DOE OSTI2020
The objective of this research effort was to explore innovative cooling architectures enabled by additive manufacturing techniques for improved turbine cooling performance. The ability to create complex internal geometries was leveraged to better distribute coolant as well as to integrate inherently unstable flow devices to enhance internal and external heat transfer. This was accomplished with a multi-faceted approach including analytical, experimental, and computational components. This final report documents progress during the total 4.25 year effort that was extended (at no additional cost) from the original 3-year cooperative agreement. Prior to starting the project, significant effort was invested in investigating innovative cooling designs from the open literature. When the project started, we quickly down-selected to 4 configurations: impingement jet fluidic oscillators (for internal leading edge cooling), reverse film cooling (for pressure surface), sweeping film cooling jets (for suction surface), and trailing edge slot cooling with microchannels. During the 2nd year, the reverse film cooling design was shown to be sub-optimal and work on that topic was halted. The three remaining technologies were integrated into a large scale nozzle guide vane and installed into a low-speed linear cascade facility for further interrogation. Initial results showed the sweeping film cooling jets (on the suction surface) to be the most promising technology compared to a baseline diffusion shaped film hole (777 design). The benefit was particularly evident at high blowing ratios (>1.5) when the 777 coolant film separated from the downstream surface. Benefits were also evident at elevated freestream turbulence levels. The leading edge cooling with unsteady jets was less effective in terms of peak or average cooling – however it was superior to round hole impingement cooling in terms of spatial uniformity. Finally, the trailing edge cooling design with micro-channels was scrapped in favor of a pinned arrangement with centerbody. During the 3rd year, the same three technologies were integrated into a transonic linear cascade for an assessment of compressibility effects. Again, the sweeping film cooling jets proved superior at high blowing ratios while the unsteady leading edge impingement and trailing edge pin-fins with centerbody designs yielded mixed results. Finally, during the 4th and final year, these 3 technologies were integrated into a direct metal laser sintered (DMLS) nozzle guide vane for testing in a high temperature, transonic annular vane cascade. The facility matches the flow temperature, Mach number, and coolant pressure ratios of an actual gas turbine. Before doing this, an additional series of tests were completed to validate a redesigned trailing edge cooling architecture. This final design included a centerbody with triangular pins between the centerbody and the vane external skin. The majority of these triangular pins are fabricated with a 30% gap to the centerbody – reducing their pressure drop considerably while still providing excellent heat transfer augmentation. This additional test campaign required an additional 3-month extension request to complete testing in the high temperature NGV test facility (Turbine Reacting Flow Rig – TuRFR). Testing of the DMLS vane in TuRFR pitted the 3 innovative cooling technologies against more traditional technologies (shaped 777 film hole, round impingement jet, and full pin arrangement in the trailing edge. The sweeping film cooling jets (on the suction surface) showed approximately 15% improvement in overall effectiveness compared to the 777 film hole while the trailing edge showed up to 20% improvement. The leading edge impingement was disappointing with a substantially lower effectiveness than traditional direct impingement. In summary, the study was successful in demonstrating that DMLS-enabled cooling technologies can yield significant gains in cooling performance.