Search NASA⌕ Search

NASA NTRS · 20230008978

NASA Small Engine Components Compressor Test Facility: High Efficiency Centrifugal Compressor Vaneless Diffuser and Transition Duct Configurations

Abstract

The original vaned configuration of the High Efficiency Centrifugal Compressor (HECC) was developed with aggressive design targets to facilitate advancement of state-of-the-art technology in gas turbine compressors. This work documents modifications to the Small Engine Components Compressor Test Facility to support testing of the HECC vaneless diffuser and transition duct configurations, both of which are open geometries. These configurations were developed as follow-up studies to improve understanding of the differences between the predicted and actual performance of the original HECC vaned diffuser stage. Specifically, the vaneless diffuser was designed to provide the impeller with ideal exit conditions such that the impeller performance could be isolated from downstream stationary components, and the additively manufactured transition duct inlet configuration enables investigation into the effects of the inlet flow path on the stage performance. Features of note in the facility are active clearance control, bleed flow regulation, modular inlet configurations, and steady-state and fast-response instrumentation throughout the flow path. Details of the facility and instrumentation are presented as well as the baseline performance of the compressor stage. The geometry, performance, and detailed aerodynamic data have been made available to the public at https://storage.googleapis.com/hecc-data/NASA-HECC-Data-Archive.zip.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Herbert M. Harrison, Ezra O. McNichols, Matthew R. Blaha. NASA Small Engine Components Compressor Test Facility: High Efficiency Centrifugal Compressor Vaneless Diffuser and Transition Duct Configurations. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20230008978

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

NASA HECC Geometry and Performance Review Part 1: Validation of a Computational Model for the Vaneless Diffuser Configuration with As-Manufactured Impeller Geometry

An investigation of the NASA High Efficiency Centrifugal Compressor (HECC) vaneless diffuser configuration was performed. This multipart investigation presents an extensive validation of the computational model against experimental data. The validated model was then used to explore the effects geometric differences between the as-manufactured and design-intent impellers. Lastly, the validated model was used for comparison against an experimental tip clearance study. Part I of the investigation focused on describing the HECC vaneless computational model and its validation against the experimental data published in GT2023-103128. To generate the model, a verification of the manufactured impeller was performed and was confirmed to match the impeller CAD. Section data from the impeller CAD, referred to as the As-Manufactured geometry, were used for development of the computational model. Steady RANS simulations utilizing the Wilcox K-Omega 98 turbulence model and a multiblock structured mesh were used to conduct a mesh convergence study. The resultant mesh was then used for simulations at both design-speed and off-design speed conditions. The simulations compared well to data in both 1D and 2D terms for the major performance metrics of efficiency, total pressure rise, and total temperature rise. Based on the observed results the model was deemed validated and was used in the latter two parts of the multipart investigation.

centrifugal compressor↗

NASA HECC Geometry and Performance Review Part 2: Geometric Differences Between the As-Manufactured and Design-Intent Impeller Geometry and their Effects on the Vaneless Diffuser Configuration Performance

An investigation of the NASA High Efficiency Centrifugal Compressor (HECC) vaneless diffuser configuration was performed. This multipart investigation focused on validating the computational model against experimental data. The validated model was then used to explore the effects of observed geometric differences between the As-Manufactured and Design-Intent impellers. Lastly, the validated model was used for comparison against an experimental tip clearance study. Part II of the investigation of the NASA HECC vaneless diffuser configuration focused on understanding the differences in geometry and performance between the As-Manufactured impeller and the Design-Intent impeller. This was achieved through comparison of the As-Manufactured HECC vaneless computational model, developed from the solid model of the impeller and validated in Part I, against a new model developed from the Design-Intent blade sections published in NASA/CR-2014-218114/Rev1. The 1D performance values showed that the As-Manufactured impeller underperformed compared to the Design-Intent for all four speedlines that were simulated. Further investigation of profiles, loading and contours showed consistent underperformance of the As-Manufactured relative to the Design-Intent. An investigation into the source of the performance differences led to the discovery of several significant variations in the impeller geometries. The differences that were observed can be summarized into four categories: fillets, trailing-edge exit radii variation, dissimilarity in the splitter leading-edge geometry and main blade thickness differences. The investigation then shifted its effort to quantify the performance effects caused by geometric differences. The investigation showed that out of the four geometric differences that were explored, the differences in the splitter blade had the largest impact. These differences most notably changed flow physics near the splitter leading edge, especially near the tip of the impeller.

centrifugal compressor↗

Development of a Computational Fluid Dynamics Model for a High-Speed Centrifugal Compressor

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has become widely used in the design and analysis of turbomachinery components such as centrifugal compressors. However, CFD is only a limited representation of experimental cases and struggles to model complex flows or can lack small model details to increase computation speed. To make advancements in compressor technology, designers need tools like CFD that can help them predict flow behavior in new designs. The High Efficiency Centrifugal Compressor (HECC) was designed by United Technologies Research Center (UTRC) for NASA to investigate the difficulties behind improving centrifugal compressor technology and to provide an open case to the turbomachinery research community. CFD analysis was completed by UTRC to aid in the design process. The pre-test study significantly overpredicted the compressor’s performance, and while post-test analysis was more representative, its results have yet to be publicly available. CFD technology has also since improved in recent years. In this study, a high-fidelity computational model for the vaneless configuration of HECC operating at its design point was developed and compared to an equivalent experimental case. This model incorporated GPU versions of mesh generation and solver codes from AeroDynamic Solutions, Inc. The development of such a model is significant since there has yet to be a published numerical simulation of HECC’s vaneless configuration. Additionally, the use of GPU codes decreases computation times for the model, which has allowed for the inclusion of impeller blade fillets. Initial results showed a general overprediction of compressor performance by the model. Predictions were more accurate for the impeller compared to predictions for the full compressor stage. Spanwise analyses showed that the model tended to follow flow behavior patterns exhibited in the experiment. Beyond this study, this model will be iterated upon and experimentally validated to further examine HECC performance.

centrifugal compressor↗