximizing the passive cooler field of view to space will enhance performance. While instrument heat loads and passive cooler parasitic heat loads are controlled by instrument designers, the external environmental heat loads and cooler views to space are governed by spacecraft and mission designers. Solar powered planetary missions require large arrays to generate sufficient power for spacecraft subsystems and payloads. Two or more solar array wings with cell coverage of the order of 40-80 m2 are often needed to generate sufficient power at 3-6 AU. These large arrays are typically symmetrically configured and can extend tens of meters. The arrays along with spacecraft attitude requirements near the target planetary bodies pose significant challenges for passive cooling at large AU. It is very difficult to provide a clear field of view to space for the cooler with large articulating arrays while keeping solar loads from impinging the cooler and meeting the spacecraft attitude science pointing requirements. This is counter intuitive because of the decreasing solar flux and colder planetary body temperatures at large AU. This paper presents the challenges and opportunities of passive cryogenic cooling versus active cooling for solar powered planetary missions.

Rodriguez, Jose I.↗

Power Hibernation for Low-Cost Solar Powered Lunar Missions

Because the surface of the Moon drops to cryogenic temperatures, no solar-powered lunar spacecraft have reliably operated beyond a single lunar day. Passive thermal control cannot keep a spacecraft sufficiently warm for the 354-hour lunar night, and active thermal control requires a dramatic increase in battery mass at the expense of payload mass. Extreme conditions seen on the lunar surface suggest a radioisotope solution is ideal, but mass, cost, and schedule are inconsistent with low-cost frequent flight intent of the commercial lunar payload services (CLPS) program. To solve the issue of lunar night survivability without radioisotope sources of power and heat, a lunar power hibernation approach is being developed at the Glenn Research Center, which exploits the ability of common 18650 Lithium-ion cells to passively survive cryogenic freeze-thaw cycles and recover without apparent performance degradation. A key aspect of this hibernation approach is the use of cryogenically operable electronics that safely manage the restoration of the battery thermal environment at lunar dawn. A spacecraft utilizing this strategy will operate into the lunar night on batteries until the state of charge or spacecraft temperature reaches a predetermined threshold. At this point, systems are shut down and the battery is isolated from the main bus to prevent charge or discharge during the freezing and thawing transitions. The system remains passive until lunar dawn, where temperatures can reach as low as 50 K. All electronics must be tolerant to these conditions. When the solar arrays are finally illuminated at lunar dawn, the main bus power electronics will initiate a “cold start” and begin regulating array power. The main bus electronics must be designed to operate at cryogenic temperatures. Array power is used to warm the battery and passive electronics back to operational temperatures. Once batteries are returned to normal temperatures, diagnostics and precharging is performed, as needed, and the battery is reconnected. The overall spacecraft system reboots and returns to nominal operations until lunar night returns. To assure that we can develop batteries suited for many hibernation freeze/thaw cycles, STMD Space Technology Research Grant Program (STRG) has selected two principal investigators that will thoroughly characterize of the Li-ion cell through the freeze-thaw process, investigate degradation mechanisms, and identify potential diagnostic techniques. STMD STRG is also funding an investigation of Gallium-Nitride semiconductors for cryogenic power applications. This work includes physics-informed modeling that considers cryogenic conductivity, carrier mobility, and quantum effects that govern semiconductor performance at cryogenic temperatures. These models can enable engineers to develop accurate cryogenic simulation models that assist in the design of power controls stable over the entire lunar surface temperature range. Meanwhile, Glenn is performing cryogenic testing of batteries and electronics, establishing design guidelines for power applications in extreme cold lunar environment, and potentially developing a hibernation technology demonstrator. The hibernation approach will enable low-cost lunar robotic missions to extend their operating lifetime to many months while minimizing development costs and impact on payload capacity. The need for cryogenically operable electronics is restricted to only main bus power and battery controls, as the majority of systems simply need to passively tolerate cryogenic temperatures. This allows developers to continue to exploit the cost savings of legacy and COTS hardware with minimum modification. For these reasons, lunar power hibernation is a viable near-term solution for lunar night survivability for solar powered commercial landers.

Space power↗

Preliminary Low Temperature Electron Irradiation of Triple Junction Solar Cells

For many years extending solar power missions far from the sun has been a challenge not only due to the rapid falloff in solar intensity (intensity varies as inverse square of solar distance) but also because some of the solar cells in an array may exhibit a LILT (low intensity low temperature) degradation that reduces array performance. Recent LILT tests performed on commercial triple junction solar cells have shown that high performance can be obtained at solar distances as great as approx. 5 AU1. As a result, their use for missions going far from the sun has become very attractive. One additional question that remains is whether the radiation damage experienced by solar cells under low temperature conditions will be more severe than when measured during room temperature radiation tests where thermal annealing may take place. This is especially pertinent to missions such as the New Frontiers mission Juno, which will experience cell irradiation from the trapped electron environment at Jupiter. Recent testing2 has shown that low temperature proton irradiation (10 MeV) produces cell degradation results similar to room temperature irradiations and that thermal annealing does not play a factor. Although it is suggestive to propose the same would be observed for low temperature electron irradiations, this has not been verified. JPL has routinely performed radiation testing on commercial solar cells and has also performed LILT testing to characterize cell performance under far sun operating conditions. This research activity was intended to combine the features of both capabilities to investigate the possibility of any room temperature annealing that might influence the measured radiation damage. Although it was not possible to maintain the test cells at a constant low temperature between irradiation and electrical measurements, it was possible to obtain measurements with the cell temperature kept well below room temperature. A fluence of 1E15 1MeV electrons was selected as representative of a moderately high dose that might be expected for a solar powered mission. Fluences much greater than this would require large increases in array area and mass, compromising the ability of PV to compete with non-solar alternatives.

Stella, Paul M.↗

Mission analysis of solar powered aircraft

The effect of a real mission scenario on a solar powered airplane configuration which had been developed in previous work were assessed. The mission used was surveillance of crop conditions over a route from Phoenix to Tucson to Tombstone, Arizona. Appendices are attached which address the applicability of existing platforms and payloads to do this mission.

Hall, D. W.↗

Reliable Power Hibernation and Recovery for Solar Powered Lunar Missions

NASA Glenn Research Center has been working on a solution to surviving the lunar night based on the discovery that Li-Ion cells can survive the freeze/thaw process. This implies that a lunar surface spacecraft could hibernate through the coldest portions of the night and recover at lunar dawn. Survival and recovery also depend on power electronics capable of tolerating the cold and reliably starting at lunar dawn based on solar array output alone. GRC is working with STMD Space Technology Research Grant investigators to characterize Li-ion cells through the freeze-thaw process and fully understand the electro-chemical and thermal-mechanical processes to assure reliable cell hibernation and recovery. Further, we are working with investigators to determine what power semiconductor material, transistor technology, and power architecture is best suited for reliable cold start at lunar dawn and methodically restoring the power system to full operation for the next lunar cycle.

Spacecraft Power↗