Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “thick-walled theory”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

Exact solution of burst pressure for thick-walled pipes using the flow theory of plasticity

This paper develops an exact solution of burst pressure for defect-free, thick-walled pipes using the flow theory of plasticity in terms of the average shear stress yield criterion (or Zhu-Leis yield criterion). The pipe steel is assumed to obey the power-law strain hardening rule, and large plastic deformation is described by the finite strain theory. On this basis, internal pressure is obtained as a power series function of the effective strains on the inside and outside surfaces of the thick-walled pipe with use of the second Bernoulli numbers. At burst failure, the Zhu-Leis flow solution of burst pressure is determined as a power series solution, and the burst effective strains, the burst effective stresses, and the burst pressure are functions of the diameter ratio (D o / D i ), strain hardening exponent (n), and ultimate tensile strength (UTS). Similarly, the Tresca and von Mises flow solutions of burst pressure are also determined as a power series solution in terms of the Tresca and von Mises yield criteria. A general closed-from exact solution of burst pressure is then proposed for the three yield criteria, and the results showed that the proposed exact solution matches well with the power series solution for each yield criterion. Moreover, the von Mises flow solution is an upper bound prediction, the Tresca flow solution is a lower bound prediction, and the Zhu-Leis flow solution is an intermediate prediction that agrees well with the finite element analysis results of burst pressure for thick-walled pipes. Furthermore, two datasets of full-scale burst tests are then utilized to evaluate and validate the proposed flow solutions of burst pressure for both thin and thick-walled pipes.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Burst Pressure Solutions of Thin and Thick-Walled Cylindrical Vessels

Pressure vessels (PVs) are widely used in the energy industry. Accurate burst pressure is critical to structural design and safe operation for both thin and thick-walled PVs. The traditional strength theories utilized a single-parameter material property, such as the yield stress or the ultimate tensile stress (UTS) to develop failure models for determining the yield or ultimate pressure carrying capacity in the PV design. The UTS-based Barlow formula is a typical burst pressure model developed from the Tresca strength theory that provides the basis for developing regulation rules and failure models for different industry design codes, such as ASME BPVC, ASME B31.3, and ASME B31G, among others. In order to reduce the conservatism of the Tresca strength model, ASME BPVC recently adapted failure models developed from the von Mises strength theory for the PV design and analysis. It has been commonly accepted that the burst pressure of pipelines depends on the UTS and strain hardening exponent, n, of the pipeline steel. An average shear stress yield theory was thus developed, and the Zhu-Leis solution of burst pressure was obtained as a function of UTS and n for thin-walled line pipes. Experiments showed that the Zhu-Leis solution provides an accurate, reliable prediction of burst pressure for defect-free thin-walled pipes. In order to extend the Zhu–Leis solution to thick-walled cylindrical PVs, this paper defined three new flow stresses, modified the traditional strength theories, and obtained three new burst pressure solutions that are valid for both thin and thick-walled cylindrical vessels. The proposed flow stresses are able to describe the tensile strength and the plastic flow response of PVs for a strain hardening steel. The associated strength theories were then developed in terms of the Tresca, von Mises, and Zhu-Leis yield criteria. From these new strength theories, three burst pressure solutions were obtained for thick-walled cylinders, where the von Mises solution is an upper bound prediction, the Tresca solution is a lower bound prediction, and the Zhu-Leis solution is an intermediate prediction of burst pressure for thick-walled cylinders. Lastly, the proposed burst pressure solutions were evaluated and validated by two large datasets of full-scale burst tests for thick-walled tubes and for thin-walled pipes.

42 ENGINEERING↗

EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION OF THEORETICAL BURST STRENGTH SOLUTION FOR DEFECT-FREE THICK-WALLED PIPES

The burst pressure of line pipes is an important strength property required in pipeline design and integrity management. Historically, the Barlow formula in conjunction with the ultimate tensile stress (UTS) of pipeline steels were utilized to estimate the burst strength of line pipes. However, the Barlow formula did not consider the plastic flow effect for ductile steels and is applicable only to thin-walled pipes. In 2006, the present author proposed a new multiaxial plastic yield theory and obtained a theoretical Zhu-Leis solution of burst strength for defect-free thin-walled pipes in term of UTS and strain hardening exponent n of pipeline steels. The Zhu-Leis solution has been validated by various burst test data for thin-walled pipelines for a wide range of steel grades from Grade B to X120. Recently, the present author extended the Zhu-Leis theory of plasticity to thick-walled pipes and obtained the Zhu-Leis solution of burst pressure for thick-walled pipes. The proposed burst pressure solution is applicable to both thin and thick-walled pipes. To experimentally validate the proposed theoretical burst pressure solution, this paper obtains a set of burst test data for three thick-walled pipes in Grade B carbon steel with a nominal diameter of 2.375 inches and three nominal wall thicknesses, resulting in D/t = 15.4, 10.9, 6.9. Through comparisons, these burst data validate the theoretical burst pressure solution for thick-walled pipes. Moreover, two additional burst test datasets collected from literature for thin and thick-walled pipes further validate the proposed burst pressure solution for both thin and thick-walled pipes.

Zhu, Xiankui↗

Burst pressure models and validations for thick-walled pipelines containing corrosion defects

Corrosion is one major threat to pipeline integrity. Over the past decades, many corrosion models have been developed for determining the remaining strength of corroded pipelines, including ASME B31.G, Modified B31.G, LPC, PCORRC and their modified models. All these corrosion models are applicable only to large diameter, thin-walled pipelines with a diameter to wall thickness ratio D/t ≥ 20. In practice, many pipelines have a small diameter and thick wall with a D/t ratio < 20, and thus an adequate corrosion model is needed for assessing remaining strength for corroded thick-walled pipelines. This paper briefly reviews the theoretical burst pressure models for defect-free thin and thick-walled pipelines and four representative corrosion assessment models for thin-walled corroded pipelines. On this basis, two modified corrosion models are proposed to thick-walled pipelines in terms of the average shear stress yield theory. To verify the proposed corrosion models, comprehensive validations are performed. Numerical validations include the elastic-plastic finite element analysis to determine burst pressure for pipelines without and with corrosion defects and the model evaluation using a large dataset of available FEA results of burst pressure for machined defects. Experimental validations include a set of burst pressure tests for defect-free thick-walled pipes with different thicknesses and the model evaluation using one large burst dataset for machined defects with flat bottoms and another large dataset for real corrosion defects with curved river bottom profiles. Both numerical and experimental validations show that the proposed corrosion models can more accurately predict the remaining strength for corroded thin and thick-walled pipelines.

Pipeline↗

Experimental Validation of Exact Burst Pressure Solutions for Thick-Walled Cylindrical Pressure Vessels

Burst pressure is one of the critical strength parameters used in the design and operation of pressure vessels because it represents the maximum pressure that a vessel can withstand before failing. Historically, the Barlow formula was used as a design base for estimating burst pressure. However, it does not consider the plastic flow response for ductile steels and is applicable only to thin-walled cylinders (i.e., the diameter to thickness ratio D/t ≥ 20). A new multiaxial plastic yield theory was developed to consider the plastic flow response, and the associated theoretical (i.e., Zhu–Leis) solution of burst pressure was obtained and has gained extensive applications in the pipeline industry because it was validated by different full-scale burst test datasets for large-diameter, thin-walled pipelines in a variety of steel grades from Grade B to X120. The Zhu–Leis flow theory of plasticity was recently extended to thick-walled pressure vessels, and the associated exact flow solution of burst pressure was obtained and is applicable to both thin and thick-walled cylindrical shells. Many full-scale burst tests are available for thin-walled line pipes in the pipeline industry, but limited pressure burst tests exist for thick-walled vessels. To validate the newly developed exact solutions of burst pressure for thick-walled cylinders, this paper conducts a series of burst pressure tests on small-diameter, thick-walled pipes. In particular, six burst tests are carried out for three thick-walled pipes in Grade B carbon steel. These pipes have a nominal diameter of 2.375 inches (60.33 mm) and three nominal wall thicknesses of 0.154, 0.218, and 0.344 inches (3.91, 5.54, and 8.74 mm), leading to D/t = 15.4, 10.9, and 6.9, respectively. With the burst test data, comparisons show that the Zhu–Leis flow solution of burst pressure matches well the burst test data for thick-walled pipes. Thus, these burst tests validate the accuracy of the Zhu–Leis flow solution of burst pressure for thick-walled cylindrical vessels.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Exact solutions of burst pressure for thick-walled cylinders in power-law strain hardening steels

Exact solutions of burst pressure for defect-free, thick-walled cylindrical pressure vessels with capped ends are developed using the flow theory of plasticity in terms of the Tresca, von Mises, and Zhu-Leis yield criteria. The material is assumed to obey a power-law strain hardening rule, and the finite strain theory is adopted to describe large plastic deformation. On this basis, internal pressure is obtained as a complex polynomial function of effective strains on the inside and outside surfaces of the pressure vessel with the use of the Bernoulli numbers. At burst failure, the effective strains and stresses on the inside and outside surfaces are first determined, and then three flow solutions of burst pressure are obtained as a power series function of the diameter ratio (D o /D i ), strain hardening exponent (n), and ultimate tensile strength (UTS). The power series solution is confirmed to agree well with the exact flow solution of burst pressure in a closed-form for each yield criterion, and the results show that the von Mises flow solution is an upper bound prediction, the Tresca flow solution is a lower bound prediction, and the Zhu-Leis flow solution is an intermediate prediction of burst pressure. In conclusion, two sets of full-scale burst test data are then utilized to evaluate and validate the proposed flow solutions of burst pressure for both thin-walled pipes and thick-walled cylindrical pressure vessels.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Evaluation of Maximum Allowable Working Pressure and Svensson Burst Pressure Recommended in API 579-1 2021 Edition

Abstract API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 2021 Edition provides the minimum wall thickness, the maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP), and the membrane stress equations for thin and thick-walled cylindrical shells subject to internal pressure in Section 2C.3.3.1 of Appendix 2C – Thickness, MAWP, and Stress Equations for an FFS Assessment. The minimum wall thickness and MAWP are determined using the hoop stress and the Tresca yield criterion. Section 2C.7 – Estimation of Burst Pressure newly added the Svensson method for calculating burst pressure of cylindrical shells under internal pressure, where the plastic yielding is characterized by the von Mises yield criterion. For thin-walled cylinders, the von Mises flow solution of burst pressure in Equation (2C.179) was recommended. For thick-walled cylinders, an implicit burst pressure solution in an integral equation (2C.176) was recommended. But this integral equation is inconvenient to use in practice. It is well known that the classic plasticity theory includes the Tresca and von Mises yield criteria, with the Tresca criterion predicting a lower bound solution and the von Mises criteria predicting an upper bound solution. In addition, the present author developed an average shear stress yield criterion that can determine more accurate limit and burst pressures for thin and thick-walled cylinders. This work uses these three yield criteria to evaluate the minimum required wall thickness, MAWP and Svensson burst pressure recommended in the API 579 code.

burst pressure↗

Evaluation of Maximum Allowable Working Pressure and Svensson Burst Pressure Recommended in API 579-1 2021 Edition

ABSTRACT API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 2021 Edition provides the minimum wall thickness, the maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP), and the membrane stress equations for thin and thick-walled cylindrical shells subject to internal pressure in Section 2C.3.3.1 of Appendix 2C – Thickness, MAWP, and Stress Equations for an FFS Assessment. The minimum wall thickness and MAWP are determined using the hoop stress and the Tresca yield criterion. Section 2C.7 – Estimation of Burst Pressure newly added the Svensson method for calculating burst pressure of cylindrical shells under internal pressure, where the plastic yielding is characterized by the von Mises yield criterion. For thin-walled cylinders, the von Mises flow solution of burst pressure in Equation (2C.179) was recommended. For thick-walled cylinders, an implicit burst pressure solution in an integral equation (2C.176) was recommended. But this integral equation is inconvenient to use in practice. It is well known that the classic plasticity theory includes the Tresca and von Mises yield criteria, with the Tresca criterion predicting a lower bound solution and the von Mises criteria predicting an upper bound solution. In addition, the present author developed an average shear stress yield criterion that can determine more accurate limit and burst pressures for thin and thick-walled cylinders. This work uses these three yield criteria to evaluate the minimum required wall thickness, MAWP and Svensson burst pressure recommended in the API 579 code.

burst pressure↗

A parametric finite element study for determining burst strength of thin and thick-walled pressure vessels

To accurately predict the burst strength of both thin and thick-walled pressure vessels (PVs), a parametric study of PV burst strength was performed for a wide range of vessel geometries and materials using elastic-plastic finite element analysis (FEA). A valid FEA model was established through a detailed study of 2D versus 3D FEA models, the critical stress failure criterion versus the limit load criteria, and the thick-wall effect on the FEA simulations. Here, the results show that the stresses and strains at the mean diameter, rather than outside diameter, determines a more accurate burst strength for both thin and thick-walled PVs. On this basis, a parametrized FEA script using the ABAQUS Python application programming interface (API) was used to create a large database of PV burst strengths for a variety of vessel geometries and materials, demonstrating that Python scripting is a powerful technique for performing parametric studies or generating large databases. From the FEA results, using the regression method, a new burst pressure model was developed as a function of the vessel geometry (D/t ratio) and material properties (UTS and n). As validated by a large number of full-scale burst test data, the proposed burst model can very accurately predict the burst strength for both thin and thick-walled PVs.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Effective field theory of fluctuating wall in open systems: from a kink in Josephson junction to general domain wall

We investigate macroscopic behaviors of fluctuating domain walls in nonequilibrium open systems with the help of the effective field theory based on symmetry. Since the domain wall in open systems breaks the translational symmetry, there appears a gapless excitation identified as the Nambu-Goldstone (NG) mode, which shows the non-propagating diffusive behavior in contrast to those in closed systems. After demonstrating the presence of the diffusive NG mode in the (2+1)-dimensional dissipative Josephson junction, we provide a symmetry-based general analysis for open systems breaking the one-dimensional translational symmetry. A general effective Lagrangian is constructed based on the Schwinger-Keldysh formalism, which supports the presence of the gapless diffusion mode in the fluctuation spectrum in the thin wall regime. Besides, we also identify a term peculiar to the open system, which possibly leads to the instability in the thick-wall regime or the nonlinear Kardar-Parisi-Zhang coupling in the thin-wall regime although it is absent in the Josephson junction.

71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSIC↗