Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “topology optimization”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

Tunable phononic bandgap materials designed via topology optimization

Topology optimization is used to design phononic bandgap materials that are tunable by mechanical deformation. A periodic media is considered, which due to the assumption of length scale separation, allows the dispersion relations to be obtained by analyzing a single unit cell subjected to Floquet–Bloch boundary conditions. A finite macroscopic deformation is applied to the unit cell to affect its geometry and hence dispersion. We tune the dispersion–deformation relation to our liking by solving a topology optimization problem using nonlinear programming. The adjoint method is employed to compute the sensitivities, and the non-differentiability of degenerate eigenvalues is avoided using symmetric polynomials. Several tunable phononic crystal designs are presented. Also, a verification analysis is performed, wherein the optimized design is interpreted and analyzed using a conforming finite element mesh.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2018

Topology optimization of finite strain viscoplastic systems under transient loads [Dynamic topology optimization based on finite strain visco-plasticity]

In this paper, a transient finite strain viscoplastic model is implemented in a gradient-based topology optimization framework to design impact mitigating structures. The model's kinematics relies on the multiplicative split of the deformation gradient, and the constitutive response is based on isotropic hardening viscoplasticity. To solve the mechanical balance laws, the implicit Newmark-beta method is used together with a total Lagrangian finite element formulation. The optimization problem is regularized using a partial differential equation filter and solved using the method of moving asymptotes. Sensitivities required to solve the optimization problem are derived using the adjoint method. To demonstrate the capability of the algorithm, several protective systems are designed, in which the absorbed viscoplastic energy is maximized. Finally, the numerical examples demonstrate that transient finite strain viscoplastic effects can successfully be combined with topology optimization.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2021

Mesh independency in topology optimization

The topology optimization community has regularly employed optimization algorithms from the operations research community. However, these algorithms are implemented in the sequence space l2 instead of the proper function space where the design variable resides. In this software, we benchmark the mesh independent implementation of pyMMAopt with three common problems in topology optimization. We show how the volume fraction variable discretization on non-uniform meshes affects the convergence of l2 based optimization algorithms and how pyMMAopt successfully achieves mesh independent convergence.

Salazar De Troya, Miguel↗
DOE OSTI2021

Plastic work constrained elastoplastic topology optimization

An elastoplastic topology optimization framework for limiting plastic work generation while maximizing stiffness is presented. The kinematics and constitutive model are based on finite strain linear isotropic hardening plasticity, and the balance laws are solved using a total Lagrangian finite element formulation. Aggregation of the specific plastic work combined with an adaptive normalization scheme efficiently constrains the maximum specific plastic work. The optimization problem is regularized using an augmented partial differential equation filter, and is solved by the method of moving asymptotes where path-dependent sensitivities are derived using the adjoint method. The numerical examples show a clear dependence on the optimized maximum stiffness structures for different levels of constrained specific plastic work. It is also shown that due to the history dependency of the plasticity, the load path significantly influences the structural performance and optimized topology.

42 ENGINEERING↗
NASA NTRS2014

Optimal Topology of Aircraft Rib and Spar Structures under Aeroelastic Loads

Several topology optimization problems are conducted within the ribs and spars of a wing box. It is desired to locate the best position of lightening holes, truss/cross-bracing, etc. A variety of aeroelastic metrics are isolated for each of these problems: elastic wing compliance under trim loads and taxi loads, stress distribution, and crushing loads. Aileron effectiveness under a constant roll rate is considered, as are dynamic metrics: natural vibration frequency and flutter. This approach helps uncover the relationship between topology and aeroelasticity in subsonic transport wings, and can therefore aid in understanding the complex aircraft design process which must eventually consider all these metrics and load cases simultaneously.

Stanford, Bret K.↗
NASA NTRS2018

Implementation of Topology Optimization Using OpenMDAO

Topology optimization is one of the widely known branches among the structural optimization, and it distinguishes itself by a large design domain and versatility. It can determine the optimal design out of an infinite number of configurations, thereby drawing interest from both industry and academia with regards to its applicability to additive manufacturing. However, its implementation is often a daunting task for engineers in practice. One of the issues is the programming effort required whenever the implementation requires any changes, ranging from subtle tweaks to drastic changes in the problem definition, and the derivative computation must be correspondingly updated after any change. The implementation, therefore, is not only time-consuming but also repetitive and susceptible to human-induced errors. In this regard, topology optimization implementations stand to benefit from reusability, ease of restructuring, and modularity. In this work, we propose OpenMDAO, a computational framework for multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO), as a generic platform for topology optimization. Two widely used topology optimization techniquesâ€"density-based and level-setâ€"are implemented as a demonstration. These techniques are implemented in a decomposed manner, with the aid of the modular architecture of OpenMDAO as well as state-of-the-art numerical methods. Variations on the density-based topology optimization approach are shown to demonstrate the modularity and automation for derivative computation that OpenMDAO provides.

Chung, Hayoung↗
DOE OSTI2021

Concurrent Shape and Topology Optimization

The typical topology optimization workflow uses a design domain that does not change during the optimization process. Consequently, features of the design domain, such as the location of loads and constraints, must be determined in advance and are not optimizable. A method is proposed herein that allows the design domain to be optimized along with the topology. This approach uses topology and shape derivatives to guide nested optimizers to the optimal topology and design domain. The details of the method are discussed, and examples are provided that demonstrate the utility of this approach.

42 ENGINEERING↗
NASA NTRS2000

Adjoint Techniques for Topology Optimization of Structures Under Damage Conditions

The objective of this cooperative agreement was to seek computationally efficient ways to optimize aerospace structures subject to damage tolerance criteria. Optimization was to involve sizing as well as topology optimization. The work was done in collaboration with Steve Scotti, Chauncey Wu and Joanne Walsh at the NASA Langley Research Center. Computation of constraint sensitivity is normally the most time-consuming step of an optimization procedure. The cooperative work first focused on this issue and implemented the adjoint method of sensitivity computation (Haftka and Gurdal, 1992) in an optimization code (runstream) written in Engineering Analysis Language (EAL). The method was implemented both for bar and plate elements including buckling sensitivity for the latter. Lumping of constraints was investigated as a means to reduce the computational cost. Adjoint sensitivity computation was developed and implemented for lumped stress and buckling constraints. Cost of the direct method and the adjoint method was compared for various structures with and without lumping. The results were reported in two papers (Akgun et al., 1998a and 1999). It is desirable to optimize topology of an aerospace structure subject to a large number of damage scenarios so that a damage tolerant structure is obtained. Including damage scenarios in the design procedure is critical in order to avoid large mass penalties at later stages (Haftka et al., 1983). A common method for topology optimization is that of compliance minimization (Bendsoe, 1995) which has not been used for damage tolerant design. In the present work, topology optimization is treated as a conventional problem aiming to minimize the weight subject to stress constraints. Multiple damage configurations (scenarios) are considered. Each configuration has its own structural stiffness matrix and, normally, requires factoring of the matrix and solution of the system of equations. Damage that is expected to be tolerated is local and represents a small change in the stiffness matrix compared to the baseline (undamaged) structure. The exact solution to a slightly modified set of equations can be obtained from the baseline solution economically without actually solving the modified system.. Shennan-Morrison-Woodbury (SMW) formulas are matrix update formulas that allow this (Akgun et al., 1998b). SMW formulas were therefore used here to compute adjoint displacements for sensitivity computation and structural displacements in damaged configurations.

Akgun, Mehmet A.↗
DOE OSTI2022

Manufacturing and stiffness constraints for topology optimized periodic structures

Topology optimization (TO) is commonly applied to design the unit cells of periodic structures. For example, metamaterials, lattice structures, phononic crystals (PhC), and photonic crystals (PC) have all been previously designed via TO. Unfortunately, the optimal structures for certain design objectives, e.g., bandgaps, are often impossible to manufacture as they have disconnected regions or “islands” of solid material (ISM) that are not self-supporting. Additionally, designs with enclosed void space (EVS) are problematic for additive manufacturing (AM) since support material or pre-sintered powder cannot be removed after manufacturing. We present a series of constraints that may be incorporated into any TO framework to ensure structures are self-supporting without enclosed voids. Additionally, we employ homogenization-based constraints that allow the designer to tune the elastic stiffness and isotropy of the optimized design. The proposed constraints are evaluated on example microstructures and utilized in a simple optimization test problem to highlight their abilities and limitations so that guidelines for appropriate combinations of constraints may be proposed. Effective constraint combinations are demonstrated on the design of 3D photonic crystals for maximum bandgap subject to manufacturing and stiffness constraints.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2020

A Topology Optimization Framework to Facilitate Adoption of Advanced District Thermal Energy Systems

Advanced district thermal energy systems, which circulate water at temperatures near ambient conditions, and facilitate the utilization of waste heat and renewable thermal sources, can lower the carbon-intensity of urban districts, advancing the U.N. Sustainable Development Goals. Optimization of the network topology — the selection of the best subset of buildings and the best network to connect them, to minimize life cycle cost — can increase adoption of these system in appropriate applications. The potential "solution space" of the topology optimization problem grows factorially with the number of buildings in the district, motivating the consideration of a design heuristic. In this study, a heuristic for the network selection was evaluated with an exhaustive search, for a prototypical four-building district. For the prototypical district considered, the heuristic was effective in selecting an optimal network topology. Additionally, it was found that, in this case, the selection of the subset of buildings was more influential on the life cycle cost than the selection of the network topology. This work is part of a larger effort to develop a topology optimization framework for district thermal energy systems, which is anticipated to address barriers to adoption of ambient-temperature systems.

28 EE - Advanced Manufacturing Office (EE-5A)↗
NASA NTRS1992

Truss topology optimization with simultaneous analysis and design

Strategies for topology optimization of trusses for minimum weight subject to stress and displacement constraints by Simultaneous Analysis and Design (SAND) are considered. The ground structure approach is used. A penalty function formulation of SAND is compared with an augmented Lagrangian formulation. The efficiency of SAND in handling combinations of general constraints is tested. A strategy for obtaining an optimal topology by minimizing the compliance of the truss is compared with a direct weight minimization solution to satisfy stress and displacement constraints. It is shown that for some problems, starting from the ground structure and using SAND is better than starting from a minimum compliance topology design and optimizing only the cross sections for minimum weight under stress and displacement constraints. A member elimination strategy to save CPU time is discussed.

Sankaranarayanan, S.↗
DOE OSTI2018

A computational study of symmetry and well-posedness of structural topology optimization

We report on computational topological optimization of elastic structures, in particular minimization of compliance subject to a constraint on the mass. Through computational experiments, it is discovered that even very simple optimization problems can exhibit complex behavior such as critical points and bifurcation. In the vicinity of significant points, structural topology optimization problems are not well-posed since infinitesimally small perturbations lead to distinct topologies.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2019

A dual mesh method with adaptivity for stress-constrained topology optimization

This paper is concerned with the topological optimization of elastic structures, with the goal of minimizing the compliance and/or mass of the structure, subject to a stress constraint. It is well known that depending upon the geometry and the loading conditions, the stress field can exhibit singularities, if these singularities are not adequately resolved, the topological optimization process will be ineffective. For computational efficiency, adaptive mesh refinement is required to adequately resolve the stress field. This poses a challenge for the traditional Solid Isotropic Material with Penalization (SIMP) method that employs a one-to-one correspondence between the finite element mesh and the optimization design variables because as the mesh is refined, the optimization process must somehow be re-started with a new set of design variables. The proposed solution here is a dual mesh approach, one finite element mesh defines the material distribution, a second finite element mesh is used for the computation of the displacement and stress fields. This allows for stress-based adaptive mesh refinement without modifying the definition of the optimization design variables. A second benefit of this dual mesh approach is that there is no need to apply a filter to the design variables to enforce a length scale, instead the length scale is determined by the design mesh. This reduces the number of design variables and allows the designer to apply spatially varying length scale if desired. The efficacy of this dual mesh approach is established via several stress-constrained topology optimization problems.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Simultaneous shape and topology optimization of inflatable soft robots

Simultaneous shape and topology optimization is used to design pressure-activated inflatable soft robots. The pressure loaded boundary is meshed conformingly and shape optimized, while the morphology of the robot is topology optimized. The design objective is to exert maximum force on an object, i.e. to produce soft “grippers”. The robot’s motion is modeled using nearly incompressible finite deformation hyperelasticity. To ensure stability of the robot, the buckling load factors obtained via linearized buckling analyses are constrained. The finite element method is used to evaluate the optimization cost and constraint functions and the adjoint method is employed to compute their sensitivities. The numerical examples produce pressure-driven soft robots with varying complexity. We also compare our simultaneous optimization results to those obtained via sequential topology and then shape optimization.

42 ENGINEERING↗