Herbert M. Harrison | Search NASA

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Small Engine Components Compressor Test Facility: High Efficiency Centrifugal Compressor Vaneless Diffuser and Transition Duct Configurations

The original vaned configuration of the High Efficiency Centrifugal Compressor (HECC) was developed with aggressive design targets to facilitate advancement of state-of-the-art technology in gas turbine compressors. This work documents modifications to the Small Engine Components Compressor Test Facility to support testing of the HECC vaneless diffuser and transition duct configurations, both of which are open geometries. These configurations were developed as follow-up studies to improve understanding of the differences between the predicted and actual performance of the original HECC vaned diffuser stage. Specifically, the vaneless diffuser was designed to provide the impeller with ideal exit conditions such that the impeller performance could be isolated from downstream stationary components, and the additively manufactured transition duct inlet configuration enables investigation into the effects of the inlet flow path on the stage performance. Features of note in the facility are active clearance control, bleed flow regulation, modular inlet configurations, and steady-state and fast-response instrumentation throughout the flow path. Details of the facility and instrumentation are presented as well as the baseline performance of the compressor stage. The geometry, performance, and detailed aerodynamic data have been made available to the public at https://storage.googleapis.com/heccdata/NASA-HECC-Data-Archive.zip.

centrifugal compressor↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Small Engine Components Compressor Test Facility: High Efficiency Centrifugal Compressor Vaneless Diffuser and Transition Duct Configurations

The original vaned configuration of the High Efficiency Centrifugal Compressor (HECC) was developed with aggressive design targets to facilitate advancement of state-of-the-art technology in gas turbine compressors. This work documents modifications to the Small Engine Components Compressor Test Facility to support testing of the HECC vaneless diffuser and transition duct configurations, both of which are open geometries. These configurations were developed as follow-up studies to improve understanding of the differences between the predicted and actual performance of the original HECC vaned diffuser stage. Specifically, the vaneless diffuser was designed to provide the impeller with ideal exit conditions such that the impeller performance could be isolated from downstream stationary components, and the additively manufactured transition duct inlet configuration enables investigation into the effects of the inlet flow path on the stage performance. Features of note in the facility are active clearance control, bleed flow regulation, modular inlet configurations, and steady-state and fast-response instrumentation throughout the flow path. Details of the facility and instrumentation are presented as well as the baseline performance of the compressor stage. The geometry, performance, and detailed aerodynamic data have been made available to the public at https://storage.googleapis.com/hecc-data/NASA-HECC-Data-Archive.zip.

centrifugal compressor↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA HECC Geometry and Performance Review Part 1: Validation of a Computational Model for the Vaneless Diffuser Configuration with As-Manufactured Impeller Geometry

An investigation of the NASA High Efficiency Centrifugal Compressor (HECC) vaneless diffuser configuration was performed. This multipart investigation focused on validating the computational model against experimental data. The validated model was then used to explore the effects of observed geometric differences between the as-manufactured and design-intent impellers. Lastly, the validated model was used for comparison against an experimental tip clearance study. Details regarding each of the parts are detailed below: A multipart investigation of the NASA High Efficiency Centrifugal Compressor (HECC) vaneless diffuser configuration was performed. Part I of the investigation focused on describing the HECC vaneless computational model and its validation against the experimental data published in GT2023-103128. To generate the model, a verification of the manufactured impeller was performed and was confirmed to match the impeller CAD. Section data from the impeller CAD, referred to as As-Manufactured, were used in the model. Steady RANS simulations using a multiblock structured mesh were used to conduct a mesh convergence study. The resultant mesh was then used for simulations at both design-speed and off-design speed conditions. The simulations compared well to data in both 1D and 2D terms. Based on the observed results the model was deemed validated and was used in the latter two parts of the multipart investigation.

centrifugal compressor↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA HECC Geometry and Performance Review Part 2: Geometric Differences Between the as-Manufactured and Design-Intent Impeller Geometry and Their Effects on the Vaneless Diffuser Configuration Performance

An investigation of the NASA High Efficiency Centrifugal Compressor (HECC) vaneless diffuser configuration was performed. This multipart investigation focused on validating the computational model against experimental data. The validated model was then used to explore the effects of observed geometric differences between the as-manufactured and design-intent impellers. Lastly, the validated model was used for comparison against an experimental tip clearance study. Details regarding each of the parts are detailed below: This second part of a multipart investigation of the NASA HECC vaneless diffuser configuration focused on the comparison of the as-manufactured HECC vaneless computational model validated in Part I against a new model that used the same grid and solver settings but replaced the impeller section data with the design-intent sections from NASA/CR-2014-218114/Rev1. The 1D performance values showed that the as-manufactured impeller underperformed compared to the design-intent for all four speedlines that were simulated. Further investigation of radial profiles, loading and contours showed consistent underperformance of the as-manufactured. An investigation into the source of the difference led to the discovery of several geometric differences in the two impellers of magnitudes that could not be explained outside of manufacturing. The differences that were observed can be summarized into four categories: fillets, TE exit radius differences, splitter LE differences and main blade thickness differences. The investigation then shifted to attempting to isolate the geometric differences as best as possible and to understand their contribution to the observed underperformance. The investigation showed that out of the four geometric differences that were explored, the differences in the splitter blade had the largest effect.

centrifugal compressor↗