Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

McElrath, Tim

Publications and source records attributed to McElrath, Tim.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2022

Final Approach Navigation to Europa: Setting Up for a Successful Landing

Jupiter's moon Europa has been a prime target in the search for extraterrestrial life since the Galileo orbiter indicated that a saltwater ocean may exist beneath its icy crust. The proposed Europa Lander mission targets revolutionary science investigations on the surface of Europa with the main objective to search for evidence of life. Europa presents unique challenges to a landing mission because of its hostile radiation environment and the lack of information about its terrain. This paper provides an overview of Europa Lander Navigation-Deorbit, Descent, and Landing (DDL) technology development study, which is focused on the interface between ground navigation operations and onboard DDL behavior and the challenges associated with landing a probe on Europa.

McElrath, Tim↗
NASA NTRS2021

Mars 2020 Navigation Performance

On February 18, 2021, the Perseverance rover and Ingenuity helicopter demonstration landed at Jezero Crater. The Entry, Descent, and Landing (EDL) architecture, largely the same used to land Curiosity at Gale Crater on August 6, 2012, required high-fidelity flight dynamics simulation with two independent tools to verify performance. The process for creating the EDL simulation using the Dynamics Simulator for Entry, Descent and Surface landing (DSENDS) tool will be discussed, along with its use for for independent verification of the EDL statistical analysis results and reference trajectory simulation. Analysis and usage details both in development and cruise, along with post-landing assessment of the prediction performance of the simulation, will also be discussed.

Wagner, Sean↗
NASA NTRS2021

Orbit Determination for the Mars 2020 Mission

NASA’s Mars 2020 Mission successfully executed its Martian entry, descent, and landing sequence on February 18, 2021. Spacecraft navigation guided the spacecraft from its launch injection to entry into the Martian atmosphere; to do so, three trajectory correction maneuvers and two onboard state updates were performed. Navigation was required to provide an entry state with a maximum uncertainty of 2.8 km in position and 2.0 m/sec in velocity (3-σ); the flight performance was approximately 900 m and 66 cm/sec (3-σ). This paper presents the orbit determination models, measurements, filter strategies and performance throughout launch, cruise and Mars approach.

Wong, Mau↗
NASA NTRS2021

Navigating Low-Energy Trajectories to Land on the Surface of Europa

The current interest in sending a probe to the surface of Europa in search of life demands not only efficient strategies in mission design, but also requires the capability of knowing the navigability of such types of trajectories. An initial search to find low-energy approach trajectories with a variety of topologies that are challenging to navigate is initially performed in the circular restricted three-body problem. These trajectories are subsequently converted to the ephemeris model and used for detailed navigation analysis. We explore several maneuver strategies and assess spacecraft state uncertainties at Europa arrival as well as fuel consumption.

McElrath, Tim↗
NASA NTRS2019

Europa Lander trajectory design: case studies for the direct-to-earth architecture

This paper presents interesting phasing problems that came up in support of design studies for a potential Europa Lander mission. Recent system trades were performed after the Mission Concept Review in fall 2017, when the NASA board recommended the Europa Lander project design a Direct-to-Earth architecture, i.e. where the Lander would communicate directly to the Earth, without data relay from the carrier vehicle.

Landau, Damon↗
NASA NTRS2018

Two-Dimensional Planetary Surface Landers

We proposed to develop a new landing approach that significantly reduces development time and obviates the most complicated, most expensive, and highest-risk phase of a landing mission. The concept is a blanket- or carpet-like two-dimensional (2D) lander (~1-m × 1-m surface area and <1-cm thick) with a low mass/drag ratio, which allows the lander to efficiently shed its approach velocity and provide a more robust structure for landing integrity. The form factor of these landers allows dozens to be stacked on a single spacecraft for transport and distributed en masse to the surface. Lander surfaces will be populated on both sides by surface-mount, low-profile sensors and instruments, surface-mount telecom, solar cells, batteries, processors, and memory. Landers will also incorporate thin flexible electronics, made possible in part by printable electronics technology. The mass and size of these highly capable technologies further reduces the required stiffness and mass of the lander structures to the point that compliant, lightweight, robust landers capable of passive landings are possible. This capability avoids the costly, complex use of rockets, radar, and associated structure and control systems. This approach is expected to provide an unprecedented science payload mass to spacecraft mass ratio of approximately 80% (estimated based on current knowledge). This compared to ~1% for Pathfinder, ~17% for MER, and 22% for MSL rovers. Clearly, one difference is rovers vs. a lower capability lander. An outcome of the Phase I study is a clear roadmap for near-term demonstration and long-term technology development.

Landers↗
NASA NTRS2017

A Science-Driven Mission Concept to An Exoplanet

A concept for a science-driven robotic mission to an exoplanet was developed by a team of scientists and engineers from NASA and academia. The concept and scope were based on key mission and science requirements designed to address the question: “What makes a flight mission to an exoplanet compelling, in terms of science return, compared to what we will be able to learn in the next few decades with large near-Earth telescopes or other remote sensing techniques such as a telescope at the Solar Gravity Lens Focus?” By thinking systematically through mission and science goals and objectives, key requirements were developed that would drive technology developments in all necessary aspects, not just on propulsion. Unique science measurements would be performed en route to the exoplanet, including exploring the environment in the outer regions of our solar system, the Oort Cloud, the local interstellar medium, and the astrospheric environment around the host star. One of the key mission science objectives, and one that addresses why a mission to an exoplanet is compelling, was to confirm and characterize life. This objective is fundamental and drives the need for a precursor exoplanet characterization program to search for Earth-centric biosignatures and also drives key aspects of the mission concept. The team concluded that a direct confirmation of life would require in situ observations and measurements which cannot be performed on a fast (~10% of the speed of light) flyby; thus, the mission would require a method to slow down, orbit, or send a probe to the exoplanet’s surface. This capability drives a trade between interstellar travel velocity, trip duration, and propulsion architecture, as well as a high level of onboard autonomy, including adaptive science data collection, on-board data processing, and analysis. This paper describes our mission concept, the key requirements, and open trades.

Bennett, Gary↗
NASA NTRS2015

Mission Design Analysis for the Martian Moon Phobos: Close Flybys, Missed Thrusts, and Other In-Flight Entertainment

A robotic mission to the Martian moons Phobos and Deimos would offer a wealth of scientific information and serve as a useful precursor to potential human missions. In this paper, we investigate a prospective mission enabled by solar electric propulsion that would explore Phobos via a series of flybys followed by capture into orbit around the moon. Of particular interest are low-cost options for capture and walkdown to the target science orbits aided by multi-body effects due to the mutual gravitational interaction of Phobos and Mars. We also consider contingency operations in the event of missed thrust or maneuver execution errors.

SEP↗
NASA NTRS2012

Using Gravity Assists in the Earth-moon System as a Gateway to the Solar System

For spacecraft departing the Earth - Moon system, lunar flybys can significantly increase the hype rbolic escape energy (C3, in km 2 /sec 2 ) for a modest increase in flight time. Within ~2 months, lunar flybys can produce a C3 of ~2. Over 4 - 6 months, lunar flybys alone can increase the C3 to ~4.5, or they can provide for additional periapsis burns to increase the C3 from ~2 -3 to 10 or more, suitable for planetary missions. A lunar flyby departure can be followed by additional ∆ -V (such as that efficiently provided by a low thrust system, eg. Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP)) to raise the Earth - relative velocity (at a ratio of more than 2:1) before a subsequent Earth flyby, which redirects that velocity to a more di stant target, all within not much more than a year. This paper describes the applicability of lunar flybys for different flight times and propulsi on systems, and illustrates this with instances of past usage and future possibilities. Examples discussed i nclude ISEE - 3, Nozomi, STEREO, 2018 Mars studies (which showed an 8% payload increase), and missions to Near Earth Objects (NEOs). In addition, the options for the achieving the initial lunar flyby are systematically discussed, with a view towards their p ractical use with in a compact launch period. In particular, we show that launches to geosynchronous transfer orbit (GTO) as a secondary payload provide a feasible means of obtaining a lunar flyby for an acceptable cost, even for SEP systems that cannot ea sily deliver large ∆ - Vs at periapsis. Taken together, these results comprise a myriad of options for increasing the mission performance, by the efficient use of lunar flybys within an acceptable extension of the flight time.

lunar fly-bys↗