Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Engelhard, Mark

Publications and source records attributed to Engelhard, Mark.

At least 1,297 records · Page 72
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2021

Conversion of ethanol to 1,3–butadiene over Ag–ZrO 2 /SiO 2 catalysts: The role of surface interfaces

A series of Ag–ZrO 2 /SiO 2 catalysts with different metal–support interfaces were synthesized in an effort to elucidate the roles of specific interfaces in controlling the ethanol to 1,3–butadiene conversion and selectivity. According to the results of detailed characterizations (e.g. CO/pyridine–DRIFTS, XPS, TEM, NH 3 –TPD, and 1 H MAS NMR), it was found that the Ag–O–Si interfaces significantly enhanced the dehydrogenation of ethanol while the presence of ZrO 2 improved the interaction between Ag and ZrO 2 /SiO 2 , creating more Ag δ+ active sites. In this research, the high dispersion of ZrO 2 on SiO 2 generated abundant Zr–O–Si interfaces with medium and weak Lewis acidity, promoting the condensation of acetaldehyde to crotonaldehyde. These Zr–O–Si interfaces in close interaction with Ag δ+ species played a critical role in the enhanced H transfer during the MPV reduction of crotonaldehyde to crotyl alcohol. The synergies among the interfaces resulted in retarded ethanol dehydration reactivity, balanced ethanol dehydrogenation and condensation reactions, and a subsequent high 1,3–butadiene yield.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2020

Understanding the Deactivation of Ag–ZrO 2 /SiO 2 Catalysts for the Single-step Conversion of Ethanol to Butenes

Ag–ZrO 2 /SBA-16 has recently been found to be efficient for catalyzing the single-step conversion of ethanol to butene (1- and 2-butene mixtures) in the presence of H 2 . The reaction proceeds via a cascading sequence of reactions over mixed metal and Lewis sites, with the catalyst composition tuned to selectively favor butene formation. However, the catalyst slowly deactivates when evaluated over long reaction times. Here, we evaluated the lifetime of the Ag–ZrO 2 /SBA-16 catalyst system for ethanol-to-butene conversion at 325 °C for up to 800 hours on stream. Several characterization techniques were used to elucidate the mechanism(s) by which catalyst deactivation occurs. Coke deposition, Ag particle sintering, and Ag 0 -to-Ag + oxidation state change were identified to be the major causes of catalyst deactivation. Coke deposits cover primarily Lewis acid sites which are responsible for aldol condensation, Meerwein-Ponndorf-Verley (MPV) reduction, and dehydration reactions. Ag particle sintering and Ag oxidation state change leads to a reduction in the number of metallic Ag sites responsible for the dehydrogenation/hydrogenation steps. The fresh catalyst likely experiences hydrothermal sintering in the early stage of reaction and permanently loses some active Lewis acid sites before reaching a new structural steady state. The deactivation of Lewis acid sites leads to a decrease in overall ethanol conversion, whereas the deactivation of the metallic Ag sites decreases the butene selectivity. For catalyst regeneration, oxidative calcination (at 500 °C) followed by reduction (at 325 °C) successfully removes all the coke species on the catalyst surface and restores the metallic Ag particles of the 4Ag–4ZrO 2 /SBA-16 catalysts.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2020

Reply to: “Pitfalls in identifying active catalyst species”

In Pereira-Hernández et al., we reported the influence of the high-temperature vapor-phase synthesis method (also called atom trapping, or AT) on the activity for CO oxidation of a Pt/CeO 2 catalyst, compared to a conventional synthesis method (strong electrostatic adsorption, or SEA). The findings suggest that the AT method leads to increased activity compared to the SEA method, and this is related to improved redox properties of the support at low temperature. Recently, Ren and Chen questioned the interpretation of the results and suggested alternative explanations for the findings. However, as addressed in this paper, we are firmly of the opinion that the original analysis, results, and conclusions provided in Pereira-Hernández et al. are valid and accurately explain the phenomena observed.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗