Engineering topics

Ginosar, Daniel M.

Publications and source records attributed to Ginosar, Daniel M..

6 records

DOE OSTI2024

Electrodialysis: An effective methodology to purify the leachate of spent Li-ion batteries

The electrification of transportation and the transition of society towards low or net-zero carbon emissions has led to a skyrocketing global demand for Li-ion batteries. After a service life of three to ten years, Li-ion batteries have less than 80 % of their initial capacities and draw near to the end of their lives for practical utilization. Due to potential supply chain shortages and the value embodied in Li-ion batteries, it is imperative to recycle them, to recover the materials, and to improve the circularity and the sustinability of the industry. How to cost-effectively purify spent batteries while reducing time, energy, and waste emissions is a challenge faced by Li-ion battery recyclers. The first electrochemical membrane reactor reported in our group hasa high selectivity towards lower Cu 2+ , Al 3+ and Fe 3+ ions (<5 ppm) and retains >95% of the Ni 2+ , Co 2+ and Mn 2+ ions in the leachate. An advanced electrochemical membrane reactor was developed in this study. Further, not only does the new reactor have the same selectivity as the original reactor, but other advantages including a faster leachate processing rate (up to 10X faster). The advanced reactor can also directly generate acid at the anode side; eliminating the reactor restoration step. The prominent advantages that this electrodialysis technology has over chemical-precipitation methods include: (1) ion recovery efficiencies do not diminish after removing the impurities, Ni 2+ , Co 2+ and Mn 2+ , even at a higher initial Ni 2+ ion concentrations; in comparison, chemical precipitation has Ni 2+ , Co 2+ and Mn 2+ ion recovery efficiencies reduced significantly when the initial Ni 2+ , Co 2+ and Mn 2+ ion concentrations increase. (2) electrodialysis does not change the concentrations of Ni 2+ , Co 2+ and Mn 2+ ions significantly, but chemical precipitation could reduce Ni 2+ and Co 2+ ions to less than half of their initial values. Through electro-dialyzing the leachate, the H 2 evolution reaction mechanism was found to switch from the Volmer-acid Heyrovsky mechanism to the Volmer-alkaline Heyrovsky mechanism at a pH of around 3.7.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

DOE OSTI2023

Thermally stable porous catalyst systems and methods to produce the same

This disclosure provides compositions and methods directed to thermally stable catalyst systems, which display stable physical properties and/or stable catalytic properties after thermal pretreatment at a temperature in the range of about 600° C. to about 1000° C. The catalyst systems include metal particles which contain a stable metal and a catalytic metal deposited on a porous support. Embodiments of the disclosure include catalyst systems that can be used in high temperature applications such as the hybrid sulfur cycle. The hybrid sulfur cyclic is an elevated temperature and high acid reaction that may be conducted using concentrated sulfuric acid heated to 800° C. Embodiments of the disclosure can provide thermally stable catalysts and methods to produce thermally stable catalysts that remain active for at least 80 hours' exposure to these harsh conditions.

Monnier, John↗

DOE OSTI2023

Reservoir Thermal Energy Storage Benchmarking (Rev. 3)

A benchmarking analysis of RTES research funded by GTO through the Beyond Batteries projects was conducted against the ESGC to see where they fit within the identified ESGC Use Cases. The projects were found to advance knowledge in multiple ESGC use cases, either directly or in some cases, indirectly as enabling technologies. This analysis is helpful to understand where RTES and associated research fits into the larger discussion around energy storage technologies. Also, a retrospective analysis of the Beyond Batteries projects was conducted to evaluate what the projects learned and how the results can be applied to advance the value of RTES. Major results of each of the studies are summarized in Table 2. Additionally, a comparative metrics analysis for RTES was completed to understand where RTES lies within the energy storage industry. Metrics for evaluation of RTES and its comparison to other storage technologies were selected and ranges of their values compiled. The selected metrics – LCOE (levelized cost of energy), capital costs, roundtrip efficiency, energy storage capacity, and storage time – were chosen based on data availability and have a particularly strong influence on the potential deployment of a storage technology. Charts which compare the metrics are presented in section 4.3 and show ranges for each of the 10 selected technologies. However, due to a lack of domestic operational facilities, values for RTES and for portions of the remaining technologies are based on theoretical modeling and studies of best-case scenarios. LCOE estimates for RTES fall within the lower reaches of Figure 15, but nevertheless amount to 2 – 5 times the ESGC Roadmap goal for LCOE, for example in the Facilitating and Evolving Grid Use Case. Capital costs for RTES sit on the higher end (Figure 16) but are expected to decrease as new projects are developed and the technology is refined. The theoretical roundtrip efficiency reported for RTES varies from mid to high percentages (Figure 17) with efficiencies upwards of 93% in modeled scenarios in the Portland Basin (Bershaw et al.,2020). RTES is also expected to have the largest energy storage capacities and longest storage times, likely matched only by lower efficiency hydrogen storage. To better assess the role that RTES could play in energy storage we examined it’s potential in the U.S. The potential depends on many factors. Recently, many researchers have started looking at deep sedimentary basins, depleted oil and gas fields, and basalt formations as potential targets for RTES development. The United States Geological Survey (USGS) has analyzed various cities and shown substantial RTES potential in the cooling sector (Pepin et al., 2021). By modeling RTES in low-quality groundwater (e.g., brackish), it is shown to be favorable across the U.S. with particular suitability in the Illinois Basin, Coastal Plains, and Basin and Range regions. Seasonal RTES operations have also been modeled in the Portland Basin by those at the USGS and Portland State University to simulate an RTES system supplying heating loads needed for the Oregon Health and Science University. Simulations suggest that high conductive heat loss in the initial years exists but tends to decrease with increasing time and development of the resource due to self-insulating nature of the basalts (Burns et al., 2020). Other national laboratory efforts are taking a close look at many of the technical issues involved with RTES (McLing et al., 2019, McLing et al., 2022). These include difficulties in understanding geochemical, hydrogeological, mechanical, and microbiological changes at such elevated temperatures and operational scenarios. Major gaps in research are identified and suggested for future work. With this increased focus to understand how to make RTES successful in the U.S., this technology could be a potential solution to many of the nation’s energy storage problems. For the energy independence of this country, the DOE should prioritize de-risking this technology by making future investments in pilot-scale demonstrations to attract potential investors.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗

DOE OSTI2022

Electrification and decarbonization of spent Li-ion batteries purification by using an electrochemical membrane reactor

The expanding electric vehicle market brings with it exponential growth in the use of lithium (Li)-ion batteries (LIB) for which a wave of spent LIB is expected to come within the next 5 to 10 years. Due to the economic and strategic value imbedded within the metals contained in LIB, different recycling technologies, including hydrometallurgy, pyrometallurgy and direct recycling, are under development. Being different from previous hydrometallurgical methods, which may have high chemical consumption and negative environmental impact, an electrochemical membrane reactor is designed and validated for the first time, to electrify and decarbonize the impurity removal process. This reactor electroplates copper (Cu) and electrochemically precipitates aluminum (Al) and iron (Fe) from simulated spent LIB leachates, by consuming only air, water, and electricity, and the impurities are reduced to <1 ppm. The purified leachate maintains 99.5 % of the nickel (Ni), 95.4 % of the cobalt (Co) and 99.14 % of manganese (Mn) from the original leachate solution, and then can be directly applied for cathode precursor synthesis. Additionally, the purification process doesn’t introduce extra impurity, and the reactor restoration process generates valuable by-product hydro sulfate (H2SO4). This electrochemical process can reduce the cost, because of the much less chemical consumption and the valuable by-product generation, and mitigates the waste emissions, because of no extra impurity introduced and no greenhouse gas (GHG) produced. In conclusion, the chemical precipitation method uses significant amount of NaOH, which induced GHG emission during the manufacturing process.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

DOE OSTI2022

Separation of isoprene from biologically-derived gas streams

Renewable organic precursors, including olefinic compounds such as isoprene, have attracted interest from the polymer and pharmaceutical industries. Biologically-derived processes can generate these target compounds; however, their gaseous product streams are complex mixtures of condensable organic vapors (COVs), water vapor, carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), and/or nitrogen (N 2 ). Because COVs, CO 2 and water vapor are known to alter polymer membranes, mixed gas separations data at ambient and elevated temperatures are limited. Here, this study focused on two classes of polymer membranes, glassy [polyetherimide (Ultem®)] and a rubbery [polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)] with results indicating that isoprene separation is possible in humidified gas environment (2–4 vol% water). Gas permeabilities of these membranes did not noticeably change in the presence of humidity; however, the selectivity of these membranes was significantly lower compared to their performance under dry conditions. The role of water vapor in gas transport was derived from the energy of activation of permeation (E p ) for PDMS and Ultem® from 30–80°C in humidified mixed gas streams. For both polymers, E p data shows a slight decrease in selectivity with the other gases (hydrogen, N 2 , CO 2 , and methane) at elevated temperatures in the presence of water vapor. Thus, these COVs separations are feasible with polymer membranes in the presence of humidified gas streams, even in the case of glassy and rubbery membranes in series.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

DOE OSTI2022

Methods and systems for treating an aqueous solution

A method of treating an aqueous solution comprises forming a treatment stream comprising a condensable material. The treatment stream is introduced to an aqueous solution comprising water and a solute to fractionally precipitate the solute out of the aqueous solution and form a solids stream comprising the solute and an aqueous liquid stream comprising at least one solute-depleted solution of the water and the condensable material. The condensable material of at least a portion of the aqueous liquid stream is separated from the water of the at least a portion of the aqueous liquid stream to at least partially reform the treatment stream and form an aqueous liquid product stream depleted in the solute. Aqueous solution treatment systems and additional methods of treating an aqueous solution are also described.

Wilson, Aaron D.↗