DOE OSTI2018
Spin-state energetics are important for understanding properties that involve more than one spin state, for example, catalysis occurring on two or more potential energy surfaces corresponding to different electronic spins. Very often, multiple-spin processes involve transition-metal compounds, and therefore, it is important to understand the electronic structure and energetics of such compounds in different spin states. In this work, we benchmark relative spin-state energies of FeF 2 with respect to the quintet ground spin state using both singleconfigurational and multi-configurational methods, and we examine how they are affected by the binding of ethane and ethylene to the iron center. We also benchmark the binding energies of the complexes. The single-configurational methods used in this work are the Hartree–Fock method, 32 exchange–correlation functionals, and the CCSD(T) coupled-cluster method in both restricted and unrestricted formalisms. The multi-configurational methods that have been used are CASSCF, CASPT2, CASPT3, MRCI, MRCI+Q, and MR-ACPF. The spin-state splitting energies depend on the functional chosen and of the 32 exchange-correlation functionals investigated here we find that for the septet and spin-projected triplet states of FeF 2 , the M06 functional is the best when compared to our best estimates from multi-reference calculations. If all the nine excitation energies are considered, where there are three excited spin states (singlet, triplet, and septet) for each of the three systems (FeF 2 , FeF 2 ···ethane, and FeF 2 ···ethylene), the three best performing functionals are HLE16, SOGGA11-X, and M06-2X. We find that the binding of ethane perturbs the relative spin-state energy of FeF 2 by only a small amount, but the stronger binding of ethylene has a larger effect. For the spin-state splitting energies of FeF 2 using single-reference CCSD(T), we found the predicted results depend very strongly on precisely how the calculations are done, in particular, on the spin-restricted or spin-unrestricted character of the SCF reference state, which can differ even by around 50 kcal/mol for the SCF reference state and the subsequent CCSD(T) calculations. Furthermore, on analyzing the wave functions of both the spinrestricted or spin-unrestricted formalisms, we find that the lowest-energy singlet and triplet states of the complexes, just like FeF 2 in isolation, can have more unpaired electrons than they are usually assumed to have, i.e. they can be hyper open-shell electronic configurations, and that this can significantly lower the energy.
37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗