Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “spacecraft interactions”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1975

The MVM imaging system and its spacecraft interactions

The present work describes the main considerations and steps taken in determining the functional design of the imaging system of the Mariner Venus/Mercury (MVM) spacecraft and gives examples of some of the interactions between the spacecraft and the imaging instrument during the design and testing phases. Stringent cost and scheduling constraints dictated the use of the previous Mariner 9 dual-camera TV system. The TV parameters laid the groundwork for the imaging definition. Based on the flyby distances from Venus and Mercury and the goal of surface resolution better than 500 meters per sample pair, calculation was performed on focal length, format size, planetary coverage, and data rates. Some problems encountered in initial mechanical operation and as a result of spacecraft drift during the mission are also discussed.

Vescelus, F. E.↗
NASA NTRS1977

A simulation model of time-dependent plasma-spacecraft interactions

A plasma simulation code is presented that models the time-dependent plasma properties in the vicinity of a spherical, charged spacecraft. After showing agreement with analytic, steady-state theories and ATS-6 satellite data, the following three problems are treated: (1) transient pulses from photoemission at various emission temperatures and ambient plasma conditions, (2) spacecharge limited emission, and (3) simulated plasma oscillations in the long wavelength limit.

Rothwell, P. L.↗
NASA NTRS1984

Ground correlation investigation of thruster spacecraft interactions to be measured on the IAPS flight test

Preliminary ground correlation testing has been conducted with an 8 cm mercury ion thruster and diagnostic instrumentation replicating to a large extent the IAPS flight test hardware, configuration, and electrical grounding/isolation. Thruster efflux deposition retained at 25 C was measured and characterized. Thruster ion efflux was characterized with retarding potential analyzers. Thruster-generated plasma currents, the spacecraft common (SCC) potential, and ambient plasma properties were evaluated with a spacecraft potential probe (SPP). All the measured thruster/spacecraft interactions or their IAPS measurements depend critically on the SCC potential, which can be controlled by a neutralizer ground switch and by the SPP operation.

Power, J. L.↗
NASA NTRS2004

Validation of NASCAP-2K Spacecraft-Environment Interactions Calculations

The recently released Nascap-2k, version 2.0, three-dimensional computer code models interactions between spacecraft surfaces and low-earth-orbit, geosynchronous, auroral, and interplanetary plasma environments. It replaces the earlier three-dimensional spacecraft interactions codes NASCAP/GEO, NASCAP/LEO, POLAR, and DynaPAC. Nascap-2k has improved numeric techniques, a modern user interface, and a simple, interactive satellite surface definition module (Object ToolKit). We establish the accuracy of Nascap-2k both by comparing computed currents and potentials with analytic results and by comparing Nascap-2k results with published calculations using the earlier codes. Nascap-2k predicts Langmuir-Blodgett or Parker-Murphy current collection for a nearly spherical (100 surfaces) satellite in a short Debye length plasma depending on the absence or presence of a magnetic field. A low fidelity (in geometry and time) Nascap-2k geosynchronous charging calculation gives the same results as the corresponding low fidelity NASCAP/GEO calculation. A high fidelity calculation (using the Nascap-2k improved geometry and time stepping capabilities) gives higher potentials, which are more consistent with typical observations. Nascap-2k predicts the same current as a function of applied potential as was observed and calculated by NASCAP/LEO for the SPEAR I rocket with a bipolar sheath. A Nascap-2k DMSP charging calculation gives results similar to those obtained using POLAR and consistent with observation.

Davis, V. A.↗
NASA NTRS1979

Interactions between spacecraft and the charged-particle environment

Spacecraft-environment interactions are defined as the responses of a spacecraft surface to a charged-particle environment. This response can influence spacecraft system performance. Interactions can be divided into two broad categories: spacecraft passive, in which the environment acts on the spacecraft; and spacecraft active, in which the spacecraft causes the interaction. Passive interactions include the spacecraft-charging phenomenon. Active interactions include the relatively new interactions arising from the use of very large spacecraft and space power systems in future missions. To illustrate active interactions, a large power system operating at elevated voltages is considered. Possible interactions are described, available experimental data are reviewed, and the effect on power system performance is estimated.

Stevens, N. J.↗
NASA NTRS1979

Space environmental interactions with spacecraft surfaces

Environmental interactions are defined as the response of spacecraft surfaces to the charged-particle environment. These interactions are divided into two broad categories: spacecraft passive, in which the environment acts on the surfaces and spacecraft active, in which the spacecraft or a system on the spacecraft causes the interaction. The principal spacecraft passive interaction of concern is the spacecraft charging phenomenon. The spacecraft active category introduces the concept of interactions with the thermal plasma environment and Earth's magnetic fields, which are important at all altitudes and must be considered the designs of proposed large space structures and space power systems. The status of the spacecraft charging investigations is reviewed along with the spacecraft active interactions.

Stevens, J. N.↗
NASA NTRS1993

Interactions between spacecraft and their environments

Spacecraft inevitably interact with their environments. Besides the interactions one immediately thinks of in space (zero-g, solar heating, atmospheric drag, expansion into vacuum conditions, etc.) other interactions are also important. Those of interest to spacecraft designers so far may be grouped under several headings; plasma interactions and spacecraft charging, impact of debris and micrometeoroids, chemical reactions with neutral species, radiation degradation, etc. Researchers have made great progress in defining and evaluating the interactions of spacecraft with their expected ambient environments near Earth and in interplanetary space. Some of these interactions are discussed with an eye toward expanding our knowledge into new environments, such as may be found at the moon and Mars, that will interact in new and different ways with exploring spacecraft and spacefarers.

Ferguson, Dale C.↗
NASA NTRS1994

Spacecraft environments interactions: Protecting against the effects of spacecraft charging

The effects of the natural space environments on spacecraft design, development, and operation are the topic of a series of NASA Reference Publications currently being developed by the Electromagnetics and Environments Branch, Systems Analysis and Integration Laboratory, Marshall Space Flight Center. This primer, second in the series, describes the interactions between a spacecraft and the natural space plasma. Under certain environmental/spacecraft conditions, these interactions result in the phenomenon known as spacecraft charging. It is the focus of this publication to describe the phenomenon of spacecraft charging and its possible adverse effects on spacecraft and to present the key elements of a Spacecraft Charging Effects Protection Plan.

Herr, J. L.↗
NASA NTRS1993

Interactions between spacecraft and their environments

Interactions between spacecraft and their environments are discussed using the SSF and the SP-100 power system. It is recommended that discontinuous structure potentials of more than 100 V on a spacecraft must be connected with an insulating material of sufficient thickness to stand off the potential difference. Particular attention must be paid to conductors with a plasma arcing threshold higher than the conductor potential relative to the surrounding plasma. To avoid arcing, spacecraft surfaces should avoid exposed conductors, or at least exposed conductor-insulator junctions for LEO missions. To avoid differential charging, fully conductive surfaces should be used every where for GEO missions.

Ferguson, Dale C.↗
NASA NTRS1986

A unified approach to computer analysis and modeling of spacecraft environmental interactions

A new, coordinated, unified approach to the development of spacecraft plasma interaction models is proposed. The objective is to eliminate the unnecessary duplicative work in order to allow researchers to concentrate on the scientific aspects. By streamlining the developmental process, the interchange between theories and experimentalists is enhanced, and the transfer of technology to the spacecraft engineering community is faster. This approach is called the UNIfied Spacecraft Interaction Model (UNISIM). UNISIM is a coordinated system of software, hardware, and specifications. It is a tool for modeling and analyzing spacecraft interactions. It will be used to design experiments, to interpret results of experiments, and to aid in future spacecraft design. It breaks a Spacecraft Ineraction analysis into several modules. Each module will perform an analysis for some physical process, using phenomenology and algorithms which are well documented and have been subject to review. This system and its characteristics are discussed.

Katz, I.↗