Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Charles N. Helms

Publications and source records attributed to Charles N. Helms.

Retrieval of Normalized Gamma Size Distribution Parameters Using Precipitation Imaging Package (Pip) Snowfall Observations During Ice-Pop 2018

Parameters of the normalized gamma particle size distribution (PSD) have been retrieved from the Precipitation Image Package (PIP) snowfall observations collected during the International Collaborative Experiment - PyeongChang Olympics and Paralympic (ICE-POP 2018). Two of the gamma PSD parameters, the mass weighted particle diameter (Dmass) and the normalized intercept parameter NW, have median values of 1.15-1.31 mm and 2.84-3.04 log(mm-1 m-3), respectively. This range arises from the choice of the relationship between the maximum versus equivalent diameter, Dmx-Deq, and the relationship between the Reynolds and Best numbers, Re-X. Normalization of snow water equivalent rate (SWER) and ice water content (W) by NW reduces the range in NW resulting in well fitted power law relationship, between SWER/NW and Dmass and between W/NW and Dmass. The bulk descriptors of snowfall are calculated from PIP observations and from the gamma PSD with values of the shape parameter (μ) ranging from -2 to 10. NASA’s Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission, which adopted the normalized gamma PSD, assumes μ = 2 and μ = 3 in its two separate algorithms. The mean fractional bias (MFB) of the snowfall parameters changes with μ, where the functional dependence on μ depends on the specific snowfall parameter of interest. The MFB of the total concentration was underestimated by 0.23-0.34 when μ = 2 and by 0.29-0.40 when μ = 3, while the MFB of SWER had a much narrower range (-0.03 to 0.04) for the same μ values.

Snowfall↗

Evaluation of SWER(Ze) Relationships by Precipitation Imaging Package (PIP) during ICE-POP 2018

Improving estimation of snow water equivalent rate (SWER) from radar reflectivity (Ze), known as a SWER(Ze) relationship, is a priority for NASA’s Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission ground validation program as it is needed to comprehensively validate spaceborne precipitation retrievals. This study investigates the performance of eight operational and four research-based SWER(Ze) relationships utilizing Precipitation Imaging Probe (PIP) observations from the International Collaborative Experiment for Pyeongchang 2018 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games (ICE-POP 2018) field campaign. During ICE-POP 2018, there were 10 snow events that are classified by synoptic conditions as either cold low or warm low, and a SWER(Ze) relationship is derived for each event. Additionally, a SWER(Ze) relationship is derived for each synoptic classification by merging all events within each class. Two new types of SWER(Ze) relationships are derived from PIP measurements of bulk density and habit classification. These two physically based SWER(Ze) relationships provided superior estimates of SWER when compared to the operational, event-specific, and synoptic SWER(Ze) relationships. For estimates of the event snow water equivalent total, the event-specific, synoptic, and best-performing operational SWER(Ze) relationships outperformed the physically based SWER(Ze) relationship, although the physically based relationships still performed well. This study recommends using the density or habit-based SWER(Ze) relationships for microphysical studies, whereas the other SWER(Ze) relationships are better suited toward hydrologic application.

Ali Tokay↗

Understanding PIP Measurements of Particle Shape via Image Analysis

A number of instruments exist to measure the size, shape and orientation angle of precipitation particles near the surface; this study will specifically focus on three of them: the precipitation imaging package (PIP), the multi-angle snowflake camera (MASC), and the two-dimensional video distrometer (2DVD). The measurements of particular interest for developing precipitation microphysical retrievals from polarimetric radar and satellite-based microwave data are of the particle size, aspect ratio, and orientation angle. Due to differences in instrument design and processing software, however, the measurements made by PIP, MASC, and 2DVD are not in agreement on these key measurements. The aim of the present study is to understand how the differences between these three instruments impact their measurements of the size, aspect ratio, and orientation angle of winter precipitation particles. To this end, we have reprocessed the video files produced by PIP in a manner that replicates how the MASC and 2DVD instruments operate and process their respective data. Our findings suggest that the MASC processing software results in superior particle characteristic measurements in comparison to the other instruments, although a cursory comparison of measurements from the actual instruments suggests the PIP captures the largest number of particles of the three instruments, making PIP potentially better for computing distributions.

Charles N. Helms↗

Characteristics and Origins of Frontal Convection During IMPACTS on 25 January 2020

This presentation will discuss the characteristics of frontal convection and its estimation from the ER-2 multifrequency nadir reflectivity and Doppler velocity from a warm-occlusion frontal system that traversed across the Northeast U.S. on 25 January 2020. This system that occurred during the IMPACTS field deployment, brought widespread clouds and precipitation to the Northeast. The system brought primarily rain in most areas of more intense rainfall associated with embedded convection near the frontal band and some freezing rain and/or snowfall in the northern regions or higher terrain due to the pre-existing low-level cold air. The NASA ER-2 instrumented with multifrequency radar and the NASA P-3 with in situ microphysics measurements both collected data from this system. The focus of this presentation is on the estimation of vertical velocity in convective and non-convective regions using the ER-2 nadir Doppler measurements. Vertical velocities are inherently difficult to estimate in frontal systems at mesoscale and below other than from direct in situ measurement because of their small magnitudes and errors in the measurements. Estimates from nadir Doppler measurements such as from the ER-2 are challenging because of both Doppler velocity uncertainties and the need to estimate particle fallspeed since the Doppler measurement is the vertical velocity plus the hydrometeor fallspeed. In the presentation, the vertical velocity estimation, its associated errors, and a possible mitigation scheme are described. The characteristics of the convective and stratiform regions on 25 January 2020 are discussed. The vertical velocity estimated from the nadir Doppler measurements are compared with P-3 in situ measurements. Estimation of vertical velocity is one of the goals for upcoming spaceborne missions such as EarthCare and ACCP.

Gerald M. Heymsfield↗

A Study of the Kinematic and Dynamic Processes associated with Mesoscale Snowbands in a Midwest United States Snowstorm on 5 February 2020

Mesoscale snowbands are frequently responsible for dumping large amounts of snow over a relatively small region and pose a considerable forecasting challenge. The present study focuses on the mesoscale snowbands observed on 5 February 2020 over the Midwest United States. In order to improve the forecasting of mesoscale snowbands, it is important to understand the processes that organize these features. To this end, we are investigating the kinematic and dynamic processes that shape the mesoscale snowbands using a combination of high-altitude airborne radar, in-situ aircraft measurements, surface observations, and model simulations. This presentation will primarily focus on the three-dimensional structure of the mesoscale snowbands in terms of EXRAD reflectivity and horizontal winds. The horizontal winds are retrieved from the EXRAD scanning-beam Doppler velocities using a VAD technique. These winds, in combination with virtual potential temperature taken from the HRRR operational analysis, are used to compute the bulk Richardson number in order to investigate any contributions to banding features that might be tied to Kelvin-Helmholtz instability. Our analysis does not support the presence of Kelvin-Helmholtz instability. That said, low, but not subcritical, Richardson numbers were found near the top of some banding features in this event and it is possible that the model analysis is smoothing out the virtual potential temperature fields. Finally, we present arguments for using a flight module designed to sample the along-band structures with particular emphasis on observing generating cells and low-level microphysics.

Charles N. Helms↗