Engineering topics

McCann, Michael Thompson

Publications and source records attributed to McCann, Michael Thompson.

3 records

DOE OSTI2024

Isotopic gamma lines for identification of shielding materials

Identifying the constituting materials of concealed objects is crucial in a wide range of sectors, such as medical imaging, geophysics, nonproliferation, national security investigations, and so on. Existing methods face limitations, particularly when multiple materials are involved or when there are challenges posed by scattered radiation and large areal mass. Here we introduce a novel brute-force statistical approach for material identification using high spectral resolution detectors, such as HPGe. The method relies upon updated semianalytic formulae for computing uncollided flux from source of gamma radiation, shielded by a sequence of nested spherical or cylindrical materials. These semianalytical formulae make possible rapid flux estimation for material characterization via combinatorial search through all possible combinations of materials, using a high-resolution HPGe counting detector. An important prerequisite for the method is that the geometry of the objects is known (for example, from X-ray radiography). We demonstrate the viability of this material characterization technique in several use cases with both simulated and experimental data in spherical geometry.

98 NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT, SAFEGUARDS, AND PHYSICAL P↗

DOE OSTI2024

Robust and Simple ADMM Penalty Parameter Selection

We present a new method for online selection of the penalty parameter for the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) algorithm. ADMM is a widely used method for solving a range of optimization problems, including those that arise in signal and image processing. In its standard form, ADMM includes a scalar hyperparameter, known as the penalty parameter, which usually has to be tuned to achieve satisfactory empirical convergence. In this work, we develop a framework for analyzing the ADMM algorithm applied to a quadratic problem as an affine fixed point iteration. Using this framework, we develop a new method for automatically tuning the penalty parameter by detecting when it has become too large or small. We analyze this and several other methods with respect to their theoretical properties, i.e., robustness to problem transformations, and empirical performance on several optimization problems. Our proposed algorithm is based on a theoretical framework with clear, explicit assumptions and approximations, is theoretically covariant/invariant to problem transformations, is simple to implement, and exhibits competitive empirical performance.

42 ENGINEERING↗

DOE OSTI2023

Comparison of Supervised and Un-Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Threat Detection and Scintillator Performance for Radiation Portal Monitoring

Following the events of September 11, 2001, international border crossing have been equipped with radiation portal monitors (RPMs) to identify illicit radioactive material. Polyvinyl toluene (PVT) scintillators are commonly used due to their low cost and reasonable maintainability, however they offer low spectral resolution. Despite the fact that over twenty years has transpired since this event, radioisotopes are still typically identified by hand-crafted classification algorithms, e.g., total counts or energy windowing, and exhibit relatively poor performance in detecting threats at the low false alarm rates required to support the stream of commerce. While some improvement to performance has been realized via the use of supervised machine learning, these classification algorithms typically utilize simulations in lieu of real data due to the sparsity of data for one or more classes. Accordingly, the performance of these algorithms is somewhat less than optimal when examining experiments or simulations with model mismatch. Consequently, in this work, we examine the application of a number of unsupervised machine learning, anomaly detection based algorithms, to circumvent the inverse crime when analyzing spectroscopy data for RPMs. We also compare anomaly detection results with those obtained via the use of supervised classification detection ML algorithms when model mismatch is introduced between the simulated threat items utilized for training/testing. Finally, we compared the performance of the PVT scintillators to those obtained with higher resolution detectors using both anomaly detection and supervised classification algorithms.

98 NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT, SAFEGUARDS, AND PHYSICAL P↗