Phillips, Alexandra A.

DOE OSTI2023

Organic sulfur from source to sink in low‐sulfate Lake Superior

Abstract Organic sulfur plays a crucial role in the biogeochemistry of aquatic sediments, especially in low sulfate (< 500 μ M) environments like freshwater lakes and the Earth's early oceans. To better understand organic sulfur cycling in these systems, we followed organic sulfur in the sulfate‐poor (< 40 μ M) iron‐rich (30–80 μ M) sediments of Lake Superior from source to sink. We identified microbial populations with shotgun metagenomic sequencing and characterized geochemical species in porewater and solid phases. In anoxic sediments, we found an active sulfur cycle fueled primarily by oxidized organic sulfur. Sediment incubations indicated a microbial capacity to hydrolyze sulfonates, sulfate esters, and sulfonic acids to sulfate. Gene abundances for dissimilatory sulfate reduction ( dsrAB ) increased with depth and coincided with sulfide maxima. Despite these indicators of sulfide formation, sulfide concentrations remain low (< 40 nM) due to both pyritization and organic matter sulfurization. Immediately below the oxycline, pyrite accounted for 13% of total sedimentary sulfur. Both free and intact lipids in this same interval accumulated disulfides, indicating rapid sulfurization even at low concentrations of sulfide. Our investigation revealed a new model of sulfur cycling in a low‐sulfate environment that likely extends to other modern lakes and possibly the ancient ocean, with organic sulfur both fueling sulfate reduction and consuming the resultant sulfide.

Phillips, Alexandra A.↗

DOE OSTI2021

Practical considerations for amino acid isotope analysis

Over the last few decades, isotopic analysis of amino acids at the compound- and position-specific levels has been rapidly advancing across diverse fields. As these techniques progress, evaluation of isotopic fractionation associated with sample workup is essential. This critical review of analytical methods through the lens of isotope geochemistry provides a benchmark for researchers across disciplines seeking to make compound- and position-specific amino acid isotope measurements. We focus on preparation, acid hydrolysis, clean-up, derivatization, separation, and C, H, N, and S isotope measurement. Despite substantial customizability across these steps, the following general recommendations should maximize recovery while minimizing isotopic fractionation. Samples should be freeze-dried and stored anoxically at ≤ –20 °C prior to conventional acid hydrolysis (6N HCl, 110 °C, 20–24 h, anoxic), which suffices for many residues. Both gas and liquid chromatographic (GC and LC, respectively) techniques are well-established and separate about 15 amino acids; LC bypasses the need for derivatization, while GC provides higher sensitivity. Furthermore, when derivatization is needed, n-acetyl and alkoxycarbonyl esters provide the most reproducible C isotope ratios. For compound-specific analyses, online GC–IRMS and LC–IRMS systems offer the easiest workflow, but EA–IRMS enables potential multi-element isotope analysis. Emerging techniques like high-resolution mass spectrometry are also promising for multi-element analysis and recover position-specific isotopic information. Looking forward to the next decade of innovation, isotope geochemists and ecologists can improve amino acid isotope analysis by focusing on streamlining multi-element analysis and standardizing calibration practices across laboratories.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗