NASA NTRS1980
The truncation theory as it pertains to the calculation of geoid undulations based on Stokes' integral, but from limited gravity data, is reexamined. Specifically, the improved procedures of Molodenskii et al. are shown through numerical investigations to yield substantially smaller errors than the conventional method that is often applied in practice. In this improved method, as well as in a simpler alternative to the conventional approach, the Stokes' kernel is suitably modified in order to accelerate the rate of convergence of the error series. These modified methods, however, effect a reduction in the error only if a set of low-degree potential harmonic coefficients is utilized in the computation. Consider, for example, the situation in which gravity anomalies are given in a cap of radius 10 deg and the GEM 9 (20,20) potential field is used. Then, typically, the error in the computed undulation (aside from the spherical approximation and errors in the gravity anomaly data) according to the conventional truncation theory is 1.09 m; with Meissl's modification it reduces to 0.41m, while Molodenskii's improved method gives 0.45 m. A further alteration of Molodenskii's method is developed and yields an RMS error of 0.33 m. These values reflect the effect of the truncation, as well as the errors in the GEM 9 harmonic coefficients. The considerable improvement, suggested by these results, of the modified methods over the conventional procedure is verified with actual gravity anomaly data in two oceanic regions, where the GEOS-3 altimeter geoid serves as the basis for comparison. The optimal method of truncation, investigated by Colombo, is extremely ill-conditioned. It is shown that with no corresponding regularization, this procedure is inapplicable.