Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “wall-modeled LES”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Wall-modeled LES of the NASA Juncture Flow Experiment

We perform wall-modeled large eddy simulation (WMLES) of the NASA Juncture Flow experiment (Kegerise & Neuhart, NASA/TM–2019–20286) using an equilibrium wall model and unstructured finite volume solver, to assess its predictive ability for complex geometries. The flow condition simulated corresponds to 5 degrees angle of attack with a freestream Mach number of 0.189, and a Reynolds number based on the mean crank chord of 2.4 million. All simulations neglect the effects of wind tunnel walls, sting and mast present in the experiment. To assess the performance of WMLES on simpler flows with very coarse grids, we simulate flow in a turbulent channel at a friction Reynolds number, Reτ≈2000, and flow through a square duct at anReτ≈1000. The duct flow results using the equilibrium wall model indicate that the skin friction is inaccurate near the corner for grid topologies and resolutions typically used in WMLES, having implications for more complicated flows such as the juncture flow. For the juncture flow simulation, two different approaches are investigated. The first approach consists of a truncated-domain simulation wherein the inflow plane of the computational domain is placed at≈0.2chord length of the wing, and we prescribe the mean flow from a separate Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) solution along with synthetic turbulence to initiate realistic unsteadiness in the domain. The second approach involves simulating the entire geometry with trips to trigger transition to turbulence. The truncated- and full-domain simulations contain about 62 and 90 million cells, respectively; with 8-10 points per boundary layer thickness in the wall-parallel directions, 14-20 points in the wall-normal direction and a near-wall viscous spacing (∆n+1) of≈100. Preliminary results are encouraging overall in terms of the prediction of wall pressure, wall skin friction, velocity and stresses; but indicate that further work is required to improve the predictions in the separation bubble and wing-fuselage corner regions. The grid resolution used in this study is still fairly coarse, and the results should be interpreted as work in progress.

Prahladh S Iyer↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Wall-modeled LES of Flow Over a Gaussian Bump

We perform wall-modeled large eddy simulations (WMLES) of turbulent flow over a Gaussian-shaped bump geometry, to assess its performance in the accelerating and separation regions of the flow. The flow conditions are based on the ongoing CFD validation experiments of Slotnick [NATO STO-MP-AVT-307, 2019]. The oncoming flow Mach number is 0.176, and two Reynolds numbers are simulated that are about 10000 and 36000 based on boundary layer thickness upstream of the bump. Preliminary Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations are first performed to assess the effects of Mach number, Reynolds number, tunnel top and sidewall effects. Finally, WMLES results with an equilibrium wall model will be presented at two Reynolds numbers to assess their performance for this flow by making detailed comparisons with available experimental and higher-fidelity numerical data.

turbulence, wall model, large eddy simulation↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Wall-modeled LES of Flow Over a Gaussian Bump

We perform wall-modeled large eddy simulations (WMLES) of turbulent flow over a Gaussian-shaped bump geometry, to assess its performance in the acceleration and separation regions of the flow. An unstructured finite-volume solver is used along with an equilibrium wall model. The Mach number of the oncoming flow selected for the simulation is 0.176, and two Reynolds numbers (Re) are simulated that are about 10000 and 36000 based on boundary layer thickness upstream of the bump. Spanwise periodic results for the lower Re case are compared with the available DNS data, while the full three-dimensional simulation results for the higher Re case are compared to available experimental data. Sensitivity of WMLES results are assessed for a number of factors including grid resolution, wall model exchange location, type of wall model, and unstructured grid topology. The WMLES results for the lower Re case agree well with available DNS data in terms of the wall pressure variation, velocity and turbulent stress profile comparisons. The skin-friction predictions show a reduced tendency to separate. This appears to be accentuated for the higher Re case, for the medium resolution grid used in this study, where WMLES does not predict any flow separation in the mean, which is in contrast to the large separation bubble observed in the experiments.

turbulence↗
NASA NTRS2019

eddy Users Manual

eddy is a collection of tools - nonlinear solvers, meshing, post-processing, visualization, optimization, etc. - for performing scale-resolving simulations of multi-physics applications. The framework is designed to enable advanced R&D on a variety of topics by leveraging a mature capability for scale resolving simulations, and simultaneously be an appropriate tool for application analysis and support. Currently, eddy is at a relatively low technical readiness level (TRL), and users and developers should maintain appropriate expectations. The technical details behind eddy are outlined in several publications which can be consulted for more information [1–10]. The solvers are built around an unstructured high-order capability, and heavily utilize the tensor product sum-factorization approach for efficiency. The unsteady formulation utilizes a fully implicit space-time approach with a matrix-free Newton- Krylov method. A primitive steady-state solver is available for testing purposes, but is not expected to converge for all but simple verification cases. The Navier-Stokes fluid solvers do not support either RANS or hybrid-RANS capability, only LES and wall-modeled LES approaches. All of the solvers within eddy support three modes of operation: a primal solve of the full nonlinear problem, and two linearization approaches of the primal solve - the ad joint and the tangent solution. Details on how to select and use these three modes are outlined in Sec. 3.

Murman, Scott M.↗
DOE OSTI2026

Estimating and Evaluating Roughness Length and Displacement Height in Heterogeneous Urban Environments

The roughness length (z 0 ) and displacement height (z d ) are essential surface-layer parameters in numerical models (e.g., weather, climate, wall-modeled LES, etc.). This work evaluates the consistency of z 0 and z d estimates from morphometric and anemometric methods using data from two eddy-covariance flux towers (AmeriFlux US-INg and US-INc) in Indianapolis, IN. Results show inconsistencies in estimated z 0 and z d values depending on the chosen method. The two evaluated anemometric methods estimate non-physical values of z d when compared to roughness elements surrounding both towers. Additionally, predictions of mean wind speed using surface-layer similarity theory with morphometric estimates exhibit a bias during near-neutral and stable conditions relative to observations. The overestimation of mean wind speed by surface layer similarity theory is consistent with previous observational and modeling studies in urban areas, suggesting that the application of similarity theories to urban environments may have limitations. Differentiation of vegetation from built structures appears to impact morphometric z 0 and z d estimates, particularly where vegetation is abundant; however, it has little impact on correcting biases in the similarity theory. Specifically, we find that existing similarity theories using morphometric estimates underestimate integral velocity and length scales, and the degree of underestimation depends on the stability conditions. Accounting for the degree of anisotropy in surface-layer turbulence helps reduce the biases between similarity theories and observations during unstable conditions, but not in near-neutral cases. Future work is needed to identify the cause of such biases for near-neutral conditions.

Aerodynamic roughness length↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Scale resolving simulations of the NASA Juncture Flow Model using the LAVA solver

Two distinct simulation methodologies: Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation (DDES) and stress based Wall-modelled Large Eddy Simulation (WMLES) are evaluated using structured overset curvilinear grids for the NASA juncture flow model. While both methodologies are shown to mitigate the primary shortcomings of steady state Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes(RANS) simulations, several unresolved aspects are identified. Strong sensitivity to RANS-typegrid refinement is observed in the DDES with a substantial deterioration of the solution quality with increasing spatial resolution associated with deficiencies in the shielding function. Mean profiles for attached boundary layers on the fuselage show spurious inflections suggesting modelled stress depletion on finer grids. Lower numerical dissipation in terms of spatial discretization and time step size is seen to improve the solution quality, and the advantage of using RC and QCR2000 corrections in the underlying RANS closure is demonstrated for DDES on RANS-type meshes. Equilibrium Wall-Modelled LES used grids that resolved the tripping dots over the fuselage nose and the wing leading edge, consistent with the experiment setup. These simulations resulted in a cost-competitive approach compared to DDES on RANS-type grids. Although the agreement between WMLES predictions of first and second order single point statistics with experimental measurements is promising, a fundamental shortcoming is noted in terms of an overshoot in streamwise momentum in corner regions of the wing-fuselage juncture. This excess momentum subsequently delays the onset of separation,thereby resulting in an underprediction in length of the separation bubble. Some quantitative sensitivity to numerical discretization is observed; lowering of numerical dissipation shows better agreement with the experiment.

T^3↗
DOE OSTI2025

High-Fidelity Simulations of a Mach 9 Shock-Turbulent Boundary Layer Interaction

High-fidelity large-eddy simulations (LES) and wall-modeled large-eddy simulations (WMLES) are performed on the interaction of a Mach 9 turbulent boundary layer with a 34-degree compression ramp. Our primary interest is the sensitivity of mean and unsteady wall quantities to grid density. Additionally within the context of WMLES, we seek to explore solution sensitivity to the wall-model exchange location.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2024

An enrichment wall modeling framework for spectral element methods

In the present work, a first-of-its-kind enrichment wall-model is developed within the spectral element method (SEM) framework for large-eddy simulations (LES) of wall-bounded turbulent flows. The method augments the polynomial solution in the wall-adjacent elements with an analytical law-of-the-wall enrichment function representing the mean velocity near the wall. In the solution representation, this enrichment function captures the large gradients in the boundary layer, which allows the polynomial modes to represent the turbulent fluctuations. The enriched solution is able to resolve the shear stress at the wall without any modification to the no-slip wall boundary conditions, which allows for greater accuracy in the near-wall region compared to traditional methods. The enrichment wall modeling approach is implemented in a high-order SEM computational fluid dynamics solver, Nek5000, and its performance is assessed in turbulent channel flow wall-modeled LES for a range of Reynolds numbers. It is demonstrated that the enrichment wall-model improves solution accuracy on under-resolved near-wall grids as compared to traditional shear stress wall-models.

42 ENGINEERING↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Exploring Unstructured Mesh Adaptation for Hybrid Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes/Large Eddy Simulation

Mesh adaptation methods for the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations are rapidly maturing and beginning to impact the design of aerospace vehicles. RANS turbulence modeling improvements have slowed and may stagnate. Wall-modeled large eddy simulation (LES) and hybrid RANS/LES (HRLES) may provide an improved modeling capability but require specialized expertise to construct appropriate meshes and are considered be too ex-pensive for routine practical use. The realization of the CFD Vision 2030 Study includes improving geometry linkage, mesh generation/adaptation, and turbulence modeling/resolving methods for automated management of errors and uncertainties of physics-based, predictive modeling that can set the stage for ensuring a vehicle is in compliance with a regulation or specification (i.e., certification or qualification by analysis). An exploration of mesh adaptation for HRLES is performed to document synergies and challenges between mesh adaptation and HRLES. Vortex breakdown over a delta wing is examined to show the improvement of HRLES over RANS turbulence modeling approaches. A high lift configuration is shown to demonstrate complex geometry capability. Research and development opportunities are identified to advocate for continuing investments that may allow HRLES to enter routine practical use as a tool for aerospace vehicle analysis and design.

Michael A Park↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Summary of the 5th Propulsion Aerodynamics Workshop Nozzle Test Case: Heated Nozzle Exhaust Passing Over A Film-Cooled Plate

This paper summarizes findings from the fifth AIAA Propulsion Aerodynamics Workshop nozzle test case. The experimental configuration examined by workshop participants was a subsonic nozzle with a square exit blowing a heated exhaust over a film-cooled plate. Computational fluid dynamics solutions were obtained and compared to experimental measurements of flow velocities and temperatures, as well as plate surface temperatures. The heated nozzle operated with a Mach 0.3 exit flow at a static temperature ratio of 2.7. Cooling air blowing ratios of 0, 1, and 2 were considered. Computational meshes for the flow domain were provided for participants. Workshop participants from eight separate organizations represented government, industry, and academia. A variety of flow solutions were obtained: Most of the flow solutions employed a Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) approach, but scale-resolving simulations were used in some cases, including wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (LES), and a few hybrid RANS-LES approaches. One Lattice-Boltzmann solver was employed. For heat transfer to the test article, many participants used a conjugate heat transfer approach. Effects of mesh sensitivity, flow solution approach, and wall heat transfer approach are considered. In general, a fully three-dimensional conjugate heat transfer approach enabled better prediction of surface temperatures than simpler wall temperature boundary treatments. Also, the scale resolving approaches provided better prediction of static temperatures in the flow immediately above the plate consisting of the hot jet exhaust boundary layer interacting with the cooling film. Comparisons of plate surface friction drag and heat transfer obtained from the computations are also presented.

nozzle↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Hybrid RANS-LES Perspective for the High Lift Common Research Model Using LAVA

An assessment of a Hybrid RANS/LES (HRLES) approach for𝐶𝐿,max prediction is presented for the NASA High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL). Both the free air and the wind tunnel configuration of the CRM-HL are investigated and the results are compared to the QinetiQ wind tunnel experiments and to two other numerical approaches: Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and Wall-Modeled Large Eddy Simulations (WMLES). For the free-air configuration, HRLES was shown to address some of the known shortcomings in RANS methods and prevent inboard and outboard flow separation particularly in the region of𝐶𝐿,max and post-stall. To achieve these improvements over RANS, LES-appropriate grids and numerical discretizations are required. HRLES predicts a weak pitch break at the highest angle-of-attack due to onset of wing-root corner flow separation whereas the free-air corrected experiment values indicate an occurrence of a much stronger pitch break. The improvements of HRLES over a URANS approach has been objectively shown by computing a set of solutions with the same grid, same numerics and time-step size and comparing the solutions. It was also found that when applying HRLES to a RANS best practice grid and numerics that the HRLES method significantly under performed RANS. For the in tunnel configuration, HRLES showed good agreement with the loads, surface pressure and oil-flow photographs obtained in the experiment. HRLES was able to improve upon the RANS simulations, which showed a sharp loss of lift at the two highest angles-of-attack due to large scale inboard and outboard separation on the wing, by correctly predicting the corner flow separation and showing remarkably close agreement in the flow topologies with the experiment.

TTT↗
DOE OSTI2025

Structural uncertainty assessment for fire-engulfed objects in crosswind: Establishing credibility for a multiphysics wall-modeled large-eddy simulation paradigm

A structural uncertainty validation study for a large-scale, fire-engulfed, elevated object subjected to crosswind is presented to establish the credibility of a high-fidelity, low-Mach, turbulent reacting flow wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES) approach that includes multiphysics coupling to participating media radiation and conjugate heat transfer. To establish that WMLES can accurately predict surface quantities including drag and pressure coefficient in the low-Mach crosswind regime, a foundational elevated isothermal cylinder validation case is presented at a similar gap-to-diameter ratio of 0.25, spanning the subcritical to supercritical drag regime (Re 𝐷 = 1.1 × 10 5 and 4.3 × 10 5 , respectively). Here, this study exercised both static and dynamic coefficient LES (Smagorinsky and 𝑘 sgs ) with both local and exchange-based velocity sampling. Results showcase that the drag crisis (or the sudden drop in drag coefficient at increased Re 𝐷 ) is well captured when using an exchange-based dynamic coefficient WMLES methodology, while noting lack of mesh convergence and overall drag and pressure coefficient predictively when using a static coefficient, local velocity sampling WMLES. For the 𝒪⁡(10) m JP-8 liquid pool fire crosswind validation study presented, two experimental crosswind configurations (2 m/s and 9.5 m/s) are showcased for a fire-engulfed mock fuselage roughly 4 m in diameter. Using the best model-form practices identified in the isothermal study, dynamic coefficient 𝑘 sgs exchange-based WMLES fire validation findings demonstrate accurate peak irradiation and skin temperature predictions as a function of crosswind magnitude. Excessive yaw in the low-crosswind fuselage configuration, consistent with experimental findings, captured a significant predicted asymmetry in flame attachment and heat flux toward the downwind cylindrical cap—indicative of axial vortex structures transporting the flame along the upper and lower fuselage leeward surface. All fire mesh resolution simulations captured the experimental finding that as crosswind increased, predicted flame shape and peak irradiation magnitude onto the fuselage transitioned from a windward to a leeward cylinder location due to the migration of the upper- to lower-shear fuel/air mixing layer thereby demonstrating the novelty, significance, and credibility of this high-fidelity WMLES reacting flow framework.

Domino, Stefan Paul [Sandia National Laboratories ↗
NASA NTRS2018

Wall-Modeled Lattice Boltzmann and Navier-Stokes Approaches for Separated Flows

Lattice Boltzmann (LB) and hybrid Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes/large eddy simulation (RANS/LES) methods within the Launch Ascent and Vehicle Aerodynamics (LAVA) solver framework are applied to NASA's Revolutionary Computational Aerosciences (RCA) standard test cases for separated flows. A detailed comparison between the performance and accuracy of the two emerging numerical methodologies for turbulence resolving simulations, i.e. the LB and hybrid RANS/LES methods will be presented. This contribution addresses the RCA technical challenge to identify and down-select critical turbulence, transition, and numerical method technologies for 40% reduction in predictive error for standard turbulence separated flow test cases. Results for the 2D NASA wall-mounted hump and the axisymmetric transonic bump including time-averaged pressure coefficient, skin friction, and velocity pro les, as well as resolved and modeled Reynolds stresses for both numerical approaches will be presented and differences between LB and hybrid RANS/LES will be discussed.

Lattice Boltzmann↗
DOE OSTI2025

An intercomparison of wall fluxes in a turbulent thermal convection chamber: Direct numerical simulations and wall-modeled large-eddy simulations enhanced by machine learning

Thermal convection in a closed chamber is driven by a warm bottom, a cold top, and side walls at various temperatures. Although wall fluxes are the source of convection energy, accurately modeling these fluxes (i.e., the wall model) is challenging. In large-eddy simulations (LESs), many wall models are traditionally derived from the canonical boundary layer, which may be unsuitable for thermal convection bounded by both horizontal and vertical walls. This study conducts a model intercomparison of dry convection in a cubic-meter chamber using three direct numerical simulations (DNSs) and four LESs with different wall models. The LESs employ traditional wall models, a new wall model employing physics-aware neural networks, and a refined grid near the walls. The experiment involves four cases with varying sidewall temperatures. Our results show that LESs capture the main flow features and the trends of mean fluxes. The physics-aware neural networks and refined wall grids can improve the temporally averaged local fluxes when the large-scale circulation has a preferred direction. Even without the local improvement of wall fluxes, the LES flow quantities (temperature and velocities) can still largely match those in DNSs, provided the mean flux largely matches the DNSs. Additionally, DNSs reveal that a variation in corner treatments has minimal impacts on the flow quantities away from corners. Finally, LESs underestimate the mean fluxes of the entire wall due to their inability to resolve corner regions, but their mean flux away from the corner can better match DNS.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗