Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “trilateration”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

ATS-5 trilateration support

The development of an L-band trilateration network capable of locating the ATS-5 satellite, determining the satellite's orbital elements, and predicting the satellite position was investigated. An automatic tone-code ranging transponder was used to compare ranging measurements and communications reliability for the VHF and L-band. The L-band transponder network, analytical techniques, and the determination of the Kepler orbit parameters are described along with the calibration procedures, operation procedures, and verification of trilateration position.

Brisken, A. F.↗

Trilateration range and range rate system. Volume 1: CDA system manual

This document is one of a series of manuals designed to provide the information required to operate and maintain the Command and Data Acquisition (CDA) equipment of the Trilateration Range and Range Rate (TRRR) System. Information pertaining to the equipment in the Trilateration Range and Range Rate System which is designed to interface with existing NASA equipment located at Wallops Island, Virginia is presented.

Source record↗

Location of ATS-5 by L-band trilateration

Near real-time ATS-5 satellite positions and short term position predictions were derived from an experimental L-band trilateration network. Satellite position accuracies of approximately 0.0002 degrees in latitude and longitude and 20 meters in earth center distance were demonstrated. Individual slant range measurements from the master ground station to the satellite were precise to within 12 meters; from the satellite to each of two automatic remote transponders, 23 meters. The trilateration network comprised a master ground station near Schenectady, New York and remote unmanned transponders in Buenos Aires, Argentina and near Wahiawa, Hawaii.

Brisken, A. F.↗

A Trilateration Scheme for Relative Positioning

We introduce a trilateration scheme that evaluates the 3-dimensional (3-D) relative position between a reference spacecraft and a target spacecraft using raw-range measurements from a distance baseline of known locations, which we call “anchors”. The anchors can be antennas of a ground-based network (e.g., Deep Space Network (DSN) or Near Earth Network (NEN) stations), or satellites of a spacebased network (e.g., global positioning system (GPS) or tracking and data relay satellite (TDRS)). We define raw-range as the range that includes all the systematic errors that occur during range measurements. A unique feature of this approach is that accurate relative position is derived from a “differencing function” of raw-range measurements of the reference spacecraft and target spacecraft, thereby eliminating most of the systematic errors, such as media effects, ephemeris errors, instrument delays, clock bias, etc. There can be an arbitrary number of target spacecraft, and relative positioning of target spacecraft with respect to the reference spacecraft can be done simultaneously. In this paper, we first assume an idealized system in which clocks on the reference and target spacecraft are synchronized, with clocks of the anchors synchronized as well. We develop a novel iterative algorithm that computes the relative position of the target spacecraft with respect to the reference spacecraft. We illustrate the relative positioning method using the scenario of a network of three ground stations (i.e., the anchors) at Goldstone, California, USA, Madrid, Spain, and Marlargue, Argentina tracking two spacecraft at geosynchronous orbit distance. We demonstrate that the algorithm converges to submeter accuracy in estimating the relative position, in the presence of random errors and systematic errors in raw-range measurements, and in the presence of angular errors in estimating the pointing vectors between the anchors and the reference spacecraft. Next, we relax the requirement of perfect time synchronization between spacecraft, and show that by using an additional anchor, one can estimate and remove the clock biases between the reference and target spacecraft. We add a ground station at Kourou to the above example of three ground stations of Goldstone, Madrid, and Marlargue, and demonstrate that the updated algorithm also converges to meter-level accuracy (submeter in some cases) in the presence of clock biases in addition to the random errors, systematic errors, and angular errors as shown in the above case. We compare this scheme with a similar trilateration scheme for relative positioning scheme first proposed by Montenbruck in 2002.

Cheung, Kar-Ming↗

Results of the 3 November 1974 Applications Technology Satellite-6 (ATS-6) trilateration test

The highly successful 24 hour trilateration tracking and orbit determination test conducted on 3 November 1974 is described. In this test a new method of accurately computing geostationary spacecraft orbits was applied to the Applications Technology Satellite (ats-6). A single tracking station interrogates several strategically deployed ground based transponders via the synchronous satellite whose orbit is to be determined. The ATS-6 tracking data measurement noise over the 24 hour period was observed to be 0.3 mm/sec in range rate and 1.5 meters in range. By means of overlap orbit computation using 2 separate tracking data bases, the ATS-6 total position and velocity uncertainties were determined to reach a minimum of 30 meters and 0.2 cm/sec respectively. The maximum position and velocity uncertainty over this same time period was determined to be approximately 250 meters and 2 cm/sec respectively. A position determination using simultaneous tracking of the NASA-GSFC site by ATS-6 and ATS-3 was also performed. Station location recovery was to an accuracy on the order of 100 meters over the first 10 hours of tracking.

Schmid, P. E.↗

Earth parameters from global satellite triangulation and trilateration

Results obtained from 159-station global satellite triangulation and trilateration (including Baker-Nunn, BC-4, PC-1000 camera observations, SECOR, C-Band radar and EDM distance measurements) indicate differences in the semidiameter and orientation of the earth compared to results obtained from dynamic satellite solutions. Geoidal undulations obtained can be made consistent with dynamically determined ones at the expense of slight changes in the currently accepted parameters defining the gravity field of the level ellipsoid.

Mueller, I. I.↗

Three-dimensional adjustment of trilateration data

The three-dimensional locations of the monuments in the USGS Hollister trilateration network were adjusted to fit line length observations observed in 1977, using a Bayesian approach, and incorporating prior elevation estimates as data in the adjustment procedure. No significant discrepancies in the measured line lengths were found, but significant elevation adjustments (up to 1.85 m) were needed to fit the length data.

Sung, L.-Y.↗

Precision Time Protocol-Based Trilateration for Planetary Navigation

Progeny Systems Corporation has developed a high-fidelity, field-scalable, non-Global Positioning System (GPS) navigation system that offers precision localization over communications channels. The system is bidirectional, providing position information to both base and mobile units. It is the first-ever wireless use of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Precision Time Protocol (PTP) in a bidirectional trilateration navigation system. The innovation provides a precise and reliable navigation capability to support traverse-path planning systems and other mapping applications, and it establishes a core infrastructure for long-term lunar and planetary occupation. Mature technologies are integrated to provide navigation capability and to support data and voice communications on the same network. On Earth, the innovation is particularly well suited for use in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), as it offers a non-GPS precision navigation and location service for use in GPS-denied environments. Its bidirectional capability provides real-time location data to the UAV operator and to the UAV. This approach optimizes assisted GPS techniques and can be used to determine the presence of GPS degradation, spoofing, or jamming.

Murdock, Ron↗

Accuracy/Computation Performance of a New Trilateration Scheme for GPS-Style Localization

We recently introduced a new geometric trilateration (GT) method for GPS-style positioning. Preliminary singlepoint analysis using simplistic error assumptions indicates that the new scheme delivers almost indistinguishable localization accuracy as the traditional Newton-Raphson (NR) approach. Also, the same computation procedure can be used to perform high-accuracy relative positioning between a reference vehicle and an arbitrary number of target vehicles. This scheme has the potential to enable a) new mission concepts in collaborative science, b) in-situ navigation services for human Mars missions, and c) lower cost and faster acquisition of GPS signals for consumer-grade GPS products. The new GT scheme differs from the NR scheme as follows: 1. The new scheme is derived from Pythagoras Theorem, whereas the NR method is based on the principle of linear regression. 2. The NR method uses the absolute locations (xi, yi, zi)’s of the GPS satellites as input to each step of the localization computation. The GT method uses the Directional Cosines Ui’s from Earth’s center to the GPS satellite Si. 3. Both the NR method and the GT method iterate to converge to a localized solution. In each iteration step, multiple matrix operations are performed. The NR method constructs a different matrix in each iterative step, thus requires performing a new set of matrix operations in each step. The GT scheme uses the same matrix in each iteration, thus requiring computing the matrix operations only once for all subsequent iterations. In this paper, we perform an in-depth comparison between the GT scheme and the NR method in terms of a) GPS localization accuracy in the GPS operation environment, b) its sensitivity with respect to systematic errors and random errors, and c) computation load required to converge to a localization solution.

Lee, Charles↗

Global satellite triangulation and trilateration for the National Geodetic Satellite Program (solutions WN 12, 14 and 16)

A multi-year study and analysis of data from satellites launched specifically for geodetic purposes and from other satellites useful in geodetic studies was conducted. The program of work included theoretical studies and analysis for the geometric determination of station positions derived from photographic observations of both passive and active satellites and from range observations. The current status of data analysis, processing and results are examined.

Ivan I Mueller↗

Global satellite triangulation and trilateration results

Summary of the results of the Ohio State University geometric adjustment for the coordinates at 158 satellite tracking stations. In the solution the origin of the coordinate system is defined through the 'inner' adjustment procedure, whereas the orientation is through the Conventional International Origin and the Greenwich Mean Astronomical Meridian, both as defined by the Bureau International de l'Heure. The scale is implemented through Secor observations and weighted height constraints. Chord distances derived from C-band radar observations and from electronic distance measurements are also included, but they seem to have very little effect. The scale selected corresponds to a best fitting ellipsoid of a = 6,378,142 m and 1/f = 298.25. The average standard deviation of a single coordinate is 3.9 m.

Mueller, I. I.↗

NASA Keynote at the 2015 Trilateral SMA Conference, Frascati, Italy

The purpose of this presentation is to illustrate some new directions within NASA's safety and mission function in response to changes in missions, technology, and practices. The presentation lists last year's highlights from NASA's human and robotic spaceflight missions, and discusses anticipated highlights for the coming year taken from existing Agency presentations. It will highlight changes to NASA's mission and the way NASA does business, as described in the 2014 strategic plan. It will then discuss how these changes pose challenges to trusted SMA practices, and provide some examples of initiatives NASA is taking action to address these challenges.

Safety Mission Assurance↗