Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “workarounds,”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 records

System Driven Workarounds

The Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS) in a partnership between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), participating carriers, and labor organizations. It is designed to improve the National Airspace System by collecting and studying reports detailing unsafe conditions and events in the aviation industry. Employees are able to report safety issues or concerns with confidentiality and without fear of discipline. Safety reports highlighting system driven workarounds for the aviation community highlight the human workaround for the complex aviation system.

aviation safety↗

Orion Cabin Lighting System: Filter Workaround for Maintaining Crew Circadian Entrainment

Introduction: Suboptimal crew circadian entrainment (CCE) is common and results in cumulative fatigue and reduced cognitive function. This may promote use of psychostimulants and hypnotics. The Orion Cabin Lighting System (OCLS) consists of 15 dimmable lamps circuited to several zones. The OCLS monochromatic white lamp design is insufficient for maintaining CCE. While blue light (480-nm) elicits peak wake-cycle response, it is a powerful disruptor of CCE. We propose OCLS lamp filters (OLFs) as a workaround for maintaining CCE. Methods: Preliminary OLFs testing utilized a tunable-white LED to serve as a baseline lamp in the NASA Lighting Lab’s controlled environment (prototype OCLS lamps were unavailable). Illuminance and spectral irradiances were measured with the NASA Lighting Lab’s spectroradiometer. ConOps is proposed for OLFs. Results: OLFs markedly attenuated 480-nm light and illumination with minimal mass/volume requirements. ConOps includes in-flight deployment of OLFs and reducing OCLS lamp intensity prior to bedtime. Pros: minimal mass/volume, no added power, and a simplistic design. Cons: manual twice-daily articulation of OLFs, undetermined frangibility/flammability/off-gassing and effects on thermal regulation, and untested task illumination or color fidelity in the Orion cabin. Discussion: While OLFs aptly attenuate 480-nm light from our tunable LED lamp in the Lighting Lab’s controlled environment, they remain untested within the Orion cabin on OCLS lamps. Future tests include Orion cabin illumination optimization for appropriate Lux delivery and ensuring task/color fidelity with OLFs deployed. Adequate OCLS cooling should be similarly assessed. Other safety testing includes OLF frangibility/flammability/off-gassing in an enriched-O 2 /hypobaric environment. Together, these data will demonstrate OLFs provide a viable workaround for maintaining CCE further ensuring mission safety and success.

Carlos Rene Dostal↗

Abstract: Orion Lighting Workaround for Maintaining Crew Circadian Entrainment

Introduction. Light is the major environmental time cue of our endogenous circadian pacemaker. Suboptimal crew circadian entrainment (CCE) is common and associated with acute and chronic medical symptoms. Additionally, fatigue from suboptimal CCE promotes problematic use of sleep medications. The Orion Cabin Lighting System (OCLS) consists of monochromatic light-emitting diode (LED) lamps. However, light is a powerful suppressor of melatonin and it is a disruptor of CCE if used at incorrect times. A commercial off the shelf (COTS) dynamic lighting system (COTS-DLS) is a potential workaround for maintaining CCE.

Matthew Lindsey↗

ISS Regenerative Life Support: Challenges and Success in the Quest for Long-Term Habitability in Space

This presentation will discuss the International Space Station s (ISS) Regenerative Environmental Control and Life Support System (ECLSS) operations with discussion of the on-orbit lessons learned, specifically regarding the challenges that have been faced as the system has expanded with a growing ISS crew. Over the 10 year history of the ISS, there have been numerous challenges, failures, and triumphs in the quest to keep the crew alive and comfortable. Successful operation of the ECLSS not only requires maintenance of the hardware, but also management of the station resources in case of hardware failure or missed re-supply. This involves effective communication between the primary International Partners (NASA and Roskosmos) and the secondary partners (JAXA and ESA) in order to keep a reserve of the contingency consumables and allow for re-supply of failed hardware. The ISS ECLSS utilizes consumables storage for contingency usage as well as longer-term regenerative systems, which allow for conservation of the expensive resources brought up by re-supply vehicles. This long-term hardware, and the interactions with software, was a challenge for Systems Engineers when they were designed and require multiple operational workarounds in order to function continuously. On a day-to-day basis, the ECLSS provides big challenges to the on console controllers. Main challenges involve the utilization of the resources that have been brought up by the visiting vehicles prior to undocking, balance of contributions between the International Partners for both systems and resources, and maintaining balance between the many interdependent systems, which includes providing the resources they need when they need it. The current biggest challenge for ECLSS is the Regenerative ECLSS system, which continuously recycles urine and condensate water into drinking water and oxygen. These systems were brought to full functionality on STS-126 (ULF-2) mission. Through system failures and recovery, the ECLSS console has learned how to balance the water within the systems, store and use water for contingencies, and continue to work with the International Partners for short-term failures. Through these challenges and the system failures, the most important lesson learned has been the importance of redundancy and operational workarounds. It is only because of the flexibility of the hardware and the software that flight controllers have the opportunity to continue operating the system as a whole for mission success.

Bazley, Jesse A.↗

Identifying Outside Influences as Latent Factors to Risk in Human Performance

During the Acquisition Life Cycle for a program, there are several opportunities for the system in design to be adjusted in accordance with its changing landscape as it is being shaped by evolving policy and organizational culture. Human Systems Integration is integral to identifying these opportunities of change as there are a set number of activities that may account for altered operational states, human performance deviations, and overall component engagement if HSI is enacted early enough in the life cycle. Some changes that occur in the operational environment may not be accounted for since the organizational culture and practices are not currently a part of the HSI focus. Likewise, policy changes themselves from a top-to-bottom analysis may not have the appearance of effecting human performance until having gone through a trail-and-error period. Workarounds to adjust for unforeseen policy affects become the system's solution that usually includes changes in the training and education of the operators, maintainers, and support personnel. A system full of workarounds and off-normal practices, that cause operators to disregard the purpose of the design, coupled with the false notion that these activities are proven for successful system operation, is the very definition of “an accident waiting to happen”. Unforeseen changes in policies and practices that cause new and unusual activities to successfully and keep the system running, should be considered latent factors that may cause a potential mishap, and not part of the resilience that humans provide to the successful operation of the system. This presentation will explore how latent factors may find their way into system operations and how they can be identified and addressed.

Human Systems Integration↗

Skylab experimental performance evaluation manual. Appendix O: Experiment T002 manual navigation sightings (MSFC)

A series of analyses for Experiment T002, Navigation Sightings (MSFC), to be used for evaluating the performance of the Skylab corollary experiments under preflight, inflight, and post-flight conditions are presented. Experiment contingency plan workaround procedure and malfunction analyses are presented in order to assist in making the experiment operationally successful.

Purushotham, K. S.↗

Skylab experiment performance evaluation manual. Appendix P: Experiment T003 inflight aerosol analysis (DOT/MSFC)

A series of analyses is presented for experiment T003, inflight aerosol analysis, to be used for evaluating the performance of the Skylab corollary experiments under preflight, inflight, and post-flight conditions. Experiment contingency plan workaround procedure and malfunction analyses are presented in order to assist in making the experiment operationally successful.

Purushotham, K. S.↗

Skylab experiment performance evaluation manual. Appendix N: Experiment S183 ultraviolet panorama (MSFC), revision 1

A series is presented of analyses for Experiment S183, Ultraviolet Panorama (MSFC), to be used for evaluating the performance of the Skylab corollary experiments under preflight, inflight, and post-flight conditions. Experiment contingency plan workaround procedure and malfunction analyses are presented in order to assist in making the experiment operationally successful.

Purushotham, K. S.↗

Skylab experimental performance evaluation manual. Appendix D: Experiment M487 habitability/crew quarters (MSFC)

This appendix contains a series of analyses for Experiment M487, Habitability/ Crew Quarters (MSFC), to be used for evaluating the performance of the Skylab corollary experiments under preflight, inflight, and post flight conditions. Experiment contingency plan workaround procedure and malfunction analyses are presented in order to assist in making the experiment operationally successful.

Purushotham, K. S.↗

Skylab experiment performance evaluation manual. Appendix E: Experiment M512 Materials processing facility (MSFC)

Analyses for Experiment M512, Materials Processing Facility (MSFC), to be used for evaluating the performance of the Skylab corollary experiments under preflight, inflight, and post-flight conditions are presented. Experiment contingency plan workaround procedure and malfunction analyses are presented in order to assist in making the experiment operationally successful.

Thomas, O. H., Jr.↗

Skylab experiment performance evaluation manual. Appendix J: Experiment M555 gallium arsenide single crystal growth (MSFC)

Analyses for Experiment M555, Gallium Arsenide Single Crystal Growth (MSFC), to be used for evaluating the performance of the Skylab corollary experiments under preflight, inflight, and post-flight conditions are presented. Experiment contingency plan workaround procedure and malfunction analyses are presented in order to assist in making the experiment operationally successful.

Byers, M. S.↗

Skylab experiment performance evaluation manual. Appendix S: Experiment T027 contamination measurement sample array (MSFC)

Analyses for Experiment T027, Contamination Measurement Sample Array (MSFC), to be used for evaluating the performance of the Skylab corrollary experiments under preflight, inflight, and post-flight conditions are presented. Experiment contingency plan workaround procedure and malfunction analyses are presented in order to assist in making the experiment operationally successful.

Tonetti, B. B.↗