Search NASA⌕ Search

NASA NTRS · 20230008493

Retrieval of Normalized Gamma Size Distribution Parameters Using Precipitation Imaging Package (Pip) Snowfall Observations During Ice-Pop 2018

Abstract

Parameters of the normalized gamma particle size distribution (PSD) have been retrieved from the Precipitation Image Package (PIP) snowfall observations collected during the International Collaborative Experiment - PyeongChang Olympics and Paralympic (ICE-POP 2018). Two of the gamma PSD parameters, the mass weighted particle diameter (Dmass) and the normalized intercept parameter NW, have median values of 1.15-1.31 mm and 2.84-3.04 log(mm-1 m-3), respectively. This range arises from the choice of the relationship between the maximum versus equivalent diameter, Dmx-Deq, and the relationship between the Reynolds and Best numbers, Re-X. Normalization of snow water equivalent rate (SWER) and ice water content (W) by NW reduces the range in NW resulting in well fitted power law relationship, between SWER/NW and Dmass and between W/NW and Dmass. The bulk descriptors of snowfall are calculated from PIP observations and from the gamma PSD with values of the shape parameter (μ) ranging from -2 to 10. NASA’s Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission, which adopted the normalized gamma PSD, assumes μ = 2 and μ = 3 in its two separate algorithms. The mean fractional bias (MFB) of the snowfall parameters changes with μ, where the functional dependence on μ depends on the specific snowfall parameter of interest. The MFB of the total concentration was underestimated by 0.23-0.34 when μ = 2 and by 0.29-0.40 when μ = 3, while the MFB of SWER had a much narrower range (-0.03 to 0.04) for the same μ values.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ali Tokay, Liang Liao, Robert Meneghini, Charles N. Helms, S. Joseph Munchak, David B. Wolff, Patrick N. Gatlin. 2023-05-01. Retrieval of Normalized Gamma Size Distribution Parameters Using Precipitation Imaging Package (Pip) Snowfall Observations During Ice-Pop 2018. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20230008493

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

On the Effects of Cloud Water Content on Passive Microwave Snowfall Retrievals

The Bayesian passive microwave retrievals of snowfall often rely on mathematical matching of the observed vectors of brightness temperature with an a priori database of precipitation profiles and their corresponding brightness temperatures. Mathematical proximity does not necessarily lead to consistent retrievals due to limited information content of passive microwave observations. This paper defines imposter (genuine) vectors of brightness temperature as those that are mathematically close but physically inconsistent (consistent) and characterizes them through the Silhouette Coefficient (SC) analysis. The Neyman–Pearson (NP) hypothesis testing is used to separate the imposter and genuine brightness temperatures based on their associated values of cloud ice (IWP) and liquid water path (LWP), given by coincidences of CloudSat Profiling Radar (CPR) and the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Microwave Imager (GMI). The study determines thresholds for IWP and LWP that allow optimal identification of imposter brightness temperatures of non-snowing and snowing clouds, which can mislead the passive microwave retrieval algorithms to falsely detect or miss the snowfall events. It is demonstrated that emission signal of supercooled liquid water in snowing clouds can lead to improved passive microwave retrieval of snowfall and conditioning the retrievals to the cloud IWP and LWP can result in marginal correction of the snowfall detection probability; however, reduce the probability of false alarm by 6%–8% over sea ice and open oceans.

Snowfall↗