Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Bagby, Alyssa

Publications and source records attributed to Bagby, Alyssa.

Comparing measurements of the mixing layer height to modeled values

The mixing layer height (MLH) is the top layer of turbulent mixing within the lower atmosphere, above the Earth’s surface. Estimates of the mixing layer height allow us to determine the volume available for the dispersion of pollutants throughout the atmosphere. Our goal is to identify the most suitable mixing layer height input for our dispersion modeling tool (AERMOD). For this project we evaluated two different methods of estimating the local mixing layer height. First, we use 3 estimates of the mixing layer height obtained from a ceilometer, each height estimate corresponds to a different gradient in aerosol backscatter which is used as a proxy for mixing layer height identification. Second, we use AERMET, our AERMOD modeling system preprocessor for meteorological data, which estimates the mixing layer height using several equations combined with measured meteorological data. We evaluate the ceilometer and AERMET estimates over a 5-year period (2015-2019) to see how well aligned the estimated mixing layer heights are. Our results suggest that our model, AERMET, is on average, aligned with ceilometer estimates during the daytime hours. However, daily maximum MLH estimates by AERMET occur earlier in the day than those estimated by the ceilometer. We believe that the ceilometer struggles with accurately measuring the MLH during nighttime hours as a result of sensor limitations.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Lightning strike prediction at the Savannah River Site

At the Savannah River Site, employees receive warnings about lightning only after three strikes have already occurred near the site. In order to increase employee safety, it is preferential to warn employees of a lightning threat much sooner. We used data from an on-site Electric Field Mill to measure values of the atmospheric electric charge. We also used lightning detection data from the National Lightning Detection Network and the Geostationary Lightning Mapper. By comparing the data of each, we can determine how long before or after a lightning strike did the Electric Field Mill first measure within our lightning detection threshold. If the detection threshold occurs before the strike does, this provides a lead time for knowing about lightning risks before they happen. Our findings conclude that 95% of lightning strikes have a lead time in the electric field where we can predict the lightning before it occurs and warn employees of the potential lightning threat. However, our lightning detection threshold can occur even without lightning or precipitation. Finding how these false lightning alarms affect our data is necessary to improving the lightning warning system.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗