Search NASASearch

Engineering topics

Brian Freitag

Publications and source records attributed to Brian Freitag.

At least 19 records

Synergy of Urban Heat, Pollution, and Social 1 Vulnerability in One of America’s Most Rapidly 2 Growing Cities: Houston, We Have a Problem

During the first two decades of the twenty-first century, we analyze the expansion of 23urban land cover, urban heat island (UHI), and urban pollution island (UPI) in the Houston 24Metropolitan Area (HMA) using land cover classifications derived from Landsat and land/aerosol 25products from NASA's Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer. Our approach involves 26both direct utilization and fusion with in situobservations for a comprehensive characterization.27We also examined how social vulnerability within the HMA changed during the study period and 28whether the synergy of UHI, UPI,and social vulnerability enhances environmental inequalities.

Andrew Blackford

Easy, Scalable Subsetting of GEDI Point Clouds

The GEDI Subsetter, a Python tool developed for NASA’s Multi-mission Algorithm and Analysis Platform (MAAP), optimizes the accessibility and visualization of GEDI point clouds by enabling users to efficiently subset data in a convenient, scalable manner. Complex science data often requires users to learn new software skills and handle many large files. Handling and cleaning large data sets is tedious and error-prone. These challenges significantly impede analysis. One of the goals of NASA's MAAP is to provide a platform that lowers the barrier to conducting research and analysis at scale. When a group of MAAP users wanted to conduct above-ground biomass estimation using GEDI data, we found that their existing workflow for leveraging GEDI data suffered from the barriers mentioned above. Furthermore, their workflow did not scale easily beyond a small number of granules. We found that existing tools related to GEDI data retrieval and subsetting were too limiting, so the GEDI Subsetter was written to support MAAP users’ needs. Being able to run many subsetting jobs simultaneously in the MAAP, and parallelizing the code itself, has led to significant speed improvements in obtaining relevant data, reducing subsetting time from hours to minutes. MAAP users can now more quickly and easily obtain only the data relevant to their research, by choosing which GEDI collection they want to work with (L1A, L2A, L2B, or L4A), and how they want to subset it, by specifying an area of interest, a temporal range, and relevant attributes. This has significantly reduced the feedback loop for users, allowing them to much more quickly subset GEDI data and begin their analysis. Although the GEDI Subsetter originally targeted users of the MAAP, it is generalized such that it can also be used outside of the MAAP and includes a command-line interface for convenience. Furthermore, with minor modifications, it should be possible to use it with non-GEDI data as the general pattern should be applicable to other sparse/track-based sensors.

Charles Daniels

Deepti: Deep-Learning-Based Tropical Cyclone Intensity Estimation System

Tropical cyclones are one of the costliest natural disasters globally because of the wide range of associated hazards. Thus, an accurate diagnostic model for tropical cyclone intensity can save lives and property. There are a number of existing techniques and approaches that diagnose tropical cyclone wind speed using satellite data at a given time with varying success. This paper presents a deep learning-based objective, diagnostic estimate of tropical cyclone intensity from infrared satellite imagery with 13.24 kt Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). In addition, a visualization portal in a production system is presented that displays deep learning output and contextual information for end users, one of the first of its kind.

Manil Maskey

ImageLabler: Labeling and Managing Image Data for Machine Learning in the Earth Sciences

While machine learning techniques for image classification have been around for a long time, storing and managing the vast number of images required as training data is still a problem for scientists. This is especially true for the field of Earth science, where only recently have experts begun using machine learning techniques for image-based phenomena classification. Image Labeler, a fast and scalable cloud-based tagging platform for Earth science images, seeks to improve upon existing methods of managing images and associated metadata, such as maintaining categorized folders of images on a local machine, a process that can be cumbersome and difficult to scale. The platform facilitates rapid development of image-based Earth science phenomena training datasets by allowing scientists to upload their existing imagery as well as extract new samples from open satellite imagery services made available through NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Service (GIBS). Image Labeler also supports GeoTIFF data, with capabilities such as displaying GeoTIFFs on an interactive map, drawing shapefiles over them, and tagging them with additional metadata. This allows scientists to perform spatiotemporal subsetting with geographic information and develop training data more quickly. Built using modern web technologies, Image Labeler includes additional capabilities such as team collaboration for large-scale image tagging projects. Users can download their data in a machine-learning-ready format, allowing scientists to spend time on experimentation rather than on the collection of training data. In this presentation, we demonstrate how Image Labeler seeks to become a one-stop image data management solution for machine learning applications in Earth science.

Ashish Acharya

Phenomena Portal: Large- Scale Visual Exploration of Atmospheric Phenomena

The Earth science community is experiencing a high influx of remote sensing data due to recent advancements in sensor technology. This enables the community to extend their research on a larger scale than ever before. Unfortunately, traditional data processing techniques do not scale well to these new, high volume data sources. State-of-the-art machine learning (ML) pipelines have been proven to overcome these burdens in various other fields but are underexploited within the physical sciences community. Moreover, ML is reliant on labeled data, which is currently sparsely available, owing to the fact that ML adoption is still in the early stages within the Earth and atmospheric science communities. To address these issues, we developed the Phenomena Portal, a visual exploration tool that uses ML to detect various atmospheric phenomena on a global scale. This allows the Earth and atmospheric science communities to view trends of occurrences of phenomena, identify potential relationships between them, and analyze spatiotemporal patterns over time. These detections can also serve as initial labeled data for ML research pertaining to the respective phenomena. The tool also incorporates feedback from subject matter experts to further improve the model detection accuracy, thereby facilitating human-in-the-loop. This presentation will provide an overview of the ML model development and cloud deployment. We also discuss the capabilities of the user interface for displaying the detections.

Muthukumaran Ramasubramanian

A Survey of Earth Observation Data Needed by U.S. Federal Agencies

The Satellite Needs Working Group (SNWG), part of the U.S. Group on Earth Observations (USGEO), surveys U.S. Federal civil agencies every two years regarding the Earth observation data they need in order to accomplish their high-priority agency objectives. The 2020 SNWG survey marked the third assessment cycle (after 2016 and 2018). Information solicited by the survey includes the nature of the need, features and phenomena being observed, data measurement characteristics, satellites and data products the agency uses or plans to use, agency satisfaction with currently available data, and limitations to agency use of satellite data. For analysis purposes, agency needs are assigned to science Focus Areas such as atmospheric composition, carbon/ecosystems, solid Earth, water, etc. Analysis of the survey responses yields insights on the current landscape of Earth observation needs across the U.S. Government agencies. The evolution over multiple survey cycles has been analyzed by the SNWG Assessment team at the Interagency Implementation and Advanced Concepts Team (IMPACT) at Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC). Key trends emerged in the agency-agnostic analysis that can be helpful to NASA decision-makers evaluating the ongoing, evolving, and emerging needs for NASA missions and instrument datasets expressed by participating agencies in the SNWG.

Katrina Virts

Best Practices from NASA's Open Science Response to the Satellite Needs Working Group (SNWG) Process

The Satellite Needs Working Group (SNWG) in the U.S. Group on Earth Observations (USGEO) provides dedicated analysis and advice to the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), and is charged with identifying satellite data needs across the U.S. Government agencies to which the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) responds with solutions aligning with its missions and goals. The SNWG puts out a biennial survey to the U.S. Government agencies asking a variety of questions aimed at gleaning their current needs for satellite data. NASA’s response to the SNWG since 2016 has been to serve the community at large with open science and open data products derived through the SNWG process. With the next SNWG cycle set to kick off in 2022, the NASA SNWG team has been actively working to incorporate lessons learned from the past three cycles into the NASA-side process and tools. We will discuss the best practices and tools NASA has developed in response to the SNWG survey assessment process. These assist NASA’s decisions on how best to utilize existing, and proposing new, products and services to address the needs of other U.S. agencies.

Cerese Albers

Maximizing Earth Science Observations with Data Harmonization: Harmonized Landsat/Sentinel-2

In August 2021, NASA released science quality harmonized Landsat/Sentinel-2 products for both cloud-based access and direct download from the Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center (LP DAAC). These 30-meter products, HLSS30 (Sentinel-2 component) and HLSL30 (Landsat component) are placed on the same grid and are generated and distributed fully in the cloud. Similarly, ESA is prototyping harmonized Landsat Sentinel-2 products at 10-meter resolution. The data production and science teams from NASA and ESA will present technical details on the data production system, data product status and availability, and the benefit of harmonizing instruments with similar sensing characteristics between the agencies.

Earth Science