Heating of Coronal X-Ray Bright Points

Biswajit Mondal; Amy R. Winebarger; P. S. Athiray

NASA NTRS · 20240000683

Heating of Coronal X-Ray Bright Points

Biswajit Mondal·Amy R. Winebarger·P. S. Athiray

Abstract

The X-ray bright points (XBPs) are consistently present on the solar disk throughout time and space. Studying their contribution to overall coronal emissions and heating is intriguing. XBPs are prominently visible during the solar minimum, especially in the absence of bright active regions (ARs). In this discussion, we'll talk about the contribution of XBPs to coronal X-ray emissions during the cycle minimum. This analysis is based on spectroscopic observations by Solar X-ray Monitor (XSM) onboard Chandrayaan 2, alongside concurrent observations from the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) on the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) and the X-Ray Telescope (XRT) on the Hinode observatory. Similar to ARs, XBPs consist of coronal loops visible in EUV/X-ray images. We investigated the possibility of nanoflares sustaining the heating of these XBP loops by comparing observed emissions with field-aligned hydrodynamic simulations. Our results suggest that nanoflares could indeed maintain the heating of the XBPs. Furthermore, we conducted a detailed study of a single XBP observed during the successful flight of the Marshall Grazing Incidence Spectrometer (MaGIXS). The unique observations made by MaGIXS, combined with 1D hydrodynamic simulations, enabled us to determine the nanoflare heating frequency for this particular XBP.

Explore related subjects

coronal heating

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Biswajit Mondal, Amy R. Winebarger, P. S. Athiray. Heating of Coronal X-Ray Bright Points. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20240000683

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Nanoflare Heating of an X-Ray Bright Point

Nanoflares are thought to be one of the prime candidates that can keep the solar corona to its multimillion kelvin temperature. Individual nanoflares are difficult to detect with the present generation instruments, however their presence can be inferred by comparing the nanoflare heated simulated plasma emissions with the observed emission. Here, we present a simulation of emission from an X-ray Bright Point (XBP) that was observed by the Marshall Grazing Incidence X-ray Spectrometer (MaGIXS), along with concurrent observations from SDO/AIA and Hinode/XRT. We use EBTEL hydrodynamic code to simulate the XBP loops. Length and magnetic field strength of these loops are derived from the potential field extrapolation of the observed photospheric magnetogram by HMI/SDO. Each loop is assumed to be heated by random nanoflares, whose magnitude and frequency are determined by the looplength and magnetic field strength. The simulated outputs are used to predict the intensity of spectrally pure map of Fe-18, Fe-17, Ne-9 ,O-8, O-9, Ne-9 etc, which are then compared with the derived intensity from MaGIXS observation. Further we have predicted the intensity map as observed by AIA and XRT and compared them with the observation. We also estimated the temperature distribution of the XBP from the simulation and found a good agreement with the derived distribution from MaGIXS observation.

coronal heating↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Nanoflare Heating Frequency of an X-ray Bright Point Observed by MaGIXS

Nanoflares have been considered to be one of the most likely candidates for heating the solar corona to multi-million kelvin temperatures. Individual nanoflares are difficult to detect with today's instruments, but their presence may be established by comparing simulated nanoflare-heated plasma emissions to observed emissions. We present a simulation of emission from an X-ray Bright Point (XBP) detected by the MaGIXS, as well as simultaneous observations from SDO/AIA and Hinode/XRT. To simulate the XBP loops, we utilize the HYDRAD code. The length and magnetic field strength of these loops are determined using potential field extrapolation of SDO/HMI's observed photospheric magnetogram. Each loop is considered to be heated by random nanoflares, the amplitude and frequency of which are governed by the length of the loop and the strength of the magnetic field. The simulated outputs are used to estimate the intensity of spectrally pure maps of Fe-18, Fe-17, Ne-9, O-8, O-9, Ne-9, and so on, which is then compared to the intensity determined from MaGIXS observations. In addition, we derived the intensity maps obtained by AIA and XRT and compared them to the observed data. The composite distribution of the delay time of the nanoflares for which the simulated loops morphology and intensities match with observation shows a peak at 200s-500s, indicating that most of the nanoflares have a high/intermediate frequency.

coronal heating↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Nanoflare Heating Frequency of an X-Ray Bright Point Observed By MaGIXS

Nanoflares are thought to be one of the prime candidates that can heat the solar corona to its multimillion kelvin temperature. Individual nanoflares are difficult to detect with the present generation instruments, however their presence can be inferred by comparing simulated nanoflare-heated plasma emissions with the observed emission. Using HYDRAD coronal loop simulations, we model the emission from an X-ray bright point observed by the Marshall Grazing Incidence X-ray Spectrometer (MaGIXS), along with concurrent observations from the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) onboard Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) and X-Ray Telescope (XRT) onboard Hinode observatory. The length and magnetic field strength of the coronal loops are derived from the potential field extrapolation of the observed photospheric magnetogram by Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) onboard SDO. Each loop is assumed to be heated by random nanoflares, whose magnitude and frequency are determined by the loop length and magnetic field strength. The simulation results are then compared and matched against the measured intensity from AIA, XRT, and MaGIXS. Our model results indicate the loop morphology and emissions from the XBP under study could be well matched by a distribution of nanoflares with average delay times 400 s to 800 s, which strongly suggest that the heating is dominated by high-frequency events. Further, we demonstrate the high sensitivity of MaGIXS and XRT to diagnose the heating frequency using this method, while AIA passbands are found to be the least sensitive.

coronal heating↗