Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “supercooled liquid water content”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2016

Vibrating-Wire, Supercooled Liquid Water Content Sensor Calibration and Characterization Progress

NASA conducted a winter 2015 field campaign at the NASA Glenn Research Center intended to generate a validation database for the NASA Icing Remote Sensing System. The weather balloons carried a specialized, disposable sensor designed to determine supercooled liquid water content aloft. Significant progress has been made to calibrate and characterize these specialized sensors. Calibration testing of these sensors was carried out in a specially developed, low-speed, icing wind tunnel. The sensor icing behavior was documented and analyzed. Finally, post-campaign evaluation of the balloon soundings revealed a gradual drift in the sensor data with increasing altitude. The behavior was analyzed and a method to account for the drift was developed.

Icing↗
NASA NTRS2016

Vibrating-Wire, Supercooled Liquid Water Content Sensor Calibration and Characterization Progress

NASA conducted a winter 2015 field campaign using weather balloons at the NASA Glenn Research Center to generate a validation database for the NASA Icing Remote Sensing System. The weather balloons carried a specialized, disposable, vibrating-wire sensor to determine supercooled liquid water content aloft. Significant progress has been made to calibrate and characterize these sensors. Calibration testing of the vibrating-wire sensors was carried out in a specially developed, low-speed, icing wind tunnel, and the results were analyzed. The sensor ice accretion behavior was also documented and analyzed. Finally, post-campaign evaluation of the balloon soundings revealed a gradual drift in the sensor data with increasing altitude. This behavior was analyzed and a method to correct for the drift in the data was developed.

Icing↗
NASA NTRS2016

Vibrating-Wire, Supercooled Liquid Water Content Sensor Calibration and Characterization Progress

NASA conducted a winter 2015 field campaign using weather balloons at the NASA Glenn Research Center to generate a validation database for the NASA Icing Remote Sensing System. The weather balloons carried a specialized, disposable, vibrating-wire sensor to determine supercooled liquid water content aloft. Significant progress has been made to calibrate and characterize these sensors. Calibration testing of the vibrating-wire sensors was carried out in a specially developed, low-speed, icing wind tunnel, and the results were analyzed. The sensor ice accretion behavior was also documented and analyzed. Finally, post-campaign evaluation of the balloon soundings revealed a gradual drift in the sensor data with increasing altitude. This behavior was analyzed and a method to correct for the drift in the data was developed.

Icing↗
NASA NTRS2016

Supercooled Liquid Water Content Instrument Analysis and Winter 2014 Data with Comparisons to the NASA Icing Remote Sensing System and Pilot Reports

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has developed a system for remotely detecting the hazardous conditions leading to aircraft icing in flight, the NASA Icing Remote Sensing System (NIRSS). Newly developed, weather balloon-borne instruments have been used to obtain in-situ measurements of supercooled liquid water during March 2014 to validate the algorithms used in the NIRSS. A mathematical model and a processing method were developed to analyze the data obtained from the weather balloon soundings. The data from soundings obtained in March 2014 were analyzed and compared to the output from the NIRSS and pilot reports.

aviation meterology↗
NASA NTRS1951

Analysis of Meteorological Data Obtained During Flight in a Supercooled Stratiform Cloud of High Liquid-Water Content

Flight icing-rate data obtained in a dense and. abnormally deep supercooled stratiform cloud system indicated the existence of liquid-water contents generally exceeding values in amount and extent previously reported over the midwestern sections of the United States. Additional information obtained during descent through a part of the cloud system indicated liquid-water contents that significantly exceeded theoretical values, especially near the middle of the cloud layer.. The growth of cloud droplets to sizes that resulted in sedimentation from the upper portions of the cloud is considered to be a possible cause of the high water contents near the center of the cloud layer. Flight measurements of the vertical temperature distribution in the cloud layer indicated a rate of change of temperature with altitude exceeding that of the moist adiabatic lapse rate. This excessive rate of change is considered to have contributed to the severity of the condition.

Perkins, Porter J.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Preliminary Study of Inter-Facility LWC Differences in Appendix C and Supercooled Large Drop Conditions due to Calibration Instruments

The simulation of clouds containing Supercooled Large Droplets has received increasing attention due to the introduction of Appendix O and future associated requirements for means of compliance. Supercooled Large Droplet conditions can cover four orders of magnitude in drop sizes, imposing a larger instrument measurement challenge than for Appendix C conditions. Wind tunnel facilities have adopted different instrumentation for liquid water content measurement, with fundamentally different principles of operation. In order to explore the comparability of the different instruments used for Appendix C and SLD measurement, and its impact on confidence in measurements used for means of compliance, a project was established to conduct a series of dedicated tests at three wind tunnel facilities. To date, liquid water content measurements have been completed using a Multi-Element sensor as the common instrument at two of the facilities. The data have provided preliminary information suggesting that substantial inter-facility differences likely exist in liquid water content estimates in Supercooled Large Droplet conditions that appear to be largely attributable to the choice of calibration instruments. These results are dependent on the assumption that the Multi-Element probe would produce equivalent measurements at the two facilities if the liquid water content were the same, regardless of other environmental differences that may exist between the two facilities. Planned further testing with other liquid water content measurement techniques may provide further information to confirm or refute the results of this study.

aircraft icing↗
NASA NTRS2005

The NASA Icing Remote Sensing System

NASA and the U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL) have an on-going activity to develop remote sensing technologies for the detection and measurement of icing conditions aloft. A multiple instrument approach is the current emphasis of this activity. Utilizing radar, radiometry, and lidar, a region of supercooled liquid is identified. If the liquid water content (LWC) is sufficiently high, then the region of supercooled liquid cloud is flagged as being an aviation hazard. The instruments utilized for the current effort are an X-band vertical staring radar, a radiometer that measures twelve frequencies between 22 and 59 GHz, and a lidar ceilometer. The radar data determine cloud boundaries, the radiometer determines the sub-freezing temperature heights and total liquid water content, and the ceilometer refines the lower cloud boundary. Data are post-processed with a LabVIEW program with a resultant supercooled LWC profile and aircraft hazard identification. Remotely sensed measurements gathered during the 2003-2004 Alliance Icing Research Study (AIRS II) were compared to aircraft in-situ measurements. Although the comparison data set is quite small, the cases examined indicate that the remote sensing technique appears to be an acceptable approach.

Reehorst, Andrew L.↗
NASA NTRS2005

NASA Icing Remote Sensing System Comparisons From AIRS II

NASA has an on-going activity to develop remote sensing technologies for the detection and measurement of icing conditions aloft. A multiple instrument approach is the current emphasis of this activity. Utilizing radar, radiometry, and lidar, a region of supercooled liquid is identified. If the liquid water content (LWC) is sufficiently high, then the region of supercooled liquid cloud is flagged as being an aviation hazard. The instruments utilized for the current effort are an X-band vertical staring radar, a radiometer that measures twelve frequencies between 22 and 59 GHz, and a lidar ceilometer. The radar data determine cloud boundaries, the radiometer determines the sub-freezing temperature heights and total liquid water content, and the ceilometer refines the lower cloud boundary. Data is post-processed with a LabVIEW program with a resultant supercooled LWC profile and aircraft hazard identification. Individual remotely sensed measurements gathered during the 2003-2004 Alliance Icing Research Study (AIRS II) were compared to aircraft in-situ measurements. Comparisons between the remote sensing system s fused icing product and in-situ measurements from the research aircraft are reviewed here. While there are areas where improvement can be made, the cases examined indicate that the fused sensor remote sensing technique appears to be a valid approach.

Reehorst, Andrew L.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Preliminary Study of Inter-Facility LWC Differences in Appendix C and Supercooled Large Droplet Conditions due to Calibration Instruments

The simulation of clouds containing Supercooled Large Droplets has received increasing attention due to the introduction of Appendix O and future associated requirements for means of compliance. Supercooled Large Droplet conditions can cover four orders of magnitude in drop sizes, imposing a larger instrument measurement challenge than for Appendix C conditions. Wind tunnel facilities have adopted different instrumentation for liquid water content measurement, with fundamentally different principles of operation. In order to explore the comparability of the different instruments used for Appendix C and SLD measurement, and its impact on confidence in measurements used for means of compliance, a project was established to conduct a series of dedicated tests at three wind tunnel facilities. To date, liquid water content measurements have been completed using a Multi-Element sensor as the common instrument at two of the facilities. The data have provided preliminary information suggesting that substantial inter-facility differences likely exist in liquid water content estimates in Supercooled Large Droplet conditions that appear to be largely attributable to the choice of calibration instruments. These results are dependent on the assumption that the Multi-Element probe would produce equivalent measurements at the two facilities if the liquid water content were the same, regardless of other environmental differences that may exist between the two facilities. Planned further testing with other liquid water content measurement techniques may provide further information to confirm or refute the results of this study.

aircraft icing↗
NASA NTRS2006

Progress in the Development of Practical Remote Detection of Icing Conditions

The NASA Icing Remote Sensing System (NIRSS) has been under definition and development at NASA Glenn Research Center since 1997. The goal of this development activity is to produce and demonstrate the required sensing and data processing technologies required to accurately remotely detect and measure icing conditions aloft. As part of that effort NASA has teamed with NCAR to develop software to fuse data from multiple instruments into a single detected icing condition product. The multiple instrument approach utilizes a X-band vertical staring radar, a multifrequency microwave, and a lidar ceilometer. The radar data determine cloud boundaries, the radiometer determines the sub-freezing temperature heights and total liquid water content, and the ceilometer refines the lower cloud boundary. Data is post-processed with a LabVIEW program with a resultant supercooled liquid water profile and aircraft hazard depiction. Ground-based, remotely-sensed measurements and in-situ measurements from research aircraft were gathered during the international 2003-2004 Alliance Icing Research Study (AIRS II). Comparisons between the remote sensing system s fused icing product and the aircraft measurements are reviewed here. While there are areas where improvement can be made, the cases examined suggest that the fused sensor remote sensing technique appears to be a valid approach.

Reehorst, Andrew↗
NASA NTRS2006

Comparison of Balloonsonde and Remote Sensing Atmospheric Measurements

As part of its aircraft icing research program, the NASA Glenn Research Center is conducting a program to develop technologies for the remote sensing of atmospheric conditions. A suite of instruments, currently ground-based, are used to identify a region of supercooled liquid water which is labeled as hazardous if its liquid water content is sufficiently high. During the recently completed Alliance Icing Research Study (AIRS II), these instruments were deployed in conjunction with those of other U.S. and Canadian researchers at the Mirabel Airport near Montreal. As part of the study, balloonsondes were employed to provide in-situ measurement of the atmospheric conditions that were being concurrently remotely sensed. Balloonsonde launches occurred daily at 1200 GMT to provide AIRS forecasters with local data and additionally when research aircraft were present in the airspace. In this paper, we compare the processed data from the NASA remote sensing instruments, which included an X-band radar, lidar and two radiometers, to the data gathered from the 70 soundings conducted while the NASA instruments were active. Among the parameters compared are cloud upper and lower boundaries, temperature and humidity profiles and freezing levels.

Brinker, David J.↗
NASA NTRS2021

NASA Glenn Icing Research Tunnel: 2019 Cloud Calibration Procedure and Results

The NASA Glenn Research Center 2019 Icing Research Tunnel cloud calibration results are presented in this paper. The current status of the cloud uniformity, liquid water content, and drop-size calibration results will be discussed. The goals achieved in this calibration were to establish a uniform cloud and to generate transfer functions from the inputs of airspeed, spray bar atomizing air pressure, and spray bar water pressure to the outputs of median volumetric diameter (drop size distributions) and liquid water content. This was completed for both 14 CFR Parts 25 and 29, Appendix C (“typical” icing) and Appendix O (supercooled large drop) conditions. The cloud uniformity from the Standard nozzles has remained the same as what was reported for the 2014 full calibration. Changes were made to the Mod1 nozzle cloud, resulting in higher liquid water content values associated with the Mod1 cloud.

Emily N. Timko↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Isokinetic Probe Total Water Content Measurements in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel with Supercooled Large Drop Conditions

An Isokinetic Total Water Content Evaporator (IKP2) was used to measure liquid water content (LWC) in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel (IRT) with spray conditions that ranged in LWC and cloud drop size spectra as characterized by the median volumetric diameter (MVD). The IKP2 measurements were made as part of an international collaborative effort to investigate the measurement of supercooled large drop (SLD) conditions in several icing wind tunnels. This report focuses on the IKP2 and background water vapor (BWV) measurements made within the NASA IRT during the October 2017 test entry. The IKP2 TWC results are compared to the IRT LWC calibration values for a range of LWC and MVD values. The IRT LWC calibration is based on measurements from a multi-element hot-wire probe. In general, the IKP2 TWC values were approximately 9% greater than the IRT LWC calibration values over a range of LWC from 0.4 g/m3 to 3.0 g/m3. The ratio of IKP2 TWC to IRT LWC calibration ranged from approximately 0.9 to 1.27 over a range of MVD from 15µm to 460 µm. Comparisons of this data set to IKP2 data from a 2014 IRT test entry show similar results in the regions where overlaps occurred. The results support the theory and observations of water mass loss from hot-wire TWC sensors when subjected to large MVD conditions.

Icing cloud instruments↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Isokinetic Probe Total Water Content Measurements in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel with Supercooled Large Drop Conditions

An Isokinetic Total Water Content Evaporator (IKP2) was used to measure liquid water content (LWC) in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel (IRT) with spray conditions that ranged in LWC and cloud drop size spectra as characterized by the median volumetric diameter (MVD). The IKP2 measurements were made as part of an international collaborative effort to investigate the measurement of supercooled large drop (SLD) conditions in several icing wind tunnels. This report focuses on the IKP2 and background water vapor (BWV) measurements made within the NASA IRT during the October 2017 test entry. The IKP2 TWC results are compared to the IRT LWC calibration values for a range of LWC and MVD values. The IRT LWC calibration is based on measurements from a multi-element hot-wire probe. In general, the IKP2 TWC values were approximately 9% greater than the IRT LWC calibration values over a range of LWC from 0.4 g/m3 to 3.0 g/m3. The ratio of IKP2 TWC to IRT LWC calibration ranged from approximately 0.9 to 1.27 over a range of MVD from 15m to 460 m. Comparisons of this data set to IKP2 data from a 2014 IRT test entry show similar results in the regions where overlaps occurred. The results support the theory and observations of water mass loss from hot-wire TWC sensors when subjected to large MVD conditions.

o Aircraft Icing↗
NASA NTRS2021

Isokinetic Probe Total Water Content Measurements in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel with Supercooled Large Drop Conditions

An Isokinetic Total Water Content Evaporator (IKP2) was used to measure liquid water content (LWC) in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel (IRT) with spray conditions that ranged in LWC and cloud drop size spectra as characterized by the median volumetric diameter (MVD). The IKP2 measurements were made as part of an international collaborative effort to investigate the measurement of supercooled large drop (SLD) conditions in several icing wind tunnels. This report focuses on the IKP2 and background water vapor (BWV) measurements made within the NASA IRT during the October 2017 test entry. The IKP2 TWC results are compared to the IRT LWC calibration values for a range of LWC and MVD values. The IRT LWC calibration is based on measurements from a multi-element hot-wire probe. In general, the IKP2 TWC values were approximately 9% greater than the IRT LWC calibration values over a range of LWC from 0.4 g/m3 to 3.0 g/m3. The ratio of IKP2 TWC to IRT LWC calibration ranged from approximately 0.9 to 1.27 over a range of MVD from 15um to 460 um. Comparisons of this data set to IKP2 data from a 2014 IRT test entry show similar results in the regions where overlaps occurred. The results support the theory and observations of water mass loss from hot-wire TWC sensors when subjected to large MVD conditions.

o Aircraft Icing↗
NASA NTRS2014

NASA Glenn Icing Research Tunnel: 2014 Cloud Calibration Procedure and Results

The results of the December 2013 to February 2014 Icing Research Tunnel full icing cloud calibration are presented. The calibration steps included establishing a uniform cloud and conducting drop size and liquid water content calibrations. The goal of the calibration was to develop a uniform cloud, and to generate a transfer function from the inputs of air speed, spray bar atomizing air pressure and water pressure to the outputs of median volumetric drop diameter and liquid water content. This was done for both 14 CFR Parts 25 and 29, Appendix C ('typical' icing) and soon-to-be released Appendix O (supercooled large drop) conditions.

liquid water content↗