Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

O'Brien, Robert C.

Publications and source records attributed to O'Brien, Robert C..

5 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2021

Methods of forming fuel rods comprising porous fuel materials

A method of forming a fuel rod for a nuclear reactor comprises disposing a powder comprising particles of a fuel material on a substrate, exposing the powder to energy from an energy source to form a first layer of a nuclear fuel, the first layer comprising inter-granular bonds between the particles of the fuel material, disposing additional powder comprising particles of the fuel material over the first layer of the nuclear fuel, and exposing the additional powder to energy from the energy source to form a second layer of the nuclear fuel and to form the nuclear fuel to have a void fraction greater than about 0.20, the second layer comprising inter-granular bonds between the additional powder and the first layer of the nuclear fuel. Related nuclear fuels comprising a porous structure, fuel rods, nuclear reactors, and methods are disclosed.

O'Brien, Robert C.↗
DOE OSTI2020

Investigation of the irradiation effects in additively manufactured 316L steel resulting in decreased irradiation assisted stress corrosion cracking susceptibility

While additive manufacturing (AM) is an area of increasing interest to the nuclear industry, there are significant research and development needs prior to successful implementation of additively manufactured components into reactors. AM steel behaves differently than traditional wrought material, as has been observed in numerous mechanical testing studies. The nuclear industry must also understand the material response to irradiation. This work examines the irradiation damage and the irradiation assisted stress corrosion cracking behavior (IASCC) of both proton irradiated AM and wrought 316L steel. For IASCC testing, specimens were strained to 4% plastic strain in a simulated boiling water reactor environment (288°C, 0.2 µS/cm). Transmission and scanning electron microscopy, confocal microscopy, and X-ray computed tomography were used to examine coupons of the material as well as tensile bars used in the IASCC testing. This work found that the wrought 316L was more susceptible to IASCC than the AM steel, however, some IASCC was observed in the AM steel when tested with the tensile axis parallel to the build direction. Electron microscopy has shown significantly fewer radiation induced voids formed in the AM steel. While the pre-existing pore network in the AM steel may act as a sink to point defects, this is not expected to be the major factor in the reduced swelling observed in the AM steel. The lower density of radiation induced voids was expected to contribute to the IASCC resistance by decreasing the localization of deformation in the irradiated specimens, however, severity of localized deformation in AM steel, measured in dislocation channel spacing and height, was similar or more severe to that found in wrought. In conclusion, the presence of severe cracking in the wrought specimens did not allow for a direct comparison of localized deformation severities between the AM and wrought steel.

Additive manufacturing↗
NASA NTRS2016

Economical Production of Pu-238: NIAC Phase I Final Report

All space exploration missions traveling beyond Jupiter must use radioisotopic power sources for electrical power. The best isotope to power these sources is plutonium-238 (Pu-238). The US supply of Pu-238 is almost exhausted and will be gone within the next decade. The Department of Energy has initiated a production program with a $10M allocation from NASA but the cost is estimated at over $100M to get to production levels. The Center for Space Nuclear Research (CSNR) has conceived of a potentially better process to produce Pu-238 earlier and for significantly less cost. Potentially, the front end capital costs could be provided by private industry such that the government only had to pay for the product produced. In the Phase I NIAC (NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts) grant, the CSNR has evaluated the feasibility of using a low power, commercially available nuclear reactor to produce 1.5 kg of Pu-238 per year. The impact on the neutronics of the reactor have been assessed, the amount of Neptunium target material estimated, and the production rates calculated. In addition, the size of the post-irradiation processing facility has been established. Finally, as the study progressed, a new method for fabricating the Pu-238 product into the form used for power sources has been identified to reduce the cost of the final product. In short, the concept appears to be viable, can produce the amount of Pu-238 needed to support the NASA missions, can be available within a few years, and will cost significantly less than the current DOE program.

Plutonium↗