Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “torrefaction”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

3 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2016

Torrefaction Processing for Human Solid Waste Management

This study involved a torrefaction (mild pyrolysis) processing approach that could be used to sterilize feces and produce a stable, odor-free solid product that can be stored or recycled, and also to simultaneously recover moisture. It was demonstrated that mild heating (200-250 C) in nitrogen or air was adequate for torrefaction of a fecal simulant and an analog of human solid waste (canine feces). The net result was a nearly undetectable odor (for the canine feces), complete recovery of moisture, some additional water production, a modest reduction of the dry solid mass, and the production of small amounts of gas and liquid. The liquid product is mainly water, with a small Total Organic Carbon content. The amount of solid vs gas plus liquid products can be controlled by adjusting the torrefaction conditions (final temperature, holding time), and the current work has shown that the benefits of torrefaction could be achieved in a low temperature range (< 250 C). These temperatures are compatible with the PTFE bag materials historically used by NASA for fecal waste containment and will reduce the energy consumption of the process. The solid product was a dry material that did not support bacterial growth and was hydrophobic relative to the starting material. In the case of canine feces, the solid product was a mechanically friable material that could be easily compacted to a significantly smaller volume (approx. 50%). The proposed Torrefaction Processing Unit (TPU) would be designed to be compatible with the Universal Waste Management System (UWMS), now under development by NASA. A stand-alone TPU could be used to treat the canister from the UWMS, along with other types of wet solid wastes, with either conventional or microwave heating. Over time, a more complete integration of the TPU and the UWMS could be achieved, but will require design changes in both units.

Serio, Michael A.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Review of Existing Policies Affecting the Jettison of Waste in Low Earth Orbit and Deep Space

The management of waste generated onboard spacecraft during future long-duration deep-space missions will require different solutions from those currently implemented on the International Space Station which consist exclusively of collecting, storing, and returning the waste to Earth. Alternative options for managing spacecraft waste are to process it for recycling and recovery of resources, and to jettison it overboard in a solid form (such as a compacted tile) or in a gaseous form after torrefaction or other trash-to-gas technologies. The waste generated during a deep-space mission is derived mainly from spacecraft logistics supplies, food and beverage residues, personal or scientific items used by the crew, human metabolic waste, and unused spare components. Uncontained and unprocessed trash is a potential health hazard and a habitat volume liability, which makes onboard long-term storage an inefficient and non-optimal option. However, the jettison of solid, processed waste appears to be an effective solution for crewed deep-space missions, leading not only to volume reduction and habitat safening, but also to considerable mass savings in the spacecraft’s propulsion system. However, the disposal of trash overboard also creates a navigation hazard for spacecraft and the potential risk of contamination of planetary bodies, interfering with the search for life. This paper investigates the requirements covered by existing policies that could affect the jettison concept of operations and system design.

Jettison↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Design of a Jettison System For Space Transit Vehicles

Many options to re-use waste are currently being developed by NASA. These include combustion, compaction, torrefaction, and converting waste materials to an easily stored base polymer for future use. Human exploration missions require large amounts of supplies such as food, clothing and spare parts. A many-month journey to Mars will result in the generation of a substantial amount of problematic waste products. It is thought that this waste must be discarded to enable a Mars transit mission. The most cost-effective, reliable, and safest method to address this problem may be to simply jettison these materials from the spacecraft. The ability to jettison requires a multi-component integrated system design. Major components include a launcher, airlocks, trash bags, and tracking system. Depending upon mission requirements, a jettison dedicated airlock may be necessary. In other cases, the crew airlock might be all that’s needed. Examples of what to jettison include food waste, fecal containers, broken equipment, foam, expendables, hygiene products, health items, wipes, and clothing. The most important design factor is always crew safety. Other features to consider are loss of air due to the inefficiencies of vacuum pumps in the airlock, outgassing from the bags, and liquids condensing on the airlock that result in unwanted coatings. The launching system design must consider many different features: while in planetary orbit, a minimum exit velocity is necessary so the jettisoned material will not complete an orbit only to return and strike the ship. Also, for planetary protection issues, enabling waste to be sent to distant non-critical locations is highly desirable. When the space craft is in planetary transit to say, Mars, the jettison exit velocity should be low if the material is not released along the direction of travel. This is to minimize trajectory perturbations due to jettison-imposed torque on the spacecraft. Design considerations for the launcher include exit velocity, power consumption, volume and mass of material jettisoned, and frequency of jettison. Finally, the launcher must be able to handle many different types and shapes of waste products. This paper will discuss these design issues and give guidance to a pathway forward.

Steve Sepka↗