Search NASASearch

Engineering topics

Amy R. Winebarger

Publications and source records attributed to Amy R. Winebarger.

The Case for Solar Full-disk Spectral Diagnostics: Chromosphere to Corona

In the context of the recent call for white papers for the Decadal Survey for Solar and Space Physics (Heliophysics) 2024–2033, we present the argument that spatially-resolved spectral diagnostics over the full solar disk should be made a high-priority goal in Heliophysics and lead to the development of a mission concept that has the potential to become a cornerstone of the Heliophysics System Observatory (HSO). We claim that a mission providing consistent full-disk sampling of plasma properties (Doppler-shifts, non-thermal velocities, electron densities, elemental composition, etc.) of the chromosphere-corona system at the dynamic timescales of solar eruptive phenomena will revolutionize the field by adding the spectral diagnostics capability to the highly successful concept of full-disk imaging, everywhere, all the time, represented by the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO). We argue for it to be developed by the end of the current Decadal Survey cycle around the lessons learned from spectroscopic missions in the current NASA development pipeline, that include innovative strategies for faster integration of large fields-of-view, and comprehensive temperature coverage.

Sun

Optimizing spectroheliogram deconvolution methods : MaGIXS - A case study

Over the past five years, new methods to reconstruct spectrally pure maps of the Sun from spectroheliogram data have emerged. In particular, with the rebirth of long-abandoned slitless imaging spectroscopy, one may obtain both spatial and spectral information over a large field of view simultaneously. Yet, depending on the size of the extended source combined with the extent of spectral dispersion, there will be locations in the focal plane where spectral lines from different spatial locations overlap and must be deconvolved. An unfolding method has been successfully developed and demonstrated on the recent rocket flight MaGIXS, which observed several strong emission lines (9 to 30$\AA$) from different portions of two active regions. In the work we are going to present, we conduct a systematic investigation of the parameters that controls and optimizes the inversion method to unfold overlappogram data. We also demonstrate a derived method of the inversion that does not require previous assumptions on the thermal and ionization equilibrium and abundance state of the plasma.

Spectroheliogram

Nanoflare heating in coronal X-ray Bright Points

Understanding the heating of the non-flaring solar corona is an active topic of research in heliophysics. It is well accepted that magnetic fields are mainly responsible for coronal heating. The photospheric driver randomly moves the foot-points of the magnetic field lines, and either generates waves or the quasi-static buildup of magnetic energy, depending on the timescale of motion. Heating by the dissipation of the magnetic energy is termed as DC heating while the dissipation of wave is known as AC heating mechanism. Both the AC and DC heating mechanisms can lead to impulsive heating events, termed nanoflares. The magnitude and frequency of these nanoflares determine whether they can adequately satisfy the coronal heating budget. Thus it is of great importance to study the nanoflares properties to validate their role in coronal heating. Individual nanoflares are difficult to detect with the present generation instruments, however their presence can be inferred through indirect observational techniques combined with simulated nanoflare-heated plasma emissions. We combined the observed emission properties of coronal X-ray bright points (XBP) in EUV and X-ray wavelengths with the simulated nanoflare heated plasma to understand nanoflare properties and their contribution in coronal heating. Our results indicate that the heating of coronal XBPs could be explained by frequent nanoflares. Further we demonstrate that the sensitive spectroscopic observations in X-ray wavelength are crucial to diagnose the nanoflare properties.

Biswajit Mondal

Heating of Coronal X-Ray Bright Points

The X-ray bright points (XBPs) are consistently present on the solar disk throughout time and space. Studying their contribution to overall coronal emissions and heating is intriguing. XBPs are prominently visible during the solar minimum, especially in the absence of bright active regions (ARs). In this discussion, we'll talk about the contribution of XBPs to coronal X-ray emissions during the cycle minimum. This analysis is based on spectroscopic observations by Solar X-ray Monitor (XSM) onboard Chandrayaan 2, alongside concurrent observations from the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) on the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) and the X-Ray Telescope (XRT) on the Hinode observatory. Similar to ARs, XBPs consist of coronal loops visible in EUV/X-ray images. We investigated the possibility of nanoflares sustaining the heating of these XBP loops by comparing observed emissions with field-aligned hydrodynamic simulations. Our results suggest that nanoflares could indeed maintain the heating of the XBPs. Furthermore, we conducted a detailed study of a single XBP observed during the successful flight of the Marshall Grazing Incidence Spectrometer (MaGIXS). The unique observations made by MaGIXS, combined with 1D hydrodynamic simulations, enabled us to determine the nanoflare heating frequency for this particular XBP.

coronal heating

Nanoflare Heating Frequency of an X-Ray Bright Point Observed By MaGIXS

Nanoflares are thought to be one of the prime candidates that can heat the solar corona to its multimillion kelvin temperature. Individual nanoflares are difficult to detect with the present generation instruments, however their presence can be inferred by comparing simulated nanoflare-heated plasma emissions with the observed emission. Using HYDRAD coronal loop simulations, we model the emission from an X-ray bright point observed by the Marshall Grazing Incidence X-ray Spectrometer (MaGIXS), along with concurrent observations from the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) onboard Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) and X-Ray Telescope (XRT) onboard Hinode observatory. The length and magnetic field strength of the coronal loops are derived from the potential field extrapolation of the observed photospheric magnetogram by Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) onboard SDO. Each loop is assumed to be heated by random nanoflares, whose magnitude and frequency are determined by the loop length and magnetic field strength. The simulation results are then compared and matched against the measured intensity from AIA, XRT, and MaGIXS. Our model results indicate the loop morphology and emissions from the XBP under study could be well matched by a distribution of nanoflares with average delay times 400 s to 800 s, which strongly suggest that the heating is dominated by high-frequency events. Further, we demonstrate the high sensitivity of MaGIXS and XRT to diagnose the heating frequency using this method, while AIA passbands are found to be the least sensitive.

coronal heating

Determining The Nanoflare Heating Frequency of an X-Ray Bright Point Observed by MaGIXS

Nanoflares are thought to be one of the prime candidates that can heat the solar corona to its multi-million kelvin temperature. Individual nanoflares are difficult to detect with the present generation instruments, however their presence can be inferred by comparing simulated nanoflare-heated plasma emissions with the observed emission. Using HYDRAD coronal loop simulations, we model the emission from an X-ray bright point (XBP) observed by the Marshall Grazing Incidence X-ray Spectrometer (MaGIXS), along with nearest-available observations from the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) onboard Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) and X-Ray Telescope (XRT) onboard Hinode observatory. The length and magnetic field strength of the coronal loops are derived from the linear-force-free extrapolation of the observed photospheric magnetogram by Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) onboard SDO. Each loop is assumed to be heated by random nanoflares, whose magnitude and frequency are determined by the loop length and magnetic field strength. The simulation results are then compared and matched against the measured intensity from AIA, XRT, and MaGIXS. Our model results indicate the observed emissions from the XBP under study could be well matched by a distribution of nanoflares with average delay times 1500 s to 3000 s, which suggest that the heating is dominated by high-frequency events. Further, we demonstrate the high sensitivity of MaGIXS and XRT to diagnose the heating frequency using this method, while AIA passbands are found to be the least sensitive.

coronal heating